Short-term and long-term effects of immunoadsorption in refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a prospective study in 17 patients

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rozanolixizumab in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a randomised, subject-blind, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial and open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a peripheral nerve disorder characterised by weakness and sensory loss. We assessed the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor rozanolixizumab for CIDP management.

METHODS

CIDP01 (NCT03861481) was a randomised, subject-blind, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study. Adults with definite or probable CIDP receiving subcutaneous or intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance therapy were randomised 1:1 to 12 once-weekly subcutaneous infusions of rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg or placebo, stratified according to previous immunoglobulin administration route. Investigators administering treatment and assessing efficacy, and patients, were blinded. The primary outcome was a change from baseline (CFB) to day 85 in inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (iRODS) score. Eligible patients who completed CIDP01 entered the open-label extension CIDP04 (NCT04051944).

RESULTS

In CIDP01, between 26 March 2019 and 31 March 2021, 34 patients were randomised to rozanolixizumab or placebo (17 (50%) each). No significant difference in CFB to day 85 in iRODS centile score was observed between rozanolixizumab (least squares mean 2.0 (SE 3.2)) and placebo (3.4 (2.6); difference -1.5 (90% CI -7.5 to 4.5)). Overall, 14 (82%) patients receiving rozanolixizumab and 13 (76%) receiving placebo experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event during the treatment period. Across CIDP01 and CIDP04, rozanolixizumab was well tolerated over up to 614 days; no clinically meaningful efficacy results were seen. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Rozanolixizumab did not show efficacy in patients with CIDP in this study, although this could be due to a relatively high placebo stability rate. Rozanolixizumab was well tolerated over medium-to-long-term weekly use, with an acceptable safety profile.

Insights into refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a comprehensive real-world study

Background

Refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a challenging subset of CIDP. It does not respond well to immune therapy and causes substantial disability. A comprehensive understanding of its clinical profile, electrophysiological characteristics and potential risk factors associated with refractoriness remains to be further elucidated.

Methods

Data in this cross-sectional study was collected and reviewed from the Huashan Peripheral Neuropathy Database (HSPN). Included patients were categorized into refractory CIDP and non-refractory CIDP groups based on treatment response. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared between refractory and non-refractory CIDP groups. Potential risk factors associated with refractory CIDP were explored with a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

Fifty-eight patients with CIDP were included. Four disease course patterns of refractory CIDP are described: a relapsing-remitting form, a stable form, a secondary progressive form and a primary progressive form. Compared to non-refractory CIDP patients, refractory CIDP exhibited a longer disease duration (48.96 ± 33.72 vs. 28.33 ± 13.72 months, p = 0.038) and worse functional impairment (MRC sum score, 46.08 ± 12.69 vs. 52.81 ± 7.34, p = 0.018; mRS, 2.76 ± 0.93 vs. 2.33 ± 0.99, p = 0.082; INCAT, 3.68 ± 1.76 vs. 3.03 ± 2.28, p = 0.056, respectively). Electrophysiological studies further revealed greater axonal impairment (4.15 ± 2.0 vs. 5.94 ± 2.77 mv, p = 0.011, ulnar CMAP) and more severe demyelination (5.56 ± 2.86 vs. 4.18 ± 3.71 ms, p = 0.008, ulnar distal latency, 7.94 ± 5.62 vs. 6.52 ± 6.64 ms, p = 0.035, median distal latency; 30.21 ± 12.59 vs. 37.48 ± 12.44 m/s, p = 0.035, median conduction velocity; 58.66 ± 25.73 vs. 42.30 ± 13.77 ms, p = 0.033, median F-wave latency), compared to non-refractory CIDP. Disease duration was shown to be an independent risk factor for refractory CIDP (p < 0.05, 95%CI [0.007, 0.076]).

Conclusion

This study provided a comprehensive description of refractory CIDP, addressing its clinical features, classification of clinical course, electrophysiological characteristics, and prognostic factors, effectively elucidating its various aspects. These findings contribute to a better understanding of this challenging subset of CIDP and might be informative for management and treatment strategies.

Differenzialdiagnose der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose in der klinischen Praxis

Die Diagnose der Amyotrophen Lateralsklerose (ALS) beruht vorwiegend auf klinischen Kriterien und kann aufgrund des heterogenen Erscheinungsbildes gerade in frühen Krankheitsstadien mitunter schwierig sein. Wegweisend sind der Nachweis einer kombinierten Pathologie des oberen und unteren Motoneurons, der fokale Onset, das Ausbreitungsmuster (Spreading), das typische Verteilungsmuster der Paresen, das Vorhandensein oder Fehlen nicht-motorischer Zusatzsymptome sowie Art und Geschwindigkeit der Krankheitsprogredienz. Dieser Review stellt Charakteristika der ALS sowohl im Hinblick auf die klinische Untersuchung als auch apparativer Zusatzdiagnostik in Abgrenzung zu den wichtigsten Differenzialdiagnosen in Form von Einschlusskörperchenmyositis, Chronisch Inflammatorischer Demyelinisierender Polyneuropathie (CIDP), Mulifokaler Motorischer Neuropathie (MMN), adulter Form der Spinalen Muskelatrophie (SMA), Kennedy-Syndrom und Hereditärer Spastischer Paralyse (HSP) dar.

Treatment of CIDP

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is a disabling but treatable disorder. However, misdiagnosis is common, and it can be difficult to optimise its treatment. Various agents are used both for first and second line. First-line options are intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids and plasma exchange. Second-line therapies may be introduced as steroid-sparing agents or as more potent escalation therapy. It is also important to consider symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain and non-pharmacological interventions. We discuss the evidence for the various treatments and explain the practicalities of the different approaches. We also outline strategies for monitoring response and assessing the ongoing need for therapy.

Potential therapeutic strategies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune neuropathy involving peripheral nerve and nerve roots. The pathological hallmark of CIDP is macrophage-induced demyelination. Antibodies against nerve fibers, complement decomposition, abnormalities in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid cytokine profile, and changes of peripheral blood cell proportion were also reported in CIDP patients. These findings in immunopathology provide support for the introduction of potential therapeutic options for the treatment of CIDP. In this review, we systematically listed the potential therapeutic strategies targeting different components of the immune system by comparing the treatment of other autoimmune inflammatory diseases of the nervous system. Several ongoing clinical trials will assess the efficacy and safety of potential CIDP treatments.

The Role of Plasma Exchange in the Treatment of Refractory Autoimmune Neurological Diseases: a Narrative Review

Autoimmune neurological disorders are commonly treated with immunosuppressive therapy. In patients with refractory conditions, standard immunosuppression is often insufficient for complete recovery or to prevent relapses. These patients rely on other treatments to manage their disease. While treatment of refractory cases differs between diseases, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange (PLEX), and immune-modulating treatments are commonly used. In this review, we focus on five autoimmune neurological disorders that were the themes of the 2018 Midlands Neurological Society meeting on PLEX in refractory neurology: Autoimmune Encephalitis (AE), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorders (NMOSD), Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Myasthenia Gravis (MG). The diagnosis of inflammatory neuropathies is often challenging, and while PLEX can be very effective in refractory autoimmune diseases, its ineffectiveness can be confounded by misdiagnosis. One example is POEMS syndrome (characterized by Polyneuropathy Organomegaly, Endocrinopathy, Myeloma protein, Skin changes), which is often wrongly diagnosed as CIDP; and while CIDP responds well to PLEX, POEMS does not. Accurate diagnosis is therefore essential. Success rates can also differ within 'one' disease: e.g. response rates to PLEX are considerably higher in refractory relapsing remitting MS compared to primary or secondary progressive MS. When sufficient efforts are made to correctly pinpoint the diagnosis along with the type and subtype of refractory autoimmune disease, PLEX and other immunotherapies can play a valuable role in the patient management.

Novel Immunological and Therapeutic Insights in Guillain-Barré Syndrome and CIDP

Inflammatory neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases of the peripheral nervous system that include acute and chronic diseases, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The etiology and pathophysiological mechanisms of inflammatory neuropathies are only partly known, but are considered autoimmune disorders in which an aberrant immune response, including cellular and humoral components, is directed towards components of the peripheral nerve causing demyelination and axonal damage. Therapy of these disorders includes broad-spectrum immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatments, such as intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, or plasma exchange. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to any of these therapies, and treatment selection is not optimized according to disease pathophysiology. Therefore, research on disease pathophysiology aiming to reveal clinically and functionally relevant disease mechanisms and the development of new treatment approaches are needed to optimize disease outcomes in CIDP and GBS. This topical review describes immunological progress that may help guide therapeutic strategies in the future in these two disorders.

Protein A immunoadsorption for the treatment of refractory anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis: A single-center prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption (IA) for anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis resistant to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patients with refractory anti-NMDAR encephalitis, treated with protein A IA. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, modified Rankin Score (mRS), and anti-NMDAR antibodies were documented before and after IA and at follow-up. Clinical improvement was defined as a decrease of mRS ≥1. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Ten patients with mRS ≥3 were enrolled and treated with protein A IA; treatment was performed for an average of 5.2 times per patient. Among the nine patients with positive serum anti-NMDAR, the titer decreased in seven patients, of which two became negative. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) anti-NMDAR titer decreased in all patients, and one became negative. Anti-NMDAR levels were tested in two patients at follow-up and found to have declined continuously. All patients exhibited clinical improvement with a mRS decline ≥1 after IA treatment (median mRS: 5.0 [range, 3.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [range, 2.0-4.0], p = 0.014), and the median mRS decreased to 1.0 (range, 0-3.0) at follow-up. After IA, all patients exhibited accelerated recovery. No adverse events were observed during IA treatment.

CONCLUSION

Protein A IA may be effective for treating IVMP/IVIG-resistant anti-NMDAR encephalitis and well tolerated. It is necessary to initiate larger-scale prospective controlled studies to validate the efficacy and safety of protein A IA in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes

We aimed to compare the electrophysiology and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) results of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) subtypes and to explore the progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP. We collected the medical records of 45 CIDP patients to analyse the rate of progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP subtypes. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein (p = 0.024) and overall disability sum score (ODSS) (p = 0.000) differed among patients with typical CIDP, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy (DADS) and Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS). The compound motor action potential (CMAP) of typical CIDP was lower than that of the other subtypes (p = 0.016, p = 0.022 and p = 0.012). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of nerve roots in typical CIDP was significantly thicker than that of nerve roots in DADS and LSS. There were fewer DADS and LSS patients who progressed to typical CIDP than those who progressed to pure motor and pure sensory CIDP (p = 0.000), and the progression from pure motor to typical CIDP required a significantly longer time than the progression from pure sensory to typical CIDP (p = 0.007). Typical CIDP was more severe than the other subtypes not only in terms of clinical and electrophysiology factors but also in terms of MRN factors.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy and Its Variants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and its variants comprise a group of immune-mediated neuropathies with distinctive clinical presentations and electrodiagnostic features. Prompt recognition of these treatable disorders is mandatory as delays result in significant disability and morbidity. This article highlights the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment approach of these polyneuropathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The spectrum of CIDP is expanding with the recent characterization of neuropathies associated with nodal and paranodal antibodies. These neuropathies are distinguished by their unique presentations and are often refractory to IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Subcutaneous immunoglobulins have recently been approved as a treatment option for CIDP and join corticosteroids, IVIg, and plasma exchange as first-line treatment.

SUMMARY

CIDP is characterized by progressive symmetric proximal and distal weakness, large fiber sensory loss, and areflexia, with clinical nadir reached more than 8 weeks after symptom onset. Autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies fall on a continuum, with differences in the type of nerve fibers affected and pattern of deficits. Distinguishing between typical CIDP and its variants allows for selection of the most appropriate treatment.

Safety and Tolerability of Plasma Exchange and Immunoadsorption in Neuroinflammatory Diseases

Plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) are frequently used for treatment of various autoimmune-mediated neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Although both methods are generally regarded as well-tolerated treatment options, evidence for safety and tolerability is low for most indications and largely relies on small case series. In this study, we retrospectively analysed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory changes in 284 patients with various neurological indications who received either PE (n = 65, 113 cycles) or IA (n = 219, 435 cycles) between 2013 and 2020 in our Neurology department. One standard treatment cycle for PE as well as IA consisted of five treatments on five consecutive days. During every treatment, the 2.0-2.5-fold individual plasma volume (PV) was treated in IA, while in PE, the 0.7-fold individual PV was replaced by human albumin solution. Overall, both methods showed an excellent safety profile; no deaths of life-threatening adverse events were recorded. Severe AEs (corresponding to grade 3 on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading scale v5.0) including three patients with sepsis, one pneumonia, and one pneumothorax were present in 5/435 IA cycles (1.1%); in the PE group, no severe AEs were recorded. Furthermore, although advantageous tolerability is generally considered the main advantage of IA over PE, we found that overall frequency of AEs (including grades 1 and 2) was higher in IA (67.1% of all cycles) compared to PE (35.4%; p < 0.001). The low incidence of AEs in PE might be caused by the lower PV exchanged during each treatment (0.7-fold) compared to previous studies which predominantly exchanged the 1.0-1.5-fold PV. In order to verify this hypothesis as well as confirming the efficacy of this lower-dosed scheme, prospective studies comparing different treatment regimens are needed.

Immunoadsorption and Plasma Exchange in Seropositive and Seronegative Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

The inflammatory neuropathies are disabling conditions with diverse immunological mechanisms. In some, a pathogenic role for immunoglobulin G (IgG)-class autoantibodies is increasingly appreciated, and immunoadsorption (IA) may therefore be a useful therapeutic option. We reviewed the use of and response to IA or plasma exchange (PLEx) in a cohort of 41 patients with nodal/paranodal antibodies identified from a total of 573 individuals with suspected inflammatory neuropathies during the course of routine diagnostic testing (PNAb cohort). 20 patients had been treated with PLEx and 4 with IA. Following a global but subjective evaluation by their treating clinicians, none of these patients were judged to have had a good response to either of these treatment modalities. Sequential serology of one PNAb+ case suggests prolonged suppression of antibody levels with frequent apheresis cycles or adjuvant therapies, may be required for effective treatment. We further retrospectively evaluated the serological status of 40 patients with either Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and a control group of 20 patients with clinically-isolated syndrome/multiple sclerosis (CIS/MS), who had all been treated with IgG-depleting IA (IA cohort). 32 of these patients (8/20 with CIDP, 13/20 with GBS, 11/20 with MS) were judged responsive to apheresis despite none of the serum samples from this cohort testing positive for IgG antibodies against glycolipids or nodal/paranodal cell-adhesion molecules. Although negative on antigen specific assays, three patients’ pre-treatment sera and eluates were reactive against different components of myelinating co-cultures. In summary, preliminary evidence suggests that GBS/CIDP patients without detectable IgG antibodies on routine diagnostic tests may nevertheless benefit from IA, and that an unbiased screening approach using myelinating co-cultures may assist in the detection of further autoantibodies which remain to be identified in such patients.

Distinguish CIDP with autoantibody from that without autoantibody: pathogenesis, histopathology, and clinical features

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is considered to be an immune-mediated heterogeneous disease involving cellular and humoral immunity. In recent years, autoantibodies against nodal/paranodal protein neurofascin155 (NF155), neurofascin186 (NF186), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) have been identified in a small subset of patients with CIDP, which disrupt axo-glial interactions at nodes/paranodes. Although CIDP electrodiagnosis was made in patients with anti-nodal/paranodal component autoantibodies, macrophage-induced demyelination, the characteristic of typical CIDP, was not observed. Apart from specific histopathology, the pathogenic mechanisms and clinical manifestations of CIDP with autoantibody are also distinct. We herein compared pathogenesis, histopathology, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic response in CIDP with autoantibody vs. CIDP without autoantibody. CIDP with autoantibodies should be considered as an independent disease entity, not a subtype of CIDP due to many differences. They possibly should be classified as CIDP-like chronic nodo-paranodopathy, which can better characterize these disorders, help diagnose and make the most effective therapeutic decisions.