1
|
Alzhrani F, Aljazeeri I, Abdelsamad Y, Alsanosi A, Kim AH, Ramos-Macias A, Ramos-de-Miguel A, Kurz A, Lorens A, Gantz B, Buchman CA, Távora-Vieira D, Sprinzl G, Mertens G, Saunders JE, Kosaner J, Telmesani LM, Lassaletta L, Bance M, Yousef M, Holcomb MA, Adunka O, Thomasen PC, Skarzynski PH, Rajeswaran R, Briggs RJ, Oh SH, Plontke S, O'Leary SJ, Agrawal S, Yamasoba T, Lenarz T, Wesarg T, Kutz W, Connolly P, Anderson I, Hagr A. International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery. Ear Hear 2024:00003446-990000000-00303. [PMID: 38915137 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements. DESIGN A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence. RESULTS Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement. CONCLUSIONS A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Alzhrani
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Isra Aljazeeri
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Aljaber Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Specialized Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
- Isra Aljazeeri shared first author
| | - Yassin Abdelsamad
- Research Department, Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Alsanosi
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ana H Kim
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angel Ramos-Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Angel Ramos-de-Miguel
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Artur Lorens
- Word Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Bruce Gantz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery/Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital St. Poelten, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - James E Saunders
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Julie Kosaner
- Meders Speech and Hearing Clinic, Meders İşitme ve Konuşma Merkezi, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Laila M Telmesani
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manohar Bance
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Medhat Yousef
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Audiology Unit, ENT Department, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Meredith A Holcomb
- Hearing Implant Program, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Oliver Adunka
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Per Cayé- Thomasen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Piotr H Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland
- Center of Hearing and Speech "Medincus," Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Ranjith Rajeswaran
- Madras ENT Research Foundation MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing, Chennai, India
| | - Robert J Briggs
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Seung-Ha Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Stefan Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stephen J O'Leary
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tatsuya Yamasoba
- Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Wesarg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Walter Kutz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Connolly
- Clinical Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria; and
| | - Ilona Anderson
- Clinical Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria; and
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Díaz M, Morales-Puebla JM, Sánchez-Cuadrado I, Varela-Nieto I, Gavilán J. Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve functionality in various vestibular schwannoma scenarios: Lessons learned. Hear Res 2024; 446:108997. [PMID: 38564963 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition. Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation. Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case. The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; La Paz Research Institute (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miryam Calvino
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; La Paz Research Institute (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Díaz
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH. Madrid, Spain
| | - José Manuel Morales-Puebla
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; La Paz Research Institute (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; La Paz Research Institute (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Varela-Nieto
- La Paz Research Institute (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Networking Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Neuropathology of Hearing and Myelinopathies, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sols-Morreale, CSIC-UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Gavilán
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; La Paz Research Institute (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Esser J, Walger M, Pollet N, Klußmann JP, Ruge M, Goldbrunner R, Lüers JC. [Vestibular Schwannoma: Factors in Therapy Decision-Making]. Laryngorhinootologie 2024; 103:176-186. [PMID: 38128578 DOI: 10.1055/a-2222-0878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Esser
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf und Hals-Chirurgie, Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Köln, DE 50937, Germany
| | - Martin Walger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Köln, DE 50937, Germany
| | - Naomi Pollet
- Universität zu Köln, Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf und Hals-Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, DE 50937, Germany
| | - Jens Peter Klußmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Köln, DE 50937, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ruge
- Klinik für Stereotaxie und Funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Köln, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Universität zu Köln, Medizinische Fakultät, Zentrum für Neurochirurgie, Klinik für Allgemeine Neurochirurgie, Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Köln, Germany
| | - Jan Christoffer Lüers
- Klinik und Poliklinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universität zu Köln Medizinische Fakultät, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cochlear implantation: an effective modality for hearing restoration following vestibular schwannoma resection. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 30:309-313. [PMID: 36036530 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Preservation of hearing is one of the tenets of vestibular schwannoma management. In recent years, cochlear implants have been employed with increasing use in patients who have suffered profound sensorineural hearing loss due to the natural history of vestibular schwannoma or due to injury to neurovascular anatomy at time of surgical resection. RECENT FINDINGS Cochlear implantation has been found to be an effective modality for hearing restoration following vestibular schwannoma. Simultaneous cochlear implantation has been employed by an increased number of centers around the world and has been shown to provide restoration of open set speech perception and return of binaural hearing. Ongoing use of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) has improved our detection of viable cochlear nerves and provided insight into those who would benefit from this procedure. Finally, minimally invasive approaches to the internal auditory canal and intralabyrinthine tumors have been described. These methods frequently employ simultaneous cochlear implantation and have emphasized that hearing preservation remains possible with surgical excision despite the location of the tumor. SUMMARY Cochlear implantation is an effective modality for hearing restoration following vestibular schwannoma excision.
Collapse
|
5
|
Villamil V, Wolbring G. Influencing discussions and use of neuroadvancements as professionals and citizens: Perspectives of Canadian speech-language pathologists and audiologists. Work 2022; 71:565-584. [DOI: 10.3233/wor-205104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early involvement of stakeholders in neuroethics and neurogovernance discourses of neuroscientific and neurotechnological advancements is seen as essential to curtail negative consequences. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and audiologists (AUs) make use of neuroadvancements including cochlear implants, brain-computer interfaces, and deep-brain stimulation. Although they have a stake in neuroethics and neurogovernance discussions, they are rarely mentioned in having a role, whether as professionals or as citizens. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to explore the role of SLPs and AUs as professionals and citizens in neuroethics and neurogovernance discussions and examine the utility of lifelong learning mechanisms to learn about the implications of neuroadvancements to contribute in a meaningful way to these discussions. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews conducted with 7 SLPs and 3 AUs were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants stated that their roles expected from them as professionals and as citizens indicate the importance to be knowledgeable on ethical, legal, and social implications of neuroadvancements and that lifelong learning is not used to learn about these implications. CONCLUSION: More must be done to facilitate the participation of SLPs and AUs in neuroethics and neurogovernance discussions, which would enrich the neuroethics and neurogovernance discourses benefitting patients, professionals, and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Villamil
- Speech-Language Pathology, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Gregor Wolbring
- Community Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tadokoro K, Bartindale MR, El-Kouri N, Moore D, Britt C, Kircher M. Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82:643-651. [PMID: 34745832 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Ipsilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) has been an emerging trend over the last two decades. We conducted the first systematic review of hearing outcomes comparing neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and sporadic VS undergoing CI. A comparison of the two populations and predictor of outcome was assessed. This is an update to a previously presented study. Data Sources Systemic data searches were performed in PubMed NCBI and Scopus by an academic librarian. No restrictions based on the year of publication were used. Study Selection Studies were selected if patients had a diagnosis of NF2 and a CI placed in the affected side with reports of hearing outcome. Two independent reviewers screened each abstract and full-text article. Data Extraction Studies were extracted at the patient level, and the assessment of quality and bias was evaluated according to the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Main Outcome Measures Outcome predictors were determined by using the chi-square test and Student's t -test. Results Overall, most CI recipients functioned in the high-to-intermediate performer category for both sporadic and NF2-related VS. Median AzBio (Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test) was 72% (interquartile range [IQR]: 50) in NF2 patients and 70% (IQR: 7.25) in sporadic patients. Larger tumor size predicted a poorer final audiometric outcome. Conclusions Categorization of hearing outcome into superior performance and inferior performance based on sentence recognition revealed a generally good hearing outcome regardless of treatment or patient population. Select patients with sporadic and NF2 VS may benefit from CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent Tadokoro
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
| | | | - Nadeem El-Kouri
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
| | - Dennis Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
| | - Christopher Britt
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
| | - Matthew Kircher
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses to electrical stimulation at round window membrane in congenitally deaf children at different ages. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 148:110821. [PMID: 34225082 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the usefulness of measuring the electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABRs) to electrical stimulation at the round window niche (RWN) and round window membrane (RWM) and the effect of deafness duration on functions of the auditory pathway to the level of the brainstem. METHODS According to the age at cochlear implantation (CI), 99 children with profound sensorineural hearing loss were divided into four groups: ≤12 months (group A), 13-36 months (group B), 37-60 months (group C) and >60 months (group D). The eABRs were evoked by electrical stimulation at RWN and RWM during the operation of CI. RESULTS The higher eABR extraction rate and lower threshold for RWM stimulation was found than those for RWN stimulation. The eⅢ latencies and eⅢ-eⅤ latency intervals for RWM stimulation were similar among four groups. However, children with earlier CI (group A) showed a significantly shorter eⅤ latency than others. CONCLUSION The eABR evoked by the electrical stimulation at RWM is more stable and sensitive compared with that at RWN for evaluating functions of the auditory conduction pathway. Development in the upper brainstem pathway may be more vulnerable to long-term deafness as revealed by the eⅤ latency.
Collapse
|
8
|
Butler MJ, Wick CC, Shew MA, Chicoine MR, Ortmann AJ, Vance J, Buchman CA. Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring for Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: A Case Series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21:324-331. [PMID: 34332508 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opab274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) often results in profound hearing loss and cochlear implantation is an emerging hearing rehabilitation option. However, cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in this population vary, and intraoperative monitoring to predict cochlear nerve viability and subsequent outcomes is not well-established. OBJECTIVE To review the use of intraoperative electrically evoked cochlear nerve monitoring in patients with NF2 simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and cochlear implantation. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of 3 patients with NF2 that underwent simultaneous TL VS resection and cochlear implantation with electrical auditory brainstem response (eABR) measured throughout tumor resection. Patient demographics, preoperative assessments, surgical procedures, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Patients 1 and 3 had a reliable eABR throughout tumor removal. Patient 2 had eABR pretumor removal, but post-tumor removal eABR presence could not be reliably determined because of electrical artifact interference. All patients achieved auditory percepts upon CI activation. Patients 1 and 2 experienced a decline in CI performance after 1 yr and after 3 mo, respectively. Patient 3 continues to perform well at 9 mo. Patients 2 and 3 are daily users of their CI. CONCLUSION Cochlear implantation is attainable in cases of NF2-associated VS resection. Intraoperative eABR may facilitate cochlear nerve preservation during tumor removal, though more data and long-term outcomes are needed to refine eABR methodology and predictive value for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret J Butler
- Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Cameron C Wick
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew A Shew
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael R Chicoine
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Amanda J Ortmann
- Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Janet Vance
- Saint Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: role of transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and serial neural response telemetry. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2021; 135:602-609. [PMID: 34011420 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215121001328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the utility of pre-operative transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and post-operative neural response telemetry in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder patients. METHODS Four auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder patients who had undergone cochlear implantation and used it for more than one year were studied. All four patients underwent pre-operative transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing, intra-operative and post-operative (at 3, 6 and 12 months after switch-on) neural response telemetry, and out-patient cochlear implant electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing (at 12 months). RESULTS Patients with better waveforms on transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing showed superior performance after one year of implant use. Neural response telemetry and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response measures improved in all patients. CONCLUSION Inferences related to cochlear implantation outcomes can be based on the waveform of transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Robust transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses suggest better performance. Improvements in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and neural response telemetry over time indicate that electrical stimulation is favourable in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder patients. These measures provide an objective way to monitor changes and progress in auditory pathways following cochlear implantation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dhanasingh A, Hochmair I. Special electrodes for demanding cochlear conditions. Acta Otolaryngol 2021; 141:157-177. [PMID: 33818260 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1888506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Optimal matching of an electrode array to the cochlear anatomy plays a key role in bringing the best benefit of CI technology to the users. Even within the category of normal anatomy cochlea, the size variation is huge justifying MED-EL's FLEX electrode array to be available in five different lengths. Within the malformed inner-ear category the anatomical variation is huge, convincing MED-EL to custom-design the electrode array as per the request from the operating surgeons. Thanks to G. Bredberg, M. Beltrame, L. Sennaroglu, J. Gavilan, S. Plontke, T. Lenarz, J. Müller, and few others for their valuable suggestions on unique electrode designs satisfying various needs. Translational research efforts at MED-EL in cooperation with CI surgeons from across the world led to the implantation of a variety of electrode array designs in patients with special cochlear needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingeborg Hochmair
- MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geraete Gesellschaft m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lu T, Li Q, Zhang C, Chen M, Wang Z, Li S. The sensitivity of different methods for detecting abnormalities in auditory nerve function. Biomed Eng Online 2020; 19:7. [PMID: 32013979 PMCID: PMC6998811 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-0750-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cochlear implants (CIs) have become important for the treatment of severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Meanwhile, electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs), which can be examined and evaluated with minimal patient cooperation, have become more reliable for tone measurement and speech recognition postoperatively. However, few studies have compared the electrophysiological characteristics of the auditory nerve using ECAPs and EABRs under different functional states of the auditory nerve (FSANs). We used guinea pig models in which six electrodes were implanted unilaterally with continuous electrical stimulation (ES) for 4 h. The amplitude growth functions (AGFs) of the alternating polarity ECAP (AP-ECAP) and forward-masking subtraction ECAP (FM-ECAP), as well as the EABR waves under “normal” and “abnormal” FSANs, were obtained. Results Both the AP-ECAP and FM-ECAP thresholds were significantly higher than those measured by EABR under both “normal” FSAN and “abnormal” FSANs (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the slope values between electrodes 1 and 2 and electrodes 3 and 4 in terms of the AP-ECAP under the “abnormal” FSAN (p < 0.05). The threshold gaps between the AP-ECAP and FM-ECAP were significantly larger under the “abnormal” FSAN than under the “normal” FSAN (p < 0.05). Conclusions Both of the ECAP thresholds were higher than the EABR thresholds. The AP-ECAP was more sensitive than the FM-ECAP under the “abnormal” FSAN.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cochlear Implant Outcomes Following Vestibular Schwannoma Resection: Systematic Review. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:1190-1197. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
13
|
Chen B, Li Y, Lu S, Chen J, Shi Y, Cui D, Zhang L, Xie J. Cochlear implant surgery through oval window: A novel approach in a child with facial nerve aberration. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 135:110110. [PMID: 32446042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is safe for simple case presentations. However, facial nerve (FN) aberrations may impede insertion of the electrode through a round window and increase the risk of iatrogenic FN injury. We developed a novel method of cochlear implantation, a present the case of a child with FN aberrations. Inferior displacement of a horizontal segment of FN lay on the surface of th e promontory, obscuring the round window. The oval window was used and the electrode successfully inserted. No postoperative complications occurred, and significant improvement in speech perception was achieved. This novel approach is suitable for patients with FN aberrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biao Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China.
| | - Simeng Lu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| | - Jingyuan Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| | - Ying Shi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| | - Danmo Cui
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| | - Lifang Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| | - Jing Xie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100730, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dahm V, Auinger AB, Honeder C, Riss D, Landegger LD, Moser G, Matula C, Arnoldner C. Simultaneous Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation Using Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry for Decision-making. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:1266-1273. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
15
|
Role and Scope Coverage of Speech-Related Professionals Linked to Neuro-Advancements within the Academic Literature and Canadian Newspapers. EDUCATION SCIENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/educsci9020098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Speech-related professionals such as speech language pathologists (SLPs) and audiologists make use of neuro-advancements including neurotechnologies such as cochlear implants (CIs), brain-computer interfaces, and deep brain stimulation. Speech-related professionals could occupy many roles in relation to their interaction with neuro-advancements reflecting the roles expected of them by their professional organizations. These roles include: service provider, promoter of neuro-products such as CIs, educator of others, neuro-related knowledge producer and researcher, advocates for their fields and their clients in relation to neuro-advancements, and influencers of neuro-policy, neuroethics and neuro-governance discussions. Lifelong learning, also known as professional development, is used as a mechanism to keep professionals up to date on knowledge needed to perform their work and could be used to support the fulfillment of all the roles in relation to neuro-advancements. Using 300 English language Canadian newspapers and academic articles from SCOPUS and the 70 databases of EBSCO-Host as sources, we found that the neuro-advancement content linked to speech-related professionals centered around CIs and brain computer interfaces, with other neuro-technologies being mentioned much less. Speech-related professionals were mostly mentioned in roles linked to clinical service provision, but rarely to not at all in other roles such as advocate, researcher or influencer of neuroethics and neuro-governance discussions. Furthermore, lifelong learning was not engaged with as a topic. The findings suggest that the mentioning of and engagement with roles of speech-related professionals linked to neuro-advancements falls short given the expectations of roles of speech-related professionals for example. We submit that these findings have implications for the education of speech-related professionals, how others perceive the role and identity of speech-related professionals, and how speech-related professionals perceive their own role.
Collapse
|