Cochlear implants in adults with partial deafness: subjective benefits but associated psychological distress

Satisfaction with life in a sample of prelingually deaf cochlear implant users with a good command of spoken Polish as the primary language

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the level of satisfaction with life (SWL) in a group of cochlear implant (CI) users who had been prelingually deaf but were orally educated. They had received one or two CIs (as a child, adolescent, or adult) and were highly competent Polish speakers. This study looked at three factors that may affect SWL - psychosocial, deafness/hearing and communication related, and sociodemographic.

METHODS

The participants were prelingually deaf CI users who had learned highly competent spoken Polish as their primary language. They had been educated in mainstream or integrated schools (not schools for the deaf), and had no other disability or severe illness. Measurements were done with 5 questionnaires: the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the I-Others Questionnaire, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Deaf Identity Development Scale (DIDS), and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ).

RESULTS

The SWL level of the group was similar to that of the standard Polish population. SWL was positively related to positive self-perception, acceptance of oneself as a deaf person, and to perceiving the benefits of having a CI (as measured by three NCIQ domains: self-esteem, activity limitations, and social interactions). On the other hand, negative self-perception, marginal deaf identity, and depressive symptoms were negatively related to SWL. There was no relationship between SWL and knowledge of sign language. Lower depressive symptoms and greater hearing loss were both significant predictors of SWL, although those who used two CIs generally had a lower SWL.

CONCLUSIONS

Prelingually deaf CI users with low SWL require psychological support in many spheres, including working through problems of deaf identity, self-acceptance, and depression. Additional research should involve diverse DHH CI users, including those with limited spoken Polish competency or sign language skills, as well as members of the Polish Deaf community.

Quality of Voice in Patients With Partial Deafness Before and After Cochlear Implantation

Partial deafness is a condition characterised by normal hearing thresholds in low frequencies and increased hearing thresholds (nearly deafness) for high frequencies. Typical hearing aids are rather of a very limited use in this condition as they do not improve understanding of speech. Patients with partial deafness can be presently treated with cochlear implants, which had not been used before due to the risk of damage of hearing remains by electrode introduced into cochlea. The purpose of our study was an objective and subjective assessment of voice quality in partial deafness patients before and after cochlear implantation. The subjects in this study were 25 post-lingual, bilaterally partially deaf patients, 13 females and 12 males. The reference group composed of 55 normal hearing individuals (28 females and 27 males). The acoustic analysis was performed with a multidimensional voice analysis MDVP (Multi Dimension Voice Program), and the subjective assessment was done with GRBAS scale. Initial analysis of voice changes in partial deafness patients was performed versus normal hearing individuals, then voice parameters were measured and perceptual voice assessment was done before and 9 months after cochlear implantation. Measurements of acoustic voice parameters in partially deaf patients showed changes in most of frequency, amplitude, noise and subharmonic components versus normal hearing control group. The most significant, statistically important changes were observed in fundamental frequency variation (vF0), absolute jitter (Jita), jitter percent (Jitt), amplitude perturbation quotient (APQ), smoothed amplitude perturbation quotient (sAPQ), relative average perturbation (RAP), peak amplitude variation (vAm), relative amplitude modulation (Shim), percent shimmer (%Shim), pitch perturbation quotient (PPQ), smoothed pitched perturbation quotient (sPPQ), degree of subharmonics (DSH), degree of voiceless (DUV), number of subharmonic segments (NSH), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR), voice turbulence index (VTI). All patients in the study group were subjects to cochlear implantation. After 9 months objective and subjective assessment of patients` voices were performed again. Statistically important changes were identified in average fundamental frequency variability (vF0), relative amplitude modulation index (ShdB), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR), number of subharmonics NSH, degree of subharmonics (DSH) and the degree of voiceless (DUV). Comparison of the objective voice parameters changes after cochlear implantation with subjective, perceptual voice quality assessments leads to observation, that improvement of subjective voice quality after cochlear implantation takes place parallelly with improvement of certain objective acoustic voice parameters and some correlations exist. We found, that G correlates with vF0 and Shim, R correlates with DSH and NSH, B correlates with NSH and NHR, A correlates with DUV. We did not prove correlation of S with any of the objective parameters in our research group. Our study proved, that acoustic and perceptual features of voice in partially deaf adults are different than in normally hearing people and cochlear implantation in partial deafness patients is an effective tool to improve hearing and leads to improvement of the acoustic structure of the voice.Partial deafness is a condition characterised by normal hearing thresholds in low frequencies and increased hearing thresholds (nearly deafness) for high frequencies. Typical hearing aids are rather of a very limited use in this condition as they do not improve understanding of speech. Patients with partial deafness can be presently treated with cochlear implants, which had not been used before due to the risk of damage of hearing remains by electrode introduced into cochlea. The purpose of our study was an objective and subjective assessment of voice quality in partial deafness patients before and after cochlear implantation. The subjects in this study were 25 post-lingual, bilaterally partially deaf patients, 13 females and 12 males. The reference group composed of 55 normal hearing individuals (28 females and 27 males). The acoustic analysis was performed with a multidimensional voice analysis MDVP (Multi Dimension Voice Program), and the subjective assessment was done with GRBAS scale. Initial analysis of voice changes in partial deafness patients was performed versus normal hearing individuals, then voice parameters were measured and perceptual voice assessment was done before and 9 months after cochlear implantation. Measurements of acoustic voice parameters in partially deaf patients showed changes in most of frequency, amplitude, noise and subharmonic components versus normal hearing control group. The most significant, statistically important changes were observed in fundamental frequency variation (vF0), absolute jitter (Jita), jitter percent (Jitt), amplitude perturbation quotient (APQ), smoothed amplitude perturbation quotient (sAPQ), relative average perturbation (RAP), peak amplitude variation (vAm), relative amplitude modulation (Shim), percent shimmer (%Shim), pitch perturbation quotient (PPQ), smoothed pitched perturbation quotient (sPPQ), degree of subharmonics (DSH), degree of voiceless (DUV), number of subharmonic segments (NSH), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR), voice turbulence index (VTI). All patients in the study group were subjects to cochlear implantation. After 9 months objective and subjective assessment of patients` voices were performed again. Statistically important changes were identified in average fundamental frequency variability (vF0), relative amplitude modulation index (ShdB), noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR), number of subharmonics NSH, degree of subharmonics (DSH) and the degree of voiceless (DUV). Comparison of the objective voice parameters changes after cochlear implantation with subjective, perceptual voice quality assessments leads to observation, that improvement of subjective voice quality after cochlear implantation takes place parallelly with improvement of certain objective acoustic voice parameters and some correlations exist. We found, that G correlates with vF0 and Shim, R correlates with DSH and NSH, B correlates with NSH and NHR, A correlates with DUV. We did not prove correlation of S with any of the objective parameters in our research group. Our study proved, that acoustic and perceptual features of voice in partially deaf adults are different than in normally hearing people and cochlear implantation in partial deafness patients is an effective tool to improve hearing and leads to improvement of the acoustic structure of the voice.

Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices and Other Technologies on Deaf and Hard of Hearing People

Deaf and hard of hearing people use a variety of assistive devices and technologies as a strategy to mitigate, counter or compensate for life difficulties resulting from hearing loss. Although outcome measures are commonly used with hearing aids, few studies have explored the perceived psychosocial impact of other assistive devices and technologies or the factors leading to their abandonment or lack of use. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to assess the psychosocial impact of different assistive devices on deaf and hard of hearing people using the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale. The sample was made up of 291 individuals, 176 women and 115 men, with an average age of 56.12 years (standard deviation (SD) = 25.11), who were all users of different assistive devices. Overall, the results of the study showed that the use of assistive devices had a positive psychosocial impact, although this impact varied slightly depending on the specific type of device. Moreover, a relationship was identified between the psychosocial impact and the probability of future abandonment of a hearing aid or a cochlear implant. The results point to the importance of considering the psychosocial impact derived from the use of a device as a relevant variable in the adoption process of assistive technologies for deaf and hard of hearing people.

Validation of AQoL-8D: a health-related quality of life questionnaire for adult patients referred for otolaryngology

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to validate the AQoL-8D questionnaire in the adult population of patients referred to an otolaryngology clinic.

Methods

AQoL-8D was translated into Polish. 463 patients (age18–80 years) with otolaryngological conditions were assessed with the AQoL-8D, SF-6D, and SWLS questionnaires. We investigated the item content-relevance, factor structure by means of Confirmatory Factor Analysis, corrected item-total correlations, Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson correlation of the AQoL-8D scores with results from SF-6D and from the SWLS questionnaires. Finally, ANOVA was used to test the AQoL-8D ability to group the HRQoL of patients in terms of their otolaryngological management type.

Results

The median score of item content-relevance was 5.0 for all AQoL-8D items. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed the following fit indices: Comparative Fit Index = 0.81; Tucker–Lewis Index = 0.80; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.07. Cronbach's alpha for AQoL-8D dimensions ranged from 0.48 to 0.79. Mean item-total correlations over all dimensions, super dimensions, and the instrument overall were higher than 0.3. There was a significant Pearson correlation between the results obtained with AQoL-8D and SF-6D (r = 0.68), and with AQoL-8D and SWLS (r = 0.43). A one-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of management type on HRQoL as measured by AQoL-8D [F(4,458) = 6.12, p < 0.001]

Conclusion

AQoL-8D provides valid and reliable measures of HRQoL in patients undergoing otolaryngological treatment. Because it is a generic questionnaire, it is possible to make general comparisons of otolaryngology outcomes with those from other subspecialties.