Nodal yield of neck dissections and influence on outcome in laryngectomized patients

Factors affecting lymph node yield and density in neck dissection

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that neck dissections with a minimum of 16-18 yielded nodes are associated with better overall survival compared to neck dissections with lower yields.

AIMS

We aimed to identify factors affecting the lymph node yield and density in patients with oral cavity cancer undergoing elective neck dissection levels 1-3.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using prospectively registered data, we conducted a population-based cohort study on all patients surgically treated for oral cavity cancer including levels 1-3 neck dissection at our institution from 2018 to 2022. Uni and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with lymph node yields.

RESULTS

In total, 221 patients were included. The mean lymph nodes yield and density were 19 (95%CI 18-20) and 0.12 (95%CI 0.09-0.16), respectively. In multivariate analysis, increasing body weight (p = .034) was positively and previous radiotherapy (p = .006) were negatively correlated with the number of yielded lymph nodes. Lymph node density was positively correlated with body weight (p = .011) and body mass index (p = .032) in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Increasing body weight was positively and previous radiotherapy was negatively correlated to lymph node yield. These factors should be taken into consideration when interpreting the lymph node yield as an indicator of neck dissection quality.

Nodal Yield in Level II-IV Neck Dissections in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study is to analyze factors associated with nodal yield in level II-IV selective neck dissections (NDs) and the secondary objective is to assess its impact on overall and disease-free survival.

METHODS

Observational retrospective study including adult patients submitted to level II-IV ND from January 2015 to December 2021 in the otorhinolaryngology department of a tertiary hospital center.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients and 78 level II-IV NDs (34 bilateral and 10 unilateral) were included. The median age at diagnosis was 60 (22-74) years, and 93.2% of the patients were male. A lower nodal yield was significantly associated with previous radiotherapy (p = 0.042) and extranodal invasion (p < 0.001) and was non-significantly associated with older age (p = 0.065). Furthermore, on a Cox analysis adjusted to the cN status and age, the nodal yield was not associated with five-year disease-free survival (HR = 0.986; 95% CI = 0.922-1.054; p = 0.681) nor with five-year overall survival (HR = 1.006; 95% CI = 0.925-1.095; p = 0.888).

CONCLUSION

A reduced nodal yield in level II-IV NDs was significantly associated with previous radiotherapy and extranodal extension and non-significantly associated with age. There was no association between the nodal yield and five-year overall survival or disease-free survival.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield, Lymph Node Density, and pN in Oral Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate thresholds for lymph node yield (LNY), lymph node density (LND), and pN in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma in relation to previous findings in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective register-based study.

SETTING

Copenhagen Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma database.

METHODS

Appropriate thresholds for LNY, LND, and pN were determined by areas under the curve and subsequently subjected to multivariate analysis. Five-year overall survival and 3-year recurrence-free survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

In total, 413 patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma were included. In the pN0 cohort, no superior/prognostic LNY cutoff values were detected. In the pN+ cohort, areas under the curve determined thresholds of LNY, LND, and pN to be 21 nodes, 5%, and 3 metastases, respectively. The 5-year overall survival was 52% for patients with LNY ≥21 vs 38% for patients with LNY <21 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11; P < .05), 60% for patients with LND ≤5% vs 38% for patients with LND >6% (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.57; P < .05), and 43% for patients with pN <3 vs 26% for patients with pN ≥3 (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-2.15; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased nodal yield, decreased LND, and decreasing number of pN were associated with significantly improved survival outcomes. LNY might serve as a prognosticator of survival as well as a surgical quality indicator. LND may have implications as a tool in cancer staging and treatment planning.

Defining High-Quality Integrated Head and Neck Cancer Care Through a Composite Outcome Measure: Textbook Outcome

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To further improve the quality of head and neck cancer (HNC) care, we developed a composite measure defined as "textbook outcome" (TO).

METHODS

We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients after curvative-intent primary surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or chemoradiation (CRT) for HNC between 2015 and 2018 at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. TO was defined as 1) the start of treatment within 30 days, 2a) satisfactory pathologic outcomes, without 30-day postoperative complications, for the surgically treated group, and 2b), for RT and CRT patients, no unexpected or prolonged hospitalization and toxicity after the completion of treatment as planned.

RESULTS

In total, 392 patients with HNC were included. An overall TO was achieved in 9.6% of patients after surgery, 20.6% after RT, and 2.2% after CRT. Two indicators (margins >5 mm and start treatment <30 days) reduced TO radically for both groups.

CONCLUSION

TO can aid the evaluation of the quality of care for HNC patients and guide improvement processes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Prognostic value of the nodal yield in elective neck dissections in patients with head and neck carcinomas

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to assess the prognostic capacity of the nodal yield in elective neck dissections performed in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) without clinical or radiological evidence of regional involvement (cN0) at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 647 patients with HNSCC treated with an elective neck dissection.

RESULTS

Patients with < 15 dissected nodes (n = 172, 26.6%) had a 5-year disease-specific survival of 64.9% (95% CI: 57.3-72.5%), while for patients with ≥ 15 dissected nodes (n = 475, 73.4%), it was of 81.9% (95% CI: 78.4-85.4%) (P = 0.0001). The nodal yield category had prognostic capacity on the disease-specific survival in patients with tumors located in the oral cavity (P = 0.001), the oropharynx (P = 0.023) and the hypopharynx (P = 0.034), while for patients with tumors located in the larynx, no significant differences appeared (P = 0.779). Differences in regional recurrence-free survival were also observed based on the nodal yield category in patients with extra-laryngeal tumors (5-year regional recurrence-free survival of 81.0% in patients with < 15 dissected nodes vs 89.0% in patients with ≥ 15 dissected nodes; P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

The nodal yield in elective neck dissections in patients without evidence of lymph node disease (cN0) had prognostic capacity depending on the location of the primary tumor. For tumors located in the larynx, the number of dissected nodes did not significantly influence the prognosis. For tumors located in the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx, patients with < 15 dissected nodes had a disease-specific mortality 2.9 times higher than patients with ≥ 15 dissected nodes.

Impact of Lymph Node Yield in Patients Undergoing Total Laryngectomy and Neck Dissection

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of lymph node yield (LNY) in patients undergoing neck dissection at the time of total laryngectomy (TL). To determine the impact of radiation therapy (RT) on LNY.

METHODS

Retrospective review of LNY and clinical outcomes in 232 patients undergoing primary or salvage total laryngectomy (TL) with ND.

RESULTS

Preoperative RT significantly decreased mean LNY from 31.7 to 23.9 nodes (P < .001). In primary TL patients, age (P < .001) and positive margins (P = .044) were associated with decreased OS. In salvage TL patients, only positive margins was associated with poorer OS (P = .009). No LNY cutoff provided significant OS or DFS benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy significantly reduces LNY in patients undergoing TL and ND. Within a single institution cohort, positive margins, but not LNY, is associated with survival in both primary and salvage TL patients.Level of Evidence: 4.

Prognostic importance of harvested lymph node number, metastatic lymph node number, and lymph node ratio in surgically managed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Lymph node metastasis is a well-known prognostic factor for laryngeal carcinoma. However, current nodal staging systems provide limited information regarding prognosis. Additional parameters should be considered to improve prognostic capacity.

Objectives

To assess the prognostic values of metastatic lymph node number, ipsilateral/contralateral harvested lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in patients undergoing surgical treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Seventy-four patients diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma primarily managed surgically were included in this study. The patients’ pathological and survival data were obtained from their medical records. The effects of harvested lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed.

Results

Ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral evaluations of harvested lymph nodes showed no significant associations with prognosis. Lymph node ratio was significantly associated with overall survival when evaluated bilaterally. Metastatic lymph node number showed more suitable stratification than TNM classification.

Conclusions

Metastatic lymph node number and bilateral lymph node ratio parameters should be taken into consideration to improve the prognostic capacity of TNM.

Rational surgical neck management in total laryngectomy for advanced stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Controversies exist in regard to surgical neck management in total laryngectomies (TL). International guidelines do not sufficiently discriminate neck sides and sublevels, or minimal neck-dissection nodal yield (NY).

METHODS

Thirty-seven consecutive primary TL cases from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of local tumor growth using a previously established imaging scheme, metastatic neck involvement, and NY impact on survival.

RESULTS

There was no case of level IIB involvement on any side. For type A and B tumor midline involvement, no positive contralateral lymph nodes were found. Craniocaudal tumor extension correlated with contralateral neck involvement (OR: 1.098, p = 0.0493) and showed increased involvement when extending 33 mm (p = 0.0134). Using a bilateral NY of ≥ 24 for 5-year overall survival (OS) and ≥ 26 for 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) gave significantly increased rate advantages of 64 and 56%, respectively (both p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This work sheds light on regional metastatic distribution pattern and its influence on TL cases. An NY of n ≥ 26 can be considered a desirable benchmark for bilateral selective neck dissections as it leads to improved OS and DFS. Therefore, an omission of distinct neck levels cannot be promoted at this time.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several recent studies have indicated that the lymph node ratio (LNR) is an independent prognostic factor for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LHSCC). The purpose of this paper is to assess the prognostic value of LNR and explore appropriate cutoff values by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase (via Ovid), and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies on the prognostic value of LNR in LHSCC up to October 31, 2019. Then, Literature review, data extraction, and quality assessment of eligible studies were performed by two independent reviewers back-to-back. Lastly, Stata 14.0 software was hired to conduct a meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 445 articles were retrieved, and 13 studies published in English between 2013 and 2019 were included after the title/abstract and full-text screening. Among the 13 studies contributed to 4197 patients, seven studies were about hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC), four studies about laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), and the remaining two studies about LHSCC. The meta-analysis results showed that shorter overall survival (OS) (HR 1.49; 95%CI: 1.18 to 1.88), disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR 1.66; 95%CI: 1.32 to 2.07) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.04; 95%CI: 1.54 to 2.71) were significantly correlated with a higher LNR in a random-effect model. The cutoff values of eligible studies were varied from 0.03 to 0.14, and the lowest significant LNR was 0.044.

Conclusion

LNR is a valuable prognostic factor in the survival of LHSCC and may be used to improve the tumor staging systems, which, however, requires the solid support of more high-quality studies.

Incidence of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Larynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma, by Subsite, T Classification and Neck Level: A Systematic Review

Background: Larynx cancer is a common site for tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. In cases with a clinically negative neck, the indications for an elective neck treatment are still debated. The objective is to define the prevalence of occult metastasis based on the subsite of the primary tumor, T classification and neck node levels involved. Methods: All studies included provided the rate of occult metastases in cN0 larynx squamous cell carcinoma patients. The main outcome was the incidence of occult metastasis. The pooled incidence was calculated with random effects analysis. Results: 36 studies with 3803 patients fulfilled the criteria. The incidence of lymph node metastases for supraglottic and glottic tumors was 19.9% (95% CI 16.4–23.4) and 8.0% (95% CI 2.7–13.3), respectively. The incidence of occult metastasis for level I, level IV and level V was 2.4% (95% CI 0–6.1%), 2.0% (95% CI 0.9–3.1) and 0.4% (95% CI 0–1.0%), respectively. For all tumors, the incidence for sublevel IIB was 0.5% (95% CI 0–1.3). Conclusions: The incidence of occult lymph node metastasis is higher in supraglottic and T3–4 tumors. Level I and V and sublevel IIB should not be routinely included in the elective neck treatment of cN0 laryngeal cancer and, in addition, level IV should not be routinely included in cases of supraglottic tumors.

Lymph node ratio as a prognostic marker in advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma after primary total laryngopharyngectomy

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2018, 79 patients underwent total laryngopharyngectomy and adjuvant therapy. LNR was determined and statistically compared to patients' overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional and distant failure.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS, DSS and DFS rates were 45.6%, 73.4% and 56.9%, respectively. 24.1% and 25.3% developed loco- regional failure or distant metastatic disease, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that high LNR (cut-off >0.07) was significantly associated with distant and locoregional failure. On multivariate analysis, LNR remained an independent predictor for OS (P = .004), DSS (P = .009) and DFS (P = .044).

CONCLUSION

Increased LNR in patients with advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinoma is significantly linked to shortened OS, DSS, DFS and higher locoregional and distant metastatic disease.

Molecular prognosticators in clinically and pathologically distinct cohorts of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-A meta-analysis approach

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) includes multiple subsites that exhibit differential treatment outcome, which is in turn reflective of tumor stage/histopathology and molecular profile. This study hypothesized that the molecular profile is an accurate prognostic adjunct in patients triaged based on clinico-pathological characteristics. Towards this effect, publically available micro-array datasets (n = 8), were downloaded, classified based on HPV association (n = 83) and site (tongue n = 88; laryngopharynx n = 53; oropharynx n = 51) and re-analyzed (Genespring; v13.1). The significant genes were validated in respective cohorts in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for correlation with clinico-pathological parameters/survival. The gene entities (n = 3258) identified from HPV based analysis, when validated in TCGA identified the subset specifically altered in HPV+ HNSCC (n = 63), with three genes showing survival impact (RPP25, NUDCD2, NOVA1). Site-specific meta-analysis identified respective differentials (tongue: 3508, laryngopharynx: 4893, oropharynx: 2386); validation in TCGA revealed markers with high incidence (altered in >10% of patients) in tongue (n = 331), laryngopharynx (n = 701) and oropharynx (n = 404). Assessment of these genes in clinical sub-cohorts of TCGA indicated that early stage tongue (MTFR1, C8ORF33, OTUD6B) and laryngeal cancers (TWISTNB, KLHL13 and UBE2Q1) were defined by distinct prognosticators. Similarly, correlation with perineural/angiolymophatic invasion, identified discrete marker panels with survival impact (tongue: NUDCD1, PRKC1; laryngopharynx: SLC4A1AP, PIK3CA, AP2M1). Alterations in ANO1, NUDCD1, PIK3CA defined survival in tongue cancer patients with nodal metastasis (node+ECS-), while EPS8 is a significant differential in node+ECS- laryngopharyngeal cancers. In oropharynx, wherein HPV is a major etiological factor, distinct prognosticators were identified in HPV+ (ECHDC2, HERC5, GGT6) and HPV- (GRB10, EMILIN1, FNDC1). Meta-analysis in combination with TCGA validation carried out in this study emphasized on the molecular heterogeneity inherent within HNSCC; the feasibility of leveraging this information for improving prognostic efficacy is also established. Subject to large scale clinical validation, the marker panel identified in this study can prove to be valuable prognostic adjuncts.

Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review

Objective

Literature analysis on the prognostic factor of the nodal yield (NY) in neck dissections (NDs), which in general surgical oncology is a strong prognosticator and quality‐of‐care marker.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of all PubMed and Embase publications until June 30, 2018 screening for data on NY as prognosticator and overall survival (OS) as outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Risk for bias was asserted by application of the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool.

Results

Of the 823 screened publications, 15 were included in this analysis. Five out of seven that compared NY ≥18 vs <18 as prognosticator, showed significantly improved survival if NY ≥18. Six studies used other cutoffs and three reported improved survival with each additionally harvested lymph node.

Conclusion

Increased NY in ND specimen for HNSCC, most commonly described as ≥18 lymph nodes, is associated with improved OS and could be used as a prognosticator and quality‐of‐care marker.

Prognostic significance of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: Study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, observational study

Background

Lymph node involvement is a fundamental prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Lymph node yield (LNY), which is the number of lymph nodes retrieved after neck dissection, and lymph node ratio (LNR), which is the ratio of positive lymph nodes out of the total removed, are measurable indicators that may have the potential to be used as prognostic factors. The present study is designed to define the exact role of LNY and LNR regarding the overall and specific survival of patients affected by oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCC. It has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov database (NCT03534778).

Methods

This is a multicenter study involving tertiary care referral centers in Europe and North America. Patients affected by oral cavity, HPV+ and HPV- oropharyngeal SCC undergoing neck dissection will be consecutively enrolled and followed-up for up to 5 years. Patients and disease characteristic will be properly recorded and centrally analyzed. The primary end-point is to define reliable cut off-values for LNY and LNR which may serve as prognosticators of survival. This will be achieved through the use of ROC curves. Secondary outcomes will be the Overall survival (OS), Disease Specific Survival (DSS), and Progression Free Survival Hazard Ratios (HR) at 2-, 3- and 5 years, which will be evaluated through the Kaplan-Meier method and the difference in survival attested by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be performed to understand the association of various outcomes with LNY and LNR.

pN status predicts outcomes in surgically treated pT1-pT2 patients of various disease stages with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a 17-year retrospective single center cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The optimal treatment for a substantial proportion of patients with pT1-pT2 squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) remains to be refined. The extent of surgery, role and potential benefit of adjuvant treatment are to be balanced against therapy-induced side effects. We compared the outcomes of surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy (CRT) and investigated the prognostic value of established clinicopathological parameters.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected for 227 patients who were treated by surgery alone (n = 31), RT (n = 87) and CRT (n = 109) in a single center.

RESULTS

Patients with stage I/II disease who had received adjuvant RT showed a better disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.04) than those who had received adjuvant CRT treatment. Conversely, patients with stage III/IV disease who had received CRT showed a better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.003) and DFS (P = 0.03) than those who had received surgery alone or adjuvant RT without chemotherapy. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with pN0 to pN1 had better OS (P = 0.02), disease-specific survival (DSS) (P = 0.003), DFS (P = 0.02) and metastases free survival (MFS) (P = 0.002) compared to patients with pN2 to pN3. Multivariate analysis showed that the pN status was an independent factor for OS (P = 0.03), DSS (P = 0.04), relapse-free survival (P = 0.03), DFS (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The pN status is the most important prognostic factor for pT1 to pT2 SCCHN. Adjuvant CRT was associated with significantly better survival outcomes in patients with pN1 and pN2-3 or more advanced stage, while adjuvant RT showed significantly better outcomes in patients with pN0.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield and Density in Head and Neck Malignancies

Objective

Studies have suggested that the lymph node yield and lymph node density from selective or elective neck dissections are predictive of patient outcomes and may be used for patient counseling, treatment planning, or quality measurement. Our objective was to systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies that investigated the prognostic significance of lymph node yield and/or lymph node density after neck dissection for patients with head and neck cancer.

Data Sources

The Ovid/Medline, Ovid/Embase, and NLM PubMed databases were systematically searched on January 23, 2017, for articles published between January 1, 1946, and January 23, 2017.

Review Methods

We reviewed English-language original research that included survival analysis of patients undergoing neck dissection for a head and neck malignancy stratified by lymph node yield and/or lymph node density. Study data were extracted by 2 independent researchers (S.C. and M.O.). We utilized the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to account for heterogeneity of studies.

Results

Our search yielded 350 nonduplicate articles, with 23 studies included in the final synthesis. Pooled results demonstrated that increased lymph node yield was associated with a significant improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.833; 95% CI, 0.790-0.879). Additionally, we found that increased lymph node density was associated with poorer survival (hazard ratio, 1.916; 95% CI, 1.637-2.241).

Conclusions

Increased nodal yield portends improved outcomes and may be a valuable quality indicator for neck dissections, while increased lymph node density is associated with diminished survival and may be used for postsurgical counseling and planning for adjuvant therapy.

Predictors of Clinicopathologic Stage Discrepancy in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study

Objective To determine the frequency, associated factors, and prognosis of clinicopathologic stage discrepancy in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Study Design Retrospective study using a national database. Setting National Cancer Database. Subjects and Methods Cases of OPSCC diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013, with full clinical and pathologic staging information available were identified. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment variables associated with overall stage discrepancy were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results In total, 7731 cases of OPSCC were identified. Overall stage discrepancy was present in 30.2% of cases (21.9% upstaging, 8.2% downstaging). A total of 13.1% of cases were T-upstaged, and 10.5% of cases were T-downstaged; 22.9% of cases were N-upstaged, and 8.6% of cases were N-downstaged. Upstaging by overall stage was associated with a high Charlson-Deyo score, high tumor grade, number of lymph nodes examined, and increasing tumor size. No factors were positively associated with downstaging. High tumor grade was negatively associated with downstaging. For stage II, III, and IVA tumors, upstaging was associated with poorer OS. Conclusion Clinicopathologic stage discrepancy is common in OPSCC and is likely attributable to insensitive clinical staging techniques as well as to intrinsic tumor biologic properties. Upstaging is associated with poorer prognosis, which is likely due to advancement of disease.