Does pediatric septoplasty compromise midfacial growth? A systematic review

Pediatric Functional Rhinoplasty

Surgery on the growing pediatric nose poses many questions regarding the indications and proper timing. Historically, surgeries on the pediatric nose led to facial growth alterations so many urged caution and waiting until skeletal maturity at the age of 18. However, animal studies showed some promise that facial growth may not be affected. Investigations into effects of pediatric sinus surgery and septal surgery on facial growth showed no issues. The external nose is somewhat different in that minor variations potentially can grow to a cosmetic deformity. However, numerous studies on facial growth show, to date, that it is not affected, and that surgery is safe. The caveat that one uses is the techniques of cartilage sparing and preservation, which have been studied and shown to be safe. There are ways to measure the effectiveness of surgery in relieving nasal airway obstruction both objectively and, more recently, subjectively. It is essential to treat pediatric nasal airway obstruction to avoid other facial growth problems, such as mouth breathing, snoring, malocclusion, and obstructive sleep apnea.

Secondary surgery techniques to optimise functional and aesthetic outcomes in orofacial clefting

Although the goal of primary surgery is to avoid the need for secondary surgery, in a proportion of patients this is not always possible. Secondary, or revisional, surgery is frequently undertaken in patients with orofacial clefts and may present a complex and challenging problem for the multidisciplinary team. There are a broad range of functional and aesthetic issues that secondary surgery might aim to address. These include palatal fistulae (that may be symptomatic for air, fluid or food), velopharyngeal insufficiency (typically manifesting with decreased intelligibility or nasal regurgitation), suboptimal cleft lip scars (that can significantly impact upon the psychosocial wellbeing of the patient), and nasal asymmetry (that is frequently accompanied by nasal airway concerns). Unilateral and bilateral clefts are each associated with a characteristic nasal deformity that requires a tailored surgical approach. Suboptimal maxillary growth in repaired orofacial clefts may impact negatively on both appearance and function; surgical correction through orthognathic surgery can be transformational for the patient. The general dental practitioner, cleft orthodontist and restorative dentist all play a critical role in this process.

Postoperative Outcomes in Pediatric Septoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Identify risk factors and perioperative morbidity for pediatric patients undergoing septoplasty.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database was retrospectively queried to identify patients who underwent septoplasty (CPT 30520) for a diagnosis of deviated nasal septum (ICD J34.2) from 2018 to 2019. Outcomes analyzed include patient demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical setting, operative characteristics, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 729 children were identified. Median age at time of surgery was 15.8 years, with most patients (82.8%) >12 years of age; no significant association was identified between age at time of surgery and adverse surgical outcomes. Overall, postoperative complications were uncommon (0.6%), including readmission (0.4%), septic shock (0.1%), and surgical site infection (0.1%). A history of asthma was found to be a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (P = .035) as well as BMI (P = .028).

CONCLUSION

The 30-day postoperative complications following pediatric septoplasty in children reported in the NSQIP-P database are infrequent. Special considerations regarding young age, complex sinonasal anatomy, and surgical technique remain important features in considering corrective surgery for the pediatric nose and certainly warrant further investigation in subsequent studies.

Utilizing Age of Menarche to Optimize Pediatric Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pediatric septorhinoplasty has sparked controversial debate amongst craniofacial surgeons, particularly due to its potential growth disturbances of the face and nose. The purpose of this study is (1) to conduct a systematic literature review that explores unique considerations and limitations associated with performing rhinoplasty in the pediatric population; (2) to discuss objective indicators for determining craniofacial skeleton maturation; (3) to perform a case series to further understand whether the age of menarche serves as a good proxy for estimating the time of facial growth maturation, and by extension, whether a post-menarchal patient is a suitable candidate for rhinoplasty.

METHODS

Systematic literature review was performed in order to assess unique considerations and limitations of pediatric rhinoplasty. Retrospective chart review and anthropometric (9 linear, 3 angular, 6 indices) measurements were performed for ten pediatric female patients who underwent open septo-rhinoplasty. Follow-up times ranged from 66 to 103 weeks. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts according to age at the time of menarche. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who had undergone menses for longer than 2 years at the time of rhinoplasty, whereas Cohort 2 comprised of patients who either had menses within 2 years of rhinoplasty or did not have menses at the time of rhinoplasty. Data included demographic factors, procedural variables, revision surgeries, and complications. Measurements were conducted using VECTRA software (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ). Differences in measurements between the 2 postoperative timepoints were compared.

RESULTS

Literature review yielded 17 articles, which had conflicting opinions regarding pediatric rhinoplasty and ultimately, highlighting the need for a more objective tool for guiding the decision to perform rhinoplasty.Patients in Cohort 1 had minimal deviations in measurements over time, within the exception of an increase in nasal tip projection and a decrease in nasolabial angle and facial width. Patients in Cohort 2 had decreases in facial height, upper facial height, nasal tip angle, and nasofrontal angle. Nasolabial angle decreased for both cohorts. Of the ten patients, 1 in Cohort 2 underwent revision rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case series suggests that anthropometric measurements remain relatively more stable for patients who have undergone menses for more than 2 years, compared to those who have not. Although this study has limitations, further investigation is warranted in order to determine whether age of menarche may serve as a useful tool for craniofacial surgeons in guiding the decision to perform rhinoplasty.