1
|
Brakemeier EL, Guhn A, Stapel S, Reinhard MA, Padberg F. [Inpatient psychotherapy of depressive disorders: options and challenges]. DER NERVENARZT 2023; 94:213-224. [PMID: 36853327 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-023-01448-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The psychotherapy of depressive disorders has become established as a central component of inpatient treatment in psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals and furthermore constitutes an important component of the residency training in Germany; however, the number of studies examining the effectiveness and efficacy is limited. METHODS This narrative review summarizes the current state of research on inpatient psychotherapy for depressive disorders. The results of meta-analyses as well as practice-based observational studies from routine treatment in Germany, disorder-specific special programs, and side effects of inpatient psychotherapy are summarized. RESULTS The number of studies on the efficacy of inpatient psychotherapy of depressive disorders is overall low. The main finding of the largest recent meta-analysis indicates that psychotherapy in clinics and other facilities has a significant effect on depressive symptoms, with small to moderate effect sizes in randomized controlled studies. The effects are mostly maintained even after 9-15 months follow-up. An observational study from routine treatment with a very large sample size reported large pre-post and pre-follow-up effect sizes. It additionally revealed factors that appear to be difficult to change during inpatient psychotherapy, negatively affect treatment success and could be specifically addressed in future trials. Special programs, such as inpatient Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) and the inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) indicate acceptance and efficacy/effectiveness in an initial randomized controlled (IPT) study and in observational (CBASP) studies. Side effects of inpatient psychotherapy were reported by 60-94% of patients with depressive disorders, whereby a perceived dependence on the therapist or the therapeutic setting was identified as a frequent side effect. CONCLUSION Overall, the results of the narrative review reveal that inpatient psychotherapy appears to be meaningful and effective for many patients with depressive disorders. Specific side effects, cost-effectiveness, and the question of differential indications (what works for whom?) should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Lotta Brakemeier
- Lehrstuhl für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychologie, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
| | - Anne Guhn
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Matthias A Reinhard
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LMU Klinikum, München, Deutschland
| | - Frank Padberg
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, LMU Klinikum, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eielsen M, Ulvenes PG, Røssberg JI, Høstmælingen A, Soma CS, Wampold BE. The Effectiveness of an Intensive Inpatient Psychotherapy Program for Chronic Depression: A naturalistic comparison with wait list. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:745. [PMID: 36451114 PMCID: PMC9710086 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04381-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic depression (CD) typically have an early symptom onset, more psychiatric comorbidities, more treatment attempts, and more frequent and longer inpatient hospitalizations than patients with major depressive disorders. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an intensive inpatient psychotherapy program for patients with chronic depression (CD). The primary research question was whether two intensive psychodynamic inpatient treatments, affect phobia therapy (APT) and VITA, were superior to an outpatient wait list condition, receiving treatment as usual (TAU), at completion of treatment. To investigate if a potential difference between the intensive treatment and the wait list control group was dependent on a specific psychotherapeutic model, the study contrasted two therapies with similar intensity, but different theoretical rationales. METHODS Two hundred eighty patients with CD were included in a naturalistic study. Patients were assessed at four time points; assessment, start of therapy, end of therapy and 1-year follow-up. Three comparisons were performed with patients matched across groups; Intensive inpatient treatment program (APT + VITA) vs wait list during treatment, APT vs VITA during treatment and APT vs VITA during follow-up. The outcome measure was the BDI-II. RESULTS Intensive inpatient treatment program vs. wait list showed a significant difference in favor of the intensive treatment. No significant differences were found between APT and VITA during therapy or follow-up; but both groups had large effect sizes during treatment, which were maintained during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The intensive inpatient psychotherapy program showed superior effect on chronic depression over an outpatient wait list condition receiving treatment as usual (TAU), but no significant differences were found between the two intensive inpatient psychodynamic treatments. The results provide support for the effectiveness of an intensive inpatient psychotherapy program in treatment of chronic and severe disorders, such as CD, which could be of benefit for policymakers and the health care sector as they are allocating recourses efficiently. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05221567) on February 3rd, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikkel Eielsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvanssveien 21, 0372, Oslo, Norway. .,Research Institute, Modum Bad Psychiatric Center, Modum Bad Research Institute, Badeveien 287, 3370, Vikersund, Norway.
| | - Pål Gunnar Ulvenes
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Research Institute, Modum Bad Psychiatric Center, Modum Bad Research Institute, Badeveien 287, 3370 Vikersund, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3a, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Ivar Røssberg
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Sognsvanssveien 21, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Høstmælingen
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3a, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Christina S. Soma
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Educational Psychology, University of Utah, 1721 Campus Center Dr., SAEC Room 3220, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 USA
| | - Bruce E. Wampold
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Research Institute, Modum Bad Psychiatric Center, Modum Bad Research Institute, Badeveien 287, 3370 Vikersund, Norway ,grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 317 Education Building, 1000 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706-1326 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuzminskaite E, Gathier AW, Cuijpers P, Penninx BW, Ammerman RT, Brakemeier EL, Bruijniks S, Carletto S, Chakrabarty T, Douglas K, Dunlop BW, Elsaesser M, Euteneuer F, Guhn A, Handley ED, Heinonen E, Huibers MJ, Jobst A, Johnson GR, Klein DN, Kopf-Beck J, Lemmens L, Lu XW, Mohamed S, Nakagawa A, Okada S, Rief W, Tozzi L, Trivedi MH, van Bronswijk S, van Oppen P, Zisook S, Zobel I, Vinkers CH. Treatment efficacy and effectiveness in adults with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma history: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9:860-873. [PMID: 36156242 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00227-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood trauma is a common and potent risk factor for developing major depressive disorder in adulthood, associated with earlier onset, more chronic or recurrent symptoms, and greater probability of having comorbidities. Some studies indicate that evidence-based pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies for adult depression might be less efficacious in patients with a history of childhood trauma than patients without childhood trauma, but findings are inconsistent. Therefore, we examined whether individuals with major depressive disorder, including chronic forms of depression, and a reported history of childhood trauma, had more severe depressive symptoms before treatment, had more unfavourable treatment outcomes following active treatments, and were less likely to benefit from active treatments relative to a control condition, compared with individuals with depression without childhood trauma. METHODS We did a comprehensive meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020220139). Study selection combined the search of bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase) from Nov 21, 2013, to March 16, 2020, and full-text randomised clinical trials (RCTs) identified from several sources (1966 up to 2016-19) to identify articles in English. RCTs and open trials comparing the efficacy or effectiveness of evidence-based pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or combination intervention for adult patients with depressive disorders and the presence or absence of childhood trauma were included. Two independent researchers extracted study characteristics. Group data for effect-size calculations were requested from study authors. The primary outcome was depression severity change from baseline to the end of the acute treatment phase, expressed as standardised effect size (Hedges' g). Meta-analyses were done using random-effects models. FINDINGS From 10 505 publications, 54 trials met the inclusion criteria, of which 29 (20 RCTs and nine open trials) contributed data of a maximum of 6830 participants (age range 18-85 years, male and female individuals and specific ethnicity data unavailable). More than half (4268 [62%] of 6830) of patients with major depressive disorder reported a history of childhood trauma. Despite having more severe depression at baseline (g=0·202, 95% CI 0·145 to 0·258, I2=0%), patients with childhood trauma benefitted from active treatment similarly to patients without childhood trauma history (treatment effect difference between groups g=0·016, -0·094 to 0·125, I2=44·3%), with no significant difference in active treatment effects (vs control condition) between individuals with and without childhood trauma (childhood trauma g=0·605, 0·294 to 0·916, I2=58·0%; no childhood trauma g=0·178, -0·195 to 0·552, I2=67·5%; between-group difference p=0·051), and similar dropout rates (risk ratio 1·063, 0·945 to 1·195, I2=0%). Findings did not significantly differ by childhood trauma type, study design, depression diagnosis, assessment method of childhood trauma, study quality, year, or treatment type or length, but differed by country (North American studies showed larger treatment effects for patients with childhood trauma; false discovery rate corrected p=0·0080). Most studies had a moderate to high risk of bias (21 [72%] of 29), but the sensitivity analysis in low-bias studies yielded similar findings to when all studies were included. INTERPRETATION Contrary to previous studies, we found evidence that the symptoms of patients with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma significantly improve after pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments, notwithstanding their higher severity of depressive symptoms. Evidence-based psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy should be offered to patients with major depressive disorder regardless of childhood trauma status. FUNDING None.
Collapse
|
4
|
Guhn A, Merkel L, Heim C, Klawitter H, Teich P, Betzler F, Sterzer P, Köhler S. Impaired empathic functioning in chronic depression: Behavioral evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) model. J Psychiatr Res 2022; 152:79-85. [PMID: 35716512 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) model proposes preoperational functioning as a core feature of persistent depressive disorders (PDD). Empathy deficits comprise one aspect. Resulting from childhood maltreatment, empathy deficits may aggravate social isolation, a key factor in the maintenance of depression. CBASP targets empathy by teaching patients to disengage from past experiences and to engage successfully in present social interactions. However, behavioral evidence for empathy deficits in PDD has remained elusive. We reasoned that deficits become apparent only under stress and that these deficits improve after CBASP-treatment. Twenty-two patients and 21 controls performed two parallel versions of the Multifaceted Empathy Test. For stress induction, a negative autobiographical event was presented before performing the task. A neutral event served as control. Fifteen patients performed the experiment twice, before and after a 12-week inpatient CBASP-treatment. Supporting our hypotheses, patients showed reduced empathy under stress, while no group difference was found in the absence of stress. Reduced empathy correlated with the level of re-experiencing negative memories. Pre-post-treatment comparison revealed that the stress-induced empathy deficit improved in patients over time. Post-treatment empathic capacity correlated positively with clinical improvement. Our findings provide empirical support for the CBASP model, but highlight an important new aspect: Empathy is not generally deficient in PDD but becomes impaired under stress. In real-life situations, stress-induced empathy impairments may exacerbate interpersonal conflicts. CBASP's interpersonal focus improved empathy, accompanied by clinical improvement as the model predicts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Guhn
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Lydia Merkel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Heim
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Psychology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heiko Klawitter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Psychology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Teich
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Betzler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Sterzer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Köhler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Netter AL, Beintner I, Brakemeier EL. Adding an app-based intervention to the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP): Proof-of-Concept in Routine Outpatient Psychotherapy Treatment (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2021; 6:e35482. [PMID: 35943764 PMCID: PMC9399836 DOI: 10.2196/35482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is an empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatment developed specifically for persistent depressive disorder. However, given the high rates of nonresponse and relapse, there is a need for optimization. Studies suggest that outcomes can be improved by increasing the treatment dose via, for example, the continuous web-based application of therapy strategies between sessions. The strong emphasis in CBASP on the therapeutic relationship, combined with limited therapeutic availabilities, encourages the addition of web-based interventions to face-to-face therapy in terms of blended therapy. Objective The aim of this study was to test an app-based intervention called CBASPath, which was designed to be used as a blended therapy tool. CBASPath offers 8 sequential modules with app-based exercises to facilitate additional engagement with the therapy content and a separate exercise to conduct situational analyses within the app at any time. Methods CBASPath was tested in an open pilot study as part of routine outpatient CBASP treatment. Participating patients were asked to report their use patterns and blended use (integrated use of the app as part of therapy sessions) at 3 assessment points over the 6-month test period and rate the usability and quality of and their satisfaction with CBASPath. Results The results of the pilot trial showed that 93% (12/13) of participants used CBASPath as a blended tool during their therapy and maintained this throughout the study period. Overall, they reported good usability and quality ratings along with high user satisfaction. All participants showed favorable engagement with CBASPath; however, the frequency of use differed widely among the participants and assessment points. Situational analysis was used by all participants, and the number of completed modules ranged from 1 to 7. All participants reported blended use, although the frequency of integration in the face-to-face sessions varied widely. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the digital augmentation of complex and highly interactive CBASP therapy in the form of blended therapy with CBASPath is feasible in routine outpatient care. Therapeutic guidance might contribute to high adherence and increase patient self-management. A few adjustments, such as saving entries directly in the app, could facilitate higher user engagement. A randomized controlled trial is now needed to investigate the efficacy and added value of this blended approach. In the long term, CBASPath could help optimize persistent depressive disorder treatment and reduce relapse by intensifying therapy and providing long-term patient support through the app.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Lena Netter
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Eva-Lotta Brakemeier
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reinhard MA, Zentz K, Nenov-Matt T, Barton BB, Rek SV, Goerigk S, Brakemeier EL, Musil R, Jobst A, Padberg F. Cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy reduces loneliness in patients with persistent depressive disorder. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
7
|
Konvalin F, Grosse-Wentrup F, Nenov-Matt T, Fischer K, Barton BB, Goerigk S, Brakemeier EL, Musil R, Jobst A, Padberg F, Reinhard MA. Borderline Personality Features in Patients With Persistent Depressive Disorder and Their Effect on CBASP Outcome. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:608271. [PMID: 33790813 PMCID: PMC8006327 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.608271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) was developed for the treatment of persistent depressive disorder (PDD), where comorbid personality disorders (PD) are common. In contrast to other PD, comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often regarded as an exclusion criterion for CBASP. In clinical settings, however, subthreshold BPD symptoms are prevalent in PDD and may not be obvious at an initial assessment prior to therapy. As data on their impact on CBASP outcome are very limited, this naturalistic study investigates BPD features in PDD and their relevance for the therapeutic outcome of a multimodal CBASP inpatient program. Method: Sixty patients (37 female, mean age 38.3, SD 11.9 years) meeting DSM-5 criteria for PDD underwent a 10 weeks CBASP inpatient program. BPD features (i.e., number of fulfilled DSM-5 criteria) together with childhood maltreatment and rejection sensitivity were assessed on admission. Before and after treatment, severity of depressive symptoms was measured using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). BPD symptoms were assessed using the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI-IV) and the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23). Intercorrelations of baseline characteristics and symptom change during treatment were analyzed. Results: Patients with PDD met a mean of 1.5 (SD 1.6) BPD criteria with 4 patients fulfilling ≥5 criteria. BPD symptoms and depressive symptoms showed a strong correlation, and BPD symptoms were additionally correlated with emotional abuse and rejection sensitivity. There was no association between BPD features at baseline and improvement on the MADRS, however, BPD features tended to be associated with a lower response according to the BDI-II score after 10 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, BPD symptoms (i.e., abandonment, impulsivity and affective instability) were reduced after 10 weeks of CBASP treatment. Discussion: BPD symptoms are prevalent in patients with PDD and highly intertwined with the experience of depressive symptoms. In this naturalistic study in PDD, BPD features at baseline did not limit the clinical response to CBASP. Future studies may extend the spectrum of PDD to comorbid subsyndromal or even syndromal BPD in order to develop tailored psychotherapeutic treatment for these complex affective disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Konvalin
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tabea Nenov-Matt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara B. Barton
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Goerigk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva-Lotta Brakemeier
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Richard Musil
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Jobst
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias A. Reinhard
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moving toward a process-oriented perspective in the personalized treatment of depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2021; 271:413-415. [PMID: 33666694 PMCID: PMC7981323 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-021-01249-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
9
|
Guhn A, Schön D, Zische Y, Sterzer P, Köhler S. Interpersonal Change During Inpatient CBASP Treatment: Focus on Group Therapy. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:620037. [PMID: 33716820 PMCID: PMC7952983 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) has been tailored specifically to the demands of patients with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). According to the CBASP model, PDD patients are supposed to live perceptually disconnected from their social environment, which consequently maintains depression. While initially developed as an individual treatment modality, the adaptation for group therapy yields an important interpersonal space. However, little is known about the specific factors that contribute to patients' benefit from the CBASP group modality. Methods: The analyzed sample comprised N = 87 PDD patients who completed a 12 week multimodal inpatient treatment including 2 weekly CBASP-specific individual and group sessions, respectively, as well as CBASP-unspecific medical contacts, pharmacotherapy and complementary therapies. Group sessions included trainings in situational analysis and interpersonal skills. Interpersonal change over therapy was examined based on the patients' self-perceived interpersonal problems (IIP) and the impact messages as perceived by their individual therapists (IMI). Pre and post-treatment data were compared using within-sample t-tests. Additionally, patients evaluated CBASP group therapy on a feedback form. They were invited to reflect on individual benefits and its helpful and unhelpful aspects. Qualitative content analysis with inductive category development was used to analyze feedback. Inter-rater reliability was computed to confirm categories before summarizing the frequencies of reported factors. Results: Self-perceived interpersonal distress significantly decreased over therapy. Patients reported reduced interpersonal problems and therapists reported more friendly and dominant impact messages. Interestingly, patients who showed a significant depressive symptom reduction described higher change scores. Regarding qualitative data, patients reported five main benefits from group therapy: Gain in social competence, self-confidence, self-reflection, interpersonal dynamics, and optimism/universality. Patients responding to CBASP identified significantly more factors than non-responders. Conclusions: Compared to studies with individual CBASP only, the present findings suggest that CBASP group therapy may contribute to the improvement of interpersonal behavior. Group therapy is discussed as a potential boosting effect for individual CBASP. However, as the present data were collected in a multimodal inpatient setting without competitor, randomized controlled trials are warranted that investigate the specific benefits of the group modality or the combined individual and group therapy over individual CBASP only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Guhn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Schön
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yvonne Zische
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Sterzer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sayegh L, Touré EH, Farquhar E, Beaulieu S, Renaud S, Rej S, Perreault M. Group Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP): A Pilot Study for Bipolar Depression. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:565681. [PMID: 33173513 PMCID: PMC7538805 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is an individually administered treatment model designed specifically for Persistent Depression however bipolar patients have traditionally been excluded from CBASP studies. There is a perception that bipolar depression will be harder to treat and requires a unique psychological approach. This pilot study reports on the feasibility of administering the same 20-week manualized group CBASP therapy with bipolar patients currently in a depressive episode. METHODS This non-randomized, single-arm prospective pilot study, reports on an a posteriori exploration of benefits to bipolar depressed patients (n=26) of the same 20-week group CBASP intervention administered to unipolar depressed patients (n=81). The clinical trial for the initial phase examining benefits of the manualized 20-week group CBASP intervention with unipolar patients was registered with the ISRCTN registry, study ID: ISRCTN95149444. Results reported here include mixed ANOVA analyses, across group treatment models and diagnostic categories. Changes over time in self-reported depressive symptoms (Inventory of Depressive Symptoms -IDS-SR), self-reported social functioning, interpersonal problems and interpersonal dispositions are documented for all patients. An exploratory longitudinal latent class analysis was used to examine patients' trajectories of improvement in depressive symptoms. Finally, the best predictors of change in reported depressive symptoms were explored with a logistic regression for all patients. RESULTS Improvements in depressive symptoms and in social functioning over time were significant for all patients with bipolar patients trending towards a greater improvement in depressive symptoms after controlling for baseline differences. An exploratory Latent Class Analysis identified two different treatment trajectories for the entire sample: 1) moderate to severely depressed patients who improved significantly (49%) and 2) severely depressed patients who did not improve (51%). The best predictors of non-response to group therapy include high baseline problems in social functioning and low rates of self-reported Perceived Improvements in overall health. CONCLUSION Bipolar patients in a depressive episode appear to benefit from the same 20-week group CBASP model designed originally for the treatment of Persistent Depressive Disorder. Bipolar patients seem more easily mobilized both during and outside of group therapy sessions and report more interpersonal confidence and more agency than unipolar depressed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliane Sayegh
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - El Hadj Touré
- Department of Sociology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Douglas Research Center, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Serge Beaulieu
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Suzane Renaud
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Complex Mood, Comorbid and Personality Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Soham Rej
- Bipolar Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,GeriPARTy Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital/Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Perreault
- Douglas Research Center, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|