Open partial horizontal laryngectomy and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a multicenter Italian experience

Current Status of Partial Laryngeal Surgery for Advanced Laryngeal Cancer: When and Why?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper aims to evaluate the evolution and current status of partial laryngeal surgery in the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer (LC). Specifically, recent progress in the selection of both patients and tumors, together with surgical and rehabilitation innovations, have contributed to balancing oncological control with the maintenance of quality of life in naïve and radiorecurrent patients. The main aspect is represented by the recognized role of open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) in this new era of laryngeal cancer treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advancements highlight OPHLs' efficacy for conservative management of intermediate to advanced stages of LC. Innovations such as supratracheal partial laryngectomy have expanded surgical options, offering a modular approach to complex cases. Improved understanding of tumor biology, enhanced imaging techniques, and more precise preoperative planning have led to better patient outcomes, emphasizing the importance of a conservative function-preserving surgical treatment. These advancements reflect a broader trend towards individualized treatment plans that prioritize both survival and quality of life. OPHLs play an important role in current management of intermediate/advanced LC, effectively balancing oncological control with the preservation of laryngeal functions. Critical factors include meticulous patient and tumor selection, the impact of surgical and technological refinements on functional outcomes, and the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment planning. Current evidence justifies the use of these interventions in many intermediate T-stage laryngeal tumors, even at risk of upstaging on pathological examination. The oncological results, the preservation of laryngeal function and the laryngectomy-free survival achieved with OPHLs appear to be highly competitive with those of non surgical organ-preservation protocols, aiming to introduce a new standard in the LC treatment.

Twenty questions from the surgeon to the radiologist to better plan an open partial horizontal laryngectomy

Open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) represent a valuable therapeutic option for tumors of the intermediate T-category and, in selected cases, for locally advanced tumors with low-volume extra-laryngeal extension. The eligibility of patients treated with this type of surgery has increased with the introduction of the modular approach to OPHL planning. This strategy follows the introduction of the classification proposed by the European Laryngological Society, based on the extent of horizontal resection. Optimization of the selection is the result of a meticulous work-up process involving close cooperation between experienced surgeons and radiologists, followed by final quality control by pathologists. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are study methods whose pearls and pitfalls are well known, especially when performed at a high level of expertise. In this paper, based on the experience of two high-volume centers, a checklist of 20 questions addressed by the surgeon to the radiologist before planning an OPHL was proposed. Considerations regarding case selection are reported for each of the questioned parameters. A very simple question-and-answer process is easy to understand and mainly addressed by less experienced colleagues who wish to increase their knowledge and skills in performing this type of surgery.

Partial Laryngectomy for pT4a Laryngeal Cancer: Outcomes and Limits in Selected Cases

A large multi-institutional case series of laryngeal cancer (LC) T4a was carried out, including 134 cases treated with open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHL) +/- post-operative radiation therapy (PORT). The goal was to understand better whether OPHL can be included among the viable options in selected pT4a LC patients who refuse a standard approach, represented by total laryngectomy (TL) + PORT. All 134 patients underwent OPHL type I (supraglottic), II (supracricoid), or III (supratracheal), according to the European Laryngological Society Classification. Comparing clinical and pathological stages showed pT up-staging in 105 cases (78.4%) and pN up-staging in 19 patients (11.4%). Five-year data on overall survival, disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, freedom from laryngectomy, and laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival (rate of patients surviving without a local recurrence or requiring total laryngectomy and without a feeding tube or a tracheostomy) were, respectively, 82.1%, 89.8%, 75.7%, 89.7%, and 78.3%. Overall, complications were observed in 22 cases (16.4%). Sequelae were observed in 28 patients (20.9%). No patients died during the postoperative period. This large series highlights the good onco-functional results of low-volume pT4a laryngeal tumors, with minimal or absent cartilage destruction, treated with OPHLs. The level of standardization of the indication for OPHL should allow consideration of OPHL as a valid therapeutic option in cases where the patient refuses total laryngectomy or non-surgical protocols with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy.

Surgery for Supraglottic Laryngeal Cancer

Although total laryngectomy continues to be important treatment of supraglottic laryngeal cancer, the management of early-stage disease has evolved from primary radiation/chemoradiation to consideration of partial laryngectomy surgery. Surgeon experience and careful patient selection can lead to excellent oncologic and functional outcomes for these techniques. However, advanced stage tumors and salvage situations are challenging and the ability to eradicate disease and preserve function should be carefully considered. Contraindications to supraglottic laryngectomy depend on surgical approach, as do complications. With adequate patient selection, high rates of cure and function can be achieved with both open and transoral supraglottic laryngectomy procedures.

Upfront surgical organ-preservation strategy in advanced-stage laryngeal cancer

PURPOSE

Advanced-stage laryngeal cancer is a challenging disease that needs multimodal treatment. Medical and surgical organ-preservation strategies have been developing in the last decades to spare these functions while granting cancer cure. The current work presents the experience of a tertiary-care center in conservative surgery for advanced-stage laryngeal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected clinical data of patients submitted to open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) and any possible adjuvant treatment from 2005 to 2018. Outcomes were also compared to the most recent studies reporting on both medical and surgical organ-preservation strategies.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients were included in the analysis. Adjuvant therapy was employed in 51% of cases. The local control rate was 96.4%, while overall survival (OS) was 67%, and laryngo-esophageal dysfunction free survival (LEDFS) was 66%. Stage IV and vascular invasion were associated with a statistically-significant worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

OPHLs are valid as upfront treatment in fit patients affected by advanced-stage laryngeal cancer. Disease control and function preservation are granted in a significant percentage of cases, even when followed by adjuvant therapy.