Personal experience in transnasal endoscopic resection of the olfactory groove meningiomas. What can an otolaryngologist offer to a neurosurgeon?

Results of Transcranial Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas in Relation to Imaging-Based Case Selection Criteria for the Endoscopic Approach

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is increasingly used for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The role of EES for large (≥4 cm) or complex OGMs is debated. Specific imaging features have been reported to affect the degree of gross total resection (GTR) and complications following EES for OGMs. The influence of these factors on transcranial resection (TCR) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of specific imaging features on outcome following TCR to provide a standard for large and endoscopically less favorable OGMs against which endoscopic outcomes can be compared.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients undergoing TCR for OGMs 2002 to 2016.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age 62.1 yr, mean maximum tumor diameter 5.04 cm and average tumor volume of 48.8 cm3) were studied. Simpson grade 1 and 2 resections were achieved in 80% and 12%, respectively. A favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) was attained in 86%. The degree of resection, mRS, mortality (4%), recurrence (6%), infection (8%), and cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention (12%) were not associated with tumor calcification, absence of cortical cuff, T2 hyperintensity, tumor configuration, tumor extension beyond midpoint of superior orbital roof, or extension to posterior wall of frontal sinus. There was no difference in resection rates but a trend towards greater complications between 3 arbitrarily divided groups of large meningiomas of increasing complexity based on extensive extension or vascular adherence.

CONCLUSION

Favorable outcomes can be achieved with TCR for large and complex OGMs Factors that may preclude endoscopic resection do not negatively affect outcome following TCR.

Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review current management strategies for olfactory groove meningioma (OGM)s and the recent literature comparing endoscopic endonasal (EEA) with traditional transcranial (TCA) approaches.

METHODS

A PubMed search of the recent literature (2011-2016) was performed to examine outcomes following EEA and TCA for OGM. The extent of resection, visual outcome, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were analyzed using percentages and proportions, the Fischer exact test and the Student's t-test using Graphpad PRISM 7.0Aa (San Diego, CA) software.

RESULTS

There were 444 patients in the TCA group with a mean diameter of 4.61 (±1.17) cm and 101 patients in the EEA group with a mean diameter of 3.55 (± 0.58) cm (p = 0.0589). GTR was achieved in 90.9% (404/444) in the TCA group and 70.2% (71/101) in the EEA group (p < 0.0001). Of the patients with preoperative visual disturbances, 80.7% (21/26) of patients in the EEA cohort had an improvement in vision compared to 12.83%(29/226) in the TCA group (p < 0.0001). Olfaction was lost in 61% of TCA and in 100% of EEA patients. CSF leaks and meningitis occurred in 25.7% and 4.95% of EEA patients and 6.3% and 1.12% of TCA patients, respectively (p < 0.0001; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our updated literature review demonstrates that despite more experience with endoscopic resection and skull base reconstruction, the literature still supports TCA over EEA with respect to the extent of resection and complications. EEA may be an option in selected cases where visual improvement is the main goal of surgery and postoperative anosmia is acceptable to the patient or in medium-sized tumors with existing preoperative anosmia. Nevertheless, based on our results, it seems more prudent at this time to use TCA for the majority of OGMs.

Frontobasal Midline Meningiomas: Is It Right To Shed Doubt on the Transcranial Approaches? Updates and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, the surgical removal of tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) and olfactory groove meningioma (OGM) requires transcranial approaches and microsurgical techniques, but in the last decade endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches have been introduced: transcribriform for OGMs and transtuberculum-transplanum for TSM. A comparative analysis of the literature concerning the two types of surgical treatment of OGMs and TSM is, however, difficult.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using the PubMed database to compare data for endoscopic and microsurgical techniques in the literature. We also conducted a retrospective analysis of selected cases from our series presenting favorable characteristics for an endoscopic approach, based on the criteria of operability of these lesions as generally accepted in the literature, and we compared the results obtained in these patients with those in the endoscopic literature.

RESULTS

We believe that making the sample more homogeneous, the difference between microsurgical technique and endoscopic technique is no longer so striking. A greater radical removal rate, a reduced incidence of cerebrospinal fluid fistula and, especially, the possibility of removing lesions of any size are advantages of transcranial surgery; a higher percentage of improvement in visual outcome and a lower risk of a worsening of a pre-existing deficit or onset of a new deficit are advantages of the endoscopic technique.

CONCLUSION

At present, the microsurgical technique is still the gold standard for the removal of the anterior cranial fossa meningiomas of all sizes, and the endoscopic technique remains a second option in certain cases.