Multicentric study on surgical information and early safety and performance results with the Bonebridge BCI 602: an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant

Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation

Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma requires a highly individualized approach, balancing disease eradication with hearing preservation, and necessitates thorough patient counseling on expected auditory outcomes and options for rehabilitation. The choice between canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy can influence hearing outcomes. Hearing rehabilitation options following cholesteatoma surgery include air- and bone-conduction devices and are individualized for the patient. Assistive listening devices such as frequency modulation systems, hearing loops, and Bluetooth technology are critical for enhancing speech understanding in noisy environments for patients who employ various hearing rehabilitation methods and require further advanced solutions.

MED-EL Bonebridge implantation in pediatric patients age 11 Years and younger: Is it safe and effective?

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with off-label MED-EL Bonebridge implantation in pediatric patients younger than 12 years of age and compare outcomes to pediatric patients 12 years and older.

METHODS

Pediatric patients who underwent Bonebridge implantation were included in a retrospective cohort study and were categorized by off-label use (<12 years) and ≥12 years at time of bone conduction implantation (BCI). Hearing outcomes were collected after implant activation, which was typically 4-8 weeks post-implantation. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to assess for differences between audiometric outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (25 implants) < 12 years of age and 17 patients (23 implants) ≥12 years of age underwent BCI. Pre-BCI speech recognition threshold (SRT) was better for the older patient group (median 50 dB) than the younger patient group (median 60 dB). Post-BCI SRT, however, was significantly lower in the younger patient group (median 22.5 dB) as compared to the older patient group (median 35 dB), (p < 0.001, Z = 3.1). The two groups performed similarly on age-appropriate wordlists presented at 50 dB HL in aided conditions (p > 0.05, -1

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients younger than 12 years showed similar or better audiometric benefit from off-label Bonebridge implantation when compared to older patients. Pediatric patients younger than 12 years can be considered Bonebridge implant candidates if clinically indicated; Bonebridge implantation in this age group appears safe and technically feasible.

Collapse

Key Words

• Active transcutaneous bone conduction device
• Bone conduction hearing device
• MED-EL bonebridge
• Off-label
• Pediatric

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Child
• Retrospective Studies
• Female
• Male
• Bone Conduction
• Adolescent
• Treatment Outcome
• Child, Preschool
• Age Factors
• Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery
• Bone-Anchored Prosthesis
• Cohort Studies
• Hearing Aids
• Speech Perception
• Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
• Prosthesis Implantation/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Kaitlyn A Brooks Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Otolaryngology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anastasia Kolousek Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Erin K Holman Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Audiology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Sean S Evans Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Otolaryngology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
Nandini Govil Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Otolaryngology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
Kristan P Alfonso Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Otolaryngology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA

Collapse

A new active bone-conduction implant: surgical experiences and audiological outcomes in patients with bilateral congenital microtia

PURPOSE

First-generation bone bridges (BBs) have demonstrated favorable safety and audiological benefits in patients with conductive hearing loss. However, studies on the effects of second-generation BBs are limited, especially among children. In this study, we aimed to explore the surgical and audiological effects of second-generation BBs in patients with bilateral congenital microtia.

METHODS

This single-center prospective study included nine Mandarin-speaking patients with bilateral microtia. All the patients underwent BCI Generation 602 (BCI602; MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) implant surgery between September 2021 and June 2023. Audiological and sound localization tests were performed under unaided and BB-aided conditions.

RESULTS

The transmastoid and retrosigmoid sinus approaches were implemented in three and six patients, respectively. No patient underwent preoperative planning, lifts were unnecessary, and no sigmoid sinus or dural compression occurred. The mean function gain at 0.5-4.0 kHz was 28.06 ± 4.55-dB HL. The word recognition scores improved significantly in quiet under the BB aided condition. Signal-to-noise ratio reduction by 10.56 ± 2.30 dB improved the speech reception threshold in noise. Patients fitted with a unilateral BB demonstrated inferior sound source localization after the initial activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-generation BBs are safe and effective for patients with bilateral congenital microtia and may be suitable for children with mastoid hypoplasia without preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction.

[Transcutaneous bone conduction implant with self-drilling screws : A new method for fixation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant. German version]

BACKGROUND

The active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (tBCI; BONEBRIDGE™ BCI 601; MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) is fixed to the skull with two self-tapping screws in predrilled screw channels. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fixation with self-drilling screws instead of the self-tapping screws, in order to simplify the surgical procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine patients (mean age 37 ± 16 years, range 14-57 years) were examined pre- and 12 months postoperatively for word recognition scores (WRS) at 65 dB SPL, sound-field (SF) thresholds, bone conduction thresholds (BC), health-related quality of life (Assessment of Quality of Life, AQOL-8D questionnaire), and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Due to avoidance of one surgical step, the surgical technique was simplified. Mean WRS in SF was 11.1 ± 22.2% (range 0-55%) pre- and 77.2 ± 19.9% (range 30-95%) postoperatively; mean SF threshold (pure tone audiometry, PTA4) improved from 61.2 ± 14.3 dB HL (range 37.0-75.3 dB HL) to 31.9 ± 7.2 dB HL (range 22.8-45.0 dB HL); mean BC thresholds were constant at 16.7 ± 6.8 dB HL (range 6.3-27.5 dB HL) pre- and 14.2 ± 6.2 dB HL (range 5.8-23.8 dB HL) postoperatively. AQOL-8D mean utility score increased from 0.65 ± 0.18 preoperatively to 0.82 ± 0.17 postoperatively. No device-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Implant fixation by means of self-drilling screws was safe and effective in all nine patients. There was significant audiological benefit 12 months after implantation.

Early Results With the New Active Bone-Conduction Hearing Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The bone conduction implant (BCI) 602 is a new transcutaneous BCI with smaller dimensions. However, limited patient numbers restrict the statistical power and generalizability of the current studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis summarize early audiological and medical outcomes of adult and pediatric patients implanted with the BCI 602 due to mixed or conductive hearing loss.

DATA SOURCE

Following the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, 108 studies were reviewed, and 6 (5.6%) were included in the meta-analysis.

REVIEW METHOD

The data on study and patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and audiological test results were extracted from each article. Meta-analysis employed the fixed-effect and random-effects models to analyze the mean differences (MDs) between pre- and postoperative performances.

RESULTS

In total, 116 patients were evaluated, including 64 (55%) adult and 52 (45%) pediatric patients. No intraoperative adverse events were reported, while postoperative complications were reported in 2 (3.1%) adult and 2 (3.8%) pediatric patients. Studies consistently showed significant improvements in audiological outcomes, quality of life, and sound localization in the aided condition. In the meta-analysis, we observed a significant difference in the unaided compared to the aided condition in sound field thresholds (n = 112; MD, -27.05 dB; P < 0.01), signal-to-noise ratio (n = 96; MD, -6.35 dB; P < 0.01), and word recognition scores (n = 96; MD, 68.89%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The implantation of the BCI 602 was associated with minimal surgical complications and excellent audiological outcomes for both the pediatric and the adult cohort. Therefore, our analysis indicates a high level of safety and reliability. Further research should focus on direct comparisons with other BCIs and long-term functional outcomes.

Role of early hearing aid experience in speech recognition in patients with bilateral congenital microtia following Bonebridge implantation: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To identify audiological and demographic variables that predict speech recognition abilities in patients with bilateral microtia who underwent Bonebridge (BB) implantation.

METHODS

Fifty patients with bilateral microtia and bilateral conductive hearing loss (CHL) who underwent BB implantation were included. Demographic data, preoperative hearing aid use experience, and audiological outcomes (including pure-tone hearing threshold, sound field hearing threshold [SFHT], and speech recognition ability) for each participant were obtained. The Chinese-Mandarin Speech Test Materials were used to test speech recognition ability. The word recognition score (WRS) of disyllabic words at 65 dB SPL signals was measured before and after BB implantation in quiet and noisy conditions.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative WRS under quiet and noisy conditions was 10.44 ± 12.73% and 5.90 ± 8.76%, which was significantly improved to 86.38 ± 9.03% and 80.70 ± 11.34%, respectively, following BB fitting. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that lower preoperative SFHT suggested higher preoperative WRS under both quiet and noisy conditions. Higher age at implantation predicted higher preoperative WRS under quiet conditions. Furthermore, patients with more preoperative hearing aid experience and lower postoperative SFHT were more likely to have higher postoperative WRS under both quiet and noisy testing conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first attempt to identify predictors of preoperative and postoperative speech recognition abilities in patients with bilateral microtia with BB implantation. These findings emphasize that early hearing intervention before implantation surgery, combined with appropriate postoperative fitting, contributes to optimal benefits in terms of postoperative speech recognition ability.

Efficacy of the Bonebridge BCI602 for Adult Patients with Single-sided Deafness: A Prospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (BCI) device for patients with single-sided deafness (SSD).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospitals.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study was conducted at 15 institutions nationwide. Thirty adult (aged ≥19 years) SSD patients were recruited. They underwent implantation of an active transcutaneous BCI device (Bonebridge BCI602). Objective outcomes included aided pure-tone thresholds, aided speech discrimination scores (SDSs), and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and sound localization test results. The Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) were used to measure subjective benefits.

RESULTS

The mean aided pure-tone threshold was 34.2 (11.3), mean (SD), dB HL at 500 to 4000 Hz. The mean total BBSS score was 27.5 (13.8). All APHAB questionnaire domain scores showed significant improvements: ease of communication, 33.6 (23.2) versus 22.6 (21.3), P = .025; reverberation, 44.8 (16.6) versus 32.8 (15.9), P = .002; background noise, 55.5 (23.6) versus 35.2 (18.1), P < .001; and aversiveness, 36.7 (22.8) versus 25.8 (21.4), P = .028. Moreover, the THI scores were significantly reduced [47.4 (30.1) versus 31.1 (27.0), P = .003]. Congenital SSD was a significant factor of subjective benefit (-11.643; 95% confidence interval: -21.946 to -1.340).

CONCLUSION

The BCI602 active transcutaneous BCI device can provide functional hearing gain without any adverse effects and is a feasible option for acquired SSD patients with long-term deafness.

A bone conduction implant using self-drilling screws : Self-drilling screws as a new fixation method of an active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant

BACKGROUND

The active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (tBCI; BONEBRIDGE™ BCI 601; MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) is fixed to the skull with two self-tapping screws in predrilled screw channels. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fixation with self-drilling screws instead of the self-tapping screws, in order to simplify the surgical procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine patients (mean age 37 ± 16 years, range 14-57 years) were examined pre- and 12 months postoperatively for word recognition scores (WRS) at 65 dB SPL, sound-field (SF) thresholds, bone conduction thresholds (BC), health-related quality of life (Assessment of Quality of Life, AQOL-8D questionnaire), and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Due to avoidance of one surgical step, the surgical technique was simplified. Mean WRS in SF was 11.1 ± 22.2% (range 0-55%) pre- and 77.2 ± 19.9% (range 30-95%) postoperatively; mean SF threshold (pure tone audiometry, PTA4) improved from 61.2 ± 14.3 dB HL (range 37.0-75.3 dB HL) to 31.9 ± 7.2 dB HL (range 22.8-45.0 dB HL); mean BC thresholds were constant at 16.7 ± 6.8 dB HL (range 6.3-27.5 dB HL) pre- and 14.2 ± 6.2 dB HL (range 5.8-23.8 dB HL) postoperatively. AQOL-8D mean utility score increased from 0.65 ± 0.18 preoperatively to 0.82 ± 0.17 postoperatively. No device-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Implant fixation by means of self-drilling screws was safe and effective in all nine patients. There was significant audiological benefit 12 months after implantation.