Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF): a rising opportunity for head and neck reconstruction

Versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction

Objective

To present our experience using the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with SCAIF at our institution. The following data were collected: age, sex, surgical indications, flap harvest time, flap dimensions, length of hospital stay, complications, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Thirty-three patients underwent SCAIF reconstruction, of whom four underwent pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction simultaneously. Twenty flaps were used to repair pharyngeal or esophageal defects following resection for tonsillar, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, and cervical esophageal cancers. Five flaps were used for tracheal reconstruction following resection for tracheal or thyroid gland cancer. Seven flaps were used for reconstruction of cervical skin defects or fistulas related to a previous treatment. One flap for tracheal stenosis following tracheotomy. The mean age of the patients was 60.69 ± 11.47 years. The mean flap harvest time was 32.00 ± 4.44 min. The mean flap size was 10.16 ± 3.91 × 5.78 ± 0.68 cm. The mean length of hospital stay is 24.84 ± 13.78 days. Three patients had partial necrosis of the distal portion of the flap, which resolved with anti-infection therapy and local wound care. One patient developed a fistula that was resolved with wound care and further surgical intervention. Complete flap loss or major complications were not observed. No donor site complication or compromised shoulder function was observed.

Conclusion

The SCAIF can be successfully used to reconstruct head and neck defects with good outcomes and limited morbidity.

Level of Evidence

4.

Effect of Preoperative Neck Radiotherapy on the Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects With the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap

Purpose: The supraclavicular artery island (SAI) flap is commonly used in the reconstruction of head and neck defects. However, the safety of SAI flaps for neck irradiated patient needs to be verified. To investigate the safety of using the SAI flap for patients who have undergone neck radiotherapy, as well as the risk factors for flap complications. Materials and Methods: Sixty-one patients (16 irradiated and 45 nonirradiated) with SAI flap-reconstructed head and neck defects were included, and relevant data were collected retrospectively. The gender, age, body mass index, presence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative albumin level, and flap size between irradiated and nonirradiated patients had no significant difference. Results: No significant difference was observed in the incidence of complications (total, mild, or severe) between the radiotherapy and nonradiotherapy groups. In univariate analysis, preoperative radiotherapy was not associated with postoperative complications of the SAI flap procedure (P = 1.00), while a low preoperative albumin level was a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (P < .05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that preoperative radiotherapy does not increase the risk of SAI flap postoperative complications compared with surgical reconstruction alone.

The Role of Supraclavicular Flap in Reconstruction Following Resection in Buccal Mucosa Carcinoma

Buccal mucosa is one of the common subsite for oral carcinoma. Following excision of the buccal mucosa tumor mass various pedicled and free flaps have been used to reconstruct the oral cavity defect. In this age of free flaps various locoregional pedicled flaps have been underrated and overlooked and supraclavicular flap is one of them. This flap meets the functional and cosmetic acceptance of the buccal mucosa defect reconstruction with minimal morbidity to the donor site. This paper presents author's experience of using supraclavicular flap in 10 patients of carcinoma buccal mucosa. In all cases surgical defect was completely covered by the flap, there was no necrosis of the flap. Functional and cosmetic outcome was acceptable in all the patients without compromising oncological clearance.

Experience of using a supraclavicular flap in reconstruction of oral cavity defects

Introduction. In case of cancer of the oral mucosa at the first stage, the standard treatment approach is radical surgical intervention, with the formation of extensive defects leading to aesthetic and functional disorders. Taking into account the characteristics of defects, choosing a flap is a difficult task. Currently, there is a wide selection of regional and microvascular free flaps. However, not all flaps meet the requirements. The supraclavicular fasciocutaneous flap, being a regional flap, has a number of advantages: easy to harvest, reliable due to the constancy of the vascular pedicle, primary closure of the donor site, scarcity of hair, the possibility of closing various defects of the oral cavity.

 Aim. To evaluate the possibility of using a supraclavicular flap in patients with oral cancer to restore the defects after surgical treatment.

Materials and methods. The study included 10 patients with malignant tumors of the oral cavity who underwent surgical intervention with defect replacement using supraclavicular flap at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology between February of 2015 and May of 2021. In 4 cases, buccal mucosa was affected; in 3 cases, the retromolar area; in 1 case, oral floor mucosa; in 1 case, mandibular alveolar ridge; in 1 case, mobile tongue. Flap sizes were 5–10 × 5–8 cm. Three (3) patients had history of radiotherapy, and 1 of them had a radical dose.

Results. In 4 patients without previous radiotherapy, partial flap necrosis was observed. In 1 patient, sutural diastasis in the oral cavity after partial flap necrosis was diagnosed. There were no cases of total flap necrosis and fistula formation. Suture dehiscence in the donor bed was observed in 1 patient only.

Conclusion. Use of supraclavicular flap is an option for oral cavity defect replacement after surgical intervention in patients with malignant tumors of the oral cavity producing satisfactory esthetic and functional results. The advantages of this flap are simple flap dissection, reliability of vascular pedicle, flexibility, possibility of replacing large defects, scant hair coverage.

Surgical Use of Supraclavicular Artery Flap for Head and Neck Cancer Defects Repair: Personal Experience

Introduction  For a long time, major surgical defects after oncological surgery have always been challenging cases for surgeons in terms of wound healing and covering technique. Objectives  To demonstrate the feasibility of supraclavicular artery flap (SCAF) in the reconstruction of surgical defects in those "fragile" patients undergoing oncological surgery who could not possibly have endured the timeframes involved in using microvascular free flaps. Methods  Between January 2018 and January 2019, at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est Hospital (Bergamo, Italy), we reported the cases of 11 patients in whom the SCAF was used for surgical reconstruction after oncological surgery in our Otolaryngology Department. The median age of the 11 patients was 68.7 years old. Results  The SCAF has proved, in almost all 11 cases in which it was used, to be very reliable and, above all, easy and quick to make in those "fragile" patients without the need for further intervention. There was only one case in which the resection involved the auricle entirely and a small area of perimeatal bone exposure occurred, which, anyway, healed by secondary intention. Conclusion  The SCAF is an extremely versatile flap for head and neck surgery to be considered especially for fragile and vulnerable patients who cannot undergo prolonged surgical time. Moreover, this technique has also shown high feasibility in small hospitals where there is not a plastic surgery department and the surgeon may face the difficulty of practicing surgical reconstruction after enlarged resection.

A Comprehensive Review on the Supraclavicular Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

The supraclavicular artery flap (SCF) is a highly vascularized fasciocutaneous flap overlying the shoulder. The flap was first described in 1979 by Lamberty but did not gain popularity until much later due to lack of a reliable technique. The main advantages of using the SCF include avoiding microsurgical techniques, requiring only a single-stage operation, shorter operative time compared with alternative options, and a wider patient population including those with comorbidities who may be excluded from more extensive operations including free flaps surgeries. The SCF has been successfully performed on individuals with advanced age, poor nutrition, cachexia, obesity, diabetes, tobacco use, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, asthma, and steroid use. The largest disadvantages of the SCF include the possibility of distal tip necrosis, size limitation without pre-expansion, and a moderately visible donor site scar. The following review and meta-analysis of the SCF details its use historically as both an island and a pedicle flap, and its application in head and neck reconstruction.

Head and neck pedicled flap autonomization using a new high-resolution indocyanine green fluorescence video-angiography device

In head and neck oncologic surgery a reconstructive phase is often required and pedicled flaps are still a viable option, though they may need a pedicle division performed at a later stage. Several techniques are commonly used for perfusion assessment of the flaps, with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence video-angiography representing a promising tool. We used ICG video-angiography to evaluate the perfusion of two of the most commonly adopted pedicled flaps in the head and neck field (the supraclavicular and the paramedian forehead flap) before and after second-stage pedicle division, allowing a safer in-setting. Moreover, the new high-resolution device that we have employed added further accuracy to the traditional video-angiography, providing a real-time flap-to-normal skin ICG ratio. Indeed, ICG video-angiography proved to be a useful tool in head and neck reconstructive surgery and it may allow an earlier second-stage pedicle division.

A Surgical Alternative in the Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Perforation

Pharyngo-esophageal perforation is a rare, life-threatening complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery with an incidence estimated to be between 0.2 and 1.51%. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of this complication is the key to reduce morbidity and mortality, as the main prognostic factor is the interval between the onset of the fistula, diagnosis and treatment. Conservative management has shown encouraging results in small and localized defects, whereas surgical approaches using flaps are to be considered for most of the cases. However, there is no clear consensus on the first choice of treatment in esophageal perforation. This case report presents the use of a supra-clavicular fascio-cutaneous pedicled propeller flap as a patch combined to primary repair of a hypopharyngeal perforation, 10 years after anterior cervical spine arthrodesis.

Supraclavicular artery fascial flap (SAFF): a valuable tool in salvage total laryngectomy and hemipharyngolaryngectomy

Objective

To describe the surgical technique of the supraclavicular artery fascial flap (SAFF) and outcomes in neopharyngeal covering with overlay technique during salvage total laryngectomy for residual or recurrent carcinoma after chemo/radiation treatment.

Methods

Chart review of patients treated between October 2018 and February 2019 at two tertiary care hospitals. Variables extracted from patient records were age, gender, history of chemo/radiation therapy, neck dissection, surgical and postoperative complications. Outcomes measured were surgical time, postoperative complications and flap failure, oral intake start and patient discharge.

Results

Ten male patients were included. Median age was 64 years. All patients underwent salvage total laryngectomy and neopharyngeal covering with SAFF. Mean flap harvest time was 25 minutes. No surgical complications or flap failure were recorded. Oral intake was started on a median of post-operative day 10. No cases of pharyngocutaneous fistula were encountered.

Conclusions

SAFF is a reliable, easy and quick to harvest flap, which provides a good alternative to other pedicled and free flaps for hypopharyngeal coverage in laryngeal salvage surgery. Donor site morbidity is almost null and postoperative complications are very rare.

Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review management of flap loss in head and neck construction with free tissue transfer as compared with locoregional flap or conservative management.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to October 2019.

REVIEW METHODS

Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors. Articles were considered eligible if they included adequate reporting of flap management after flap loss and outcomes for survival of reconstruction, length of hospitalization, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 429 patients had acute flap failure in the perioperative period. The overall success with a secondary free flap was 93% (95% CI, 0.89-0.97; n = 26 studies, I² = 12.8%). There was no difference in hospitalization length after secondary reconstruction between free tissue transfer and locoregional flaps or conservative management (relative risk of hospitalization ≥2 weeks, 96%; 95% CI, 0.80-1.14; n = 3 studies, I² = 0). The pooled relative risk of perioperative complications following free tissue transfer was 0.60 when compared with locoregional flap or conservative management (95% CI, 0.40-0.92; n = 5 studies, I² = 0).

CONCLUSION

Salvage reconstruction with free tissue transfer has a high success rate. Second free flaps following flap failure had a similar length of hospitalization and lower overall complication rate than locoregional reconstruction or conservative management. A second free tissue transfer, when feasible, is likely a more reliable and effective procedure for salvage reconstruction.

Vascularized Clavicular Bone With Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap for Oromandibular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility of an original surgical technique for head and neck oncologic reconstruction utilizing a pedicled osteocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in a cadaver model.

METHOD

Cadaver dissection, Review of literature.

DESCRIPTION

Two fresh frozen cadavers, 1 male and 1 female, were used for the dissection. Prior to dissection, measurements were taken on length of clavicle and distance between clavicular articulations and mandibular landmarks with the head in a neutral position. The SCAIF flap was raised in a subfascial plane and a 4.0 cm partial thickness clavicular bone graft was harvested attached to the flap. The pedicle was identified and the length of the supraclavicular artery was noted. The skin paddle was tunneled into the floor of mouth and the bone was placed into a pre-cut 4.0 cm mandibular body defect and fixated with a 1.7 mm Stryker mandibular reconstruction plate.

RESULTS

The male cadaver clavicle measured 16.4 cm in length. The distance from the sternoclavicular joint (SC) to the angle and symphysis of the mandible was 15.3 cm and 15.0 cm, respectively. In this cadaver, the bony graft and the vascular pedicle was not of sufficient length to reach the mandibular defect after tracing the vascular pedicle to the thyrocervical trunk (TCT), which was 13.3 cm from the mandibular angle (MA). The female cadaver had an average clavicular length of 15.0 cm, SC to angle 10.5 cm and SC to symphysis 8.1 cm. The bony graft and the vascular pedicled effortlessly reached without tension, with TCT only 7.8 cm from the MA and allowed sufficient bone graft mobility for plating.

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric model, a novel approach utilizing an osteocutaneous SCAIF was shown as a feasible reconstruction option for oromandibular defects in selected patients. This technique is limited by the anatomical relationship between the neck and vascular pedicle length. Viability could be determined by pre-operative measurements, where the clavicular length should be significantly greater than the distance from SC to MA.

Management of two rare cases of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans arising in the parotid region

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare cutaneous tumour, accounting for less than 1% of malignant tumours of the head and neck region. This tumour rarely presents metastatic disease, but has a high recurrence rate. Therefore, wide surgical excision with microscopically free margins is the therapeutic gold standard. Only five cases are described in literature of this tumour arising in the parotid region, a site that presents challenges both in achieving a wide demolition and in reconstructing the resulting defect. Here we describe two cases of DFSP arising in the parotid region that were treated surgically, achieving microscopically free margins. Reconstruction of the vast skin defect was achieved by means of a supraclavicular artery island flap, with good functional and aesthetic results.

Use of the supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of maxillofacial defects: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Free flaps are widely used in maxillofacial reconstruction; however, this approach was not feasible in the current case. It was not possible because the free flap method requires microvascular anastomosis expertise, which is difficult, time-consuming and costly.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 86-year-old woman suffered squamous cell carcinoma on the right side of her face, which resulted in a large soft-tissue defect. Here, we present a case of facial reconstruction from the inferior margin of the jaw to the top of the head. The size of the defect was 18.5 cm × 7.5 cm, which is rare for a patient of this age in the maxillofacial area. We used the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIFP) which measured 19.3 cm × 8.3 cm to repair the defect. After the operation, the flap survived without complications. Then, the patient was followed for 10 months and was satisfied with the aesthetic and functional results at the donor and recipient sites following the tumour resection. The tumour did not recur, and facial nerve function was preserved.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide a new choice for the reconstruction of large defects of the head and face, and expand the potential applications of the SCAIFP.

Clinical management of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: patients not eligible for free flaps, a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue represents the most demanding treatment planning in head and neck surgery. Ablation followed by free flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard, but not all patients are suitable for this strategy. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive view of surgical reconstruction possibilities in patients not eligible for free flaps.

METHODS

Following PRISMA recommendations, a systematic literature review was conducted searching for original papers that investigated outcomes of patients treated by surgical ablation for tongue SCC followed by reconstruction with local or pedicled flaps. Selected papers were read and data extracted for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study design was case series in sixteen papers, cohort study in the remaining four. Four different local flaps (BMM, FAMM, NLIF, SMIF) and four regional flaps have been discussed in included studies (IHF, SFIF, SCM, PMMC).

CONCLUSION

The improved anatomical knowledge makes local flaps a reliable alternative to free tissue transfer in cases requiring small-/medium-sized defects. Regional flaps still represent cornerstones in reconstruction of the tongue. Ease of execution, costs-to-benefit ratio, low-rate complications, minimal donor site morbidity represent the best advantages choosing local/regional flaps.

Supraclavicular Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery

Free flaps have been considered as the gold standard for reconstruction of head and neck region after ablative oncologic surgery. However, the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium should also involve pedicled flaps for certain situations such as patients having comorbid diseases necessiating shorter duration of surgical procedure. The supraclavicular flap is a pedicled thin fasciacutaneous flap used to reconstruct the defects in head and neck area. The flap has advantages of wide rotation of arc, easy matching with skin color of recipient area and relatively shorter flap harvesting time. Its bloods supply depends on supraclavicular artery which is a branch of transverse cervical artery. Between August 2016 and September 2019, the pedicled supraclavicular flap was used to reconstruct 17 head and neck cancers patients after ablative oncologic surgery. In 15 patients this flap was primary choice and in 2 patients it was used as a salvage reconstructive tool. Two of 17 flaps had very distal partial necrosis. There was no total loss of any flap. Flap harvesting time was always less than 1 hour. Mean duration for drainage tube removal at the donor side was 5 days. Functional outcomes were perfect. In our suggestion pedicled supraclavicular flap is a very good alternative option to free flap reconstruction especially for skin and oral cavity defects.

Application of the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap for Fistulas in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Cancer With Prior Radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SAIF) in reconstructing pharyngocutaneous fistula in patients with laryngopharyngeal cancer with prior radiotherapy.

METHODS

Six patients with laryngopharyngeal cancer with pharyngocutaneous fistula due to previous radiotherapy and surgery during 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Initially, the fistula was treated conservatively. The SAIF was applied with double folding technique to reconstruct fistula in the patients who failed to heal after conservative treatment.

RESULTS

The fistulae closed in 4 patients after conservative treatment. After SAIF operation, fistula closure was achieved in the other 2 patients who received highest dose of radiation and had largest fistulae size. The flaps grew well and there were no donor-site complications in these 2 patients. All patients achieved oral feeding without any complications.

CONCLUSION

The SAIF is an effective and safe approach to reconstruct the pharyngocutaneous fistula after laryngopharyngeal surgery in patients with laryngopharyngeal cancer with previous radiotherapy, especially for those who have received high-dose radiation and have large fistula.

Head and Neck Tumor Resection and Free Flap Reconstruction in Low-Volume Center

OBJECTIVE

To determine the surgical outcomes of free tissue transfer surgery following head and neck tumor extirpation in a low-volume medical center.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent free tissue transfer surgery for head and neck cancer at Moanalua Medical Center from 2015 to 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME OF MEASURE

Free flap failure rate and free flap-related complications.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2018, there were 27 free tissue transfer surgery (mean 6.75 flap surgery/year). There were 2 events of partial flap necrosis, and no cases of total flap loss. One patient required leech therapy for venous congestion. One patient required additional free flap surgery. Two patients developed orocutaneous fistula that resolved with local wound care. One patient developed malocclusion following mandible reconstruction using fibular free flap. Overall free flap success rate was 96%.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the ability of small-volume centers to produce positive outcomes with few complications in head and neck cancer free flap reconstructive surgery. While the data are limited to a single surgical team in one care center, it provides additional support for the idea that there are factors beyond the surgical volume that determine outcome.

Use of a skin perforator flap pedicled by the intercostal muscle for reconstruction of a posterior cervical defect

A posterior cervical defect featuring exposed spinal and occipital bone can be covered in various ways. The "ideal" flap should be a low-morbidity, pedicled locoregional flap that can reach the occiput. Cervical adjuvant radiation therapy may limit the coverage options, because many pedicles are located in areas that are often irradiated. Here, we describe a new surgical technique; we used a skin perforator flap pedicled by the intercostal muscle to cover a posterior cervical defect in a patient with metastatic squamous cell lung carcinoma. This technique is a valuable option; the flap originated from outside the irradiated area and reached the occiput. It adds to the options for cervical coverage in patients who require head-and-neck reconstruction. EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE: Level V: opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.

Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Case Series and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is emerging as an efficient and reliable flap for various complex head and neck defects after tumor extirpation.

OBJECTIVE

To examine a series of cases using a SCAIF for head and reconstruction at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 8 patients who underwent SCAIF reconstruction of various head and neck defects from 2015 to 2018 at our institution. We also reviewed the English-language literature of reports of a SCAIF used for head and neck defects.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent SCAIF reconstruction of head and neck defects. Various anatomic sites were reconstructed including the neck (n = 4), oral cavity (n = 1), and parotid/lateral skull base (n = 3). Two patients had partial flap necrosis, requiring débridement and wound care. There was no total loss of the flap or donor-site complication.

CONCLUSION

SCAIF is an excellent choice for reconstructing various head and neck defects, with low complication rates and donor-site morbidity. The outcomes of our SCAIF reconstruction are comparable to previously published outcomes.

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction: an Italian multi-institutional experience

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a thin and pliable pedicled flap that is easy and quick to harvest. Thanks to its particular features and high reliability, it is best indicated for the elderly or most fragile patients. SCAIF is very versatile, as it can be used for reconstruction of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, facial and cervical skin and tracheostomal defects. We began using this flap in four Italian tertiary referral centres, with several indications, both as first treatment and as salvage surgery. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the easy reproducibility of the flap among four different centres. A series of 28 patients underwent head and neck reconstructions with SCAIF with no recorded complications during flap harvesting. After the very first cases, harvesting time was approximately 45 minutes; 24 patients had successful flap integration at the recipient site, while the remaining 4 suffered from partial flap necrosis, two of whom needed revision surgery. Other minor complications were reported at the recipient site, always at the most distal and most delicate portion of the flap. Donor site was always closed primarily, with only three cases of partial suture dehiscence. We only selected the most fragile patients for SCAIF reconstruction, such as the elderly or those with one or more comorbidities; for this reason, we reported some serious systemic complications and one intraoperative death. SCAIF is an easy reproducible flap, with multiple possible indications. Its use as an alternative to free flaps in the head and neck region is nowadays under discussion. Its use should be encouraged among head and neck surgeons thanks to its various advantages.

Head and neck reconstruction: The supraclavicular flap: technical note

INTRODUCTION

Defects reconstruction after oncologic resection is challenging and complex in head and neck tumors. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the use of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction, in particular, when traditional free flaps is not recommended.

METHODS

We reviewed our two years' experience of the use of SCAIF on a total of 15 cases. In 10 cases, it was used as an alternative to free flaps after head and neck tumors resection. In 5 cases, SCAIF was used for revision surgery after a free flap failure. The indications for flap use have been defects due to resection of stage II-IV cancer in the head and neck region. The operative site, time, complications and functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 15 patients with a total of 16 SCAIF. One patient had received bilateral SCAIF. Out of the patients, 10 were men and 5 were women. Head and neck oncologic patients underwent tumor resection followed by immediate reconstruction using SCAIF. Among those 15 patients, 10 received previous radiotherapy in the head and neck region. All the patients had undergone multiple surgical procedures. Mean flap dimensions were 6.0cm (range, 5-7cm) wide and 22.0cm (range, 14-26cm) long. The proximal part of the flap was de-epithelialized to match the defect, resulting in a mean skin paddle length of 8.0cm (range, 5-12cm). After an average follow-up duration of 13 months (range 3-20 months), the flap survival rate was 90%. Two patients had had a partial loss of the flap. All the flaps were harvested in less than one hour. The donor sites were closed primarily and did not require any additional surgery. No donor site wound dehiscence had been reported. No infection or cellulitis were observed. None of the patients reported any functional donor site morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The supraclavicular flap provides a safe option for head and neck reconstruction of oncologic defects when traditional free flap is not recommended. It is also an excellent alternative to radial forearm free flap (RFFF) in head and neck soft tissue reconstruction, especially in vessel-depleted neck.

Supraclavicular flap practice patterns and outcomes: A survey of 221 AHNS surgeons

OBJECTIVES

To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon supraclavicular flap (SCF) practice patterns and to identify variables associated with SCF complications.

METHODS

The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between November 11, 2016, and December 31, 2016. The primary outcome was frequency of SCF complications. Independent variables included demographics, training, practice patterns, and SCF techniques.

RESULTS

Adequate survey responses were obtained from 221 AHNS surgeons. Among these, 54.3% (n = 120) performed supraclavicular flaps (SCFs). Most surgeons used the SCF for cutaneous (n = 85; 78.7%) or parotid-temporal bone (n = 59; 54.6%) defects. Nearly one-third (n = 31; 29.8%) of surgeons experienced more than a "few" SCF complications. Surgeons experienced fewer pectoralis major flap (P < 0.001) and radial forearm free flap (P < 0.001) complications compared to SCF complications. Univariate analysis demonstrated no association between surgeons with "few" SCF complications and Doppler use in SCF design (P = 0.90), harvest location (P = 0.51), and pedicle skeletonization (P = 0.25). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that surgeons performing more than 30 SCFs compared to less than or equal to 30 SCFs had a greater odds of having "few" SCF complications (odds ratio 7.1, 95% confidence interval [1.1-43.9], P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

A majority of surgeons performing SCFs use the flap to reconstruct cutaneous and parotid-temporal bone defects. The significance of relatively higher SCF complications compared to other routine flaps should be explored further. Surgeon experience with the SCF appears to be significantly associated with SCF success, whereas training characteristics, practice patterns, and technical variations may not be associated with SCF outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 129:2012-2019, 2019.

Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Despite the resurgence in regional flap use, otolaryngology resident regional flap experience has been incompletely studied. We sought to characterize United States (US) otolaryngology resident exposure to, and perceptions of, supraclavicular flaps (SCFs), submental flaps (SMFs), and other regional flaps.

METHODS

An online survey was disseminated every two weeks to 106 US otolaryngology residency program directors for distribution to residents within their programs between August and October 2016. 121 surveys were returned of which 106 were sufficiently completed and eligible for data analysis.

RESULTS

Among residents with adequate responses, 52 were postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3 (junior) residents and 54 were PGY 4-7 (senior) residents. Senior residents participated in more pectoralis major flaps (mean: 8.1, 95%-CI: 6.5-9.8) compared to SCFs (mean: 1.5, 95%-CI: 1.0-2.0, p < 0.001) and SMFs (mean: 0.7; 95%-CI: 0.4-1.0, p < 0.001). Among senior residents exposed to SCFs, SMFs and pectoralis flaps, more individuals judged pectoralis major flaps as successful or very successful (96.2%, 95%-CI: 91.1-100%), compared to SCFs (64.3%, 95%-CI: 46.5-82.0%; p < 0.001) and SMFs (63.2%, 95%-CI: 41.5-84.8%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Senior otolaryngology residents were exposed to fewer SCFs and SMFs compared to pectoralis major flaps. Resident perception that SCFs and SMFs were not as successful as pectoralis major flaps should be investigated further.

Shoulder Morbidity in Patients after Head and Neck Reconstruction with the Pedicled Supraclavicular Island Flap

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

The pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for reconstruction of the head and neck has been shown to be a pliable alternative to established pedicled flaps, such as the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Because there are limited published data regarding shoulder morbidity after SCAIF procedure, we aimed to investigate it with 2 established questionnaires for the upper extremity [Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) score].

Methods:

The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of patients who received a defect reconstruction by SCAIF. Analyzed parameters were demographics, comorbidities, donor-site morbidity and shoulder morbidity in terms of range of motion, pain, strength, and daily activities evaluated and compared between the donor site and contralateral arm.

Results:

Of the 61 consecutively performed head and neck reconstructions with SCAIF, 20 met inclusion criteria (curative intended treatment, head and neck squamous cell cancer, follow-up time more than 4 months). Mean follow-up was 17.3 months (±10.4 months) ranging from 4–35 months. Donor-site complication rate was low with 5% major (surgical revision) and 30% minor complications (conservative management). Overall Constant-Murley-Score (P = 0.334), pain (P = 0.150), overall range of motion (P = 0.861), and strength of the extremity (P = 0.638) of the shoulder receiving a SCAIF showed no significant differences to the contralateral extremity. Mean of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure score was 32.5 (±28.6).

Conclusion:

The results of the present study suggest very low shoulder morbidity in patients after SCAIF procedure with no significant functional impairment of the donor shoulder compared with the contralateral side.

[Research progress of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection]

Objective

To summarize the current status of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection, and to present its application prospects.

Methods

Related literature was reviewed, and the role evolution of pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of head and neck defects were discussed. The advance, anatomical basis, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and modification of several frequently used pedicled flaps were summarized.

Results

The evolution of pedicled flaps application showed a resurgence trend in recent years. Some new pedicled flaps, e.g., submental artery island flap, supraclavicular artery island flap, submandibular gland flap, and facial artery musculomucosal flap, can acquire equivalent or even superior outcome to free flaps in certain cases. Technological modification of some traditional pedicled flaps, e.g., nasolabial flap, pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, temporalis myofascial flap, and temporoparietal fascial flap, can further broaden their indications. These traditional flaps still occupy an irreplaceable role, especially in patients with poor condition and institution with immature microsurgical techniques.

Conclusion

The pedicled flaps still plays an important role in head and neck reconstruction after tumor resection. In certain cases, they demonstrate some advantages over free flaps, e.g., more convenient harvest, more rapid recovery, less expenditure, and better functional and aesthetic effect.

Update on the supraclavicular flap

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study is to describe the supraclavicular flap and its utility in head and neck reconstruction in the context of recent studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature regarding the supraclavicular flap has described its expanded uses in a variety of head and neck reconstructive settings. Its reliability and limited morbidity have been well demonstrated, and it has been cited as a reasonable alternative to other reconstructive options including, in some situations, free tissue transfer.

SUMMARY

The supraclavicular flap has shown dependability in reconstruction of defects in the head and neck, and it warrants consideration among reconstructive surgeons, especially for circumstances in which free tissue or other pedicled flaps are less than ideal.