Genotyping genetic markers from LCN and degraded DNA by HRM and their application in hair shaft

Improving the efficiency of Y-chromosome detection and the quality of STR typing in forensic casework with an in-house made qPCR and HRM system based on SYTO™ 9 chemistry

DNA quantification prior to STR amplification is a crucial step in forensic casework. Obtaining good-quality genetic STR profiles depends mainly on the amount and integrity of the DNA input in the PCR. In addition, the detection of male trace DNA provides key information for forensic investigation.

AIM

To evaluate the correlation between the quantification results obtained with the previously developed Amel-Y system, and its ability to detect Y-chromosome DNA by HRM, with the resulting STR profiles, and to ultimately show that Amel-Y can be routinely used in forensic casework to improve STR and Y-STR results.

MATERIAL & METHODS

Biological samples derived from forensic casework (85 reference and 391 evidence samples) were quantified by the Amel-Y system (a duplex qPCR/HRM based on SYTO™ 9 chemistry) using Rotor-Gene 6000. STRs were amplified and analyzed with GeneAmp™ PCR System 9700 or Veriti™ Thermal Cyclers and ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer, respectively.

RESULTS

After DNA normalization, a total of 386 STR profiles were obtained (305 full and 81 partial). Sex typing by HRM was 100% successful in reference samples. Male DNA was detected by HRM in 210 evidence samples. 80/201 were mixed with an excess of female DNA. In addition, Amel-Y was able to detect Y-chromosome DNA in mixed samples that did not amplify the Y-variant of Amelogenin marker with commercial STR kits. The reproducibility and precision of the Amel-Y system were demonstrated (CVCt% ≤ 9.55) within the dynamic range analyzed (0.016-50 ng/µL; 41 independent runs). Amel-Y also proved to be compatible with other real-time PCR platforms.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that Amel-Y is a robust quantification system that can be routinely used in forensic casework to obtain reliable autosomal STR profiles and can be suitable as a predictor for Y-STR typing success when male DNA is detected. HRM can be used as a rapid screening tool for male DNA detection in mixed samples. Alternative designs like Amel-Y offer independence from commercial quantification kits in forensic labs.

Designing and developing of high-resolution melting technique for separating different types of Toxoplasma gondii by analysis of B1 and ROP8 gene regions

BACKGROUND

Determination of Toxoplasma gondii genotypes plays an important role in the health management and epidemiology of toxoplasmosis. We developed HRM analysis to differentiate genotypes of T. gondii using the B1 and ROP8 genes, through comparing the sensitivity and specificity of both genes and methods used for the detection of T. gondii.

METHODS

A total of 96 DNA samples of muscle tissue of livestock and poultry brain tissue with three standard strains RH (type I), PRU (type II) and VEG (type III) were prepared and analyzed. Three methods of nested PCR, PCR-PCR and nested-qPCR-HRM were used. Specific new primers were designed and synthesized for developing HRM. Thirty positive samples obtained from nested-qPCR-HRM were sequenced (18 B1 and 12 ROP8).

RESULTS

Overall, 87 infected samples were identified using both genes. Through the B1 gene, we could separate type I (T_m = 84.8 °C) from II/III types (T_m = 84.6 °C). Also, the ROP8 gene could separate type II (T_m = 84.5 °C) from I/III types (T_m = 84.12 °C). Highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (78.72%) were observed by nested-qPCR-HRM assays of the B1 and ROP8 genes than by other methods, respectively. Thus, the B1 gene can be used to most accurately detect T. gondii, while the ROP8 gene was more appropriate for T. gondii genotyping. PCR-sequencing results were consistent with HRM results in most selected samples.

CONCLUSION

HRM analysis is a powerful diagnostic tool for rapid detection and determination of main clonal lineages, and even unusual T. gondii genotypes.