A preliminary study of PEFR monitoring in patients with chronic cough

Clinical, physiological and anti-inflammatory effect of montelukast in patients with cough variant asthma

BACKGROUND

Cough variant asthma (CVA) is a phenotype of asthma presenting solely with coughing, characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, eosinophilic inflammation and a cough response to bronchodilators. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are antiasthma medications with anti-inflammatory and bronchodilatory properties. Although LTRAs exert antitussive effects in CVA, the mechanisms involved are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the antitussive mechanisms of LTRAs in CVA patients.

METHODS

We prospectively observed the effect of montelukast (10 mg) daily for 4 weeks in 23 consecutive nonsmoking adults with anti-inflammatory treatment-naive CVA. We evaluated, before and after treatment, the cough visual analogue scale (VAS), pulmonary function (spirometry and impulse oscillation), methacholine airway responsiveness, cough receptor sensitivity, expressed by the concentration of capsaicin inducing 2 or more (C2) and 5 or more (C5) coughs, sputum eosinophil counts and levels of inflammatory mediators, including cysteinyl leukotrienes, leukotriene B(4), prostaglandin (PG) D(2), PGE(2), PGF(2)(α) and thromboxane B(2). We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients based on the symptomatic response to montelukast, defined as a decrease in the cough VAS of >25% (n = 15) or ≤25% (n = 8).

RESULTS

Montelukast significantly decreased the cough VAS (p = 0.0008), sputum eosinophil count (p = 0.013) and cough sensitivity (C2: p = 0.007; C5: p = 0.039), whereas pulmonary function, airway responsiveness and sputum mediator levels remained unchanged. Multivariate analysis showed that a better response to montelukast was associated solely with younger age (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

The antitussive effect of montelukast in CVA may be attributed to the attenuation of eosinophilic inflammation rather than its bronchodilatory properties.

Recent research and developmental strategy of anti-asthma drugs

Extensive research over the past decade has provided information about the pharmacotherapy of bronchial asthma (BA). Anti-asthma drugs are classified into two categories: relievers (for the relief of asthma attack symptoms) and controllers (for the prevention of asthma symptoms). This paper aims to review the recent advancements of anti-asthma drugs that are controller medicines. The controllers mainly act on immune and inflammatory responses in BA development. 1) Immunomodulators. Drugs that act on the immune response are classified into two categories: immunosuppressors and immunomodulators, including immunopotentiators. The immunomodulation of the Th1 and Th2 imbalance is the first strategy of the controller because allergic BA is thought to be caused by Th2-polarized immunity. Suplatast is a novel immunomodulator that can adjust the imbalance in the Th1/Th2 immune response and shows clear clinical efficacy against BA. The immunomodulator approach has shifted from a more theoretical and conceptual model to one supported by evidence of clinical efficacy.2) Anti-inflammatory agents. Corticosteroids,mast cell stabilizers and autacoid inhibitors are anti-inflammatory agents for BA. The clinical superiority of the combined therapy of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2 agonists is evident. This combined therapy shows a potent synergic anti-inflammatory effect compared to the effect by corticosteroids alone. Currently, the anti-inflammatory agents for BA under development are drugs affecting lipid mediators. The prostaglandin (PG) D2 antagonist, PGE2, EP3 agonist and PGI2 agonist are being considered in addition to well-established leukotriene and thromboxane A2 inhibitors. New development strategies and therapeutics for controllers are described in this review.

Cough and Asthma

Cough is the most common complaint for which patients seek medical attention. Cough variant asthma (CVA) is a form of asthma, which presents solely with cough. CVA is one of the most common causes of chronic cough. More importantly, 30 to 40% of adult patients with CVA, unless adequately treated, may progress to classic asthma. CVA shares a number of pathophysiological features with classic asthma such as atopy, airway hyper-responsiveness, eosinophilic airway inflammation and various features of airway remodeling. Inhaled corticosteroids remain the most important form of treatment of CVA as they improve cough and reduce the risk of progression to classic asthma most likely through their prevention of airway remodeling and chronic airflow obstruction.

Eosinophilic airway disorders associated with chronic cough

Chronic cough is a major clinical problem. The causes of chronic cough can be categorized into eosinophilic and noneosinophilic disorders, the former being comprised of asthma, cough variant asthma (CVA), atopic cough (AC) and non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB). Cough is one of the major symptoms of asthma. Cough in asthma can be classified into three categories; 1) CVA: asthma presenting solely with coughing, 2) cough-predominant asthma: asthma predominantly presenting with coughing but also with dyspnea and/or wheezing, and 3) cough remaining after treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and beta2-agonists in patients with classical asthma, despite control of other symptoms. There may be two subtypes in the last category; one is cough responsive to anti-mediator drugs such as leukotriene receptor antagonists and histamine H1 receptor antagonists, and the other is cough due to co-morbid conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux. CVA is one of the commonest causes of chronic isolated cough. It shares a number of pathophysiological features with classical asthma with wheezing such as atopy, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophilic airway inflammation and various features of airway remodeling. One third of adult patients may develop wheezing and progress to classical asthma. As established in classical asthma, ICS is considered the first-line treatment, which improves cough and may also reduce the risk of progression to classical asthma. AC proposed by Fujimura et al. presents with bronchodilator-resistant dry cough associated with an atopic constitution. It involves eosinophilic tracheobronchitis and cough hypersensitivity and responds to ICS treatment, while lacking in AHR and variable airflow obstruction. These features are shared by non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB). However, atopic cough does not involve bronchoalveolar eosinophilia, has no evidence of airway remodeling, and rarely progresses to classical asthma, unlike CVA and NAEB. Histamine H1 antagonists are effective in atopic cough, but their efficacy in NAEB is unknown. AHR of NAEB may improve with ICS within the normal range. Taken together, NAEB significantly overlaps with atopic cough, but might also include milder cases of CVA with very modest AHR. The similarity and difference of these related entities presenting with chronic cough and characterized by airway eosinophilia will be discussed.

Asthma history and presentation

Asthma is suspected from a history of key symptoms, including cough, wheezing, dyspnea, chest tightness, and increased mucus production. A positive family or personal history of atopic diseases and diseases that are comorbid with asthma, such as allergic rhinitis and rhinosinusitis, is also important. The differential diagnosis of asthma is broad and includes potentially life-threatening diseases. Pediatric asthma and psychiatric mimics require special attention to prevent misdiagnosis. Differentiating asthma from these other disease states by history alone is not always possible. Because accurate diagnosis is critical to successful treatment, objective testing by spirometry and methacholine challenge should be employed.