Patient safety in otolaryngology: a descriptive review

Examining Diagnostic Errors in the Field of Otorhinolaryngology within the Challenging Landscape of Limited-Resource Healthcare

Diagnostic accuracy is vital in otorhinolaryngology for effective patient care, yet diagnostic mismatches between non-otorhinolaryngology clinicians and ENT specialists can occur. However, studies investigating such mismatches in low-resource healthcare environments are limited. This study aims to analyze diagnostic mismatches in otorhinolaryngology within a low-resource healthcare environment. A publicly available dataset assessing diagnostic outcomes from non-otorhinolaryngology clinicians and ENT specialists was analyzed. The dataset included demographic characteristics, referral diagnoses, and final ENT specialist diagnoses. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests were employed to assess the prevalence of diagnostic mismatches and associated factors. The analysis comprised 1544 cases. The prevalence of diagnostic mismatches between non-otorhinolaryngology clinicians and ENT specialists was 67.4%. Certain specific ENT diseases demonstrated higher frequencies of diagnostic mismatches. Factors such as mismatch in the diagnosis and compliance of patient were found to influence the occurrence of diagnostic mismatches. This study highlights the presence of diagnostic mismatches in otorhinolaryngology within a low-resource healthcare environment. The prevalence of these mismatches underscores the need for improved diagnostic practices in such settings. Factors contributing to diagnostic mismatches should be further explored to develop strategies for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reducing diagnostic errors in otorhinolaryngology.

How Variable are Patient Comorbidity Profiles Among Practicing Otolaryngologists?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether certain groups of otolaryngologists (ORLs) are treating cohorts of patients with more comorbidities.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional population-based analysis.

SETTING

2019 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Dataset.

METHODS

Each ORL's average Medicare hierarchical condition category (HCC) risk score, a comorbidity index calculated from a patient's comorbidities, was collected. These were stratified and compared by various physician characteristics, including practice region and rurality, years in practice, gender, subspecialty, and setting (academic vs community).

RESULTS

Among 8959 ORLs, the mean HCC risk score for Medicare patients was 1.35 ± 0.35. On univariate analysis, ORLs practicing in urban (compared to rural), ORLs in academic settings (compared to community), and early career ORLs all had a patient population with a higher HCC risk score (P < .001 for all). On multivariate analysis controlling for gender, rurality, graduation year, and region, rural setting was associated with decreased odds of having a high-risk patient population (odds ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.48-0.71]; P < .001), while those more recently graduated has an increased risk (2000-2009: 1.41 [1.01-1.96], P = .046; 2010-2015: 2.30 [1.63-3.25], P < .001). In a separate subgroup analysis, subspecialty differences were seen and community setting was associated with decreased odds of having a high-risk patient population (0.36 [0.23-0.55]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

There is variability in patient comorbidity profiles among ORLs, with those in urban settings, those more recently graduated, and those in academic settings treating a group with more comorbidities. As the comorbidity burden may increase the cost of practice and complications, these findings may have important implications for health inequity.

Non-technical Skills Simulation Training

Purpose of Review

“Non-technical skills” are critical to patient safety and form an important part of a surgeon’s competency. Inter-disciplinary team training is now considered essential to train these valuable skills. This review discusses the importance of non-technical skills, and the role these skills have in simulation training within Otolaryngology.

Recent Findings

Otolaryngologists are uniquely positioned to encounter airway emergencies. Consequently, team-based training in crisis scenarios is especially important. Simulation can occur in situ or in the simulated setting, with “boot-camps” becoming a popular training intervention. Whilst team training within otolaryngology has been shown to be highly effective, formal assessment of these skills is not currently routine, with no assessment tool specifically tailored to ENT.

Summary

Simulation-based training is an effective and feasible method of teaching non-technical skills in Otolaryngology. With the shift towards competency-based medical education, formal assessment of these skills is important to perform.