Effects of immunotherapies and clinical outcomes in neurosarcoidosis: a retrospective cohort study

Chronic Sarcoidosis: Diagnostic Difficulties and Search for New Criteria of Inflammatory Activity (A Case Report and Literature Review)

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease with an unknown etiology and a wide range of clinical manifestations. The incidence of sarcoidosis ranges from approximately 1 to 15 cases per 100,000 individuals per year worldwide. The significant variability in clinical presentations and target organs, as well as concomitant diseases, greatly complicates diagnosis. We analyzed articles in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, where databases were searched using the keywords "chronic sarcoidosis", "diagnosis of sarcoidosis", "course of sarcoidosis", "pulmonary sarcoidosis", "cardiac sarcoidosis", "skin sarcoidosis", "neurosarcoidosis", "ocular sarcoidosis", and "autoimmune inflammation". Studies on the course and diagnosis of sarcoidosis with a deep search of ten years were included. In this review, we present an analysis of publications on the course and diagnosis of chronic sarcoidosis, as well as a clinical case. We have noted that the diagnosis of chronic sarcoidosis is particularly difficult due to the lack of specific biomarkers or their combination. The development and introduction of new diagnostic criteria for this disease will contribute to increasing the level of efficiency, not only of the diagnostic complex, but also the prognosis of the development and course of the pathological process. Conclusion: For the most accurate diagnosis and determination of prognosis, the existence of a single immunological or imaging marker with sufficient sensitivity and specificity is necessary.

Infliximab in neurosarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and relapse rates in neurosarcoidosis patients administered infliximab.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases. The search included studies from their inception to March 2023. We included case-series studies with at least 10 neurosarcoidosis patients undergoing any treatment type. Studies were also required to report at least one of the following outcomes: response rate, overall survival rate, or relapse rate. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A random-effects model facilitated the analysis of proportional treatment outcomes. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale, while a funnel plot helped detect any publication bias.

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising 237 patients with neurosarcoidosis were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 184 (77.6%) received treatment with infliximab. The pooled proportion of patients showing clinical improvement after infliximab treatment was 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.84, I2  = 49.73%). Relapse rates, derived from four studies, stood at 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.55, I2  = 56.92%). Most studies reported successful tapering or cessation of corticosteroid dosage in patients receiving infliximab. Adverse effects were reported in 52 (29.4%) patients, of which 39 out of 54 events (72.2%) were linked to infections.

INTERPRETATION

Infliximab demonstrated potential improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with refractory neurosarcoidosis and showed potential for reducing the dosage of concurrent corticosteroids. However, a degree of relapse was observed, with infections being the primary concern for adverse events.

[Neurological involvement of sarcoidosis: current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies]

Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a rare but severe form of sarcoidosis. NS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mortality is about 10% at 10 years with more than 30% of patients who have a significant disability. The most frequent features are cranial neuropathy (the facial and optic nerve most commonly affected), cranial parenchymal lesions, meningitis, spinal corn abnormalities (20-30%) and more rarely peripheral neuropathy (approximately 10-15%). The challenge of diagnosis is to eliminate other diagnoses. Atypical presentations should make to discuss the need for cerebral biopsy in order to highlight the presence of granulomatous lesions while eliminating alternative diagnosis. Therapeutic management is based on corticosteroid therapy and immunomodulators. There are no comparative prospective study to allow us to define the first-line immunosuppressive treatment and the therapeutic strategy in refractory patients. Conventional immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide are commonly used. Data on the efficacy of anti-TNFα (including infliximab) in refractory and/or severe forms are increasing during the last ten years. Additional data is necessary to assess their interest in first line in patients with severe involvement and a significant risk of relapse.

Treat to target and tight control: Could be a new approach in the treatment of sarcoidosis?

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease with multisystemic involvement. Although it is accepted as a benign disease, it can sometimes cause life-threatening organ (heart, brain) involvement that determines the prognosis of the disease. There are conflicting opinions about the treatment of the disease. In the generally accepted treatment approach the "step-by-step" model has gained weight. According to this approach, corticosteroids (CS) drugs alone are preferred in the first step in patients who require treatment. In the second step, immunosuppressive drugs (IS) are used in patients who do not respond to CS and/or have contraindications to CS use, and biologics (TNF-alpha inhibitors) are used in the third step. This treatment approach may be valid in cases with mild sarcoidosis. However, although sarcoidosis is considered a benign and self-limiting disease in some major organ involvement, the "step-by-step" approach may be a treatment option that puts the patient's life in danger. In such selected patients, much more rigorous, early and combined treatment approaches that definitely include CS, IS or biologic drugs may be required. In selected sarcoidosis patients with high risk, early diagnosis, "treat-to-target" (T2T) and "tight control" follow-up of patients seems to be a rational approach. This article reviews the "step-down" treatment regimens in light of recent literature data and hypothesizes that the T2T model may be a probable new treatment approach in patients with sarcoidosis.

Epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of neurosarcoidosis: A mono-centric retrospective study and literature review

Introduction

Neurosarcoidosis is a rare granulomatous disorder, and treatment guidelines are mainly based on retrospective studies.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study was performed to provide a detailed description of the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neurosarcoidosis followed at Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc in Belgium. The second objective of our study was to perform a comparative literature review of neurosarcoidosis, with a focus on treatment outcomes with the use of TNF-α antagonist.

Results

Among 180 patients with sarcoidosis followed in our hospital, 22 patients with neurosarcoidosis were included in the final analysis. Our literature research identified 776 articles of which 35 articles met our inclusion criteria, including 1,793 patients diagnosed with neurosarcoidosis. In our cohort, the majority of patients (86%) were diagnosed with systemic sarcoidosis which was similar to that reported in the literature (83%). Serum CRP and calcemia were elevated only in 33 and 18% of patients, respectively. Serum lysozyme and angiotensin-converting enzyme were elevated in 79 and 16% of patients, respectively. Lumbar puncture and CSF fluid analysis were performed in 15/22 patients and were abnormal in all patients. Brain MRI was performed in 21/22 patients and showed abnormalities in 16 patients consisting of parenchymal lesions in 63%, hypothalamic-pituitary axis lesions in 38%, and meningeal enhancement in 31%. In both cohort patients, methotrexate was the most frequently used treatment (>45% of cases) with a favorable outcome in an average of 50% of patients. A TNF-α antagonist was administered in 9% of patients in our cohort and in 27% of patients in the literature review. The proportion of favorable outcomes in literature research was significantly higher in patients treated with TNF-α antagonists compared to methotrexate (p < 0.0001), mycophenolate mofetil (p < 0.0001), or azathioprine (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The results of our cohort and literature review confirm that neurosarcoidosis occurred most frequently in the context of systemic sarcoidosis. Methotrexate is the most frequent second-line therapy. The effectiveness of therapy with TNF-α antagonists is well-demonstrated and associated with a better outcome. Their earlier use during the disease course among aggressive and/or refractory neurosarcoidosis should be considered.

Neurosarcoidosis: Phenotypes, Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an update of clinical presentation, diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and treatment according to recent evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neurosarcoidosis remains a diagnosis of exclusion, with infectious and malignant etiologies recognized as important mimickers. Corticosteroids remain as first-line therapy. In recent years, however, studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in the treatment of neurosarcoidosis, leading to improved outcomes. Neurosarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease with protean manifestations that may affect any part of the central and peripheral nervous system. It has many mimickers, and potentially devastating complications necessitating long-term follow-up. Early initiation of treatment, particularly with anti-TNF therapy, may lead to better outcomes and fewer relapses. There is an unmet need for randomized controlled trials that provide robust data to guide therapy and the long-term management of neurosarcoidosis patients.

Neurosarcoidosis: an update on diagnosis and therapy

INTRODUCTION

Clinically overt granulomatous involvement of the nervous system (i.e., neurosarcoidosis) can be seen in up to 10% of patients with sarcoidosis. Establishing a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is often challenging due to the heterogeneity of clinical presentations that are sometimes non-specific, and inaccessibility of tissue confirmation. Recommended treatments are based on expert opinions that are derived from clinical experience and limited data from retrospective studies, as data from randomized controlled studies are limited.

AREA COVERED

In this article, we comprehensively review all available literature on epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of neurosarcoidosis. We also offer our opinions on diagnostic approach and treatment strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the invasive nature and the limited sensitivity of biopsy of the nervous system, diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis is usually made when ancillary tests (such as magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis) are compatible, and alternative diagnoses are reasonably excluded in patients with established extraneural sarcoidosis. Several factors must be taken into consideration to formulate the initial treatment strategy, including the extent of the disease, severity, functional impairment, comorbidities and patient's preference. In addition, treatment regimen of neurosarcoidosis should be formulated with an emphasis on long-term strategy.