Caesarean scar pregnancy: is there a light in the end of the tunnel?

Cesarean scar pregnancy: should surgery be the preferred treatment approach?

PURPOSE

To compare the characteristics and outcomes of non-surgical and surgical treatments for Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

METHODS

A retrospective study conducted at a tertiary university affiliated medical center, including all women diagnosed with Cesarean scar pregnancy between 2019 and 2023. Women treated non-surgically (including: methotrexate, uterine artery embolization and balloon catheter) were compared to women treated surgically (including: hysterectomy, hysteroscopy and excision of the pregnancy with or without uterine niche repair). Demographic information, medical history, obstetric and gynecological characteristics, presenting symptoms, imaging findings, management details, surgical characteristics, and follow-up data were collected from the women's electronic medical records. Primary outcome was defined as the β-hCG levels on follow-up visit at 2 weeks following treatment.

RESULTS

42 women were diagnosed with Cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, of them 9 (21%) were treated non-surgically and 33 (79%) were treated surgically. Median age was 33 (30-36) year old and median BMI was 31 (27-35) kg/m2, with no statistical differences in-between the groups. Most of the women had previous two Cesarean sections (n = 12, 28%). 63% of the women were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. On transvaginal ultrasound examination, embryo was demonstrated in 66.7% and cardiac activity was observed in 75%. The median gestational age at diagnosis and β-hCG levels were comparable between the non-surgical and surgical treatment groups (p = 0.22, p = 0.61, respectively). In the surgical arm, the most common surgical procedure was excision of the pregnancy with uterine niche repair, that was performed in 14/42 (33%) of the women. Median hospitalization length was 3 (1-4) and 2 (1-3) days, for the non-surgical and surgical treatment groups, respectively (p = 0.51). The hemoglobin level before discharge was similar between the groups (p = 0.20). Only one woman in each group visited the emergency room before the follow-up visit (p = 0.31). β-hCG levels on follow-up were significantly lower in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Cesarean scar pregnancy can be asymptomatic and should be suspected to enable early diagnosis. Both non-surgical and surgical treatments are viable options, with comparable hospitalization lengths; however, the surgical intervention group is expected to show a significantly faster decrease in β-hCG levels.

The association of endometrial closure during cesarean section to the risk of developing uterine scar defect: a randomized control trial

PURPOSE

The surgical technique for uterine closure following cesarean section influences the healing of the cesarean scar; however, there is still no consensus on the optimal technique regarding the closure of the endometrium layer. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of closure versus non-closure of the endometrium during cesarean section on the risk to develop uterine scar defect and associated symptoms.

METHODS

A randomized prospective study was conducted of women undergoing first elective cesarean section at a single tertiary medical center. Exclusion criteria included previous uterine scar, preterm delivery and dysmorphic uterus. Women were randomized for endometrial layer closure versus non-closure. Six months following surgery, women were invited to the ambulatory gynecological clinic for follow-up visit. 2-D transvaginal ultrasound examination was performed to evaluate the cesarean scar characteristics. In addition, women were evaluated for symptoms that might be associated with uterine scar defect. Primary outcome was defined as the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) at the uterine cesarean scar. Data are presented as median and interquartile range.

RESULTS

130 women were recruited to the study, of them follow-up was achieved in 113 (86.9%). 61 (54%) vs. 52 (46%) of the women were included in the endometrial closure vs. non-closure groups, respectively. Groups were comparable for patient's demographic, clinical characteristics and follow-up time for postoperative evaluation. Median RMT was 5.3 (3.0-7.7) vs. 4.6 (3.0-6.5) mm for the endometrial closure and non-closure groups, respectively (p = 0.38). Substantially low RMT (< 2.5 mm) was measured in four (6.6%) women in the endometrial closure group and three (5.8%) of the women in the non-closure group (p = 0.86). All other uterine scar sonographic measurements, as well as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and intermenstrual bleeding rates were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Closure versus non-closure of the endometrial layer during cesarean uterine incision repair has no significant difference in cesarean scar characteristics and symptom rates at 6 months follow-up.

Evaluation of Cesarean section scar using saline contrast sonohysterography in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate Cesarean scar defects using saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) in women with a history of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

METHODS

A cohort of 38 non-pregnant women with a history of CSP treated with combined local and systemic methotrexate was investigated prospectively by SCSH. For the purpose of analysis, they were classified, according to the modified Delphi consensus criteria for CSP in early gestation, into three subgroups based on the depth of the gestational sac herniation in the midsagittal plane. Subgroup A included eight (21.1%) cases, in which the largest part of the gestational sac protruded towards the uterine cavity; Subgroup B included 20 (52.6%) cases, in which the largest part of the gestational sac was embedded in the myometrium; and Subgroup C included 10 (26.3%) cases, in which the gestational sac was located partially outside the outer contour of the cervix or uterus.

RESULTS

SCSH revealed that all women in Subgroup C had a uterine niche. The median niche length (P = 0.006) and depth (P = 0.015) were significantly greater in Subgroup C than in Subgroups A or B. The median residual myometrial thickness (RMT) was significantly lower in Subgroup C than in Subgroups A or B (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with prior CSP who had a gestational sac protruding beyond the serosal line had a significantly greater niche length and depth, and lower RMT. This knowledge may guide individualized risk counseling. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound-guided suction curettage followed by cervico-isthmic placement of foley three-way catheter for cesarean scar pregnancy's treatment. Retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare dangerous condition with still no consensus on standard treatment. Suction curettage has been used as the first-line treatment for CSP with controversial outcomes. This study evaluates efficacy of ultrasound-guided suction curettage (UGSC) followed by cervical-isthmic placement of silicon semirigid three-way foley catheter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 24 women with CSP. Preoperative ultrasound study was conducted. UGSC followed by placement of catheter was performed in all patients. The success rate and incidence of major complication, surgical time and hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

The success rate of UGSC followed by placement of foley catheter was 100%, effectively reduced major complications and none of the patients had a blood loss higher than 900 ml. Median hospital stay was 2 days and median foley stay was 1 day. Surgery had limited last with a median of 17 minutes.

CONCLUSION

UGSC followed by foley placement is a safe effective treatment for CSP with a clinical resolution of 100%. The catheter is easy to place under ultrasound guidance and prevents bleeding, reducing major procedures to solve the bleeding. Suction curettage in CSP treatment should be performed under ultrasound guidance and followed by cervical-isthmic placement of foley balloon.

Outcomes of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies in Early Gestation According to the New Delphi Consensus Criteria

OBJECTIVES

Clinical evaluation of the new Delphi consensus definition of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) in early gestation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 36 women diagnosed with CSP and treated with combined local and systemic methotrexate (MTX) between 2008 and 2021. The CSPs were classified according to the new Delphi consensus criteria into three subgroups based on the depth of the gestational sac herniation in the sagittal plane. Subgroup A included 8 (22.2%) cases in which the largest part of the gestational sac protruded toward the uterine cavity. Subgroup B included 22 (61.1%) cases in which the largest part of the gestational sac was embedded in the myometrium, and subgroup C included 6 (16.7%) cases in which the gestational was partially located outside the outer contour of the cervix or uterus.

RESULTS

The β-HCG level upon admission was significantly lower in subgroup A than in subgroups B or C (11,075 ± 7109, 18,787 ± 16,585, and 58,273 ± 55,267 mIU/mL, respectively, P = .01). All subgroup C patients had repeated courses of MTX and surgical interventions (laparotomy, uterine artery embolization, and operative hysteroscopy) at double the rate of subgroups A or B (100, 50, and 40.9%, respectively, P = .036). The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in subgroup A than in subgroups B or C (1.9 ± 1.5, 2.1 ± 1.1, and 5.4 ± 4.9 days, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome according to Delphi consensus criteria for defining CSP in early gestation has implications for clinical decision-making, patient care, and the follow-up of CSP.