Incidental uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose in the Waldeyer's ring and risk of oropharyngeal malignancy

Cancer in Patients With Incidental Asymmetric Oropharynx Positron Emission Tomography Uptake

Importance

Asymmetric oropharynx uptake on positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a common incidental finding and often prompts otolaryngology referral to rule out malignancy; however, the true risk of malignancy based on this finding is unknown.

Objective

To identify the incidence of oropharynx cancer in patients with incidental asymmetric oropharynx PET uptake.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this retrospective cohort study, patients 18 years and older undergoing PET/CT scans at Mayo Clinic between January 2001 and December 2018 were included. Patients with a history or pretest suspicion of oropharynx cancer were excluded. Data were analyzed from March 2021 to December 2023.

Exposure

Blinded radiologic review of imaging studies, including measurement of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the ipsilateral side of concern and contralateral side. Retrospective medical record review for associated clinical data.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary study outcome was the incidence of oropharynx cancer diagnosis in patients with asymmetric oropharynx PET uptake. The primary outcome was formulated before data collection.

Results

Of the 1854 patients identified with asymmetric oropharynx PET uptake, 327 (17.6%) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 173 (52.9%) were male, and the median (range) age was 65.0 (24.8-90.7) years. The mean (SD) follow-up interval was 52.1 (43.4) months. A total of 18 of 327 patients (5.5%) were newly diagnosed with oropharynx cancer. The most common diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 9), followed by lymphoma (n = 8), and sarcoma (n = 1). Patients with an incidental diagnosis of oropharynx cancer had higher mean (SD) ipsilateral SUVmax (8.7 [3.7] vs 5.3 [1.9]) and SUVmax ratio (3.0 [1.6] vs 1.6 [0.6]) compared with patients with normal examination findings. SUVmax ratio and difference were found to be good discriminators of oropharynx cancer, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 86.3% (95% CI, 76.4-94.6) and 85.8% (95% CI, 74.8-94.6), respectively. Patients with a new diagnosis of oropharynx cancer were more likely to have a corresponding CT abnormality than those with normal examination findings (6 of 18 [33%] vs 24 of 295 [8.1%]). Patients with concerning lesions on oropharynx palpation by an otolaryngology health care professional were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with oropharynx cancer compared with patients with normal examination findings (odds ratio, 28.4; 95% CI, 6.6-145.8).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, while incidental asymmetric oropharynx PET uptake was common, a new diagnosis of oropharynx cancer was not and potentially results in a large volume of unnecessary referrals and work-up. Using SUVmax ratio, SUVmax difference, and CT correlation may increase the benefit of referral. Patients with a palpable oropharynx lesion and asymmetric oropharynx PET uptake should undergo confirmatory biopsy.

Risk of malignancy in incidental oropharyngeal lesions exhibiting fluorodeoxyglucose uptake which proceed to tissue biopsy

BACKGROUND

Utilization of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose is increasing in use for a variety of indications, including surveillance of cancer patients. There is a paucity of evidence pertaining to the significance of incidental PET-avid oropharyngeal lesions. This study aims to examine the clinical and radiological features of these incidental oropharyngeal lesions in patients undergoing PET for indications other than head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of three Australian tertiary hospitals, from 2015 to 2021, on adult patients undergoing biopsy of incidental PET-avid oropharyngeal lesions. Primary outcome of interest was the incidence of malignancy. Patients with a previous history of, or undergoing investigations for, head and neck cancer were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included, wherein 21 patients had tonsillar uptake, and 13 patients had base of tongue uptake. Tonsillar disease was mostly asymmetrical (n = 15/21), bilateral (n = 11/21), and had median SUVmax 9.35 (n = 12, IQR 7.4-11.15). Base of tongue was mostly asymmetrical (n = 7/13, 54%), bilateral (n = 8/13, 62%), and had median SUVmax 8.2 (n = 10, IQR 6.9-12.65). Seven patients had malignancy confirmed on tissue biopsy: five biopsies confirmed the tissue diagnosis of suspected lymphoma, and two incidental findings of unexpected malignancies: one p16 positive tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma, and one metastatic breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

In 31 patients undergoing tissue biopsy for incidental PET-avid oropharyngeal lesions, there were two unexpected malignancies. Our study results indicate that although unexpected malignancies are uncommon, a malignant diagnosis cannot be excluded from clinical features alone.

The radiological unknown primary of the head and neck: Recommendations for imaging strategies based on a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To develop recommendations for the radiological investigation of clinically occult primary cancer in the head and neck.

DESIGN AND SETTING

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a search was performed on Medline, Embase and Cochrane library databases to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound guided Fine Needle Aspiration (US FNAC), contrast enhanced CT (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT (18F-FDG PET-CT) in the investigation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary (HNSCCUP) presenting with a metastatic cervical lymph node (s). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Version 2 tool and SIGN 50 guidelines were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of the included studies.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients presenting with metastatic cervical lymph nodes from a HNSCCUP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Utility of different imaging modalities (PET-CT, MRI, CE CT and US FNAC in the management of HNSCCUP).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria; these were meta-analyses, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal imaging strategy involves utilisation of various imaging modalities. US FNAC can provide the initial diagnosis and HPV status of the occult primary tumour. CECT and MRI detect up to 44% of occult tumours and guide management. FDG PET-CT is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of CUP and should be performed prior to panendoscopy.