Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations

Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the results of auditory perception tests and speech sound evaluations with electrode array length in patients with Mondini deformity.

METHODS

The study included 14 patients who underwent cochlear implantation and radiologically confirmed Mondini deformity between 2007 and 2021 in our clinic. While 7 patients received standard electrode arrays from the MED-EL brand, the remaining 7 received shortened electrode arrays from the MED-EL brand. Differences in auditory perception, articulation, and speech intelligibility between the two groups were examined. Auditory perception tests were administered to these patients preoperatively and at least 2 years after cochlear implant surgery. The patients' auditory perception performance was evaluated using single, double, and triple closed-set word tests (MTP-3, MTP-6, MTP-12), two-syllable open-set word test, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP) tests for articulation, Phonemic Synthesis Test (SST) for phonemic knowledge, and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for speech intelligibility.

RESULTS

Both groups did not show statistically significant differences in auditory perception tests (MTP-3, MTP-6, MTP-12, two-syllable open-set word test), speech sound tests (SST), and speech intelligibility test (SIR). Significant improvement was observed in all tests in both groups when compared preoperatively and postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference was observed in auditory perception and speech sound tests between groups with short and standard electrode arrays in patients with Mondini deformity. The option of using short electrode arrays during implantation in patients with Mondini deformity can be preferred without doubt in terms of outcomes.

Seven-Year Revision Rates for Cochlear Implants in Pediatric and Adult Populations of an Integrated Healthcare System

OBJECTIVE

We assessed three cochlear implant (CI) suppliers: Advanced Bionics, Cochlear Limited, and MED-EL, for implant revision requiring reoperation after CI placement.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of integrated-health-system database between 2010 and 2021. Separate models were created for pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) cohorts.

PATIENTS

Pediatric (age <18) and adult (age ≥18) patients undergoing cochlear implantation within our integrated healthcare system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Revision after CI placement. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk and adjust for confounding factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 2,347 patients underwent a primary CI placement, and Cochlear Limited was most implanted (51.5%), followed by Advanced Bionics (35.2%) and MED-EL (13.3%). In the pediatric cohort, the 7-year crude revision rate was 10.9% for Advanced Bionics and 4.8% for Cochlear Limited, whereas MED-EL had insufficient cases. In adults, the rates were 9.1%, 4.5%, and 3.3% for Advanced Bionics, MED-EL, and Cochlear Limited, respectively. After 2 years of postoperative follow-up, Advanced Bionics had a significantly higher revision risk (HR = 8.25, 95% CI = 2.91-23.46); MED-EL had no difference (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 0.46-9.25).

CONCLUSION

We found an increased revision risk after 2 years of follow-up for adults with Advanced Bionics CI devices. Although we found no statistical difference between manufacturers in the pediatric cohort, after 2 years of follow-up, there were increasing trends in the revision probability for Advanced Bionics. Further research may determine whether patients are better suited for some CI devices.

Long-term outcomes and electrophysiological measures of children with inner ear malformations and cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES

To compared auditory and speech performance outcomes of children with cochlear implants (CI), between those with inner ear malformations (IEMs) and with normal ear anatomy; and to describe differences in electrophysiological measurements.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A tertiary care pediatric medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty-one children with IEMs who underwent CI during 2003-2017, and 41 age-matched CI recipients with normal ear anatomy (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Post-CI auditory performance outcomes including educational setting, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR); and electrophysiological measurements, Including maximal comfortable electrical levels (CLs) and impedances along CI electrodes.

RESULTS

The ANOVA on ranks revealed lower CAP scores in the study than control group: H3 = 18.8, P < 0.001. Among children with IEMs, CAP scores were better in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) (P < 0.04). SIR scores of the control group did not differ from those with isolated EVA; however, SIR scores of the IEMs without EVA subgroup were lower than all the other study subgroups (P < 0.01). The proportion of the control group that was integrated with full inclusion educational settings into the regular mainstream schools was higher than for those with IEMs without EVA (47 % vs. 15 %, P < 0.05), but similar to those with isolated EVA. For the study group versus control group, maximal comfortable electrical levels (CLs) were higher)P > 0.03) while impedance measurements were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of pediatric recipients with normal anatomy were better than those with IEMs. Among pediatric recipients of CI with IEMs, auditory performance was better and CLs were lower among children with isolated EVA than all other IEM subgroups.

An Accurate and Individualized Preoperative Estimation Method for the Linear Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Based on Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implantation or auditory brainstem implantation is currently the only accepted method for improving severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. The length of the electrodes implanted during cochlear implantation is closely related to the degree of hearing improvement of hearing after the surgery. We aimed to explore new methods to accurately estimate the electrode array (EA) linear insertion depth based on computed tomography (CT) images prior surgery, which could help surgeons select the appropriate EA length for each patient.

DESIGN

Previous studies estimated the linear insertion depth by measuring the length of the lateral wall of the cochlea rather than the electrode's path in the cochlea duct. Here, we determined the actual position of the EA on the CT image after cochlear surgery in order to predict the path of the EA, and the length of the predicted EA path was measured by the contouring technique (CoT) to estimate the linear insertion depth of the EA. Because CoT can only measure the length of the estimated EA path on a two-dimensional plane, we further modified the measurement by weighting the height of the cochlea and the length of the EA tail (the length of the last stimulating electrode to the end, which cannot be displayed on the CT image), which we termed the modified CoT + height + tail (MCHT) measurement.

RESULTS

Based on our established method, MCHT could reduce the error to the submillimeter range (0.67 ± 0.37 mm) when estimating the linear insertion depth of various kinds of EAs compared with the actual implant length. The correlation coefficient between the linear insertion depth as predicted by MCHT and the actual was 0.958. The linear insertion depth estimated by this method was more accurate than that estimated using the classical CoT technique ( R = 0.442) and using the modified Escudé's method ( R = 0.585).

CONCLUSIONS

MCHT is a method based on CT images that can accurately predict the linear insertion depth of cochlear implants preoperatively. This is the first report that we are aware of a method for predicting linear insertion depth before cochlear implantation with only submillimeter errors and that is tailored to different types of EAs.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatrics with Inner Ear Malformations in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahvaz

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been successful in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) over the last few years. This study assessed the auditory and speech performance results of pediatrics with inner ear malformations (IEMs) following cochlear implantation at the Ahvaz cochlear implantation center and compared the outcomes of various malformations. All pediatrics with IEMs undergoing CI were included in the study. This retrospective study was performed on pediatrics with congenital IEMs who underwent cochlear implantation in Ahvaz cochlear implantation center between 2014 and 2019. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores are two of the most frequently administered tests. The CAP with ranging from 0 (displays no awareness of environmental sounds) to 7 (can use the telephone with a familiar talker), was used to measure the speech perception performance of the implanted children. Furthermore, SIR consists of five performance categories ranging from "prerecognizable words in spoken language" to "connected speech is intelligible to all listeners". Finally, the study included 22 patients. The evaluation of the CT-Scan revealed three types of inner ear malformation: Incomplete Partition (IP)-I in 2 (9.1%), IP-II in 12 (54.5%), and common cavity in 8 (36.4%) individuals. The results were shown that the median CAP score preoperative was 0.5 (interquartile range (IQR): 0-2) and postoperative was 3.5 (IQR: 3-7). There were statistically significant differences in CAP scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.036). The results were shown that the median SIR score preoperative was 1 (IQR: 1-5) and postoperative was 2 (IQR: 1-5). There were statistically significant differences in SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative (p value = 0.001). Following a thorough preoperative screening, patients with specific IEMs can be candidates for CI and not a contraindication. There were statistically significant differences in CAP and SIR scores between preoperative and second-year follow-up postoperative in the common cavity and IP-II groups.

The value of nonverbal intelligence in cochlear implant

BACKGROUND

Congenital sensorineural hearing loss is a common congenital condition.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between nonverbal mental development and the effect of post-cochlear implant in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of the CI program implemented at the ENT in the Lanzhou University Second Hospital (China). We reviewed data of 225 children who received CI between 2015 and 2018. Finally, 115 children met the inclusion criteria. Our hospital used The Griffith mental development scales to evaluate the preoperative non-verbal intelligence. The outcome of CI was evaluated using the categories of IT-MAIS, MUSS, CAP and SIR at 2 years after surgery. The associations between the preoperative non-verbal development quotient (DQ) and the postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Preoperative non-verbal DQ correlates with the long-term postoperative result, especially the Eye-hand co-ordination and Performance DQ.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Preoperative non-verbal intelligence would predict postoperative effect. The single postoperative scale does not fully reflect the postoperative result.

Establishment of Reference Values for Early Auditory Preverbal Skills of Children with Cochlear Implants

Auditory and verbal abilities of children with early cochlear implant (CI) surgery usually take some time to develop, and a reference index of early development for horizontal comparisons is urgently needed to guide the mapping process and adjust rehabilitation programs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish a reference value for early auditory preverbal skills development in children with CI and investigate the developmental curve and influencing factors for these children. The LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire (LEAQ) scores of 287 eligible Chinese participants were obtained at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 28, and 36 months interval after CI activation. The median and standard deviation of the LEAQ score of each hearing stage for these children with different activation ages were calculated to establish the reference values. Quadratic regression was conducted to fit the expected developmental curve of the LEAQ score (y=-0.057x2+2.55x+5.45 [0 to 20 months]). With a linear mixed-effects model, we found that the receptive auditory behavior increased rapidly after CI activation, while expressive language skills developed at a steady rate. We also found that the following factors all significantly influenced the LEAQ: the duration of CI use, the development quotient, age of implantation and activation, and the presence of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. The reference values and the expected developmental curve for the LEAQ in children with CI established by the present study provides guidance to clinicians and parents as well as realistic expectations regarding language and speech outcomes.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Systematic Review of Surgical Implications and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated age at implantation, improvement in hearing and speech perception outcomes, as well as surgical complications in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with Pendred Syndrome (PS) or non-syndromic enlarged vestibular aqueduct (NSEVA).

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature between 1984 and 2021 was performed. Two independent reviewers performed abstract and full-text screening using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: English language, cochlear implant, age at implantation available, age <18 years, PS, Mondini malformation, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Full-text analysis was completed using the National Institute of Health assessment tool for case series and case-control studies. Studies were also graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system.

RESULTS

In total, 198 studies were identified and screened, and 55 studies were included for analysis. Audiological outcomes were available in 46 studies, and the four-frequency pure-tone audiogram average improved by 60 to 78 dB HL due to cochlear implantation. Auditory performance and speech intelligibility scores increased by 44%. The overall average implantation age was 60 months. The implantation age was 21 months lower in the studies where individuals were implanted after the year 2000 compared with those implanted before the year 2000. Perilymph gusher/oozing was the most common surgical incident reported, occurring in 187 of 1572 implantations.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with PS/NSEVA, cochlear implantation improves pure-tone average by 60 to 78 dB HL and capacity of auditory performance/speech intelligibility by 44%. The implantation age for these children has decreased during the last two decades but is still somewhat higher than reported for unselected pediatric cochlear implantation. Perilymph gusher/oozing is the most common surgical complication.

Systematic review of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss due to inner ear malformations (IEMs) when compared to patients without IEMs. We discussed audiological outcomes such as open-set testing, closed-set testing, CAP score, and SIR score as well as postoperative outcomes such as cerebrospinal fluid gusher and incomplete insertion rate associated with cochlear implantation in individuals with IEMs.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases.

REVIEW METHODS

After screening a total of 222 studies, twelve eligible original articles were included in the review to analyze the speech and hearing outcomes of implanted patients with IEMs. Five reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. The "Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies" published by the CLARITY group was used to perform quality assessment on eligible studies. Systematic review registration number: CRD42021237489.

RESULTS

IEMs are more likely to be associated with abnormal position of the facial nerve, raising the risk of intraoperative complications. These patients may benefit from cochlear implantation, but audiological outcomes may also be less favorable than in individuals without IEMs. Furthermore, due to the risk of cerebrospinal fluid gusher, incomplete insertion of electrodes, and postoperative facial nerve stimulation, surgeons can employ precautionary measures such as preoperative imaging and proper counseling. Postoperative imaging is suggested to be beneficial in ensuring proper electrode placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implants (CIs) have the potential to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals with IEMs. Precise classification of the malformation, preoperative imaging and anatomical mapping, appropriate electrode selection, intra-operative techniques, and postoperative imaging are recommended in this population.

Different modes of cochlear implantation in children: a comparative study on hearing and speech rehabilitation effects

Objective

To study the effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implantation, binaural-bimodal hearing devices, and bilateral cochlear implantation in children with inner-ear malformation.

Methods

This study comprised 261 patients who were allocated to inner-ear malformation or control groups. Twenty-four months after surgery, aided sound-field thresholds were tested, and the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Meaningful Use of Speech Scale, Categories of Auditory Performance scale and Speech Intelligibility Rating test were completed.

Results

Aided sound-field thresholds were significantly better for bilateral cochlear implantation patients than for unilateral cochlear implantation or binaural-bimodal hearing device patients. There was no significant difference in Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, or Categories of Auditory Performance scores among the three groups. The binaural-bimodal hearing device patients outperformed unilateral cochlear implantation patients on both Meaningful Use of Speech Scale and Speech Intelligibility Rating scores. No statistical difference was observed between the two subgroups.

Conclusion

Children who received bilateral cochlear implants have the best auditory awareness in a quiet environment. Children with binaural-bimodal hearing devices have better voice control and verbal skills than unilateral cochlear implantation patients, and people are more likely to understand them. Children with inner-ear malformations benefit from cochlear implantation.

Hearing-related quality of life assessment of pediatric cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations

OBJECTIVES

To assess the quality of life (QoL) in child and adolescent cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations (IEM) and to compare their outcomes to their cochlear implant using peers with normal inner ear structures.

METHODS

The present sample consisted of 100 children (45 with IEM, 55 without IEM) and 100 adolescents (46 with IEM, 54 without IEM). The following QoL questionnaires were used to assess the hearing-related QoL: The Hearing Environments and Reflection on Quality of Life 26 (HEAR-QL-26 for children between 7 and 12 years of age) and HEAR-QL-28 (for adolescents between 13 and 18 years of age). Both questionnaires were based on a 5-points Likert scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a better perception of QoL. The scores were converted to percentage values (never = 100, almost never = 75, sometimes = 50, often = 25, almost always = 0).

RESULTS

For the patients with IEM, mean scores from the HEAR-QL-26 and HEAR-QL-28 were 50.4 (SD = 18.9) and 54.5 (SD = 19.6), respectively. For the patients without IEM, mean scores from the HEAR-QL-26 and HEAR-QL-28 were 72.7 (SD = 18.0) and 65.0 (SD = 19.1), respectively. For both child and adolescent subgroups, statistically significant differences were observed between QoL scores from patients with and without IEM (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant effects of the malformation type on the QoL findings (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Child and adolescent cochlear implant users with IEM had significantly lower scores on validated HEAR-QL versions in comparison to their implanted peers without IEM.

SMS classification of inner ear malformations: our experience with implantation in type II anomalies

PURPOSE

To study and analyse the radiological and surgical findings of 24 cochlear implantees with SMS type II cochleovestibular malformation and to compare their outcomes in terms of hearing and speech gains pre- and postoperatively.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of cochlear implanted candidates over a period of 8 year 6 months from 3 institutions was undertaken and 24 patients suffering from prelingual profound congenital sensori-neural hearing loss along with the presence of SMS type II cochleovestibular malformation were studied. Preoperative radiology, surgical difficulties and complication, and postoperative hearing and speech outcomes up to a period of 2 years, using IT-MAIS and SIR scores were noted. Statistical comparison pre- and postimplantation was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In 24 cases, we encountered four cases of SMS type IIa malformation with a smaller modiolus, while the rest 20 were type SMS type IIb with partially defective modiolus. Intraoperatively, CSF leak was observed in 11 patients. Complete electrode insertion and good electrical response (NRT) was detected in all. No facial nerve anomaly was encountered. IT-MAIS and SIR scores increased from a preoperative mean of 5.6 and 1.16-34.56 and 3.88 after 2 years postsurgery, respectively and this difference was found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our experience with SMS Type II malformations show promising and motivating results with less chances of complications. Proper evaluation and surgical planning preoperatively can lead to an uneventful surgery with good outcomes. A simple and uniform classification system of these anomalies is a must for appropriate prognostication and right decision making.

Variables influencing executive functioning in preschool hearing-impaired children implanted within 24 months of age: an observational cohort study

PURPOSE

Executive Functions (EFs) are fundamental to every aspect of life. The present study was implemented to evaluate factors influencing their development in a group of preschools orally educated profoundly deaf children of hearing parents, who received CI within 2 years of age.

METHODS

Twenty-five preschool CI children were tested using the Battery for Assessment of Executive Functions (BAFE) to assess their flexibility, inhibition, and non-verbal visuo-spatial working memory skills. The percentage of children performing in normal range was reported for each of the EF subtests. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis were performed to assess differences between gender, listening mode, and degree of parents' education subgroups. The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient was calculated to investigate the relationship between EF scores of audiological and linguistic variables.

RESULTS

Percentages ranging from 76 to 92% of the children reached adequate EF scores at BAFE. Significant relations (p < 0.05) were found between EFs and early intervention, listening, and linguistic skills. Furthermore, CI children from families with higher education level performed better at the response shifting, inhibitory control, and attention flexibility tasks. Economic income correlated significantly with flexibility and inhibitory skills. Females performed better than males only in the attention flexibility task.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is one of the first to focus attention on the development of EFs in preschool CI children, providing an initial understanding of the characteristics of EFs at the age when these skills emerge. Clinical practice must pay increasing attention to these aspects which are becoming the new emerging challenge of rehabilitation programs.

Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Cochlear implantation became a valid hearing rehabilitation option in common cavity deformity. This study aimed to assess the audiological and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity patients and to address the surgical aspect used in this population.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature review based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline from database inception through April 2020. Eighteen published articles including 138 patients with common cavity deformity met the inclusion criteria. These articles studied the surgical techniques and the audiological outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with common cavity deformity in English language.

RESULTS

Trans-mastoid labyrinthotomy was the common surgical approach in these patients. The average speech intelligibility rating and categories of auditory performance scores in common cavity deformity were lower than in normal cochlea subjects (p < 0.05), and non-significant (p > 0.05) compared with other types of inner ear malformations.

CONCLUSION

Patients with common cavity deformity who underwent cochlear implantation showed a beneficial audiological and speech outcome. However, their performance is highly variable. Therefore, pre-operative counseling of the parents is necessary. The surgical approaches should be individualized according to clinical, radiological, and surgical findings.

Evaluating Reasons for Revision Surgery and Device Failure Rates in Patients Who Underwent Cochlear Implantation Surgery

Importance

Understanding the reasons for cochlear implant (CI) revision surgery and device failure rates is important for clinicians when counseling patients who are considering CI.

Objectives

To analyze the revision surgery rate, reasons for revision surgery, and device failure and survival rates of different device models in recipients of CIs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, cochlear implants at Samsung Medical Center, a tertiary referral center, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent CI surgery from October 2001 to March 2019 were included. In the device survival analysis, the first revision surgery was considered the primary event, and the end point of observation was June 1, 2019.

Interventions

Therapeutic and rehabilitative CI surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The revision surgery rate, reasons for revision surgery, and the failure and survival rates of different device models were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to present both the device survival and cumulative survival curves with rates.

Results

In this study, 43 of 925 patients with CIs (4.6%) underwent a revision surgery. Device failure was the most common reason (28 of 43 patients [65%]). Flap-associated problems and migration of the inner device were the next most important reasons (4 of 43 [9.3%] each). Overall, the 10-year cumulative survival rate of CI surgery was 94.4%, and the device survival rate was 96.0%. Thirteen different CI devices from 4 different manufacturers were implanted, and no meaningful differences in device failure were found among CI manufacturers or devices (hazard ratios for cumulative survival: Cochlear, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.72-3.88]; Advanced Bionics, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.61-4.53]; Med-El, reference; hazard ratios for device survival: Cochlear, 1.65 [95% CI, 0.55-4.99]; Advanced Bionics, 1.93 [95% CI, 0.56-6.74]; Med-El, reference). Several recalls were issued by manufacturers during the study period, and after excluding the recalled devices, the device survival rates for 5, 10, and 15 years were 98.2%, 97.7%, and 94.9%, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Generally, implanted devices remain safe and stable for a long time, and no significant differences in survival rates were found between device types or manufacturers. Device failure was the main reason for CI revision, followed by flap-associated problems and migration of the inner device.

FORM24 electrode array and perioperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in cochlear implant recipients with cochleovestibular malformations

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with a cochleovestibular malformation (CVM) are at a higher risk of experiencing an intra-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) gusher and, therefore are at greater risk of developing postoperative meningitis than are CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy. To control CSF gushers, the FORM electrode array was developed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of the FORM24 electrode array in managing intraoperative CSF gushers and preventing postoperative CSF leakage in a population of CI recipients.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Tertiary health care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All CIs in which a FORM24 was used between January 2014 and March 2018 were reviewed for demographic and safety results.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety results were assessed as the intraoperative or postoperative presence of an episode of CSF leakage or meningitis.

SAMPLE SIZE

177 CI recipients.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (20.3%) had a CVM and 141 had normal anatomy (79.7%). Of the 36 participants with a CVM, 20 (55.6%) experienced an intraoperative CSF gusher, all of which were resolved. No cases of postoperative leakage or meningitis were recorded after a mean follow-up time of 36 months.

CONCLUSION

The FORM24 array is able to help surgeons stop intraoperative CSF gushers and prevent postoperative CSF leakage and meningitis in CI recipients with a CVM.

LIMITATIONS

Further studies are needed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Data logging variables and speech perception in prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship among objectively gathered data logging measurements, patient-related variables, and speech recognition performance of pediatric CI users.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-two prelingually implanted children who have the ability to perform word discrimination test were included in this study. To reveal the relationship between speech perception abilities and auditory exposure, seven data logging variables were analyzed: "on-air," "off-air," "coil-off," "speech," "speech in noise," "music" and "noise. In addition, implantation age (months) and CI usage duration (months) were taken into account. Finally, it was investigated the differences between unilateral, sequential bilateral, and simultaneous bilateral CI users in terms of all study variables.

RESULTS

The average on-air time ranged between 10.52 and 12.30 in the groups. In the case of sequential implantation, smaller on-air and higher coil off values were observed with the second CI. In the case of simultaneous bilateral implantation, data logging measurements were almost the same in both implants. WRS was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with on-air time (r = 0.62), coil-off count (r = -0.48), chronological age (r = 0.48), and CI duration (r = 0.44). Multiple linear regression model was fit to predict the WRS, with on-air time, CI duration, and chronological age as predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The critical importance of early intervention and long-term use of CI is well-established in the literature and is also corroborated by our findings. However, the key findings of the present study are that consistent CI use and the quality of daily listening environment also exerted a major and positive effect on the speech recognition performance of pediatric CI users. Therefore, during the monitoring of pediatric CI recipients, it is important to know the device usage data in order to detect problems in the early stages after CI.

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformation: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study evaluated the auditory performance and speech production outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear anomaly and compared the outcomes of patients with different kinds of malformation.

METHODS

Cochlear implantation was performed in 107 children with inner ear malformation at four tertiary academic centers. The categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores were evaluated preoperatively and one year and two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Types of inner ear malformation and their frequencies were: incomplete partition type-I, 19 (17.8%) patients; incomplete partition type-II, 31 (29%), common cavity, 17 (15.9%), cochlear hypoplasia, 17 (15.9%), and isolated enlarged vestibular aqueduct (isolated EVA), 23 (21.5%) patients. EVA was the coexisting anomaly in 27(25.2%) subjects. The median CAP and SIR scores improved significantly during the first two years after cochlear implantation in all groups (p-values <0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was seen in CAP and SIR scores of children with different inner ear malformations (p-value = 0.147 and 0.570, respectively) or in patients with isolated EVA compared to coexisting EVA (p-value = 0.538 and 0.075, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The median CAP and SIR scores two years after surgery were 5 (Understanding of common phrases without lip-reading) IQR: 4-6, and 3 (Connected speech is intelligible to a listener who concentrates and lip-reads within a known context) IQR: 3-4, respectively. Auditory performance and speech production were significantly improved in all inner ear malformation patient groups, and no significant difference was observed between the scores of patients with different types of anomaly.

Evaluating Common Cavity Cochlear Deformities Using CT Images and 3D Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare the common cavity (CC) with the normal anatomy inner ear in order to evaluate whether the cavity is representing both the cochlear and the vestibular parts of the inner ear and to revisit CC deformity from a three-dimensional (3D) perspective.

METHODS

High-resolution computed tomography image datasets of 17 temporal bones initially identified as CC were evaluated with 3D reconstruction and multiplanar image analysis using a free available software for 3D segmentation of the inner ear. All 3D images of CC were compared to a normal inner ear. Maximum and minimum diameter of the CC were correlated with the circumference of the CC in an axial plane.

RESULTS

In 13 cases (76%), CC represented only the vestibular part of the inner ear and did not represent CC as defined here and by Sennaroglu, Kontorinis, and Khan. True CC was correctly diagnosed in only one case (6%). In three cases (18%), a rudimentary part of the cochlear portion could be identified. The axes' length of the elliptical cavity showed a strong positive linear relation to the circumference of the cavity (long axis: r = 0.94; P < .0001; short axis: r = 0.68; P = .0029).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the assumption that many reported CC cases only represent the vestibular part of the inner ear and are therefore cases of cochlear aplasia. 3D segmentation and systematic analysis of CT-imaging add clinical value to the comprehension of the morphology of the anatomical structures of the inner ear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2C Laryngoscope, 131:386-391, 2021.