|
1
|
Cai Y, Su K, Bian A. Comparing combined paravaginal repair with pubocervical fascia plication versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2025; 311:163-173. [PMID: 39733374 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07864-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is prevalent among women, often occurring alongside anterior vaginal wall prolapse. This study compares the efficacy and safety of an improved vaginal wall repair technique with pubocervical fascia fixation versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for treating SUI in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS A single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted between September 2021 and June 2024. Women aged 40-70 years with symptomatic SUI and stage 2-3 anterior vaginal wall prolapse were randomised to either the improved repair group or the standard repair group. The primary outcome was patient-reported success at 12 months post-surgery, defined as 'very much improved' or 'much improved' on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Secondary outcomes included objective cure rates, quality of life scores, urodynamic parameters, anatomical outcomes, perioperative outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 102 women were randomised (51 in each group). At 12 months, the patient-reported success rate was significantly higher in the improved repair group (94.1% vs 78.4%, p = 0.019). The objective cure rate was also higher in the improved repair group (90.2% vs 74.5%, p = 0.038). Quality of life scores and urodynamic parameters showed greater improvements in the improved repair group. Anatomical success was achieved in 92.2% of the improved repair group compared with 80.4% in the standard repair group (p = 0.048). The improved repair technique was associated with longer operative time but lower estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay and quicker return to normal activities. The overall complication rate was lower in the improved repair group (11.8% vs 23.5%, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS The improved vaginal wall repair with pubocervical fascia fixation demonstrates superior outcomes compared with standard anterior colporrhaphy, with higher patient-reported success rates, improved quality of life and fewer complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujie Cai
- Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Dong Road, ErQi District, Zhengzhou, 450001, China
| | - Ke Su
- Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Dong Road, ErQi District, Zhengzhou, 450001, China
| | - Aiping Bian
- Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1 Jianshe Dong Road, ErQi District, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Salo H, Manninen R, Terho A, Laru J, Sova H, Koivurova S, Rossi HR. Hysterectomy is not associated with increased risk of urinary incontinence-a northern Finland birth cohort 1966 study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:2061-2069. [PMID: 39075796 PMCID: PMC11426217 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hysterectomy has been suggested to increase the risk of urinary incontinence (UI), although evidence is controversial. In our population-based cohort study, we aimed to assess the independent effect of hysterectomy on the risk of de novo UI. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a population-based cohort study on the women of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 5889). We identified all hysterectomies among the cohort (n = 461) using the national Care Register for Health Care and classified them according to surgical approach into laparoscopic (n = 247), vaginal (n = 107), and abdominal hysterectomies (n = 107). Women without hysterectomy formed the reference group (n = 3495). All women with UI diagnoses and operations were identified in the register, and women with preoperative UI diagnosis (n = 36) were excluded from the analysis to assess de novo UI. Data on potential confounding factors were collected from registers and the cohort questionnaire. Incidences of different UI subtypes and UI operations were compared between the hysterectomy and the reference groups, and further disaggregated by different hysterectomy approaches. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between hysterectomy and UI, with adjustments for several UI-related covariates. RESULTS We found no significant difference in the incidence of UI diagnoses or the rate of subsequent UI operations between the hysterectomy and the reference groups (24 [5.6%] vs. 166 [4.7%], p = 0.416 and 14 [3.3%] vs. 87 [2.5%], p = 0.323). Hysterectomy was not significantly associated with the risk of any subtype of UI (overall UI: OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.77-1.86; stress UI (SUI): OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.89-2.55; other UI: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36-1.74). After adjusting for preoperative pelvic organ prolapse (POP) diagnoses, the risk was decreased (overall UI: OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.90; other than SUI: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95). Regarding different hysterectomy approaches, the risks of overall UI and SUI were significantly increased in vaginal, but not in laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. However, adjusting for preoperative POP diagnosis abolished these risks. CONCLUSIONS Hysterectomy is not an independent risk factor for de novo UI. Instead, underlying POP appears to be a significant risk factor for the incidence of UI after hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heini Salo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Roosa Manninen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Anna Terho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Johanna Laru
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Henri Sova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Sari Koivurova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Henna-Riikka Rossi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Wang JH, Fan LL, Chen YH, Wang YJ. One and five-year efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) abbrevo and TVT-obturator in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2024; 24:147. [PMID: 38734595 PMCID: PMC11088117 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02446-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical interventions are more effective than nonsurgical approaches in providing a cure for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). In this study, we aimed to assess the benefits of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) abbrevo by comparing its efficacy and complications to those of TVT obturator. METHODS AND RESULTS 49 and 47 patients at The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between January 2013 and December 2016 were included in the TVT-O and TVT-A groups, respectively. We evaluate the success rate and perioperative complications associated with TVT-O and TVT-A. A questionnaire that utilized the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale was employed to assess the impact of surgery. Patients were followed up at 1 year, and 5 years after surgery. There were no statistically significant differences found in the efficacy of the TVT-A group and TVT-O group during both the one-year (p = 0.4) and five-year (p = 0.32) follow-up periods. In the period of one-year follow-up, 95.9% (n = 47) of patients in the TVT-O group and 95.8% (n = 45) of patients in the TVT-A group demonstrated improvement. During the period of five-year follow-up, 87.8% (n = 43) of patients in the TVT-O group and 93.6% (n = 44) of patients in the TVT-A group demonstrated improvement. CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, TVT-A and TVT-O procedures exhibited similarly high success rates and low frequencies of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Hui Wang
- Department of nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Lai Lai Fan
- Department of urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ying He Chen
- Department of urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yi Jun Wang
- Department of urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Hașegan A, Mihai I, Teodoru CA, Matacuta IB, Dura H, Todor SB, Ichim C, Tanasescu D, Grigore N, Bolca CN, Mohor CI, Mohor CI, Bacalbașa N, Bratu DG, Boicean A. Exploring the Challenges of Using Minimal Invasive Surgery to Treat Stress Urinary Incontinence: Insights from a Retrospective Case-Control Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:323. [PMID: 38337839 PMCID: PMC10855614 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a significant global health issue that particularly affects females, leads to notable societal and economic challenges and significantly affects the quality of life. This study focuses on the comparative analysis of two established surgical interventions, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and transobturator tape (TOT), at a single center and applied to 455 women suffering from SUI, with a mean follow-up period of 102 ± 30 months for TVT and 80.4 ± 13 months for TOT. Our findings indicate that, in comparison to TVT, the TOT procedure demonstrates fewer early and late post-operative complications in patient outcomes (1.41% vs. 17.64% and; 5.66% vs. 12.74%, both respectively). However, the TVT procedure shows a modestly favorable outcome in the risk of recurrence of SUI, compared to TOT (0% vs. 3.7%); the TOT procedure has also proven to be more effective in alleviating of urgency symptoms, although not at a statistically significant level (p = 0.072). Univariable and multivariable analysis of factors that predict late complications showed that only obesity can predict a worse outcome [OR]: 1.125 CI 95%: 1.105-1.533, p = 0.037), when adjustments are made for symptoms presented before surgery and procedure type. While both methods are safe and effective, the choice between them should be based on the specific characteristics of each case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Hașegan
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Ionela Mihai
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Cosmin Adrian Teodoru
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Ioana Bogdan Matacuta
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Horațiu Dura
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Samuel Bogdan Todor
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Cristian Ichim
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Denisa Tanasescu
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Nicolae Grigore
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | | | - Cosmin Ioan Mohor
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Călin Ilie Mohor
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Nicolae Bacalbașa
- Surgery Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Dan Georgian Bratu
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Adrian Boicean
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania; (A.H.); (I.M.); (C.A.T.); (I.B.M.); (H.D.); (S.B.T.); (C.I.); (D.T.); (N.G.); (C.I.M.); (C.I.M.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|