Bencycloquidium bromide nasal spray is effective and safe for persistent allergic rhinitis: a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Highlights of the treatment of allergic rhinitis according to Chinese guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aimed to introduce the pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis according to the 2022 updated Chinese guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite recent advances in basic and clinical research worldwide, pharmacotherapy remains a mainstream in allergic rhinitis treatment. Usually, the first-line drugs, involving intranasal corticosteroids, second-generation oral and intranasal H1-antihistamines, or leukotriene receptor antagonists, can achieve acceptable outcomes in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The second-line drugs, such as oral corticosteroids, intranasal decongestants and intranasal anticholinergics, can assist in controlling severe symptoms, like nasal congestion/blockage and watery rhinorrhea. For those with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis, evidence-based stepwise strategies are suitable, in which the types and dosages of drugs are de-escalated or upgraded according to their therapeutic efficacy. Meanwhile, omalizumab, a novel biological agent, has burgeoned to satisfy the need of patients.

SUMMARY

This review highlights the staples in Chinese guidelines about the pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis to better understand the guidelines and promote the clinical practice.

Development and validation of LC-MS/MS methods for the quantification of 101BHG-D01, a novel, long-acting and selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, and its main metabolite M6 in human plasma, urine and feces: Application to a clinical study in healthy Chinese subjects

101BHG-D01 is a novel, long-acting and selective muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and rhinorrhea in rhinitis. To support its clinical study, several liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for the quantification of 101BHG-D01 and its main metabolite M6 in human plasma, urine and feces were developed. The plasma samples were prepared by protein precipitation, and the urine and fecal homogenate samples were pretreated by direct dilution, respectively. The chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 C18 column with 0.1% formic acid and 10.0 mM ammonium acetate buffer solution in water and methanol as the mobile phase. The MS/MS analysis was performed by using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) under a positive ion electrospray ionization mode. The methods were validated with regards to selectivity, linearity, lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), accuracy and precision, matrix effect, extraction recovery, dilution integrity, batch size, carryover and stability. The calibration ranges were as follows: 1.00-800 pg/mL for 101BHG-D01 and 1.00-20.0 pg/mL for M6 in plasma; 0.0500-20.0 ng/mL for 101BHG-D01 and M6 in urine; 0.400-400 ng/mL for 101BHG-D01 and 0.100-100 ng/mL for M6 in feces. There was no endogenous or cross interference observed at the retention time of the analytes and internal standard in various biological matrices. Across these matrices, for the lower limit of quantitation quality control (LLOQ QC) samples, the intra- and inter-batch coefficients of variation were within 15.7%. For other QC samples, the intra- and inter-batch coefficients of variation were within 8.9%. The intra- and inter-batch accuracy deviations for all QC samples were within the range of - 6.2-12.0%. No significant matrix effect was observed from the matrices. The extraction recoveries of these methods at different concentrations were consistent and reproducible. The analytes were stable in different matrices under various storage conditions. The other bioanalytical parameters were also fully validated and met the criteria given in the FDA guidance. These methods were successfully applied to a clinical study in healthy Chinese subjects after a single dose administration of 101BHG-D01 inhalation aerosol. After inhalation, 101BHG-D01 was absorbed into plasma rapidly with the time to reach the maximum drug concentration (T_max) of 5 min and eliminated slowly with a half-life time about 30 h. The cumulative urinary and fecal excretion rates revealed 101BHG-D01 was mainly excreted in feces, rather than urine. The pharmacokinetic results of the study drug laid a foundation for its further clinical development.

Intranasal Anticholinergics for Treatment of Chronic Rhinitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Topical intranasal anticholinergics are commonly prescribed for the relief of chronic rhinitis and associated symptoms, warranting thorough assessment of the supporting evidence. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticholinergic nasal sprays in the management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis symptom severity and duration.

METHODS

A search encompassing the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus databases was conducted. Primary studies describing rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and/or postnasal drip outcomes in rhinitis patients treated with an anticholinergic spray were included for review.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1,029 unique abstracts, of which 12 studies (n = 2,024) met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and 9 (n = 1,920) for meta-analysis. Median follow-up was 4 weeks and ipratropium bromide was the most extensively trialed anticholinergic. Compared to placebo, anticholinergic treatment was demonstrated to significantly reduce rhinorrhea severity scores (standardized mean difference [95% CI] = -0.77 [-1.20, -0.35]; -0.43 [-0.72, -0.13]) and duration (-0.62 [-0.95, -0.30]; -0.29 [-0.47, -0.10]) in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis patients respectively. Benefit was less consistent for nasal congestion, postnasal drip, and sneezing symptoms. Reported adverse effects included nasal mucosa dryness or irritation, epistaxis, headaches, and pharyngitis, though comparison to placebo found significantly greater risk for epistaxis only (risk ratio [95% CI] = 2.19 [1.22, 3.93]).

CONCLUSION

Albeit treating other symptoms with less benefit, anticholinergic nasal sprays appear to be safe and efficacious in reducing rhinorrhea severity and duration in both rhinitis etiologies. This evidence supports their continued use in the treatment of rhinitis-associated rhinorrhea.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Laryngoscope, 133:722-731, 2023.

Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists Under Investigational to Treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Introduction

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapy and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) as a mono or combination treatment play a pivotal role. Several LAMAs are already available on the market in different formulations, but developing a new compound with a higher M3 receptor selectivity and a lower affinity to M2 receptors to increase the therapeutic effect and minimize the adverse effects is still a goal. Moreover, new formulations could improve adherence to therapy.

Areas Covered

This systematic review assesses investigational long-acting muscarinic antagonist in Phase I and II clinical trials over the last decade. It offers insights on whether LAMAs and/or their new formulations in clinical development can become effective treatments for COPD in the future.

Expert Opinion

Research on LAMA seems to have come to a standstill, the few new molecules under study do not show distinctive characteristics compared to the previous ones. Muscarinic antagonist/β2-agonist (MABAs) appear to be the major innovation currently under investigation, and they could theoretically open new research frontiers on the effect between adrenergic and muscarinic interaction in the same cell.