Hearing and tinnitus in head and neck cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy

Evaluation and analysis of risk factors of hearing impairment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with radiotherapy frequently causes hearing impairment (HI). HI risk data haven't been evaluated quantitatively. This study aimed to analyze the probability of HI and sever HI (SHI), develop a nomogram to quantify individual prediction, and provide dose limitation suggestions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This single-center, retrospective study was conducted based on 588 adolescents and young adults with non-metastatic NPC treated using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2010 and 2016. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model and univariate analysis were used to screen potential risk factors. The concordance index and a calibration curve evaluated the nomogram models' predictive ability, with bootstrap resampling validation.

RESULTS

We analyzed 588 patients with NPC, with a median follow-up of 103.4 months. HI occurred in 39.5 % of patients, with 29.7 % experiencing SHI. Two factors were classified as precursors for HI (volume 45 Gy of the inner ear (IEV45) and volume 50 Gy of the internal auditory canal (IACV50)), and IACmin and IACV60 for SHI, respectively. Prognostic nomograms were developed to predict HI and SHI probabilities, showing excellent discriminative abilities (c-index values = 0.806 and 0.793, respectively). We also suggested IEV45 < 50 % and/or IACV50 < 40 % as rational dose limitations for HI, and IACmin < 44 Gy and/or the IACV60 < 40 % for SHI.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive analysis could predict the risk of HI and SHI in NPC after IMRT, proposing rational dose limitations and improving long-term quality of life.

Cochlear Implantation in Radiation-Induced Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been reported as a treatment modality for radiation-induced sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, its efficacy is based on individual reports with no cumulative supporting evidence. Therefore, we conducted the current systematic review to provide cumulative evidence regarding the feasibility and safety of CI in this context.

DATABASES REVIEWED

An online bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science using MeSH-based terms.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to retrieve both observational and interventional studies that reported the outcomes of CI for patients suffering from radiation-induced SNHL.

RESULTS

We included 12 studies that recruited 88 patients who underwent CI because of radiation-induced SNHL. All included studies reported satisfactory hearing/speech perception outcomes. No serious complications were reported, whereas some manageable adverse events were reported, such as paroxysmal facial spams (n = 1), postauricular wound dehiscence with mastoid cutaneous fistula (n = 1), dehiscence in blind sac closure (n = 1), and electrode exposure (n = 1). Four studies assessed the postoperative quality of life/patient satisfaction, showing improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

CI could be considered to be feasible and safe in patients with irradiation-induced SNHL. The adverse events of CI in such cases are manageable. Future studies are needed to be strengthened this context.

Treatment Considerations for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer with a Contraindication to Cisplatin

OPINION STATEMENT

Significant advancements have been made in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer, predominantly driven by the integration of concurrent chemotherapy with radiation therapy as a standard of care for many patients. The most heavily investigated chemotherapeutic is cisplatin, yet many patients are ineligible for cisplatin due to the presence of pre-existing medical comorbidities. Moreover, given the toxicity profile of cisplatin, identifying which patients stand to benefit from cisplatin is challenging, which is particularly evident in older patients. Efforts to better risk-stratify patients based on age, performance status, and the degree of pre-existing comorbidities are ongoing and have been increasingly utilized in national clinical trials. In parallel, exploration into alternative systemic agents, including novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies, in cisplatin-ineligible patients are rapidly expanding. Cumulatively, identifying appropriate treatment paradigms in patients who harbor contraindications to cisplatin can not only improve clinical outcomes but also critically mitigate detrimental adverse effects.

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2014: outcome remains poor after major changes in treatment

PURPOSE

Hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) is typically diagnosed at late stages, the patients tend to have serious co-morbidities, distant relapses are frequent, and the related mortality remains high. The treatment paradigm of HPC has remarkably changed from primary surgical approach toward definitive, platinum-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Our aim was to analyze the HPC treatment approaches and outcome in a nationwide series and to make a comparison with a previously published corresponding nationwide patient cohort from the period 1990-1999.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed with HPC at the five university hospitals in Finland between 2005 and 2014.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 231 patients. Treatment with curative intent was offered for 175 (76%) patients and consisted of definitive radiotherapy (RT) or CRT in 156 (89%) patients, while 20 (11%) patients had primary surgery with or without adjuvant RT or CRT. The 5-year estimates for overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) for the whole study group were 22.7% and 36.5%, respectively. For patients treated with curative intent, the 5-year estimates for OS and DSS were 29.4% and 44.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment approach of HPC in Finland has changed thoroughly, as in the 1990s, 63% of HPC patients with curative treatment intent underwent primary surgery with or without RT, while in the current study, the primary treatment approach was non-surgical in 89% of the patients. However, the survival figures have not changed and remain dismal, but most of the few surviving patients now can retain their larynx.

Ototoxicity in Patients of Advanced Head and Neck Malignancies Receiving Chemoradiation Versus Radiation Alone: Comparative Study

To evaluate ototoxicity in patients receiving combined cisplatin and radiotherapy in comparison to patients receiving radiotherapy alone. A prospective study was conducted in sixty (60) cases of advanced Head and Neck malignancy (stage III and IV). Patient were divided in two randomized groups (30 each), group I received chemoradiation and group II received radiation alone. Inclusion criteria were histopathologically confirmed head & neck malignancy, normal baseline audiograms. Exclusion criteria were defined as: previously treated cases with chemotherapy/radiotherapy, patients who didn't complete treatment or lost to follow up. Ototoxicity was evaluated as per criterion established by the American speech-language-hearing association. Study participants were evaluated for ototoxicity at intervals defined as per study design. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was noticed in 56.6% and 36.6% of subjects in Group I & II respectively at 6 months follow up post completion of treatment. Incidence of sensorineural hearing loss increased significantly with cumulative dosages of chemoradiotherapy in group I and radiotherapy in group II. Incidence of SNHL in both study groups was found to be higher in patients older than 50 years. Incidence of ototoxicity in chemoradiated patients was found to be higher in comparison to patients receiving radiation alone. Ototoxicity occurred more with cumulative doses, with higher speech frequencies affected earlier in comparison to middle range frequencies. Lower frequencies were spared.

Ototoxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by intermediate or high-dose cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated ototoxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated in the CONDOR study with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by conventional radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin 100 mg/m² on days 1, 22, and 43 (cis100+RT) versus accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin weekly 40 mg/m² (cis40+ART).

METHODS

Sixty-two patients were treated in this study. Audiometry was performed at baseline, during TPF, before start of chemoradiotherapy, and 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

A complete dataset of audiometric data was available of 12 patients treated with high-dose cisplatin and of 11 patients treated with intermediate-dose cisplatin. Patients in the high-dose group showed significant more hearing loss than in the intermediate group at 4 kHz ([z = 1.98; P = .04] and 8 kHz [z = 2.07; P < .03]). Interindividual variation was high in both groups.

CONCLUSION

After induction TPF, more ototoxicity was observed in chemoradiotherapy with cis100+RT than after chemoradiotherapy with cis40+ART.

Drug-Induced Ototoxicity: Diagnosis and Monitoring

Ototoxicity diagnosis and management has historically been approached using a variety of methods. However, in recent years a consensus on useful and practical approaches has been developed through clinical guidelines of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, the American Academy of Audiology, and multiple clinical trials published in peer-reviewed literature. Some of the guidelines and approaches are used to detect and monitor ototoxicity, while others are used to grade adverse events. Some of the audiologic measures are primary, while others are adjunct measures and may be tailored to the specific needs of the patient or clinical trial. For some types of monitoring, such as drug-induced tinnitus or dizziness, validated paper survey instruments can be both sensitive and easy for fragile patients. This review addresses the characteristics of some of the most common clinical ototoxins and the most common methods for detecting and monitoring ototoxicity in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Chemoradiation-induced hearing loss remains a major concern for head and neck cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Review of the literature regarding hearing loss in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation.

DESIGN

Studies in the literature are reviewed that pertain to hearing loss sustained in head and neck cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Personal observations noted while treating these patients are also detailed.

STUDY SAMPLE

PubMed was searched for pertinent articles regarding hearing loss in head and neck cancer patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy and/or radiation.

RESULTS

Studies on the incidence and severity of hearing loss in head and neck cancer patients are limited, but those studies suggest that the risk of hearing loss is greater with higher-dose regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Newer cisplatin chemotherapy regimens using lower, weekly doses may be associated with a lower incidence and severity of hearing loss; however, large prospective studies are needed. Such information will be paramount to effective pre-treatment counselling of head and neck cancer patients.