Depressive symptomatology correlates with phantom breast syndrome in mastectomized women

Denis-Katz H, Webb C, Temple-Oberle C. Breast Reconstruction Perceptions and Access in First Nations Women Are Influenced by Colonization

Purpose: This qualitative study explored First Nations (FN) women's perceptions about breast reconstruction (BR) after breast cancer surgery. Method: Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling via Aboriginal health and community organizations, breast and plastic surgeons, an Aboriginal health liaison and an FN elder. Semistructured one-on-one interviews and an FN sharing circle were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results: Nine women participated in the interviews. Three (33%) had been offered and had pursued BR, while 6 (67%) were either not offered or had not pursued breast reconstruction. Two of these 6 stated that they were not interested in BR. Four women participated in the sharing circle; 2 had been interviewed prior and 2 were new participants who shared similar themes and experiences to other participants also interviewed. Four key themes were identified: identity, information gaps, financial and transportation barriers, and consequences of colonization. Reasons cited to pursue BR were consistent with non-FN women such as improving self-image, concepts of femininity, and sense of normalcy. All participants reported that accessible, appropriate, and timely and culturally sensitive BR information was lacking. Living on reserve and the attendant expenses related to attending medical appointments was another barrier experienced by women in our study. The devastating impacts of colonization also deeply impacted several women in our study. Conclusion: When offered, FN women were receptive to pursuing BR. FN women have a particular set of obstacles related to consequences of colonization. Culturally sensitive and relevant oral communications grounded in first-hand experiences are desired. The 4 themes identified did influence the rate of BR uptake in the FN women who participated in our study and provided significant and unique obstacles to FN women.

Optimising psychological treatment for pain after breast cancer: a factorial design study protocol in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

One in five breast cancer (BC) survivors are affected by persistent pain years after completing primary treatment. While the efficacy of psychological interventions for BC-related pain has been documented in several meta-analyses, reported effect sizes are generally modest, pointing to a need for optimisation. Guided by the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, the present study aims to optimise psychological treatment for BC-related pain by identifying active treatment components in a full factorial design.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study uses a 2×3 factorial design, randomising 192 women with BC-related pain (18-75 years) to eight experimental conditions. The eight conditions consist of three contemporary cognitive-behavioural therapy components, namely: (1) mindful attention, (2) decentring, and (3) values and committed action. Each component is delivered in two sessions, and each participant will receive either zero, two, four or six sessions. Participants receiving two or three treatment components will be randomised to receive them in varying order. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T1), session by session, every day for 6 days following the first session in each treatment component, at post-intervention (T2) and at 12-week follow-up (T3). Primary outcomes are pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale) and pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory interference subscale) from T1 to T2. Secondary outcomes are pain burden, pain quality, pain frequency, pain catastrophising, psychological distress, well-being and fear of cancer recurrence. Possible mediators include mindful attention, decentring, and pain acceptance and activity engagement. Possible moderators are treatment expectancy, treatment adherence, satisfaction with treatment and therapeutic alliance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the present study was received from the Central Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (no: 1-10-72-309-40). Findings will be made available to the study funders, care providers, patient organisations and other researchers at international conferences, and published in international, peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05444101).

Breast reconstruction after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: A comparison of guideline recommendations

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to illuminate differences in published clinical practice guideline recommendations for breast reconstruction after prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy.

METHODS

Ten guidelines were identified through a systematic search of websites and databases of reputable oncology guideline developers, and key differences and gaps in recommendations were noted. Quality assessment of the guidelines was conducted by three reviewers using the AGREE II tool, focusing on breast reconstruction specific documents rather than the general breast cancer guidelines.

RESULTS

The most comprehensive guidelines were published by Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care Ontario, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and the Association of Breast Surgery/British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. AGREE II scores in the domains of "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity and Presentation" were ranked relatively high for all four guidelines while "Applicability" and "Editorial Independence" were ranked relatively low. The Alberta and Ontario guidelines were the overall highest ranked guidelines across all domains.

CONCLUSION

Overall, these guidelines provide consistent recommendations on who should receive breast reconstruction education, who is a candidate for postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and the appropriate timing of reconstruction and extent of mastectomy. Future updates from all should focus on expanding to include alloplastic and autologous forms of reconstruction and should include a broad scope of relevant questions.

Preoperative Psychosocial and Psychophysical Phenotypes as Predictors of Acute Pain Outcomes After Breast Surgery

The severity and impact of acute pain after breast surgery varies markedly among individuals, underlining the importance of comprehensively identifying specific risk factors, including psychosocial and psychophysical traits. In this prospective observational study, women (n = 234) undergoing breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, or mastectomy with reconstruction completed a brief bedside quantitative sensory testing battery, along with measures of psychosocial characteristics. Postoperative pain severity, impact, and opioid use at 2 weeks were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory and procedure-specific breast cancer pain questionnaires. Moderate-severe average pain (>3/10) was reported by 29% of patients at 2 weeks. Regression analysis of pain outcomes revealed that pain severity was independently predicted by axillary dissection, pre-surgical pain, temporal summation of pain (TSP), (-)positive affect, and behavioral coping style. Pain impact was predicted by age, education, axillary dissection, reconstruction, but also by negative affect and depression scores. Lastly, opioid use was predicted by age, education, axillary dissection, reconstruction, TSP, and reinterpreting coping style. Our findings suggest that, individuals with certain phenotypic characteristics, including high TSP and negative affect, may be at greater risk of significant pain and continued opioid use at 2 weeks after surgery, independent of known surgical risk factors. PERSPECTIVE: We measured differences in the psychosocial and psychophysical processing of pain amongst patients before breast surgery using simple validated questionnaires and brief quantitative sensory testing. Independent of younger age and procedural extent (axillary surgery and reconstruction), affect and greater temporal summation of pain predicted acute postoperative pain and opioid use.

Phantom breast syndrome: The effect of in situ breast carcinoma

Phantom breast syndrome (PBS) represents the experience of the continued presence of the breast, after mastectomy. Our aim was to assess PBS appearance by means of a structured questionnaire and to look into possible associations to disease and treatment parameters, in 105 women with breast cancer treated by mastectomy. PBS was recorded in 22.9% of the patients. In the majority of cases phantom experience had the size (88.9%), shape (76.5%) and weight (64.7%) of the normal breast and was localised in the entire breast (50%). Concerning disease parameters, no association with primary tumour size (T) or lymph node status was detected, but interestingly, in situ breast cancer (DCIS) was found to be more frequently associated with PBS, compared with invasive tumours. No significant associations of PBS with previous sensory experiences of the breast, radiotherapy or systemic treatment were assessed. The results are interpreted within the frame of Melzack's theory of a neuromatrix, assuming that PBS represents the continued existence, even after amputation, of a sensory engram of the breast. The absence of infiltration in primary tumour histology, probably through an unknown pathophysiological mechanism, might play a role for the significantly higher incidence of PBS in women undergoing mastectomy for DCIS.