1
|
Alzhrani F, Aljazeeri I, Abdelsamad Y, Alsanosi A, Kim AH, Ramos-Macias A, Ramos-de-Miguel A, Kurz A, Lorens A, Gantz B, Buchman CA, Távora-Vieira D, Sprinzl G, Mertens G, Saunders JE, Kosaner J, Telmesani LM, Lassaletta L, Bance M, Yousef M, Holcomb MA, Adunka O, Thomasen PC, Skarzynski PH, Rajeswaran R, Briggs RJ, Oh SH, Plontke S, O’Leary SJ, Agrawal S, Yamasoba T, Lenarz T, Wesarg T, Kutz W, Connolly P, Anderson I, Hagr A. International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery. Ear Hear 2024; 45:1418-1426. [PMID: 38915137 PMCID: PMC11487033 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements. DESIGN A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence. RESULTS Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement. CONCLUSIONS A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Alzhrani
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Isra Aljazeeri
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Aljaber Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Specialized Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
- Isra Aljazeeri shared first author
| | - Yassin Abdelsamad
- Research Department, Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Alsanosi
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ana H. Kim
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angel Ramos-Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Angel Ramos-de-Miguel
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Artur Lorens
- Word Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Bruce Gantz
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery/Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Craig A. Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital St. Poelten, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - James E. Saunders
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Julie Kosaner
- Meders Speech and Hearing Clinic, Meders İşitme ve Konuşma Merkezi, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Laila M. Telmesani
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manohar Bance
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Medhat Yousef
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Audiology Unit, ENT Department, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Meredith A. Holcomb
- Hearing Implant Program, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Oliver Adunka
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Per Cayé- Thomasen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland
- Center of Hearing and Speech “Medincus,” Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Ranjith Rajeswaran
- Madras ENT Research Foundation MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing, Chennai, India
| | - Robert J. Briggs
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Seung-Ha Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Stefan Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stephen J. O’Leary
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tatsuya Yamasoba
- Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Wesarg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Walter Kutz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ilona Anderson
- Clinical Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsuji RK, Hamerschmidt R, Lavinsky J, Felix F, Silva VAR. Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 91:101512. [PMID: 39442262 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To make evidence-based recommendations for the indications and complications of Cochlear Implant (CI) surgery in adults and children. METHODS Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on cochlear implantation were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions. RESULTS The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) Evaluation of candidate patients and indications for CI surgery; (2) CI surgery - techniques and complications. CONCLUSIONS CI is a safe device for auditory rehabilitation of patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. In recent years, indications for unilateral hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma have been expanded, with encouraging results. However, for a successful surgery, commitment of family members and patients in the hearing rehabilitation process is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robinson Koji Tsuji
- Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Rogério Hamerschmidt
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Joel Lavinsky
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Departamento de Ciências Morfológicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Felippe Felix
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Vagner Antonio Rodrigues Silva
- Universidade de Campinas (Unicamp), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patel S, Walters B, Kim V, Walijee H. Immediate Facial Nerve Palsy Secondary to Otological Surgery: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:619-626. [PMID: 38865718 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Iatrogenic facial nerve palsy following otological surgery is a devastating complication that results in adverse aesthetic and functional outcomes. This study aims to review studies that have reported cases of immediate facial nerve palsy to learn why and where injuries occurred and to assess outcomes following management. DATABASES REVIEWED MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Pubmed up to June 20, 2023. METHODS Clinical studies of immediate facial nerve palsies following middle ear and cochlear implantation surgery were included. Risk of bias was examined using the Brazzelli risk of bias tool. Due to the inconsistency in reporting of outcomes, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS Of 234 studies identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The most common causes of injury were excessive drilling, use of sharp hooks to remove disease, or disorientation of the surgeon secondary to bleeding or inflammation. Variable usage of preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging and intraoperative facial nerve monitoring was reported. The tympanic segment was the most common site of injury. A variety of surgical techniques were employed to approach the facial nerve injury including facial nerve decompression, direct closure, and repair using an autologous nerve graft. CONCLUSIONS Otological surgeons should consider utilizing preoperative CT imaging to establish a three-dimensional mental image of key landmarks and anatomical variations before embarking on surgery. Intraoperative FN monitoring enables safe practice. Despite these measures, complex disease processes and hostile intraoperative conditions can present difficulty. Multiple treatment options are available to treat the underlying injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Patel
- Department of ENT, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Walters
- Department of ENT, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Valerie Kim
- Department of ENT, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom
| | - Hussein Walijee
- Department of ENT, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shahabaddin L, Al-Jaaf S, Emin A. Intraoperative Difficulties and Postoperative Complications Associated With Cochlear Implantations: A Study From Erbil City. Cureus 2024; 16:e52106. [PMID: 38213935 PMCID: PMC10783599 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Cochlear implants are highly effective for the treatment of severe to profound hearing loss. Cochlear implant surgery is a safe surgical procedure; however, due to many modifications over the years, it has been associated with certain minor and major complications. This study aimed to examine the intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications in patients who received cochlear implants in Erbil City. Methods We conducted a retrospective descriptive study regarding complications of cochlear implants involving patients who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear Implants at the Rizgary Teaching Hospital and a private hospital in Erbil City from January 2013 to July 2022. Their medical records were analyzed, and data on demographics, intraoperative difficulties, and postoperative complications were gathered. Results A total of 160 patients with cochlear implants (87 male, 54.4%; 73 female, 45.6%) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was 6.76 ± 8.02 years (range: 1-53 years); 150 of these patients were children and 10 were adults (18 years and above). Intraoperative difficulties occurred in five patients (3.1%). The overall rate of complication was 10%, 7.5% of which was minor (the most common being wound infection) and 2.5% major (the most frequent being device extrusion). Conclusions Cochlear implant surgery is a safe procedure performed to treat profoundly deaf patients. It is associated with a low rate of complications, most of which can be successfully managed with conservative measures or minimal intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Shahabaddin
- Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, IRQ
| | - Said Al-Jaaf
- Otolaryngology, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, IRQ
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Kumar A, Singh RK. Institutional Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Deprived Population. Cureus 2022; 14:e31853. [PMID: 36579265 PMCID: PMC9789532 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implantation (CI) surgeries are safe and performed successfully in many patients; however, postoperative complications still occur, which may be influenced by socioeconomic and demographic variables. Methodology: This is a retrospective observational study of 146 adults and children with hearing loss, who had CI surgery between 2017 and 2022. This study aims to assess the frequency and nature of surgical complications in patients from a low socioeconomic background who underwent CI surgery in different geographic areas. For the analysis of data, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used. RESULT A total of 146 candidates were evaluated, out of which 82 were male (56.16%) and 64 (43.84%) were female. The age of patients at the time of surgery ranged from 1-50 years. All of the patients underwent unilateral CI. Eighteen implanted patients developed minor complications with an incidence rate of 12.31%. There were no major complications observed. Further, we did not observe any post-operative meningitis as our study group was vaccinated against pneumococcal and meningococcal diseases and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib). CONCLUSION CI is an effective and safe surgical procedure for the treatment and rehabilitation of people who are deaf. It is possible to avoid complications by using meticulous surgical methods and regular post-operative monitoring to identify and treat any issues as soon as possible, regardless of socioeconomic status.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lovin BD, Sweeney AD, Chapel AC, Alfonso K, Govil N, Liu YCC. Effects of Age on Delayed Facial Palsy After Otologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2022; 131:1092-1101. [PMID: 34706584 DOI: 10.1177/00034894211053966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report 4 cases of delayed facial palsy (DFP) after pediatric middle ear (ME) surgery and systematically review and analyze the associated literature to evaluate the effects of age on DFP etiology, management, and prognosis. METHODS Systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase for articles related to DFP after cochlear implantation (CI) was performed. These articles were assessed for level of evidence, methodological limitations, and number of cases. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of age on DFP incidence. Furthermore, a comprehensive list of all pediatric DFP cases after otologic surgery was assembled through a multi-institutional retrospective review and systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles fit the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The incidence of DFP after CI was 0.23% and 1.01% for pediatric and adult cases, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P < .001, odds ratio 4.36). Twenty-three cases, adding to the 4 presented herein, were suitable for a comprehensive list. The mean age was 6.9 years. Average postoperative day of paresis onset was 5.4, with an average maximum House-Brackmann grade of 3.5. All patients obtained full facial recovery after an average of 23.5 days. CONCLUSIONS The systematic review demonstrates that DFP after pediatric CI is rare and occurs at a significantly lower rate than in adults, further supporting the viral reactivation hypothesis of DFP. The prognosis for pediatric DFP after otologic surgery is excellent, with a high rate of full recovery in a short time frame. However, steroid administration can be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IIa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Lovin
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alex D Sweeney
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery-Head and Neck Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kristan Alfonso
- Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nandini Govil
- Pediatric Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yi-Chun Carol Liu
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery-Head and Neck Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sahai I, Ghosh B, Anjankar A. A Spectrum of Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications of Cochlear Implants: A Critical Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e28151. [PMID: 36148185 PMCID: PMC9482671 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
A cochlear implant is a neuroprosthetic, electrical device that is developed for the treatment of patients who have sensory hearing loss. It directly stimulates the hearing nerve by bypassing the injured or damaged sensory receptors, the hair cells. This implant is directly placed in the inner ear. It is an electronic device which is proved to be very useful in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. This implant consists of a speech processor (externally present), which takes up the sound; transforms it into digital signals, and then internal components take it to convert it into electrical energy, which stimulates auditory nerves, and the brain perceives it and hears it as a sound. This is one of the most successful surgeries, which happens very frequently nowadays. Although, many complications are mostly associated with this implant. This paper deals with the preoperative, operative, and postoperative complications associated with cochlear implant surgery. That includes tinnitus, Meniere's disease, unilateral hearing loss, musical ear syndrome, infections; flap necrosis, facial nerve palsy, improper electrode placement, magnet displacement; failure and re-implantation, cholesteatoma, and pneumocephalus. These are just a few of the complications; there are much more complications which are associated with cochlear implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isha Sahai
- Otolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Benumadhab Ghosh
- Otolaryngology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| | - Ashish Anjankar
- Biochemistry, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Poutoglidis A, Fyrmpas G, Vlachtsis K, Paraskevas GK, Lazaridis N, Keramari S, Garefis K, Dimakis C, Tsetsos N. The role of the endoscope in cochlear implantation. A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2021; 47:708-716. [PMID: 34971491 DOI: 10.1111/coa.13909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the role of the endoscope in cochlear implantation (CI). METHODS MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library databases as well as other sources were searched by two independent reviewers. Studies including patients undergoing either exclusively endoscopic or endoscopic ally assisted CI were eligible for inclusion. Endoscopic CI approaches and postoperative complications were the primary outcomes. Secondary endpoints included the degree of round window (RW) microscopic visualization according to St Thomas' Hospital classification as well as type of cochleostomy for electrode insertion in the scala tympani (ST). RESULTS Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 191 endoscopic or endoscopically assisted CI cases. The endoscope was used for better visualization of the RW across all included studies, facilitated the insertion of the electrode in the ST and spared a mastoidectomy in a number of cases. No facial nerve palsy was reported in any of the studies. The most common complication was external auditory canal/ tympanic membrane tear followed by chorda tympani injury. CONCLUSION The microscopic CI approach is still the gold standard. The endoscope facilitates the recognition of the RW area and leads to successful and safe implantation particularly in difficult anatomical scenarios, ear malformations and advanced otosclerosis. Endoscopically assisted CI procedures offer the opportunity to avoid a posterior tympanotomy and reduce the risk of facial nerve injury. To date, the lack of long term data does not permit the widespread adoption of completely endoscopic CI procedures without a mastoidectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Poutoglidis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Fyrmpas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Vlachtsis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George K Paraskevas
- Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Lazaridis
- Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stergiani Keramari
- Second Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Garefis
- Second Academic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christodoulos Dimakis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Naval Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Tsetsos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, "G. Papanikolaou" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ellsperman SE, Zwolan TA, Telian SA. Rehabilitation for unilateral deafness - Narrative review comparing a novel bone conduction solution with existing options. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42:103060. [PMID: 33932625 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients with single sided deafness (SSD) struggle with sound localization and speech in noise. Existing treatment options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, percutaneous bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs), passive transcutaneous BCHDs, active BCHDs, and cochlear implants. Implanted devices provide benefits in speech in noise compared to CROS devices. Percutaneous BCHDs transmit sound efficiently but have aesthetic drawbacks and skin complications. Scalp attenuation impacts passive transcutaneous BCHD performance. Active BCHDs overcome these issues and provide benefits for speech in noise. Cochlear implantation is the only existing option that restores binaural input but introduces electrical rather than acoustic stimuli to the deaf ear. Active BCHDs have been designed to maintain efficient sound transmission and avoid chronic skin irritation and cosmetic concerns that may occur with percutaneous BCHDs. Cochlear implantation may be a superior option for recently deafened SSD patients, though this requires further study. The duration of deafness, patient age and comorbidities, and a shared decision-making model among patients, surgeons, and audiologists should be considered in device selection. The aim of this manuscript is to review available devices, discuss surgical considerations for implantable devices, review available published results for speech in noise and sound quality with each device, and provide an overview to guide shared decision making for patients and providers. This review consolidates available literature and reviews experience with a newer active transcutaneous active BCHD available for use in the SSD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Ellsperman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan, United States of America.
| | - Terry A Zwolan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan, United States of America.
| | - Steven A Telian
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ishikawa Y, Hosoya M, Kanzaki S, Ogawa K. Delayed facial palsy after cochlear implantation caused by reactivation of Herpesvirus: A case report and review of the literature. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021; 49:880-884. [PMID: 33736888 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implantation has many complications; however, delayed facial palsy is relatively rare. In this report, we present the case of a 60-year-old woman with delayed facial palsy after cochlear implantation. Eleven days after the operation, the patient complained of right facial palsy (Yanagihara score 6, House-Brackmann [HB] grade VI). Herpes virus reactivation and local bacterial infection were considered as possible causes of the facial paralysis. A blood test revealed an increase in viral antibody titer, and the patient was diagnosed as having herpes virus reactivation. She was treated with antiviral therapy for the facial palsy until resolution. Slight mouth weakness continued even at 1.5 months (Yanagihara score 34, HB II) but eventually resolved at 3 months (Yanagihara score 40, HB I). Delayed facial palsy is a rare but serious complication that can occur with viral reactivation regardless of the competence of the surgical procedure. Therefore, it is important to inform patients preoperatively regarding the risk of not only immediate but also delayed postoperative facial paralysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yui Ishikawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Makoto Hosoya
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Sho Kanzaki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Kaoru Ogawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Connor SEJ, Borri M, Pai I, Barnsley H. 'Black Bone' magnetic resonance imaging as a novel technique to aid the pre-operative planning of posterior tympanotomy for cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 22:35-41. [PMID: 33028179 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1823126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: 'Black Bone' magnetic resonance imaging (BB MRI) is a novel sequence developed as an alternative to computed tomography (CT) for osseous imaging. We explored its potential utilisation in the pre-operative surgical planning of posterior tympanotomy for cochlear implantation through depiction of the mastoid facial nerve (mFN) canal and the posterior canaliculus of the chorda tympani (ChT), thus defining the facial recess. Methods: Twenty five adult patients were prospectively imaged with a dedicated BB MRI sequence. A consensus qualitative BB MRI 'visibility score' for the confidence of demonstration of the mFN canal and the posterior canaliculus of the ChT was recorded, as well as a 'corresponding score' to determine whether the neural structures on BB MRI corresponded to the paths of the nerves on a previous CT study. Results/discussion: The BB MRI sequence was able to clearly delineate the course of mFN in 100% of cases and that of ChT in 72%, with their courses corresponding to those depicted on CT in almost all cases. Maximum intensity projections with 7 mm slabs provided the optimal simultaneous demonstration of mFN, ChT and round window along the posterior tympanotomy surgical approach. Conclusion: The proposed BB MRI sequence reliably depicts mFN and ChT in the majority of cases, with a performance comparable to that of CT. It is proposed that it will be a useful adjunct to MRI protocols as part of cochlear implant assessment in those centres where CT is not routinely performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E J Connor
- Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.,School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences Clinical Academic Group, King's College London, UK
| | - M Borri
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences Clinical Academic Group, King's College London, UK
| | - I Pai
- St Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Barnsley
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences Clinical Academic Group, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Humphries T, Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Rathmann C. Global Regulatory Review Needed for Cochlear Implants: A Call for FDA Leadership. Matern Child Health J 2020; 24:1345-1359. [PMID: 32876813 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-03002-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Using the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as example, we argue that regulatory agencies worldwide should review their guidance on cochlear implants (CIs). METHODS This is a position paper, thus the methods are strictly argumentation. Here we give the motivation for our recommendation. The FDA's original approval of implantation in prelingually deaf children was granted without full benefit of information on language acquisition, on childcaregiver communication, and on the lived experience of being deaf. The CI clinical trials, accordingly, did not address risks of linguistic deprivation, especially when the caregiver's communication is not fully accessible to the prelingually deaf child. Wide variability in the effectiveness of CIs since initial and updated approval has been indicated but has not led to new guidance. Children need to be exposed frequently and regularly to accessible natural language while their brains are still plastic enough to become fluent in any language. For the youngest infants, who are not yet producing anything that could be called language although they might be producing salient social signals (Goldstein et al. Child Dev 80:636-644, 2009), good comprehension of communication from caregiver to infant is critical to the development of language. Sign languages are accessible natural languages that, because they are visual, allow full immersion for deaf infants, and they supply the necessary support for this comprehension. The main language contributor to health outcomes is this combination of natural visual language and comprehension in communication. Accordingly, in order to prevent possible language deprivation, all prelingually deaf children should be exposed to both sign and spoken languages when their auditory status is detected, with sign language being critical during infancy and early childhood. Additionally, all caregivers should be given support to learn a sign language if it is new to them so that they can comprehend their deaf children's language expressions fully. However, both languages should be made accessible in their own right, not combined in a simultaneous or total communication approach since speaking one language and signing the other at the same time is problematic. RESULTS Again, because this is a position paper, our results are our recommendations. We call for the FDA (and similar agencies in other countries) to review its approval of cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children who are within the sensitive period for language acquisition. In the meantime, the FDA should require manufacturers to add a highlighted warning to the effect that results with CI vary widely and CIs should not be relied upon to provide adequate auditory input for complete language development in all deaf children. Recent best information on users' experience with CIs (including abandonment) should be clearly provided so that informed decisions can be made. The FDA should require manufacturers' guidance and information materials to include encouragement to parents of deaf children to offer auditory input of a spoken language and visual input of a sign language and to have their child followed closely from birth by developmental specialists in language and cognition. In this way parents can align with providers to prioritize cognitive development and language access in both audio-vocal and visuo-gestural modalities. DISCUSSION The arguments and recommendations in this paper are discussed at length as they come up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Humphries
- Education Studies and Department of Communication, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Gaurav Mathur
- Department of Linguistics, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Donna Jo Napoli
- Department of Linguistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA.
| | - Christian Rathmann
- Department of Deaf Studies and Sign Language Interpreting, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ozaki A, Haginomori SI, Ayani Y, Ichihara T, Inui T, Jin-Nin T, Inaka Y, Kawata R. Facial nerve course in the temporal bone: Anatomical relationship between the tympanic and mastoid portions for safe ear surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 2020; 47:800-806. [PMID: 32475630 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Avoidance of iatrogenic injury to the facial nerve is crucial during ear surgery. The anatomical relationship between the tympanic portion of the facial canal (FC) and the mastoid portion of the facial nerve was analyzed using multi-slice computed tomography (CT) scans to avoid iatrogenic facial nerve injury. METHODS In total, 364 ears of 351 patients who underwent CT scans were enrolled. The 364 ears were divided into two groups: 281 ears with middle ear inflammation (MEI) and 83 ears without middle ear inflammation (non-MEI). The anatomical relationship between the tympanic portion of the FC and mastoid portion of the facial nerve was analyzed on multi-slice CT images. The ears were categorized into three subgroups based on the course of the mastoid portion of the facial nerve to the tympanic portion of the FC: ("lateral running course", LRC), "on the tympanic line course" (OL), and "medial running course" (MRC). The proportions of ears in each subgroup were compared between the MEI and non-MEI groups. RESULTS Overall, 15% of ears were categorized as LRC, 30% were OL, and 55% were MRC. In the MEI group, the proportions of LRC, OL, and MRC ears were 17%, 32%, and 51%, respectively, whereas they were 7%, 24%, and 69% in the non-MEI group. The proportion of LRC ears in the MEI group was significantly higher than that in the non-MEI group. CONCLUSIONS Especially in patients with MEI, a more LRC for the facial nerve increases the risk of facial nerve injury during posterior tympanotomy or canal wall down mastoidectomy. The course of the facial nerve in the temporal bone should be evaluated before surgery on multi-slice CT images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiko Ozaki
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Haginomori
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Ayani
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Ichihara
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Takaki Inui
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Jin-Nin
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Yuko Inaka
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Ryo Kawata
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chauvelot J, Laurent C, Le Coz G, Jehl JP, Tran N, Szczetynska M, Moufki A, Bonnet AS, Parietti-Winkler C. Morphological validation of a novel bi-material 3D-printed model of temporal bone for middle ear surgery education. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:304. [PMID: 32355748 PMCID: PMC7186742 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background A new model of 3D-printed temporal bone with an innovative distinction between soft and hard tissues is described and presented in the present study. An original method is reported to quantify the model's ability to reproduce the complex anatomy of this region. Methods A CT-scan of temporal bone was segmented and prepared to obtain 3D files adapted to multi-material printing technique. A final product was obtained with two different resins differentiating hard from soft tissues. The reliability of the anatomy was evaluated by comparing the original CT-scan and the pre-processed files sent to the printer in a first step, and by quantifying the printing technique in a second step. Firstly, we evaluated the segmentation and mesh correction steps by segmenting each anatomical region in the CT-scan by two different other operators without mesh corrections, and by computing distances between the obtained geometries and the pre-processed ones. Secondly, we evaluated the printing technique by comparing the printed geometry imaged using µCT with the pre-processed one. Results The evaluation of the segmentation and mesh correction steps revealed that the distance between both geometries was globally less that one millimeter for each anatomical region and close to zero for regions such as temporal bone, semicircular canals or facial nerve. The evaluation of the printing technique revealed mismatches of 0.045±0.424 mm for soft and -0.093±0.240 mm for hard tissues between the initial prepared geometry and the actual printed model. Conclusions While other reported models for temporal bone are simpler and have only been validated subjectively, we objectively demonstrated in the present study that our novel artificial bi-material temporal bone is consistent with the anatomy and thus could be considered into ENT surgical education programs. The methodology used in this study is quantitative, inspired by engineer sciences, making it the first of its kind. The validity of the manufacturing process has also been verified and could, therefore, be extended to other specialties, emphasizing the importance of cross-disciplinary collaborations concerning new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Chauvelot
- ENT Department, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Cedric Laurent
- CNRS, LEM3, UMR 7239, University of Lorraine, Metz, France
| | - Gaël Le Coz
- CNRS, LEM3, UMR 7239, University of Lorraine, Metz, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Jehl
- CNRS, IJL, UMR 7198, University of Lorraine, Campus Artem, Nancy, France
| | - Nguyen Tran
- School of Surgery Nancy-Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ansó J, Dür C, Apelt M, Venail F, Scheidegger O, Seidel K, Rohrbach H, Forterre F, Dettmer MS, Zlobec I, Weber K, Matulic M, Zoka-Assadi M, Huth M, Caversaccio M, Weber S. Prospective Validation of Facial Nerve Monitoring to Prevent Nerve Damage During Robotic Drilling. Front Surg 2019; 6:58. [PMID: 31632981 PMCID: PMC6781655 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Facial nerve damage has a detrimental effect on a patient's life, therefore safety mechanisms to ensure its preservation are essential during lateral skull base surgery. During robotic cochlear implantation a trajectory passing the facial nerve at <0.5 mm is needed. Recently a stimulation probe and nerve monitoring approach were developed and introduced clinically, however for patient safety no trajectory was drilled closer than 0.4 mm. Here we assess the performance of the nerve monitoring system at closer distances. In a sheep model eight trajectories were drilled to test the setup followed by 12 trajectories during which the ENT surgeon relied solely on the nerve monitoring system and aborted the robotic drilling process if intraoperative nerve monitoring alerted of a distance <0.1 mm. Microcomputed tomography images and histopathology showed prospective use of the technology prevented facial nerve damage. Facial nerve monitoring integrated in a robotic system supports the surgeon's ability to proactively avoid damage to the facial nerve during robotic drilling in the mastoid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ansó
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cilgia Dür
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mareike Apelt
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Venail
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Kathleen Seidel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Helene Rohrbach
- Vetsuisse Faculty, Veterinary Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Franck Forterre
- Vetsuisse Faculty, Veterinary Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Inti Zlobec
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Markus Huth
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Halawani R, Aldhafeeri A, Alajlan S, Alzhrani F. Complications of post-cochlear implantation in 1027 adults and children. Ann Saudi Med 2019; 39:77-81. [PMID: 30955015 PMCID: PMC6464671 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2019.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of cochlear implant (CI) recipients is increasing so there needs to be greater awareness of possible CI complications. OBJECTIVES Describe complications of CI. DESIGN Retrospective, descriptional. SETTINGS Tertiary health care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data was collected by retrospective chart review on complications for recipients implanted for the period from January 2006 to June 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Major and minor post cochlear implantation complications. SAMPLE SIZE 1027 cochlear implant recipients. RESULTS Post-operative complications were reported in 105 patients (10.2%). Minor complications were most often encountered (9.5%). Swelling (wound seroma or hematoma) was the most common complication. The major complication rate was only 7/105, 0.7%. Meningitis did not occur and cholesteatoma occurred in only one patient. CONCLUSION CI is a safe surgical procedure at our center. We believe that this is probably due to the preoperative protocol, the surgical technique used, and the postoperative care conducted for all our patients. Despite this, it is important that both physicians and patients have knowledge of the possible consequences and risks posed by CI, especially in view of the fact that these patients require lifetime follow-up. LIMITATIONS Further studies are needed, and should include more ENT centers across all regions of Saudi Arabia. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roa Halawani
- Dr. Roa Halawani King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine,, King Saud University,, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, PO Box 245 Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia, T: +966 1 477 5735, , ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-48044286
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Delayed-onset facial nerve paresis following cochlear implantation: case report and literature review. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2018; 132:1150-1152. [PMID: 30565529 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215118002074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Facial nerve paresis is rare following cochlear implantation. Mechanisms underlying delayed-onset facial paresis are poorly understood. This paper describes the case of a patient who developed facial nerve paresis three years after implantation. A literature review was performed with the aim of identifying any similar cases. METHODS The patient case is reported, and the literature reviewed using PubMed, Embase and Ovid databases. RESULTS The literature review revealed that the vast majority of delayed-onset facial nerve paresis cases occur within the first month of implantation. Only two other cases occurring years after device implantation were identified. Although potential causative factors have been suggested, as in our case this phenomenon may be idiopathic. CONCLUSION Prognosis for recovery of late-onset facial nerve paresis seems promising, despite the unfortunate requirement for device explantation in all previous cases including our own.
Collapse
|
19
|
Shohet JA, Gende DM, Tanita CS. Totally implantable active middle ear implant: Hearing and safety results in a large series. Laryngoscope 2018; 128:2872-2878. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.27246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
20
|
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275:913-922. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4910-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
21
|
Outcomes of pediatric delayed facial palsy after head trauma. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 45:461-464. [PMID: 29033023 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze clinical outcomes of delayed facial palsy after head trauma in the pediatric population. METHODS A total of 45 pediatric cases with delayed facial palsy after head trauma were conservatively or surgically treated in our hospital between January 2009 and January 2015, and they were followed up for one year after the corresponding treatment. The clinical data were collected and the outcomes of facial nerve were analyzed. RESULTS During the one-year follow-up, 33 cases (82.5%) completely recovered, and 5 cases (12.5%) recovered to Grade II among the 40 cases accepting conservative treatment. For the 5 surgically treated cases, 4 cases (80.0%) recovered to Grade I or Grade II, and one case recovered to Grade III. CONCLUSION The outcomes of pediatric delayed facial palsy after head trauma were generally satisfactory.
Collapse
|