Applause sign in Alzheimer's disease: relationships to cognitive profile and severity of illness

The applause sign in elderly patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

Applause sign (AS) was shown to be an indicator of frontal subcortical dysfunction in many neurodegenerative diseases. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is one of those in which frontosubcortical disconnection can be displayed. We aimed to examine the presence of AS in the elderly patients with INPH and its possible diagnostic role in the frontal dysfunction commonly seen in the disease. Sixty-six patients diagnosed with probable INPH, 32 with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and 325 healthy elderly subjects were included in this cross-sectional and retrospective study. AS was evaluated with the clapping test. Patients with INPH were further assessed with frontal assessment battery (FAB), Stroop test, verbal fluency test and clock drawing test (CDT). The concentration of total amyloid-β 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, total (t) tau and phosphorylated (p)-tau proteins were also measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). AS was observed in all groups (40% in bvFTD, 28.8% in INPH, 1.2% in controls, respectively). It was significantly more frequent in patients with bvFTD and INPH as compared to the controls (p < 0.001, for each). The frequency was similar in the patients with bvFTD and INPH (p = 0.802). Significant differences were found between the AS(+) and (-) INPH patients with regards to FAB, Stroop test-errors and verbal fluency test, except for the CSF proteins. AS can be used as a simple, useful and rapid clinical test that investigates executive dysfunction in elderly patients with INPH in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

The applause sign in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related conditions

The applause sign, i.e., the inability to execute the same amount of claps as performed by the examiner, was originally reported as a sign specific for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Recent research, however, has provided evidence for the occurrence of the applause sign in various conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the applause sign and correlate its presence with neuropsychological and MRI volumetry findings in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related conditions. The applause sign was elicited with the three clap test (TCT), with a higher score indicating poorer performance. Data were recorded from 272 patients from the cohort of the German consortium for frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLDc): 111 with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 98 with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 30 with progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson's syndrome, 17 with corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and 16 with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD). For comparison, 29 healthy elderly control subjects (HC) were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent detailed language and neuropsychological assessment. In a subset of 156 subjects, atlas-based volumetry was performed. The applause sign occurred in all patient groups (40% in PSP, 29.5% in CBS, 25% in ALS/FTD, 13.3% in PPA and 9.0% in bvFTD) but not in healthy controls. The prevalence was highest in PSP patients. It was significantly more common in PSP as compared to bvFTD, PPA and HC. The comparison between the other groups failed to show a significant difference regarding the occurrence of the applause sign. The applause sign was highly correlated to a number of neuropsychological findings, especially to measures of executive, visuospatial, and language function as well as measures of disease severity. TCT scores showed an inverse correlation with the volume of the ventral diencephalon and the pallidum. Furthermore the volume of the ventral diencephalon and pallidum were significantly smaller in patients displaying the applause sign. Our study confirms the occurrence of the applause sign in bvFTD, PSP and CBS and adds PPA and ALS/FTD to these conditions. Although still suggestive of PSP, clinically it must be interpreted with caution. From the correlation with various cognitive measures we suggest the applause sign to be indicative of disease severity. Furthermore we suggest that the applause sign represents dysfunction of the pallidum and the subthalamic nucleus, structures which are known to play important roles in response inhibition.

Triple test, a diagnostic observation, can detect cognitive impairment in older adults

BACKGROUND

A simple, quick, and efficient screening tool for detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is essential, especially in the primary care setting. In this study, we examined the neuropsychological profiles of elderly patients and aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the triple test, comprised of the attended alone sign (AAS), head-turning sign, and applause sign (AS), for detecting MCI and AD.

METHOD

Comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed in 354 elderly outpatients, and the presence or absence of AS, AAS and HTS was investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 354 patients, 93 patients were considered to be cognitively impaired (MCI: 30; AD: 63); the remaining 261 were cognitively healthy. Relative to those without AS, patients with AS had significantly lower scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, the clock-drawing test, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, and Basic Activities of Daily Living Scale (P < 0.001, for each). Similar significant differences were found between patients who were positive and negative for the HTS (P < 0.001) and between those who attended the clinic alone and those who were accompanied (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of the triple test for identifying cognitively impairment (CI), MCI, and AD was 0.61, 0.30, and 0.72, respectively; the specificity was 0.85, 0.68, and 0.83, respectively; and the positive and negative predictive values were 0.69, 0.09, and 0.59, respectively, and 0.79, 0.90, and 0.89, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that the triple test is a simple, quick, and efficient screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment, and the results may reflect deterioration in patients' activities of daily living. Additionally, it could be advantageous in clinical practice because educational level does not affect the test outcome. Therefore, it may be an appropriate test to screen for cognitive impairment in the elderly, both as a bedside diagnostic test and in daily clinical practice, especially in the primary care setting.

Force control deficits in individuals with Parkinson's disease, multiple systems atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy

Objective

This study examined grip force and cognition in Parkinson’s disease (PD), Parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy (MSAp), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and healthy controls. PD is characterized by a slower rate of force increase and decrease and the production of abnormally large grip forces. Early-stage PD has difficulty with the rapid contraction and relaxation of hand muscles required for precision gripping. The first goal was to determine which features of grip force are abnormal in MSAp and PSP. The second goal was to determine whether a single variable or a combination of motor and cognitive measures would distinguish patient groups. Since PSP is more cognitively impaired relative to PD and MSAp, we expected that combining motor and cognitive measures would further distinguish PSP from PD and MSAp.

Methods

We studied 44 participants: 12 PD, 12 MSAp, 8 PSP, and 12 controls. Patients were diagnosed by a movement disorders neurologist and were tested off anti-Parkinsonian medication. Participants completed a visually guided grip force task wherein force pulses were produced for 2 s, followed by 1 s of rest. We also conducted four cognitive tests.

Results

PD, MSAp, and PSP were slower at contracting and relaxing force and produced longer pulse durations compared to controls. PSP produced additional force pulses during the task and were more cognitively impaired relative to other groups. A receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed that the combination of number of pulses and Brief Test of Attention (BTA) discriminated PSP from PD, MSAp, and controls with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

Slowness in contracting and relaxing force represent general features of PD, MSAp, and PSP, whereas producing additional force pulses was specific to PSP. Combining motor and cognitive measures provides a robust method for characterizing behavioral features of PSP compared to MSAp and PD.