Functional neurological disorder and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of misdiagnosis and clinical overlap

Misdiagnosis of functional neurological symptom disorders in paediatrics: Narrative review and relevant case report

Functional neurological symptom disorders (FNSD) pose a common challenge in clinical practice, particularly in pediatric cases where the clinical phenotypes can be intricate and easily confused with structural disturbances. The frequent coexistence of FNSDs with other medical disorders often results in misdiagnosis. In this review, we highlight the distinctions between FNSD and various psychiatric and neurological conditions. Contrary to the misconception that FNSD is a diagnosis of exclusion, we underscore its nature as a diagnosis of inclusion, contingent upon recognizing specific clinical features. However, our focus is on a critical learning point illustrated by the case of a 14-year-old male initially diagnosed with FNSD, but subsequently found to have a rare primary monogenic movement disorder (paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia, PKD). The crucial takeaway from this case is the importance of avoiding an FNSD diagnosis based solely on psychiatric comorbidity and suppressible symptoms. Instead, clinicians should diligently assess for specific features indicative of FNSD, which were absent in this case. This emphasizes the importance of making a diagnosis of inclusion. Extended follow-up and clinical-oriented genetic testing might help identify comorbidities, prevent misdiagnosis, and guide interventions in complex cases, which cannot be simply classified as "functional" solely because other conditions can be excluded.

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: an updated consensus approach

Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis-many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.

Overall comorbidities in functional neurological disorder: A narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The importance to assess and include the frequent comorbidities in the personalised care management plan of patients with functional neurological disorders (FND) has arisen through the years. FND patients are not only complaining from motor and/or sensory symptoms. They also report some non-specific symptoms that participate to the burden of FND. In this narrative review, we aim to better describe these comorbidities in terms of prevalence, clinical characteristics and their variability depending on the subtype of FND.

METHODS

The literature was searched for on Medline and PubMed. The search was narrowed to articles between 2000 and 2022.

RESULTS

Fatigue is the most common symptom reported in relation to FND (from 47 to 93%), followed by cognitive symptoms (from 80 to 85%). Psychiatric disorders are reported in 40 to 100% FND patients, depending on the FND subtype (functional motor disorder [FMD], functional dissociative seizures [FDS]…) but also on the type of psychiatric disorder (anxiety disorders being the most frequent, followed by mood disorders and neurodevelopmental disorders). Stress factors such as childhood trauma exposure (emotional neglect and physical abuse predominantly) have also been identified in up to 75% of FND patients, along with maladaptive coping strategies. Organic disorders are commonly reported in FND, such as neurological disorders (including epilepsy in FDS [20%] and FMD in Parkinson's Disease [7%]). Somatic symptom disorders including chronic pain syndromes are frequently associated to FND (about 50%). To be noted, recent data also suggest a high comorbidity between FND and hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (about 55%).

CONCLUSION

Put together, this narrative review highlights the high burden of FND patients, not only due to somatosensory alterations but also by considering the frequent comorbidities reported. Thus, such comorbidities must be taken into consideration when defining the FND personalised care management strategy for the patients.

[Diagnostic criteria, epidemiology and assessment of patients with functional neurological disorders]

Functional neurological disorders (FND) are symptoms that can affect a variety of functions including motor, sensory and cognitive. These symptoms are genuinely experienced by the patient and are related to a functional disorder rather than a structural one. There is little epidemiological data on these disorders, but their frequency is well established in clinical practice, it is the second most frequent reason for consultation in Neurology. Despite of the frequency of the disorder, general practitioners and specialists are insufficiently trained in the disease, and patients often suffer from stigmatization and/or unnecessary investigations. It is therefore important to be aware of the diagnostic approach to FND, which mostly relies on positive clinical signs. Psychiatric evaluation can help with the characterization of predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating factors of the symptoms (according to the 3P biopsychosocial model related to FND), and guide their management. Finally, diagnosis explanation is a crucial step in the management of the disease, which can in itself have a therapeutic effect, and allow the patient to adhere to the treatments.

Panic Attack, Severe Hypophosphatemia and Rhabdomyolysis in the Setting of a Motor Functional Neurological Disorder

(1) Background: panic attack is often regarded as a benign disorder with variable physical and psychological symptoms. (2) Case Presentation: We here report the case of a 22-year-old patient known for an episode of motor functional neurological disorder a year earlier who presented a panic attack with hyperventilation causing severe hypophosphatemia and rhabdomyolysis, as well as mild tetraparesis. Electrolyte disturbances quickly resolved after phosphate substitution and rehydration. However, clinical signs suggesting a relapse of a motor functional neurological disorder appeared (improved walking with dual tasks). Diagnostic workup, including brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging, as well as electroneuromyography and genetic testing for hypokalemic periodic paralysis, was unremarkable. Tetraparesis, lack of endurance, and fatigue eventually improved after several months. (3) Conclusions: the present case report highlights the intertwined relationship between a psychiatric disorder, leading to hyperventilation and acute metabolic disturbances, and functional neurological manifestations.

Functional Gait Disorders: Clinical presentations, Phenotypes and Implications for treatment

BACKGROUND

Functional Gait Disorders (FGD) are a common presentation of motor-Functional Neurological Disorders (motor-FND) that affect walking ability.

AIM

To provide a narrative review of the current literature on FGD.

METHODS

A narrative overview of published literature was undertaken, based on a systematic search of relevant databases, authoritative texts and citation tracking.

RESULTS

FGD is multidimensional and disabling, with numerous phenotypes described in the literature, including 'knee buckling,' 'astasia-abasia' and 'excessive slowness.' Motor symptoms such as weakness or tremor, and non-motor symptoms, such as pain and fatigue may contribute to the disability and distress in FGD. Phenotypic features and clinical signs are seen in FGD that demonstrate inconsistency and incongruity with structural disease. A limited number of treatment studies have specifically focussed on FGD, however, reporting of outcomes from motor-FND cohorts has demonstrated short and long-term improvements in walking ability through multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative contribution of motor and non-motor symptoms in FGD remains unknown, but it is likely that non-motor symptoms increase the illness burden and should be considered during assessment and treatment. Recommended treatment for FGD involves multidisciplinary rehabilitation, but optimum treatment elements are yet to be determined.

Functional Neurologic Disorders, disorders to be managed by neurologists, or are neurologists wandering in a dangerous field with inadequate resources?

In recent years, some neurologists reconsidered their approach to Medically Unexplained Symptoms and proposed Functional Neurologic Disorders (FND) as a new entity, claiming that neurology could offer alternative treatment options to the psychotherapies provided in psychiatry settings. FNDs, for this purpose, should include only the disorders listed as Conversion from the Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders (SSRD) group. The present review analyzes the rationale of this position and challenges the arguments provided for its support. The review also discusses the systematization of these disorders as provided by public health systems. It outlines risks stemming from economic support and public funding uncertainty, given their negligible epidemiological dimensions resulting from the parcellation of SSRD. The review underlines the unresolved issue of Factitious Disorders, which are in the same SSRD category of the international classification but are, nonetheless, overlooked by the theoretical proponents of the FND entity. Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders is also analyzed. We propose a model that supports the continuum between different SSRD conditions, including Factitious Disorders. The model is based on the emergence of feigned death reflex and deception from frontal lobe dysfunction. Finally, the paper summarizes the wealth of historical psychiatric and psychodynamic approaches and critical reviews. The study also puts in context the categorization and interpretation efforts provided by the most eminent researchers of the past century.

Moving Beyond Movement: Diagnosing Functional Movement Disorder

Functional movement disorder (FMD) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome, encompassing abnormal movements and weakness, and is a common cause of potentially disabling neurological symptoms. It is vital to recognize that FMD is a syndrome, with nonmotor manifestations negatively affecting a patient's quality of life. This review highlights a diagnostic algorithm, where a history suggestive of FMD is combined with the presence of positive signs on examination and appropriate investigations to make the diagnosis. Positive signs indicate internal inconsistency such as variability and distractibility, and clinical findings that are incongruent with other known neurological disease. Importantly, the clinical assessment acts as the first opportunity to allow patients to understand FMD as the cause for their symptoms. Accurate and early diagnosis of FMD is necessary given that it is a treatable and potentially reversible cause of disability, with significant risk of iatrogenic harm associated with misdiagnosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and investigations for functional weakness, sensory and movement disorders: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with functional neurological disorders (FND) present with weakness, sensory or movement disorder without corresponding brain pathology. The current classificatory systems suggest an inclusionary approach to diagnose FND. Hence, there is a need to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations in view of the lack of gold standard tests to diagnose FND.

METHODS

PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched for studies published from Jan 1950 to Jan 2022 which reported the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations in patients with FND. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (727 cases and 932 controls), of which 16 reported clinical signs and, five reported electrophysiological investigations, were included in the review. Two studies were of good quality, 17 of moderate quality, and two of poor quality. We identified 46 clinical signs (24 in weakness, 3 in sensory, and 19 in movement disorders) and 17 investigations (all in movement disorders). Specificity values for signs and investigations were comparatively high compared to the wide variance in sensitivity values.

CONCLUSION

Electrophysiological investigations appear to have a promising role in diagnosing FND, particularly functional movement disorders. The combined use of individual clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations may support and improve diagnostic certainty of FND. Future research can focus on improving the methodology and validating the existing clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations to enhance the validity of the composite diagnostic criterias for FND diagnosis.

Clinicians' implicit and explicit attitudes about the legitimacy of functional neurological disorders correlate with referral decisions

OBJECTIVES

Uncertainty regarding the legitimacy of functional neurological disorder (FND) remains among some health care professionals. Despite treatment guidelines and consensus recommendations, variability in clinical practice referral decisions persists. Evidence from other conditions suggests such clinical decision making is impacted by practitioners' implicit and explicit attitudes. We aimed to identify whether health care professionals hold implicit and/or explicit attitudes about the legitimacy of FND and whether these attitudes are associated with referral decision making.

DESIGN/METHODS

We included 66 health care professionals who work with people with neurological conditions: n = 37 medical doctors, mainly neurologists (n = 18) and psychiatrists (n = 10), and n = 29 doctoral level practitioner psychologists. Participants completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT), Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), a referral decision-making vignette task and self-report measures of explicit attitudes on FND-legitimacy, therapeutic optimism and clinician confidence. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) was used as a comparator condition.

RESULTS

Participants self-reported strong explicit FND-legitimate and MS-legitimate attitudes but demonstrated an implicit FND-illegitimate/MS-legitimate bias. Deeper examination provided by the IRAP data indicated pro-FND-legitimate attitudes, but no bias for or against FND-illegitimate-contrasting the pro-MS-legitimate, anti-MS-illegitimate attitudes for the comparator condition. Attitudes about FND-illegitimacy were negatively associated with likelihood of referral to physical interventions such as physiotherapy. Medical doctors had lower treatment optimism and stronger explicit attitudes that FND is illegitimate than psychologists.

CONCLUSIONS

At an implicit level, clinicians are uncertain about the illegitimacy of FND, and such attitudes are associated with lower likelihood of referral to physiotherapy in particular. Improved education on FND among health care professionals is indicated.

The borderland of multiple sclerosis and functional neurological disorder: A call for clinical research and vigilance

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) have attracted much attention from the neurological medical community over the last decades as new developments in neurosciences have reduced stigma around these by showing brain network dysfunctions. An overlap with other neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) is well known by clinicians but there is a lack of clinical and fundamental research in this field to better define diagnosis and therapeutic decisions, as well as a lack of deep understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

AIM

We aimed to provide a critical commentary on the state of knowledge about the borderland between FNDs and MS.

METHODS

We based our commentary on a joint point of view between an FND specialist and an MS expert.

RESULTS

A brief review of the previous literature and relevant new studies covering the overlap between FNDs and MS is presented, along with suggestions for future research directions.

CONCLUSION

There are clear diagnostic criteria for both FNDs and MS and a strict application of these will help better diagnosis and prevent unnecessary treatment escalation in MS or absence of referral to multimodal therapy in FND. Better teaching of younger neurologists is needed as well as prospective research focusing on pathophysiology.

Autoimmune Encephalitis Misdiagnosis in Adults

Importance

Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis can lead to harm.

Objective

To determine the diseases misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis and potential reasons for misdiagnosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective multicenter study took place from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at autoimmune encephalitis subspecialty outpatient clinics including Mayo Clinic (n = 44), University of Oxford (n = 18), University of Texas Southwestern (n = 18), University of California, San Francisco (n = 17), University of Washington in St Louis (n = 6), and University of Utah (n = 4). Inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥18 years) with a prior autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis at a participating center or other medical facility and a subsequent alternative diagnosis at a participating center. A total of 393 patients were referred with an autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis, and of those, 286 patients with true autoimmune encephalitis were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data were collected on clinical features, investigations, fulfillment of autoimmune encephalitis criteria, alternative diagnoses, potential contributors to misdiagnosis, and immunotherapy adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 107 patients were misdiagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, and 77 (72%) did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. The median (IQR) age was 48 (35.5-60.5) years and 65 (61%) were female. Correct diagnoses included functional neurologic disorder (27 [25%]), neurodegenerative disease (22 [20.5%]), primary psychiatric disease (19 [18%]), cognitive deficits from comorbidities (11 [10%]), cerebral neoplasm (10 [9.5%]), and other (18 [17%]). Onset was acute/subacute in 56 (52%) or insidious (>3 months) in 51 (48%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was suggestive of encephalitis in 19 of 104 patients (18%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis occurred in 16 of 84 patients (19%). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were elevated in 24 of 62 patients (39%). Positive neural autoantibodies were more frequent in serum than CSF (48 of 105 [46%] vs 7 of 91 [8%]) and included 1 or more of GAD65 (n = 14), voltage-gated potassium channel complex (LGI1 and CASPR2 negative) (n = 10), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor by cell-based assay only (n = 10; 6 negative in CSF), and other (n = 18). Adverse reactions from immunotherapies occurred in 17 of 84 patients (20%). Potential contributors to misdiagnosis included overinterpretation of positive serum antibodies (53 [50%]), misinterpretation of functional/psychiatric, or nonspecific cognitive dysfunction as encephalopathy (41 [38%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

When evaluating for autoimmune encephalitis, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered and misdiagnosis occurs in many settings including at specialized centers. In this study, red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses included an insidious onset, positive nonspecific serum antibody, and failure to fulfill autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic criteria. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis leads to morbidity from unnecessary immunotherapies and delayed treatment of the correct diagnosis.

Diagnostic challenges of functional neurological disorders after covid-19 disease or vaccination: case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorders have rarely been described in patients recovering from Covid-19 or after vaccination but they are probably under diagnosed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six patients referred for rehabilitation of persistent symptoms and/or sequelae of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were diagnosed with functional neurological disorders. A literature review was conducted to identify reported cases of functional neurological disorders after Covid-19 infection or vaccination.

RESULTS

In the current case series, patients diagnosed with functional neurological disorders presented high variability of clinical symptoms including hemiplegia, lower limb unilateral or bilateral paralysis, myoclonus, dystonia, tremor and sensory impairment. Four patients were young females with mild Covid-19 infection without hospital admission. Their neurological symptoms developed over the course of 4 weeks after the beginning of Covid-19 symptoms or vaccine administration with normal ancillary exams. One patient presented overlapping functional neurological symptoms and mild impairment of the left common peroneal nerve after prolonged ICU stay. In addition, all patients in our case series reported other non-motor symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive impairment and diffuse pain or dysesthesia, which are compatible with post Covid-19 condition.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that clinicians recognize functional neurological symptoms and consider it as a differential diagnosis in patients with neurological complications of Covid-19 infection and vaccination.

Compassion-Focused Therapy for an Older Adult with Motor Functional Neurological Disorder: A Case Study

OBJECTIVES

Motor functional neurological disorder (mFND) is a condition where individuals may experience difficulties such as tremors, gait impairments, and paralysis which are not explained by identified structural damage to the brain. Studies on chronic conditions have suggested that psychological interventions such as compassion-focused therapy (CFT) may be effective in improving well-being in people with mFND. However, no evidence is currently available on psychotherapy for older people with mFND.

METHODS

A 12-session CFT intervention was delivered to an 81-year-old British male with mFND. Standardized measures were administered at baseline and post-intervention.

RESULTS

At post-intervention, a 30% decrease in perceived psychological impact of mFND was found, along with clinically significant changes in anxiety and depression. Good levels of feasibility and acceptability were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of CFT for psychological difficulties linked with mFND, as well as the first evidence for any psychotherapy with an older adult with mFND.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

CFT shows the potential to be effective, feasible, and acceptable for treating difficulties linked with mFND in older people. However, further high-quality investigations based on experimental designs are needed to build on the present preliminary findings.

Neuropsychiatric Treatment Approaches for Functional Neurological Disorder: A How to Guide

There is a growing body of knowledge regarding management of functional neurological disorder (FND). The aim of this article is to guide the clinician through FND clinical management, from delivery of the diagnosis, to creation of a biopsychosocially-informed treatment plan, to troubleshooting common issues that arise throughout longitudinal care. We review the evidence and core principles of both rehabilitative therapies (physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech and language therapy) and psychological therapies for the treatment of FND, and discuss the benefits of engaging a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team. The optimal timing of specific therapeutic interventions is also discussed, emphasizing a patient-centered perspective. Resources for further reading, for both patients and clinicians, are provided throughout. Additional research is needed to further optimize the therapeutic approach to patients with FND, including the need to develop novel treatments for those that do not positively respond to currently available interventions.

Diagnosis and management of functional neurological disorder

Functional neurological disorder (FND), previously regarded as a diagnosis of exclusion, is now a rule-in diagnosis with available treatments. This represents a major step toward destigmatizing the disorder, which was often doubted and deemed untreatable. FND is prevalent, generally affecting young and middle aged adults, and can cause severe disability in some individuals. An early diagnosis, with subsequent access to evidence based rehabilitative and/or psychological treatments, can promote recovery-albeit not all patients respond to currently available treatments. This review presents the latest advances in the use of validated rule-in examination signs to guide diagnosis, and the range of therapeutic approaches available to care for patients with FND. The article focuses on the two most frequently identified subtypes of FND: motor (weakness and/or movement disorders) and seizure type symptoms. Twenty two studies on motor and 27 studies on seizure type symptoms report high specificities of clinical signs (64-100%), and individual signs are reviewed. Rehabilitative interventions (physical and occupational therapy) are treatments of choice for functional motor symptoms, while psychotherapy is an emerging evidence based treatment across FND subtypes. The literature to date highlights heterogeneity in responses to treatment, underscoring that more research is needed to individualize treatments and develop novel interventions.