Spontaneous visual exploration during locomotion in patients with phobic postural vertigo

Central vestibular networking for sensorimotor control, cognition, and emotion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to illuminate the extent of the bilateral central vestibular network from brainstem and cerebellum to subcortical and cortical areas and its interrelation to higher cortical functions such as spatial cognition and anxiety.

RECENT FINDINGS

The conventional view that the main function of the vestibular system is the perception of self-motion and body orientation in space and the sensorimotor control of gaze and posture had to be developed further by a hierarchical organisation with bottom-up and top-down interconnections. Even the vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-spinal reflexes are modified by perceptual cortical processes, assigned to higher vestibulo-cortical functions. A first comparative fMRI meta-analysis of vestibular stimulation and fear-conditioning studies in healthy participants disclosed widely distributed clusters of concordance, including the prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, temporal and inferior parietal lobe, thalamus, brainstem and cerebellum. In contrast, the cortical vestibular core region around the posterior insula was activated during vestibular stimulation but deactivated during fear conditioning. In recent years, there has been increasing evidence from studies in animals and humans that the central vestibular system has numerous connections related to spatial sensorimotor performance, memory, and emotion. The clinical implication of the complex interaction within various networks makes it difficult to assign some higher multisensory disorders to one particular modality, for example in spatial hemineglect or room-tilt illusion.

SUMMARY

Our understanding of higher cortical vestibular functions is still in its infancy. Different brain imaging techniques in animals and humans are one of the most promising methodological approaches for further structural and functional decoding of the vestibular and other intimately interconnected networks. The multisensory networking including cognition and emotion determines human behaviour in space.

Neurological update: neuro-otology 2023

Much has changed since our last review of recent advances in neuro-otology 7 years ago. Unfortunately there are still not many practising neuro-otologists, so that most patients with vestibular problems need, in the first instance, to be evaluated and treated by neurologists whose special expertise is not neuro-otology. The areas we consider here are mostly those that almost any neurologist should be able to start managing: acute spontaneous vertigo in the Emergency Room-is it vestibular neuritis or posterior circulation stroke; recurrent spontaneous vertigo in the office-is it vestibular migraine or Meniere's disease and the most common vestibular problem of all-benign positional vertigo. Finally we consider the future: long-term vestibular monitoring and the impact of machine learning on vestibular diagnosis.

Neurofunctional differences and similarities between persistent postural-perceptual dizziness and anxiety disorder

INTRODUCTION

Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) (ICD-11) and anxiety disorders (ANX) share behavioural symptoms like anxiety, avoidance, social withdrawal, hyperarousal, or palpitation as well as neurological symptoms like vertigo, stance and gait disorders. Furthermore, previous studies have shown a bidirectional link between vestibulo-spatial and anxiety neural networks. So far, there have been no neuroimaging-studies comparing these groups.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this explorative study was to investigate differences and similarities of neural correlates between these two patient groups and to compare their findings with a healthy control group.

METHODS

63 participants, divided in two patient groups (ANX = 20 and PPPD = 14) and two sex and age matched healthy control groups (HC-A = 16, HC-P = 13) were included. Anxiety and dizziness related pictures were shown during fMRI-measurements in a block-design in order to induce emotional responses. All subjects filled in questionnaires regarding vertigo (VSS, VHQ), anxiety (STAI), depression (BDI-II), alexithymia (TAS), and illness-perception (IPQ). After modelling the BOLD response with a standard canonical HRF, voxel-wise t-tests between conditions (emotional-negative vs neutral stimuli) were used to generate statistical contrast maps and identify relevant brain areas (pFDR < 0.05, cluster size >30 voxels). ROI-analyses were performed for amygdala, cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, supramarginal gyrus and thalamus (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Patient groups differed from both HC groups regarding anxiety, dizziness, depression and alexithymia scores; ratings of the PPPD group and the ANX group did differ significantly only in the VSS subscale 'vertigo and related symptoms' (VSS-VER). The PPPD group showed increased neural responses in the vestibulo-spatial network, especially in the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), and superior temporal gyrus (STG), compared to ANX and HC-P group. The PPPD group showed increased neural responses compared to the HC-P group in the anxiety network including amygdala, insula, lentiform gyrus, hippocampus, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and brainstem. Neuronal responses were enhanced in visual structures, e.g. fusiform gyrus, middle occipital gyrus, and in the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC) in healthy controls compared to patients with ANX and PPPD, and in the ANX group compared to the PPPD group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that neuronal responses to emotional information in the PPPD and the ANX group are comparable in anxiety networks but not in vestibulo-spatial networks. Patients with PPPD revealed a stronger neuronal response especially in SMG and STG compared to the ANX and the HC group. These results might suggest higher sensitivity and poorer adaptation processes in the PPPD group to anxiety and dizziness related pictures. Stronger activation in visual processing areas in HC subjects might be due to less emotional and more visual processing strategies.