1
|
Lai Y, Wang C, Mao C, Lu M, Ouyang Q, Fang Y, Cai Z, Chen W. Mandible reconstruction with free fibula flaps: Accuracy of a cost-effective modified semicomputer-assisted surgery compared with computer-assisted surgery - A retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021; 50:274-280. [PMID: 34930668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
A new individualized, cost-effective, modified semi-computer-assisted surgery (MSCAS) concept for free fibular flap mandibular reconstruction is reported and compared with the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) concept. Patients were divided into two groups and retrospectively reviewed. In the MSCAS and CAS groups, intraoperative guides were created using computer-aided design with manual fabrication and computer-aided design and manufacturing, respectively. Differences in specific linear and angular parameters on pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans were calculated for morphometric comparison, and clinical parameters and efficiency were analysed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (CAS, 7; MSCAS, 11), were included. The morphometric comparison showed no significant differences between the groups. The mean deviation of the mandibular ramus length, body length, width 1 and width 2 was 0.82 ± 0.29 mm, 1.84 ± 0.43 mm, 1.89 ± 0.61 mm and 1.45 ± 0.61 mm in the CAS group versus 1.56 ± 0.54 mm, 1.72 ± 0.33 mm, 2.24 ± 0.55 mm and 2.36 ± 0.50 mm in the MSCAS group (p = 0.7804, p = 0.9997, p = 0.9814 and p = 0.6334). The mean deviation of the sagittal, axial and coronal mandibular angles was 1.56 ± 0.48°, 1.93 ± 0.50° and 2.15 ± 0.72° in the CAS group versus 2.19 ± 0.35°, 1.86 ± 0.35° and 1.94 ± 0.55° in the MSCAS group (p = 0.7594, p = 0.9996 and p = 0.9871). There were no significant differences in clinical parameters, efficiency or postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: The accuracy and operative efficiency of the MSCAS concept are comparable to those of the more expensive CAS concept. Therefore, in times of increasing clinical costs, this concept might be an adequate and inexpensive alternative to preoperative CAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongzhen Lai
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chengyong Wang
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuanqing Mao
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Meng Lu
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qiming Ouyang
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yihong Fang
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhiyu Cai
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Weihui Chen
- Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Science, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 28, Xinquan Road, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fliss E, Yanko R, Bracha G, Teman R, Amir A, Horowitz G, Muhanna N, Fliss DM, Gur E, Zaretski A. The Evolution of the Free Fibula Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction: 21 Years of Experience with 128 Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 37:372-379. [PMID: 32998171 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1717101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The free fibula flap is commonly referred to as a "workhorse" for head and neck reconstruction. During our 21-year experience with this flap, we have performed several changes in preoperative planning, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study designed to analyze the cohort of patients who underwent free fibula transfer for head and neck reconstruction. Demographics, medical background, operative data, and postoperative outcome were collected. The changes we performed in preoperative planning, operative technique, and postoperative follow-up were assessed and their impact on outcome discussed. RESULTS During 1998 to 2019 a total of 128 free fibula flaps were transferred for head and neck reconstruction. When comparing the patients treated in the early years to those who were treated in recent years we found no statistically significant difference in minor or major nonmicrosurgical complications in the recipient and donor site and in the rate of take backs due to microsurgical reasons. However total flap failure rate improved from 28% in early years to 8% in recent years (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION During this 21-year period, we performed several changes in our practice. This included the use of a three-dimensional (3D) prefabricated model of the mandible, a shift toward side-table osteotomies, increasing the rate of osteofascial flaps in contrast to osteocutaneous flaps and the use of an implantable Doppler. These changes, together with a learning curve of the surgical team, significantly improved our overall success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehud Fliss
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ravit Yanko
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Gal Bracha
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Roy Teman
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Aharon Amir
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Gilad Horowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nidal Muhanna
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dan M Fliss
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eyal Gur
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Arik Zaretski
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|