Reply to the comment on: "Efficiency of bimaxillary advancement surgery in increasing the volume of the upper airways: a systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis"

Efficiency of maxillomandibular advancement for the treatment of obstructive apnea syndrome: a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficiency of maxillomandibular advancement using aggregated individual patient data from multiple studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This overview was structured according to the PICO strategy. It adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist and was recorded on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO-CRD42020206135). Searches were conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, and Cochrane databases for studies published until January 1, 2021. Data from the included studies were collected by one author, while another reviewed the compilation.

RESULTS

Twelve systematic reviews were included. The outcome measures studied were the apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory disturbance index, mean oxygen saturation, lowest oxygen saturation, sleepiness data, posterior air space, sella-nasion point A angle, sella-nasion point B angle, surgical success, and surgical cure in patients who underwent surgery. The AMSTAR scale presented moderate evaluations, with grades varying between 6 and 10 points. The Glenny scale revealed that the study selection did not include all languages. Only three reviews identified quality assessments conducted by at least two reviewers and only five related possible searches for unpublished data.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimaxillary advancement surgery improved respiratory indicators, sleepiness data, and increased upper airway size. However, it is necessary to standardize the surgical criteria to establish measurable efficiency of the procedure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This overview makes a critical analysis of the results of the selected systematic reviews with the aim of presenting the most clinically relevant data on the maxillomandibular advancement for treating obstructive apnea syndrome, with a focus on improving respiratory, anatomical, and quality of life indices. There are no overviews that approach this theme from a well-structured perspective.

Is Maxillomandibular Advancement Associated With Comorbidity Reduction in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea?

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether patients with documented obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have a decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) score and self-reported symptoms after maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) with genial tubercle advancement (GTA) also have a change in their medical comorbidity profile a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Changes in the quantity of medical diagnoses, quantity of prescription medications, and average weight and body mass index (BMI) were assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of OSA (AHI score >5 on polysomnogram [PSG]) treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA) with MMA and GTA from 2001 through 2015. Patients were identified through the oral and maxillofacial surgery patient data registry. Inclusion criteria were the availability of complete clinical records and requisite follow-up time. The primary predictor variable was operative status (preoperative or postoperative). The primary outcome variables were comorbidities reported to be associated with OSA and identified in the authors' previous study (J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76:1999.e1, 2018). Two-tailed paired t tests were used for continuous variables and χ² or Fisher exact tests were used for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (39 men, 7 women) met the inclusion criteria. Average weight (206.7 ± 42.4 lb preoperatively; 213.8 ± 41.7 lb postoperatively; P = .014) and average BMI (30.0 ± 5.7 kg/m² preoperatively; 30.9 ± 5.3 kg/m² postoperatively; P = .041) significantly increased in patients postoperatively. No meaningful changes in the number of medical diagnoses or number of prescription medications were noted. Stratification of patients by BMI showed significant increases in weight (188.6 ± 21.5 lb preoperatively; 200.1 ± 27.9 lb postoperatively; P = .0085) and BMI (27.1 ± 1.44 kg/m² preoperatively; 28.9 ± 3.52 kg/m² postoperatively; P = .013) only in "overweight" patients. No other parameters were found to be relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective improvement in OSA symptoms was reported by all patients and objective PSG improvement was reported for 71% of those evaluated. However, no relevant changes in comorbidity profile were found, suggesting that the medical conditions commonly observed with OSA are likely of multifocal etiology.

Controversies in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic disease characterized by repetitive pharyngeal collapse during sleep. OSA is associated with cardiovascular disease and increased mortality, among other issues. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered first line therapy for OSA, but is not always tolerated. Both non-surgical and surgical alternative management strategies are available for the CPAP intolerant patient. This article explores controversies surrounding airway evaluation, definition of successful treatment, and surgical management of the CPAP intolerant patient with moderate to severe OSA. Controversies specific to maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) are also discussed.