Metabolic effects associated with high-dose continuous megestrol acetate administration in the treatment of endometrial pathology

Therapeutic options for management of endometrial hyperplasia

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) comprises a spectrum of changes in the endometrium ranging from a slightly disordered pattern that exaggerates the alterations seen in the late proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle to irregular, hyperchromatic lesions that are similar to endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Generally, EH is caused by continuous exposure of estrogen unopposed by progesterone, polycystic ovary syndrome, tamoxifen, or hormone replacement therapy. Since it can progress, or often occur coincidentally with endometrial carcinoma, EH is of clinical importance, and the reversion of hyperplasia to normal endometrium represents the key conservative treatment for prevention of the development of adenocarcinoma. Presently, cyclic progestin or hysterectomy constitutes the major treatment option for EH without or with atypia, respectively. However, clinical trials of hormonal therapies and definitive standard treatments remain to be established for the management of EH. Moreover, therapeutic options for EH patients who wish to preserve fertility are challenging and require nonsurgical management. Therefore, future studies should focus on evaluation of new treatment strategies and novel compounds that could simultaneously target pathways involved in the pathogenesis of estradiol-induced EH. Novel therapeutic agents precisely targeting the inhibition of estrogen receptor, growth factor receptors, and signal transduction pathways are likely to constitute an optimal approach for treatment of EH.

Efficacy of oral or intrauterine device-delivered progestin in patients with complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia or early endometrial adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of progestin treatment to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia (CAH) or early endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC).

METHODS

A systematic search identified 3245 potentially relevant citations. Studies containing less than ten eligible CAH or EC patients in either oral or intrauterine treatment arm were excluded. Only information from patients receiving six or more months of treatment and not receiving other treatments was included. Weighted proportions of patients achieving pCR were calculated using R software.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the selection criteria. Eleven studies reported treatment of patients with oral (219 patients, 117 with CAH, 102 with grade 1 Stage I EC) and one reported treatment of patients with intrauterine progestin (11 patients with grade 1 Stage IEC). Overall, 74% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65-81%) of patients with CAH and 72% (95% CI 62-80%) of patients with grade 1 Stage I EC achieved a pCR to oral progestin. Disease progression whilst on oral treatment was reported for 6/219 (2.7%), and relapse after initial complete response for 32/159 (20.1%) patients. The weighted mean pCR rate of patients with grade 1 Stage I EC treated with intrauterine progestin from one prospective pilot study and an unpublished retrospective case series from the Queensland Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology (QCGC) was 68% (95% CI 45-86%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of high quality evidence for the efficacy of progestin in CAH or EC. The available evidence however suggests that treatment with oral or intrauterine progestin is similarly effective. The risk of progression during treatment is small but longer follow-up is required. Evidence from prospective controlled clinical trials is warranted to establish how the efficacy of progestin for the treatment of CAH and EC can be improved further.

Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and metaanalysis of studies evaluating the regression rate of endometrial hyperplasia with oral progestogens and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

STUDY DESIGN

Searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, and reference lists of relevant articles were examined. The methodologic index for nonrandomized studies was used for quality assessment. Metaanalysis was performed with random effects model.

RESULTS

There were 24 observational studies (1001 women), of low methodologic quality, evaluating the outcome of regression of endometrial hyperplasia with oral progestogens or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Metaanalysis showed that oral progestogens achieved a lower pooled regression rate compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for complex (pooled rate, 66% vs 92%; P < .01) and atypical hyperplasia (pooled rate, 69% vs 90%; P = .03). There was no statistical difference in simple hyperplasia (pooled rate, 89% vs 96%; P = .41).

CONCLUSION

Oral progestogens appear to induce a lower disease regression rate than Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia.

Endometrial Hyperplasia: A Review

Endometrial hyperplasia is a precursor to the most common gynecologic cancer diagnosed in women: endometrial cancer of endometrioid histology. It is most often diagnosed in postmenopausal women, but women at any age with unopposed estrogen from any source are at an increased risk for developing endometrial hyperplasia. Hyperplasia with cytologic atypia represents the greatest risk for progression to endometrial carcinoma and the presence of concomitant carcinoma in women with endometrial hyperplasia. Abnormal uterine bleeding is the most common presenting symptom of endometrial hyperplasia. Specific Pap smear findings and endometrial thickness per ultrasound could also suggest the diagnosis. Unopposed estrogen in women taking hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of endometrial hyperplasia. Tamoxifen has demonstrated its efficacy in treating women at risk for breast cancer, but it increases the risk of endometrial hyperplasia. The choice of treatment for endometrial hyperplasia is dependent on patient age, the presence of cytologic atypia, the desire for future childbearing, and surgical risk. Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia responds well to progestins. However, women with atypical hyperplasia should be treated with hysterectomy unless other factors preclude surgery.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the definition and classification of endometrial hyperplasia, to outline the clinical features of a patient with endometrial hyperplasia, to point out the natural history of endometrial hyperplasia, and to summarize the diagnostic options for patients with endometrial hyperplasia.

Megestrol acetate-induced weight gain does not negatively affect blood lipids in elderly men: effects of resistance training and testosterone replacement

BACKGROUND

Megestrol acetate (MA) has been used to stimulate weight gain in elderly populations, with the majority of the weight gain being adipose tissue. Because of the increased energy intake and adipose tissue accrual with MA, it may have a negative effect on circulating lipids. Thus, in this study we examined the effects of MA--alone and in combination with resistance training and/or testosterone replacement--on blood lipids.

METHODS

All subjects (n = 28) received MA and were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) placebo (P) injections, 2) resistance training and P (RT+P), 3) weekly injections of testosterone (T; 100 mg/week), or 4) RT and T (RT+T).

RESULTS

A significant time effect was observed for total cholesterol (p = 0.0006) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (p = .0003) with the mid and post time points being significantly lower than the pre time points for both variables. For the total cholesterol to HDL ratio, no significant differences between groups or over time (time effect: ) were observed. For triglycerides, there tended to be a time effect (p = .061), with the mid and post time points being lower than the pre time point; however, this effect was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Because it appears from our data that MA does not cause adverse blood lipid changes, the decision to use it should be based on other factors.