Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with the blind technique: 10 years' experience

Novel stapler-assisted technique for closure of persistent tracheoesophageal puncture fistula

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is a reliable method to restore voice and is an important part of voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy. However, complications following this procedure, including peri-prosthetic leakage and resulting aspiration pneumonia, may necessitate surgical closure. In this study, we present an effective and reliable method for TEP closure using a stapler-assisted technique. Case series study for patients who underwent stapler-assisted TEP closure reviewed from 2017 to 2021. All five patients had successful closure of their TEP tract without further leakage. No postoperative bleeding, wound infection, or esophageal stenosis occurred. One patient had postoperative stomal stenosis. The stapler-assisted technique for TEP closure is easy, quick, and effective. The reliability and quick return to oral intake post-operatively make it a preferable option over previous techniques.

[Historical and modern aspects of rehabilitation of voice function after laryngectomy]

The literature review presents historical and modern aspects of the rehabilitation of vocal function after laryngectomy, in particular, external devices, tracheopharyngeal bypass surgery, esophageal speech, tracheoesophageal bypass surgery without the use of a prosthetic device, voice prostheses are described. The advantages and disadvantages of each voice restoration technique, functional results, complications, prosthesis designs, their service life, bypass techniques, methods of prevention and treatment of damage to the valve apparatus of the prosthesis by colonies of microorganisms, fungal flora are analyzed.

Indications and complications of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in Chinese laryngectomees

BACKGROUND

Although there are many literatures about secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for voice prosthesis. Most of the description of indications is not specific and the description of complications is not so vivid, which is not of great value for novice doctors.

OBJECTIVE

To show specific indications and vivid complications of secondary TEP with typical clinical pictures for novice doctors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical data of 20 patients undergoing secondary TEP for Provox Vega voice prosthesis in our hospital were analyzed. The surgical indications and the prevention and treatment of common perioperative complications were summarized.

RESULTS

The surgical indications included: no obvious stenosis of the stoma and the entrance of esophagus; no obvious scar constitution, mouth opening restriction and backward restraint of the neck, etc. The common postoperative complications included: TEP fistula infection (2 cases), bleeding of the fistula (1 case), deep neck abscess (1 case), granulation hyperplasia at the inner side of the fistula (1 case), invagination of the voice prosthesis (2 cases) and leakage (2 cases).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The secondary TEP for Provox Vega voice prosthesis is clinically safe, but certain indications should be mastered. Common postoperative complications can be solved through preventive and remedial treatment schemes.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture for Voice Prosthesis Insertion Using Flexible Esophagoscopy

BACKGROUND

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis (VP) insertion is the gold standard of surgical voice restoration in postlaryngectomy patients. The conventional technique involves rigid esophagoscopes and trocar performed by ENT surgeons alone, with technical limitations encountered in patients with cervical abnormalities - in particular those with free or rotational flap reconstructions and postradiotherapy strictures. We report our technique using flexible endoscopy which we show to be feasible and without major safety events, as a possible consideration in the anticipated difficult TEP.

METHODS

Our study describes a multidisciplinary approach to secondary TEP involving a combined upper gastrointestinal (UGI) and (Ear, Nose, and Throat) ENT procedure, under the guidance of flexible esophagoscopy, with intraoperative involvement of the speech pathologist to guide VP insertion and placement. The procedure was performed with ease without major complications.

RESULTS

We identified nine postlaryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy patients in our institution who underwent secondary TEP with VP insertion using flexible esophagoscopy and multidisciplinary intra-operative involvement. All patients had pharyngeal reconstruction, including radial forearm free flap (n = 4), pectoralis major rotational flap (n = 3), and anterolateral thigh flap (n = 2). Eight out of nine patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The technique was successfully performed in all patients. There were three cases of early TEP displacement in two patients, of which one patient had a successful repeat procedure. We found the technique advantageous in terms of feasibility and practicality compared to the conventional approach, and without intraoperative difficulties encountered in achieving the desired field of views or navigating the challenging anatomy in a free flap and post-radiotherapy patients. This includes distorted cervical anatomy, the presence of bulky and hair-bearing flap skin, and stricture formation. Minor complications in our cohort included pharyngo-esophageal spasm, TEP displacement, granulation tissue, and peri-prosthetic leaks.

CONCLUSION

Our multidisciplinary approach to secondary TEP was performed with flexible esophagoscopy without major related complications. The technique is advantageous in the surgical approach to VP insertion in postlaryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy patients who have had radiotherapy or pharyngeal reconstruction. It allows for safe anatomical insertion and thorough evaluation of the upper aerodigestive tract for comorbid benign or malignant esophageal pathology.

Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after laryngoesophagectomy: surgical and functional outcomes

PURPOSE

Quality of Life (QoL) after extensive head and neck resections is of paramount importance, especially after pharyngolaryngectomy or pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy where complex digestive tract reconstruction is required (with gastric pull-up or colon transposition). Tracheodigestive puncture (TDP) is the only vocal restoration option in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative complications, vocal outcomes, voice-related and swallowing-related QoL after secondary TDP in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in the tertiary referral center of Verona Hospital between June 2014 and June 2020. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical data were assessed. Speech objective and subjective evaluation was performed. QoL was assessed with Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Seven patients met the inclusion criteria, but two had died before questionnaires were administered. No intraoperative complications were noted after TDP surgery. There were delayed complications in four cases (57.1%) and all were treated with restoration. Intelligible voice was restored in all patients. Maximum phonation time and maximal voice intensity recorded were 5.42 ± 3.27 s and 65.20 ± 5.45 dB, respectively. Acceptable average VHI-10 and MDADI scores were obtained in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary TDP performed after gastric pull-up or colon transposition reconstructions are feasible and effective procedures. An intelligible voice was restored in all patients, with satisfactory patient-perceived voice-related and dysphagia-related quality-of-life outcomes.