1
|
Babakoohi S, Gu SL, Ehsan H, Markova A. Dermatologic complications in transplantation and cellular therapy for acute leukemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2023; 36:101464. [PMID: 37353285 PMCID: PMC10291442 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Adoptive cellular immunotherapy, mainly hematopoietic stem cell transplant and CAR-T cell therapy have revolutionized treatment of patients with acute leukemia. Indications and inclusion criteria for these treatments have expanded in recent years. While these therapies are associated with significant improvements in disease response and overall survival, patients may experience adverse events from associated chemotherapy conditioning, engraftment, cytokine storm, supportive medications, and post-transplant maintenance targeted therapies. Supportive oncodermatology is a growing specialty to manage cutaneous toxicities resulting from the anti-cancer therapies. In this review, we summarize diagnosis and management of the common cutaneous adverse events including drug eruptions, graft-versus-host disease, neoplastic and paraneoplastic complications in patients undergoing cellular therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahab Babakoohi
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte, NC, USA.
| | - Stephanie L Gu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hamid Ehsan
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Alina Markova
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seghers S, Teuwen LA, Beyens M, De Blick D, Sabato V, Ebo DG, Prenen H. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to antineoplastic agents - A practical guide for the oncologist. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 116:102559. [PMID: 37084565 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) to antineoplastic agents occur frequently, and every oncologist will encounter these reactions in their clinical practice at some point. The clinical signature of IHRs can range from mild to life-threatening, and their occurrence can substantially impede the treatment course of patients with cancer. Yet, clear guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management are scarce, especially from an oncologic point of view. Therefore, herein, we review the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis and management of IHRs to chemotherapeutic agents and monoclonal antibodies. First, we focus on defining the specific entities that comprise IHRs and discuss their underlying mechanisms. Then, we summarize the epidemiology for the antineoplastic agents that represent the most common causes of IHRs, i.e., platinum compounds, taxanes and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Next, we describe the possible clinical pictures and the comprehensive diagnostic work-up that should be executed to identify the culprit and safe alternatives for the future. Finally, we finish with reviewing the treatment options in both the acute phase and after recovery, with the aim to improve the oncologic care of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Seghers
- Department of oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Laure-Anne Teuwen
- Department of oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Michiel Beyens
- Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dennis De Blick
- Department of emergency medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vito Sabato
- Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Didier G Ebo
- Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gelis S, Verdesoto JT, Pascal M, Muñoz-Cano RM. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Monoclonal Antibodies: New Approaches. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-022-00318-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of biologicals as therapeutic agents in oncology and other inflammatory diseases has dramatically increased during the last years. Due to their biological nature and inherent immunological activity, they are able to induce important adverse events, such as cytokine release reactions (rapid release of proinflammatory cytokines), serum sickness disease, and immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. The aim of the current article is to review the state of the art of anaphylaxis because of biological agents. RECENT FINDINGS Different phenotypes, and potential underlying endotypes, have been described in anaphylactic reactions to biologicals. There seems to be a spectrum from type 1 reactions (IgE or non-IgE-mediated) to cytokine release reactions, with some reactions falling in between both. Management should be directed according to such phenotypes. SUMMARY There is ongoing research to further define immediate adverse reactions to biologicals and to find relevant biomarkers to aid in their diagnosis. Such information will serve in defining their immediate and long term management.
Collapse
|