Inference of maternal uniparental disomy of the entire chromosome 2 from a paternity test

Effect of uniparental disomy in parentage testing

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is a rare type of chromosomal aberration that may hinder the analysis of kinship during forensic identification. Here, we investigated these genetic findings to avoid false exclusions during parentage testing. Thirty-nine fluorescently labeled, autosomal short tandem repeats (STR) were amplified in three cases, to detect parent-child relationships. Twenty-three fluorescently labeled Y-chromosome STRs were also employed. These were subjected to capillary electrophoresis. The parentage index was calculated by the bipartite or tripartite model. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays were performed to further investigate the genetic mechanisms. The conclusions supported the biological mother-child relationship in three cases. However, in all cases, the alleged father and child had three autosomal STR markers, constrained to a single chromosome, which did not conform to Mendelian inheritance rules. The genotyping of 23 Y-chromosome STRs did not reveal any violations of Mendelian law. The combination of STR profiling and SNP microarrays suggested that two children had maternal UPD of chromosome 7, whilst one had UPD of chromosome 2. After excluding the three incompatible loci, the conclusions supported the biological father-child relationship in all cases. The same results were obtained when parentage testing of trios was used. Uniparental disomy may complicate the judgment of kinship in parentage testing. The possibility of UPD should be considered when incompatible STR loci are found on the same chromosome. Genetic evidence obtained through additional molecular techniques can provide better interpretation of kinship in the presence of UPD and avoid false exclusions of biological relationships.

Confirmation of Paternity despite Three Genetic Incompatibilities at Chromosome 2

DNA testing in cases of disputed paternity is a routine analysis carried out in genetic laboratories. The purpose of the test is to demonstrate similarities and differences in analyzed genetic markers between the alleged father, mother, and a child. The existence of differences in the examined loci between the child and the presumed father may indicate the exclusion of biological parenthood. However, another reason for such differences is genetic mutations, including chromosome aberrations and genome mutations. The presented results relate to genetic analyses carried out on three persons for the purposes of disputed paternity testing. A deviation from inheritance based on Mendel’s Law was found in 7 out of 53 STR-type loci examined. All polymorphic loci that ruled out the paternity of the alleged father were located on chromosome 2. Additional analysis of 32 insertion–deletion markers (DIPplex, Qiagen) and sequencing of 94 polymorphic positions of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) type (Illumina, ForenSeq) did not exclude the defendant’s biological paternity. A sequence analysis of STR alleles and their flanking regions confirmed the hypothesis that the alleles on chromosome 2 of the child may originate only from the mother. The results of the tests did not allow exclusion of the paternity of the alleged father, but are an example of uniparental maternal disomy, which is briefly described in the literature.

Uniparental disomy of chromosome 21: A statistical approach and application in paternity tests

Considering the overall frequency of paternity investigation cases including mutational events, there is a real possibility that at least a fraction of all inconsistencies reported in paternity cases are caused not by polymerase slippage mutations, but to chromosomic abnormalities, as Uniparental Disomy (UPD). We report here the investigation of a trio paternity case (mother, child and alleged father), with observed inconsistencies that can alternatively be explained by occurrence of maternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 21 (miUPD21). A total of 350 short tandem repeat (STR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were tested, statistically suggesting true biological linkage within the trio. Additionally, we propose miUPD21 explains, with significantly greater probability, the occurrence of detected inconsistencies, when compared to alternative hypothesis of multiple and simultaneous slippage mutations. Similar cases could have their statistical conclusions improved or even altered by including unusual chromosomal segregation patterns in the hypothesis formulation, as well as in mathematical calculations. Such reports of allelic inconsistencies being explained by chromosomal alterations are common in clinical genetics, and such situations might have impact on forensic investigation.

Multiple methods used for type detection of uniparental disomy in paternity testing

Uniparental disomy (UPD) has attracted more attention recently in paternity testing, though it is an infrequent genetic event. Although short tandem repeat (STR) profiling has been widely used in paternity testing, it is not sufficient to use STR only to judge the genetic relationship, because the existence of UPD will inevitably affect the results of genotyping. Compared with complete UPD, segmental UPD is more difficult to detect because it does not affect all genotypes on the same chromosome. It is necessary to determine the type of UPD with multiple methods because a single method is not sufficient. Therefore, it is advisable to detect UPD in paternity testing with multiple methods. In this study, after autosomal STR profiling was used, we found that there were several gene loci on the same chromosome that did not conform to Mendelian genetic law, thus we highly suspected the existence of UPD and performed X-STR profiling immediately. Then whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was performed to identify the type, and the results provided straightforward evidence for distinguishing complete from segmental UPD. Lastly, we used deletion insertion polymorphism (DIP)-SNP SNaPshot assay and Miseq FGx sequencing (for SNP and STR) to determine whether the mutation source is maternal uniparental disomy (mUPD) or paternal uniparental disomy (pUPD). To avoid false exclusion of kinship, it is vital to determine the type of UPD in paternity testing and effective strategies based on multiple methods to detect the type of UPD are provided in this study.