Hearing and hearing rehabilitation after obliteration of troublesome mastoid cavities

Surgical Treatment for Troublesome Mastoid Cavities: Canal Wall Reconstruction With Bony Obliteration Versus Subtotal Petrosectomy

INTRODUCTION

A chronically discharging modified radical mastoid cavity may require surgical intervention. We aim to explore two techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of subtotal petrosectomy (STP) and canal wall reconstruction with bony obliteration technique (CWR-BOT).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients with a chronically discharging mastoid cavity surgically treated at the Radboud University Medical Center by STP or CWR-BOT in 2015 to 2020, excluding patients with preoperative cholesteatoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dry ear rate, audiometry, and rehabilitation.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Healing time, number of postoperative visits, complications, cholesteatoma, and need for revision surgeries.

RESULTS

Thirty-four (58%) patients underwent STP, and 25 (42%) CWR-BOT. A dry ear was established in 100% of patients (STP) and 87% (CWR-BOT). The air-bone gap (ABG) increased by 12 dB in STP, and decreased by 11 dB in CWR-BOT. Postoperative ABG of CWR-BOT patients was better when preoperative computed tomography imaging showed aerated middle ear aeration. ABG improvement was higher when ossicular chain reconstruction took place. Mean follow-up time was 32.5 months (STP) versus 40.5 months (CWR-BOT). Healing time was 1.2 months (STP) versus 4.1 months (CWR-BOT). The number of postoperative visits was 2.5 (STP) versus 5 (CWR-BOT). Cholesteatoma was found in 15% (STP) versus 4% (CWR-BOT) of patients. Complication rate was 18% (STP) and 24% (CWR-BOT) with a need for revision in 21% (STP) and 8% (CWR-BOT), including revisions for cholesteatoma.

CONCLUSION

STP and CWR-BOT are excellent treatment options for obtaining a dry ear in patients with a chronically discharging mastoid cavity. This article outlines essential contributing factors in counseling patients when opting for one or the other. Magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging follow-up should be conducted at 3 and 5 years postoperatively.

Quality of life after revision mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration

AIMS

To evaluate the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after revision canal wall down mastoidectomy with mastoid obliteration (rCWD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated by rCWD for cholesteatoma between 2016 and 2019. A control group including all patients treated by primary canal wall down with mastoid obliteration (pCWD) for cholesteatoma between 2009 and 2014 was used for the comparison of the postoperative QoL, assessed by the COMQ-12.

RESULTS

The rCWD and pCWD groups respectively counted 38 and 78 patients with an average follow-up of 30 and 62 months respectively. No significant difference was found in terms of QoL between the two groups. An intra-group analysis among rCWD patients, showed that patients treated by canal wall down (CWD) at the primary surgery had a significantly worse post-revision QoL compared to those initially treated by canal wall up (CWU), specifically in the hearing and balance domains of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision mastoid obliteration leads to similar QoL results to those obtained after primary CWD with obliteration. Patients who had undergone a CWD as primary surgery complain worse hearing and balance problems compared to those primarily submitted to CWU, even after revision surgery.

Efficacy of S53P4 Bioactive Glass for the Secondary Obliteration of Chronically Discharging Radical Cavities

Objective

Present the results of the secondary obliteration of chronically discharging radical cavities using S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG).

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Single-center study.

Methods

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients that underwent secondary obliteration of persistently draining radical cavities using S53P4 BAG between 2011 and 2022. Patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were excluded. The main outcome was postoperative otorrhea, as indicated by Merchant grading.

Results

In total, 97 patients were included. The median postoperative follow-up time was 3.9 years (range 0.5-10.4). Average time between the original canal wall down surgery and the secondary obliteration was 25.3 years (SD 11.7, range 2-66). At the most recent follow-up visit, a Merchant grade of 0 to 1 was observed in 95% of the cases. There were no cases of sensorineural hearing loss or facial palsy, one case developed a retro auricular skin defect and 1 patient developed CSF leakage. Minor complications were seen in 10 patients (10%). Ossicular chain reconstruction with a titanium prosthesis was performed in 42 cases, resulting in a median improvement of 11.2 dB in air conduction thresholds. In 9/42 cases (21%), closure of the postoperative air-bone gap to ≤20 dB was achieved. Twenty-five percent of cases could be discharged from out-patient visits.

Conclusion

Revision of persistently draining radical cavities with BAG obliteration is feasible and results in a dry and safe ear in 95% of the patients, thereby enabling wearing of a conventional hearing aid. Out-patient visits could be ceased in 25% of the cases.

Mastoid obliteration and canal wall reconstruction with posterior auricular artery (PAA) fascia-periosteum flap

OBJECTIVE

Unstable cavities are defined as cavities with cerumen accumulation that need frequent cavity cleaning in the out-patient clinic, cavities that are intolerant to water due to risk of infection or that are subject to frequent infection and otorrhoea. The objective of this study is to address the problem of troublesome mastoid cavities, with the performance of secondary mastoid obliteration and canal wall reconstruction, using a novel posterior auricular artery (PAA) fascia-periosteum flap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was designed, only secondary obliterations were included. Unstable mastoid cavities were defined as Merchant grade 2 or 3 and were included for surgery.

RESULTS

At 12 months of follow up, a complete external auditory canal (EAC) and a self-cleaning ear were achieved in all 23 patients. Completely dry ears were achieved in 21 patients (91.3%). An air-bone gap improvement of 5dB was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Mastoid obliteration and EAC reconstruction are effective procedures to treat troublesome post canal wall down mastoid cavities. They improve quality of life and enable patients to overcome ear discharge. A standard EAC size enables the utilization of conventional hearing aids, it also reduces the need for constant mastoid cleaning and decreases healthcare expenses. The PAA flap seems to be an effective procedure to achieve all these features, as it is used to obliterate the mastoid and becomes a structural component of the neo-EAC.

[Mastoid obliteration during last 5 years]

The article presents modern approaches to mastoid obliteration in cases of chronic purulent otitis media with cholesteatoma, published in peer-reviewed russian and foreign journals from 2017 to 2021. The review tells us about effect of mastoid cavity obliteration on reducing the recurrence of cholesteatoma, improving the quality of life of patients according to the results of international questionnaires and the effect of surgery on hearing in the long-term postoperative period. An analysis of the use of autologous and biocompatible materials in middle ear surgery is presented. Their safety and ease of use during surgical intervention were evaluated.

Mastoid obliteration and external auditory canal reconstruction with silicone block in canal wall down mastoidectomy

OBJECTIVE

To prevent cavity problems in canal wall down mastoidectomy, silicone block for mastoid obliteration was used.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 39 patients (21 males and 18 females) underwent canal wall down mastoidectomy and mastoid obliteration using silicone block. We evaluated the postoperative outcome, the time until epithelialization of the cavity, graft success rate, and the hearing outcome.

RESULTS

The time until complete epithelialization of the mastoid cavity was 35.5 ± 5.4 days. We had a graft success rate of 100% during the follow-ups. The postoperative evaluation revealed 36 dry ears (92.3%) patients without any cavity problems. However, one ear developed granulation tissue, and two ears had partially exposed silicone block, which required revision mastoidectomy. Regarding hearing outcomes, a complication such as deaf ear was not reported.

CONCLUSION

Silicone block is safe and suitable for mastoid obliteration and external auditory canal reconstruction in canal wall down mastoidectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term audiological, surgical and safety outcomes of a complex patient cohort treated with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device (tBCD).

METHODS

This retrospective, monocentric cohort analysis involves 31 adults with conductive (CHL) and mixed hearing loss (MHL). For outcome analysis, study results were divided into short-term follow-up data (< 12 months) and long-term follow-up data (> 12 months).

RESULTS

31 patients with a total person-time of 90.4 years and an average number of 3.2 ± 1.5 preoperatively performed surgeries on the implanted side were investigated. Mean BCD-aided PTA₄ thresholds were significantly lower than unaided PTA_4AC before surgery (64.7 ± 16.1 dB HL; CHL 50.6 ± 10.6 dB HL; MHL 72.8 ± 12.8 dB HL) and did not change between short-term (42.3 ± 13.1 dB HL; CHL 35.8 ± 6.8 dB HL; MHL 45.2 ± 14.3 dB HL) and long-term (43.4 ± 10.0 dB HL; CHL 35.8 ± 4.3 dB HL; MHL 48.1 ± 9.6 dB HL) follow-up periods. Speech intelligibility in the Freiburg monosyllables test at 65 dB improved significantly, from 16.3 ± 21.5% (CHL 26.8 ± 19.0%; MHL 8.7 ± 20.5%) in the unaided condition to 82.7 ± 15.5% (CHL 90.0 ± 12.2%; MHL 79.4 ± 16.3%) in the short-term and 85.5 ± 13.2% (CHL 93.8 ± 7.9%; MHL 79.5 ± 13.3%) BCD-aided in the long-term follow-up periods. Ten minor procedure-related and 6 implant-related (5 minor, 1 major) AEs occurred over the total follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The device provides satisfactory audiological and speech benefit over long-term follow-up periods, up to 7 years. Explant rates were very low, while the overall rate of manageable AEs was high in this complex patient cohort. The device is considered a safe and effective option in the long-term hearing rehabilitation of patients with CHL and MHL.

Results of the Active Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss After the Middle Ear Surgery: Prospective Multicenter Study (ROMEO Study)

Objectives

This study was conducted to evaluate the user satisfaction, efficacy, and safety of round window (RW) vibroplasty using the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) in patients with persistent mixed hearing loss after mastoidectomy.

Methods

The study included 27 patients (mean age, 58.7 years; age range, 28–76 years; 11 men and 16 women) with mixed hearing loss after mastoidectomy from 15 tertiary referral centers in Korea. The VSB was implanted at the RW. The Korean translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire and the Korean version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (K-IOI-HA) questionnaire were used to evaluate user satisfaction as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome measures were audiological test results and complication rates.

Results

The mean scores for ease of communication (61.3% to 29.7% to 30.2%), reverberation (62.1% to 43.1% to 37.4%), and background noise (63.3% to 37.7% to 34.3%) subscales of the APHAB questionnaire significantly decreased after VSB surgery. The mean K-IOI-HA scores at 3 and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than the mean preoperative score (18.6 to 27.2 to 28.1). The postoperative VSB-aided thresholds were significantly lower than the preoperative unaided and hearing aid (HA)-aided thresholds. There was no significant difference between preoperative unaided, preoperative HA-aided, and postoperative VSB-aided maximum phonetically balanced word-recognition scores. None of the 27 patients experienced a change in postoperative bone conduction pure tone average. One patient developed temporary facial palsy and two developed surgical wound infections.

Conclusion

RW vibroplasty resulted in improved satisfaction and audiological test results in patients with mixed hearing loss after mastoidectomy, and the complication rate was tolerable.