Prevalence of DFNB1 mutations among cochlear implant users in Slovakia and its clinical implications

Genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing loss in Europe

Hearing impairment not etiologically associated with clinical signs in other organs (non-syndromic) is genetically heterogeneous, so that over 120 genes are currently known to be involved. The frequency of mutations in each gene and the most frequent mutations vary throughout populations. Here we review the genetic etiology of non-syndromic hearing impairment (NSHI) in Europe. Over the years, epidemiological data were scarce because of the large number of involved genes, whose screening was not cost-effective until implementation of massively parallel DNA sequencing. In Europe, the most common form of autosomal recessive NSHI is DFNB1, which accounts for 11-57% of the cases. Mutations in STRC account for 16% of the recessive cases, and only a few more (MYO15A, MYO7A, LOXHD1, USH2A, TMPRSS3, CDH23, TMC1, OTOF, OTOA, SLC26A4, ADGRV1 and TECTA) have contributions higher than 2%. As regards autosomal-dominant NSHI, DFNA22 (MYO6) and DFNA8/12 (TECTA) represent the most common forms, accounting for 21% and 18% of elucidated cases, respectively. The contribution of ACTG1 and WFS1 drops to 9% in both cases, followed by POU4F3 (6.5%), MYO7A (5%), MYH14 and COL11A2 (4% each). Four additional genes contribute 2.5% each one (MITF, KCNQ4, EYA4, SOX10) and the remaining are residually represented. X-linked hearing loss and maternally-inherited NSHI have minor contributions in most countries. Further knowledge on the genetic epidemiology of NSHI in Europe needs a standardization of the experimental approaches and a stratification of the results according to clinical features, familial history and patterns of inheritance, to facilitate comparison between studies.

Evaluation of copy number variants for genetic hearing loss: a review of current approaches and recent findings

Structural variation includes a change in copy number, orientation, or location of a part of the genome. Copy number variants (CNVs) are a common cause of genetic hearing loss, comprising nearly 20% of diagnosed cases. While large deletions involving the gene STRC are the most common pathogenic CNVs, a significant proportion of known hearing loss genes also contain pathogenic CNVs. In this review, we provide an overview of currently used methods for detection of CNVs in genes known to cause hearing loss including molecular techniques such as multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), array-CGH and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, as well as techniques for detection of CNVs using next-generation sequencing data analysis including targeted gene panel, exome, and genome sequencing data. In addition, in this review, we compile published data on pathogenic hearing loss CNVs to provide an up-to-date overview. We show that CNVs have been identified in 29 different non-syndromic hearing loss genes. An understanding of the contribution of CNVs to genetic hearing loss is critical to the current diagnosis of hearing loss and is crucial for future gene therapies. Thus, evaluation for CNVs is required in any modern pipeline for genetic diagnosis of hearing loss.

Exploration of molecular genetic etiology for Korean cochlear implantees with severe to profound hearing loss and its implication

Background

Severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) requires cochlear implantation (CI) for auditory rehabilitation. Etiologic diagnoses can contribute to candidacy selection and decision-making regarding the timing of successful CI. However, few studies have been performed to address the etiologic spectrum of severe SNHL in the population where there is no consanguineous marriage and the majority of SNHL cases are sporadic in small sized families. The authors sought to comprehensively understand the etiologies of Korean cochlear implantees by incorporating the targeted resequencing of 204 candidate deafness genes (TRS-204) and a phenotype-driven candidate gene approach.

Methods

Ninety-three that consented to molecular genetic testing and underwent at least one molecular genetic test were included. Patients with a characteristic Phenotypic marker were subject to Sanger sequencing to detect variants in corresponding candidate genes. The rest of patients without any prominent phenotype were tested on GJB2. Next, TRS-204 was applied in GJB2-negative cases without any phenotypic marker. In addition, the sibling recurrence-risk of SNHL among families with non-diagnostic genotypes after TRS-204 was performed to gain insight of etiologies in non-diagnostic cases.

Results

Overall, we could find causative variants in 51 (54.8%) of the 93 cochlear implantees. Thirty (32.3%) probands could be diagnosed by direct Sanger sequencing of candidate genes selected by their phenotypes. GJB2 sequencing added 10 subjects to the group with a diagnostic genotype. TRS-204 could detect a causative variant from additional 11 cases (11.8%). We could not detect any pathogenic deletion or duplication on 204 target genes. The sibling recurrence-risk of SNHL among 42 genetically undiagnosed families with 0.03 (1/38) was significantly lower than among genetically diagnosed recessive families with 0.19 (7/37).

Conclusion

Despite that the majority of severe or more degree of SNHL occurs sporadically in Koreans, at least 54.8% of such cases that were willing to join the genetic study in the Korean population are monogenic Mendelian disorders with convincing causative variants. This study also indicates that a substantial portion of unsolved cases after applying our current protocol are predicted to have non-genetic or complex etiology rather than a Mendelian genetic disorder involving new genes beyond the 204 target genes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-014-0167-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.