Less may be more: nodal treatment in neck positive head neck cancer patients

Ultrasound in patients with treated head and neck carcinomas: A retrospective analysis for effectiveness of follow-up care

Correct follow-up is necessary to avoid under- or overtreatment in the care of patients with treated carcinomas of head and neck. Ultrasound is a cost-effective, harmless, easy, and feasible method. It can be applied in the outpatient clinic in follow-up but the United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary guidelines are recommended computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastasis for head and neck carcinomas in the follow-up period. The purpose of the study was to state that neck ultrasound would be the method of choice on follow-up care of Chinese patients who received primary treatment for carcinoma of head and neck.Patients who received primary treatment for carcinoma of the head and neck were examined for 5-years in follow-up through physical, clinical, and neck ultrasound (n = 198). If patients had no evidence of disease after 60 months of definitive therapy considered as a cure. If patients had no evidence of disease after 36 months of salvage therapy considered as a cure of recurrence.Irrespective of definitive treatment used, the study was monitored through neck ultrasound during 5 years of a follow-up visit and was reported cure in 126 (64%) patients and recurrence in 72 (36%; distant metastasis: 33 [17%], local recurrence: 24 [12%], and regional recurrence: 15 [7%]) patients. Primary tumor stage IV, III, II, and I had 63% (15/24), 51% (21/41), 32% (18/56), and 23% (18/77) recurrence, respectively. The time to detect regional recurrence was shorter than that for local recurrence (P < .0001, q = 15.059) and distant recurrence (P < .0001, q = 7.958). Local recurrence and stage I primary tumor had the highest percentage cure for recurrence.Neck ultrasound in the follow-up period is reported to be effective for the detection of recurrence of patients who received primary treatment for carcinoma of head and neck especially regional recurrence and primary tumor stage I.Level of Evidence: III.

External validation of nodal failure prediction models including radiomics in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To externally validate the previously published pre-treatment prediction models for lymph nodes failure after definitive radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This external validation cohort consisted of 143 node positive HNSCC patients treated between July 2007 and June 2016 by curative radiotherapy with or without either cisplatin or cetuximab. Imaging and pathology reports during follow-up were analyzed to indicate persisting or recurring nodes. The previously established clinical, radiomic and combined models were validated on this cohort by assessing the concordance index (c-index) and model calibration.

RESULTS

Overall 113 patients with 374 pLNs were suitable for final analysis. There were 20 (5.3%) nodal failures from 15 patients after a median follow-up of 36.1 months. Baseline characteristics and radiomic features were comparable to the training cohort. Both the radiomic model (Least-axis-length of lymph node (LALLN) and correlation of gray level co-occurrence matrix (Corre-GLCM)) and the combined model (T stage, gender, WHO performance score, LALLN and Corre-GLCM) showed good agreement between predicted and observed nodal control probabilities. The radiomic (c-index: 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.84) and combined (c-index: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59-0.82) models performed better than the clinical model (c-index: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.68) on this cohort, with a significant difference between the combined and clinical models (z-score test: p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The combined model including clinical and radiomic features was externally validated and proved useful to predict nodal failures and could be helpful to guide treatment choices before and after curative radiation treatment for node positive HNSCC patients.

Pre-treatment radiomic features predict individual lymph node failure for head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To develop and validate a pre-treatment radiomics-based prediction model to identify pathological lymph nodes (pLNs) at risk of failures after definitive radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Training and validation cohorts consisted of 165 patients with 558 pLNs and 112 patients with 467 pLNs, respectively. All patients were primarily treated with definitive radiotherapy, with or without systemic treatment. The endpoint was the cumulative incidence of nodal failure. For each pLN, 82 pre-treatment CT radiomic features and 7 clinical features were included in the Cox proportional-hazard analysis.

RESULTS

There were 68 and 23 nodal failures in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed three clinical features (T-stage, gender and WHO Performance-status) and two radiomic features (Least-axis-length representing nodal size and gray level co-occurrence matrix based - Correlation representing nodal heterogeneity) as independent prognostic factors. The model showed good discrimination with a c-index of 0.80 (0.69-0.91) in the validation cohort, significantly better than models based on clinical features (p < 0.001) or radiomics (p = 0.003) alone. High- and low-risk groups were defined by using thresholds of estimated nodal failure risks at 2-year of 60% and 10%, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 94.4% and 98.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A pre-treatment prediction model was developed and validated, integrating the quantitative radiomic features of individual lymph nodes with generally used clinical features. Using this prediction model, lymph nodes with a high failure risk can be identified prior to treatment, which might be used to select patients for intensified treatment strategies targeted on individual lymph nodes.

Failure patterns of cervical lymph nodes in metastases of unknown origin according to target volume

Purpose

This study was aim to evaluate the patterns of failure according to radiotherapy (RT) target volume for cervical lymph nodes in metastases of unknown primary origin in head and neck region (HNMUO).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-two patients with HNMUO between 1998 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed the clinical outcomes and primary site failure depending on the radiation target volume. The target volume was classified according to whether the potential head and neck mucosal sites were included and whether the neck node was treated involved side only or bilaterally.

Results

Potential mucosal site RT (mucosal RT) was done to 23 patients and 39 patients did not receive mucosal RT. Mucosal RT showed no significant effect on overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR). The location of primary site failure encountered during follow-up period was found to be unpredictable and 75% of patients with recurrence received successful salvage therapies. No significant differences in OS and LRR were found between patients treated to unilateral (n = 35) and bilateral neck irradiation (n = 21). Treatment of both necks resulted in significantly higher mucositis.

conclusions

We found no advantages in OS and LRR of patients with HNMUO when mucosal sites and bilateral neck node were included in the radiation target volume.

Prognostic role of extracapsular spread in planned neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of nodes with extracapsular spread (ECS) in patients treated with a planned neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of 109 cN+ patients who achieved a complete response in the primary location after chemoradiotherapy and treated with a planned neck dissection.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival for patients without residual metastatic nodes in the neck dissection (pN0, n = 69) was 75.7% (95% CI: 64.4%-87.0%). For patients with metastatic nodes without ECS (pN+/ECS-negative, n = 17), the corresponding figure was 74.0% (95% CI: 48.2%-99.8%), and for patients with metastatic neck nodes with ECS (pN+/ECS-positive, n = 23) it was 8.7% (95% CI: 0.0%-24.3%) (P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of ECS in the pathologic study of the planned neck dissections carried out after chemoradiotherapy in patients with human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-negative) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) allows identification of a group of patients with a high risk of failure.

Effectiveness of primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy on unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION

The review question is: what is the effectiveness of primary surgery versus primary radiotherapy on disease-free survival and quality of life in adults with an unknown primary, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?