Donor site sequelae and patient satisfaction after head and neck reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap

Guidance for Circumflex Scapular Artery Flap Utilization in Pediatric Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The circumflex scapular artery (CSA) flap system, consisting of scapular, parascapular, and chimeric flaps, is useful for pediatric reconstruction in many anatomical locations. The objectives of this case series are to offer insights into our decision-making process for selecting the CSA flap in particular pediatric reconstructive cases and to establish a framework for choosing a scapular or parascapular skin paddle. We also aim to emphasize important technical considerations of CSA flap utilization in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Pediatric reconstruction with CSA flaps performed at our institution between 2006-2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, indications, flap characteristics, complications, and operative data were abstracted. Functional donor site morbidity was assessed through postoperative physical examinations. Unpaired t test analyzed scapular versus parascapular flap size.

RESULTS

Eleven CSA flaps were successfully performed in 10 patients (6 scapular and 5 parascapular flaps). Patient ages ranged from 2 to 17 years. Scapular fasciocutaneous free flaps (n = 4) were performed in patients' ages 2-5 years for hand and forearm scar contractures. Two pedicled scapular flaps were performed for a single patient for bilateral axillary hidradenitis suppurativa. The 5 parascapular flaps were performed in patients' ages 2-14 years for calcaneus and forearm avulsion wounds and reconstruction after resection of hidradenitis suppurativa, nevus sebaceous, and Ewing sarcoma. In the sarcoma resection case, a chimeric flap with latissimus dorsi was employed. Average flap size was 101.6 ± 87.3 cm2 (range: 18-300 cm2). Parascapular flaps were significantly larger than scapular flaps (156.60 ± 105.84 cm2 vs 55.83 ± 26.97 cm2, P = 0.0495). Overall, 3 complications occurred (27.3% of cases) including venous congestion (n = 2) and wound dehiscence (n = 1). There were no reported cases of compromised shoulder function at 1.9 ± 2.5-year follow-up. The successful reconstruction rate for scapular, parascapular, and chimeric flaps was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSA flap treated a wide variety of indications demonstrating the flap's attributes: large vessel caliber, wide arc of rotation, reliable vascular anatomy, minimal donor site morbidity, and ability to incorporate bone and muscle. Our cases also highlight important pediatric considerations such as vascular mismatch and limited scapular bone stock. We recommend selection of the parascapular over the scapular flap with reconstruction of larger, complex defects given its ability to be harvested with a large skin paddle.

Reconstructive flap surgery in head and neck cancer patients: an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in postoperative radiotherapy

Background

Major advances have been made in reconstructive surgery in the last decades to reduce morbidity in head and neck cancer. Flaps are now present in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancer to cover anatomic, functional, and cosmetic needs. However, gaps in interdisciplinary innovation transfer from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) remain challenging. We aimed to provide an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in planning head and neck postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

A systematic and critical review was conducted to address areas of optimization in surgery and radiology that may be relevant to poRT.

Results

Despite extensive surgical literature on flap techniques and salvage surgery, 13 retrospective series were identified, where flap outcomes were indirectly compared between surgery alone or poRT. These low-evidence studies suggest that radiotherapy accelerates flap atrophy, fibrosis, and osteoradionecrosis and deteriorates functional outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests that tumor spread occurs at the flap-tissue junction rather than in the flaps. One prospective 15-patient study showed 31.3% vs. 39.2% flap volume reduction without or with poRT. In an international consensus, experts recognized the needs for optimized flap-sparing poRT against flap-related functional deterioration and bone damage. CT, MRI, and PET-CT modalities show potential for the delineation of the junction area between native tissues and flap for flap segmentation and to characterize flap-specific changes quantitatively and correlate them with patterns of relapse or complications.

Conclusion

Flap management in poRT is insufficiently documented, but poRT seems to damage flaps. Current gaps in knowledge underscore the need for prospective flap assessment and interdisciplinary trials investigating flap morbidity minimization by flap-sparing poRT planning.

A Comparison of Skin Graft Techniques with and without Plaster Back Slab Dressing in Reducing Donor Site Morbidity in Radial Forearm Free Flap Surgery - A Retrospective Study

Introduction

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a commonly used free flap for the reconstruction of orofacial defects because of its versatility and reliability. The donor site is closed with either split or full-thickness skin graft, and one of the common donor site morbidities is skin graft failure. Various techniques to minimise skin graft failure were reported, and we compared the skin graft techniques with and without plaster back slab dressing in the radial forearm donor site.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study of 75 patients who had RFFF for reconstruction of oral cavity cancer at two different tertiary teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom between April 2015 and March 2020. Thirty-nine patients from Hospital one had volar back slap, bolster dressing and crepe bandage. In contrast, 36 patients from Hospital two had only pressure dressing without a back slab.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 60.65 (P = 0.274). In both groups, two patients had donor site complications. However, there was no significant difference in the donor site skin graft complications with a P = 0.662.

Discussion

There was no evidence in the literature to support an ideal bandage for skin graft at the RFFF donor site. Our comparison of two techniques of skin graft dressings with and without back slap did not show any difference in the skin graft take, and the volar back slab did not add any additional benefits. The simple use of foam as a bolster dressing without a back slab is ideal for the radial forearm free flap donor site.

Reducing morbidity in radial forearm free flap donor site: a review of closure techniques

PURPOSE

Radial forearm free tissue transfer (RFFF) has been an extremely reliable reconstructive option for head and neck oncologic defects for over 30 years. With high reliability, interest has shifted in minimizing donor site morbidity, much of which results from closure techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Portable negative pressure wound devices, newer dermal substitutes, and local flap techniques have improved donor site aesthetics and function.

SUMMARY

Outcomes of the RFFF donor site may benefit from newer techniques in closure.