1
|
Ayas M, Muzaffar J, Borsetto D, Eitutis S, Phillips V, Tam YC, Salorio-Corbetto M, Bance ML. A scoping review on the clinical effectiveness of Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements in detecting extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs in Cochlear Ltd devices. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299597. [PMID: 38452034 PMCID: PMC10919746 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extrusion of electrodes outside the cochlea and tip fold overs may lead to suboptimal outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Intraoperative measures such as Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements may enable clinicians to identify electrode malposition and direct surgeons to correctly place the electrode array during surgery. OBJECTIVES To assess the current literature on the effectiveness of TIM measurements in identifying extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs. METHODS A scoping review of studies on TIM-based measurements were carried out using the Databases-Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Eleven full texts articles met the inclusion criteria. Only human studies pertaining to TIM as a tool used in CI were included in the review. Further, patient characteristics, electrode design, and TIM measurement outcomes were reported. RESULTS TIM measurements were available for 550 implanted ears with the subjects age ranged between 9 months to 89 years. Abnormal TIM measurements were reported for 6.55% (36). Tip fold over was detected in 3.64% (20) of the cases, extracochlear electrodes in 1.45% (8), and 1.45% (8) were reported as buckling. Slim-modiolar electrode array designs were more common (54.71%) than pre-curved (23.34%) or lateral wall (21.95%) electrode array. Abnormal cochlear anatomy was reported for five ears (0.89%), with normal cochlear anatomy for all other patients. CONCLUSION TIM measurement is a promising tool for the intraoperative detection of electrode malposition. TIM measurement has a potential to replace intraoperative imaging in future. Though, TIM measurement is in its early stages of clinical utility, intuitive normative data sets coupled with standardised criteria for detection of abnormal electrode positioning would enhance its sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Ayas
- College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- Emmeline Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jameel Muzaffar
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Daniele Borsetto
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of ENT, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Eitutis
- Emmeline Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Veronica Phillips
- Medical Library, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yu Chuen Tam
- Emmeline Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Salorio-Corbetto
- Emmeline Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Manohar L. Bance
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of ENT, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Song B, Oh S, Kim D, Cho YS, Moon IJ. Changes in Revision Cochlear Implantation and Device Failure Profiles. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 17:37-45. [PMID: 38228133 PMCID: PMC10933811 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As cochlear implantation (CI) experiences rapid innovations and its indications expand, the characteristics of revision CI (RCI) are evolving. This study investigated changes in the RCI profile and explored their clinical implications. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of all CIs performed at a tertiary medical institution between October 2001 and January 2023. The rates of and reasons for RCI were evaluated in relation to the manufacturer and device model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to examine cumulative and device survival curves. Cumulative and device survival rates were additionally analyzed based on age group, period of primary CI, and manufacturer. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the association between RCI and the device manufacturer. RESULTS Among 1,430 CIs, 73 (5.1%) required RCI. The predominant reason for RCI was device failure (40 of 73 RCIs [54.8%]), with an overall device failure rate of 2.8%. This was followed by flap-associated problems and migration (nine of 73 RCIs each [12.3%]). Flap retention issues emerged as a new cause in three cases (two involving the CI 632 and one involving the SYNCHRONY 2 implant), and six instances of electrode tip fold-over arose (four for the CI 600 series and two for the CI 500 series). The overall 10-year cumulative and device survival rates were 93.4% and 95.8%, respectively. After excluding models with recall issues, significant differences in cumulative (P =0.010) and device (P =0.001) survival rates were observed across manufacturers. CONCLUSION While the overall CI survival rate is stable, device failure persists as the predominant reason for RCI. Moreover, the types of complications leading to revision (including issues with flap retention and electrode tip fold-over) have shifted, particularly for newer implant models. Given the clinical importance of device failure and subsequent reoperation, clinicians should remain informed about and responsive to these trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bokhyun Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Subi Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doyun Kim
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Sang Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Joon Moon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hrncirik F, Roberts I, Sevgili I, Swords C, Bance M. Models of Cochlea Used in Cochlear Implant Research: A Review. Ann Biomed Eng 2023; 51:1390-1407. [PMID: 37087541 PMCID: PMC10264527 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03192-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
As the first clinically translated machine-neural interface, cochlear implants (CI) have demonstrated much success in providing hearing to those with severe to profound hearing loss. Despite their clinical effectiveness, key drawbacks such as hearing damage, partly from insertion forces that arise during implantation, and current spread, which limits focussing ability, prevent wider CI eligibility. In this review, we provide an overview of the anatomical and physical properties of the cochlea as a resource to aid the development of accurate models to improve future CI treatments. We highlight the advancements in the development of various physical, animal, tissue engineering, and computational models of the cochlea and the need for such models, challenges in their use, and a perspective on their future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Hrncirik
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Iwan Roberts
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Ilkem Sevgili
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Chloe Swords
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, UK
| | - Manohar Bance
- Cambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Inoue T, Tona Y, Okano T, Omori K, Yamamoto N. Detection of Tip Fold-Over of the Slim Modiolar Electrode Using Intraoperative Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023. [PMID: 36939567 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the importance of mobile cone-beam computed tomography in detecting tip fold-over of a slim modiolar electrode within the cochlea during surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary medical center. METHODS From January 2020 to June 2022, 33 ears of 30 patients with normal cochlear morphology underwent cochlear implantation with slim modiolar electrodes and intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Furthermore, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images. RESULTS The tip fold-over of the electrodes was detected using mobile cone-beam computed tomography in 3 out of 33 ears (9.1%). We could not identify the tip fold-over by scouting plain X-ray images in 2 out of 3 cases before taking the cone-beam computed tomography images. Electrode removal and reinsertion were performed before wound closure and the successful reinsertion was confirmed by mobile cone-beam computed tomography. The folded electrode tips were located at 238.8°, 152°, and 185.8°. CONCLUSION Intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography is useful in detecting the tip fold-over of the slim modiolar electrodes during surgery. Therefore, it was possible to reinsert the electrodes in all cases before closing the wound, eliminating the need for revision surgeries. Moreover, the analysis of mobile cone-beam computed tomography images may help to elucidate the mechanisms of electrode tip fold-over.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taishi Inoue
- Department of Otolaryngology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yosuke Tona
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Okano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koichi Omori
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Otolaryngology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu C, Debs S, Singh R, Kastetter S, Pierre-Louis A, Coelho DH. The case for intra-operative X-ray in cochlear implantation: Four illustrative cases and literature review. Cochlear Implants Int 2022; 23:332-338. [PMID: 36005270 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2112546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate the utility of routine intraoperative plain film imaging in optimizing outcomes in cochlear implantation. INTRODUCTION Evolving surgical techniques, programming, and electrode arrays have all improved performance outcomes in cochlear implantation. Yet despite decreasing complication rates, electrode misplacement remains a common occurrence. Utilization of intraoperative confirmational tools (radiologic, electrophysiologic) remains unstandardized despite the acknowledged importance of proper electrode positioning. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use and benefits of intraoperative X-ray (IOXR) in four cases, particularly in cases of normal electrophysiologic testing. METHODS Four cases performed by an experienced CI surgeon are discussed where electrode malposition was only detected through X-ray. Literature review was performed on the use of intraoperative imaging, focusing on plain film radiography. RESULTS Case 1-3 describe examples of resistance-free electrode insertion in patients with normal pre-operative imaging. Intraoperative impedances and neural response telemetry (NRT) were normal. However, IOXR ultimately revealed tip fold-over prompting array repositioning. Case 4 describes an elective replacement of a soft-failing device. Resistance was encountered during array insertion, with IOXR demonstrating incomplete insertion compared with prior imaging. Positioning was revised to achieve pre-revision insertion depth, demonstrating the utility of prior IOXR in revision cases. Literature review of IOXR is discussed. CONCLUSION Appropriate placement of the electrode is paramount to successful CI outcomes. These cases illustrate IOXR as a safe, effective method to ensure optimal placement even in cases of normal electrophysiologic testing, supporting its routine use even by the most seasoned surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sarah Debs
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Rhea Singh
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sean Kastetter
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Akilah Pierre-Louis
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Daniel H Coelho
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Herrmann DP, Müller-Graff FT, Kaulitz S, Cebulla M, Kurz A, Hagen R, Neun T, Rak K. Application of intentional facial nerve stimulation during cochlear implantation as an electrophysiological tool to estimate the intracochlear electrode position. Sci Rep 2022; 12:13426. [PMID: 35927465 PMCID: PMC9352782 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17732-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This proof of concept describes the use of evoked electromyographic (EMG) activation of the facial nerve for intraoperative monitoring of the electrode insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). Intraoperative EMG measurements from the facial nerve were conducted in nine patients undergoing CI implantation. Electric current pulses were emitted from contacts on the CI array during and immediately after electrode insertion. For control, the results of EMG measurements were compared to postoperative flat panel volume computed tomography scans with secondary reconstruction (fpVCTSECO). During insertion, the EMG response evoked by the electrical stimulation from the CI was growing with the stimulating contact approaching the facial nerve and declined with increasing distance. After full insertion, contacts on the apical half of the CI array stimulated higher EMG responses compared with those on the basal half. Comparison with postoperative imaging demonstrated that electrode contacts stimulating high EMG responses had the shortest distances to the facial nerve. It could be demonstrated that electrically evoked EMG activation of the facial nerve can be used to monitor the progress during CI electrode insertion and to control the intracochlear electrode position after full insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Herrmann
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kaulitz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Mario Cebulla
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Tilmann Neun
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Kristen Rak
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Misplaced Cochlear Implant Electrodes Outside the Cochlea: A Literature Review and Presentation of Radiological and Electrophysiological Findings. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:567-579. [PMID: 35261380 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS It is possible to detect when misplacement and malposition of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array has occurred intraoperatively through different investigations. We aim to explore the literature surrounding cochlear implant misplacements and share our personal experience with such cases to formulate a quick-reference guide that may be able to help cochlear implant teams detect misplacements early. BACKGROUND Misplacement and malposition of a cochlear implant array can lead to poor hearing outcomes. Where misplacements go undetected during the primary surgery, patients may undergo further surgery to replace the implant array into the correct intracochlear position. METHODS Systematic literature review on cochlear implant misplacements and malpositions and a retrospective review of our program's cases in over 6,000 CI procedures. RESULTS Twenty-nine cases of CI misplacements are reported in the English literature. Sixteen cases of cochlear implant misplacements are reported from our institution with a rate of 0.28%. A further 12 cases of intracochlear malpositions are presented. The electrophysiological (CI electrically evoked auditory brainstem response, transimpedance matrix) and radiological (X-ray and computed tomography scan) findings from our experience are displayed in a tabulated quick-reference guide to show the possible characteristics of misplaced and malpositioned cochlear implant electrode arrays. CONCLUSION Both intraoperative electrophysiological and radiological tests can show when the array has been misplaced or if there is an intracochlear malposition, to prompt timely intra-operative reinsertion to yield better outcomes for patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Caversaccio M, Dazert S, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Jablonski GE, Kameswaran M, Kuzovkov V, Leinung M, Li Y, Loth A, Magele A, Mlynski R, Mueller J, Parnes L, Radeloff A, Raine C, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stöver T, Tavora-Viera D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Gavilan J. Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events. Front Surg 2022; 9:823219. [PMID: 35402479 PMCID: PMC8987358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types. Results A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4-6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6-30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2-1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1-1.3%), 11% (9.2-13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5-3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed. Conclusion Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Institute Australia, Lions Hearing Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Loth
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Magele
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Division of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Research Center of Neurosensory Sciences, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Chris Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Medical Sciences Department of Health Sciences and Medicine. University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland. Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of ENT HNS, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Högerle C, Englhard A, Simon F, Grüninger I, Mlynski R, Hempel JM, Müller J. Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Over: Our Experience With Long and Flexible Electrode. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:64-71. [PMID: 34619728 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate if there is any incidence of electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long and flexible lateral wall electrodes implanted in two high-volume Cochlear Implant (CI) centers in Germany. In addition, a detailed literature review was performed to capture all the peer-reviewed publications reporting on tip fold-over with CI electrodes from different CI brands for comparison. METHODS Post-operative X-ray images of FLEX SOFT electrode from MED-EL in Stenver's view were retrospectively investigated for the presence of electrode tip fold-over from 378 consecutive cases in two high-volume CI centers in Germany. All patients were implanted between 2010 and 2018 by three individual experienced CI surgeons using round window and extended round window approach for CI electrode insertion. A literature review was performed following a thorough PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) search using the keywords "cochlear implant electrode tip fold-over" or "cochlear implant electrode tip roll-over" to capture articles that were published until December 2020 in English language only. Articles selection was based on electrode-related issues investigated only in-patient cases applying imaging modality. Those studies investigated tip fold-over in cadaveric temporal bones and cases with inner-ear malformation excluded. RESULTS No single case of tip fold-over was clinically detected from the retrospective investigation of post-operative X-ray images from 378 consecutive cases. The electrode angular insertion depth as measured applying the cochlear coordinate system, varied from a minimum of 560° to a maximum of 720°. The literature review on the tip fold-over issue resulted in 24 peer-reviewed published articles in total. Tip fold-over with pre-curved modiolar-hugging electrodes was reported in 85 cases out of 1,606 implantations making an incidence rate of 5.3%. With the straight lateral wall electrodes, the tip fold-over was reported in four cases out of 398 implantations making an incidence rate of 1%, not including the number of implantations reported in the current study. Otherwise it would be 0.5%. CONCLUSION Electrode tip fold-over with 31.5 mm long flexible lateral wall electrodes is highly exceptional and this can be generalized to any of the straight lateral wall electrodes from any CI brand. The literature review on tip fold-over revealed an incidence rate of 5.3% with pre-curved or modiolar-hugging electrodes and 1% with straight lateral wall electrodes from CI brands. Including this series of 0% tip fold-over, the incidence rate of electrode tip fold-over with LW electrode type would be 0.5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalina Högerle
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Anna Englhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Florian Simon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Ivo Grüninger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner," Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - John-Martin Hempel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| | - Joachim Müller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fan Y, Zhang D, Banalagay R, Wang J, Noble JH, Dawant BM. Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2021; 8:064002. [PMID: 34853805 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.8.6.064002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Robust and accurate segmentation methods for the intracochlear anatomy (ICA) are a critical step in the image-guided cochlear implant programming process. We have proposed an active shape model (ASM)-based method and a deep learning (DL)-based method for this task, and we have observed that the DL method tends to be more accurate than the ASM method while the ASM method tends to be more robust. Approach: We propose a DL-based U-Net-like architecture that incorporates ASM segmentation into the network. A quantitative analysis is performed on a dataset that consists of 11 cochlea specimens for which a segmentation ground truth is available. To qualitatively evaluate the robustness of the method, an experienced expert is asked to visually inspect and grade the segmentation results on a clinical dataset made of 138 image volumes acquired with conventional CT scanners and of 39 image volumes acquired with cone beam CT (CBCT) scanners. Finally, we compare training the network (1) first with the ASM results, and then fine-tuning it with the ground truth segmentation and (2) directly with the specimens with ground truth segmentation. Results: Quantitative and qualitative results show that the proposed method increases substantially the robustness of the DL method while having only a minor detrimental effect (though not significant) on its accuracy. Expert evaluation of the clinical dataset shows that by incorporating the ASM segmentation into the DL network, the proportion of good segmentation cases increases from 60/177 to 119/177 when training only with the specimens and increases from 129/177 to 151/177 when pretraining with the ASM results. Conclusions: A hybrid ASM and DL-based segmentation method is proposed to segment the ICA in CT and CBCT images. Our results show that combining DL and ASM methods leads to a solution that is both robust and accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yubo Fan
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | | | - Rueben Banalagay
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Jianing Wang
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Jack H Noble
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Benoit M Dawant
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Transimpedance Matrix Measurements Reliably Detect Electrode Tip Fold-over in Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e1494-e1502. [PMID: 34766947 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE During cochlear implantation, electrophysiological tests are performed to document safe technical functioning of implant and electrodes. In rare cases, the apical part of the electrode folds over during insertion. The data from transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements enable the generation of a heat map or TIM profile measuring the spatial distribution of voltage. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of heat-map TIM profiles and compare them with spread of excitation (SOE) measurements and intraoperative imaging for prediction of electrode malposition. STUDY DESIGN Non-randomized study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS One hundred patients who underwent cochlear implantation with completed TIM measurements, SOE data and perioperative imaging met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The electrophysiological data on the electrode array positioning was compared with temporal bone imaging. RESULTS In seven cases, TIM measurements showed irregular results. In two cases, irregular TIM profiles were registered, but SOE data and 3D x-ray of the temporal bone didn't display deviated electrode positioning. A 3D x-ray of the skull displayed electrode tip fold-over in four cases and electrode buckling in one case. Sensitivity of TIM measurements and SOE data was 100%, specificity of TIM measurements was 97.89%, and specificity of SOE data was 98.93%. CONCLUSION Out of 100 patients using TIM measurements for detection of electrode malpositioning, no false negative cases were detected. TIM measurements successfully detect electrode malposition in an intraoperative setting. Different heat map patterns may be observed depending on location and type of malposition.
Collapse
|
12
|
Trecca EMC, Adunka OF, Mattingly JK, Hiss MM, Cassano M, Malhotra PS, Riggs WJ. Electrocochleography Observations in a Series of Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Overs. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e433-e437. [PMID: 33196531 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tip fold-over is a rare but serious complication of cochlear implant (CI) surgery. The purpose of this study was to present intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) observations in a series of CI electrode tip fold-overs. PATIENTS Five pediatric subjects undergoing CI surgery through a round window (RW) approach with a perimodiolar electrode array, who were diagnosed with either auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder or enlarged vestibular aqueduct. INTERVENTIONS Intraoperative RW ECochG during CI surgery: tone burst stimuli were presented from 95 to 110 dB SPL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Magnitude and phase characteristics of ECochG responses obtained intraoperatively before and immediately after electrode insertion were examined for patients with and without tip fold-over. RESULTS Three subjects presented with tip fold-over and two formed the control group. Among fold-over cases, one participant exhibited an inversion in the starting phase of the cochlear microphonic response and a decrease in spectral magnitude from pre- to postinsertion. Both subjects who did not exhibit a change in phase had an increase in the ECochG-total response (ECochG-TR) magnitude. No case in the control group exhibited a change in starting phase. In regard to the ECochG-TR, all controls showed a decrease in the magnitude. CONCLUSIONS Despite the small number of patients, heterogeneous ECochG response patterns were observed within the fold-over group. Though these results are not conclusive, they can serve as a framework to begin to understand ECochG's utility in detecting intraoperative tip fold-over.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora M C Trecca
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Oliver F Adunka
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jameson K Mattingly
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Meghan M Hiss
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Michele Cassano
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Prashant S Malhotra
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - William J Riggs
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jwair S, Prins A, Wegner I, Stokroos RJ, Versnel H, Thomeer HGXM. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:1358-1368. [PMID: 33159469 PMCID: PMC8246990 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objectives/Hypothesis Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation. Study Design Systematic review. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold‐over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Results We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta‐analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold‐over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X2 = 6.8, P < .01). Conclusions Scalar translocation and tip fold‐overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358–1368, 2021
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Jwair
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus Prins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Wegner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Huib Versnel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans G X M Thomeer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Despite developments in electrophysiological testing, imaging remains the standard method to determine cochlear implant positioning. Whilst cone beam computed tomography is optimal, modified Stenver radiographs are easier to perform and are therefore commonly used. With recent debate as to the need for routine imaging in uncomplicated cases, the radiologist is increasingly faced with cases of abnormal anatomy or surgical error. The primary interest is the positioning of the electrode array within the cochlea. This includes evidence of tip roll over or kinking and depth of electrode insertion, as both are independent predictors of hearing outcomes and may necessitate revision surgery.
Collapse
|