Causes of symptom dissatisfaction in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis

Patient and care partner perspectives and preferences related to myasthenia gravis treatment: A qualitative study

Background and Aims

Due to the high symptom and treatment burden in myasthenia gravis (MG), understanding patient and care partner perspectives and preferences is crucial.

Methods

This study used voice analysis and virtual focus groups to understand patient and care partner experiences with MG-related symptoms, treatments, and preferences. The voice analysis via social media listening used artificial intelligence-powered tools to gather and structure public digital conversations on MG. Focus groups included people living with MG and care partners who completed a questionnaire and participated in a 1-h virtual session facilitated using a semi-structured interview guide. Qualitative data were aggregated, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

Results

The voice analysis examined 11,554 posts from 8321 individuals, discussing MG symptoms, treatments, and burden. Of 7563 symptom-related posts, 5902 (78%) conveyed negative, 1427 (19%) neutral, and 234 (3%) positive sentiment. The most frequently mentioned symptoms were categorized as dysarthria, muscle weakness, and dysphagia. MG treatment sentiment analysis identified 6667 posts (67%) as neutral, 2887 (29%) as negative, and 350 (4%) as positive. For the focus groups, 15 individuals (12 patients and 3 care partners) completed the questionnaire and 14 participated in the virtual focus group sessions. The 15 participants who completed the questionnaire prioritized treatment convenience, symptom control for improved quality of life, and preventing potential MG crises in their current treatment. New treatment expectations included increased effectiveness, less frequent dosing, faster onset, and fewer side effects. Participants were also receptive to wearable medication delivery systems placed on the body and valued direct involvement in treatment decisions.

Conclusion

Patients and care partners are often negatively impacted by MG symptoms and value convenient and fast-acting treatments that control symptoms with minimal side effects. Considering patient preferences may help optimize treatment decisions and improve patients' overall well-being and satisfaction in their care.

Myasthenia Gravis Disease Burden and Its Impact on Satisfaction with Life: A Qualitative Survey of Patients' Perspectives in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) has a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life; however, many clinicians do not fully understand their patients' lived experience of the disease. To understand the actual conditions of patients with MG and clarify the problems they perceive, we conducted a survey to evaluate the effects of the disease on patients' daily life and work.

METHODS

A questionnaire-based, qualitative, cross-sectional, non-interventional survey was conducted in Japan between April and May 2022 in patients with MG who were receiving regular outpatient treatment. The questionnaire included items regarding the patients' disease characteristics and experience, satisfaction with life, current treatment status, and treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

In total, 452 patients were included in the survey population (66.6% aged ≥ 60 years; 64.6% with MG disease duration ≥ 10 years; 76.6% acetylcholine receptor [AChR] autoantibody positive). The symptoms of MG had a significant impact on the patients' daily lives, with the most common symptoms being fatigability (74.8%), ptosis (59.7%), diplopia (54.2%), and weakness in the arms and/or legs (50.9%). Patients commonly identified exercise (73.7%), work 68.0%), hobbies (60.4%), travel (60.0%), and socializing with friends (59.7%) as being difficult to perform, with approximately 50% of patients reporting that hospitalization sometimes interfered with their ability to work. In total, 27.2% of patients were dissatisfied with life, with the highest rates of dissatisfaction among patients who were either positive for muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) autoantibodies or seronegative for both AChR and MuSK autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

In Japanese patients with MG, over 25% are dissatisfied with life, indicating several unmet needs in this population.

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG.

METHODS

Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022).

RESULTS

New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment

BACKGROUND

Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research.

METHODS

MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings.

RESULTS

Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Systematic review of the patient burden of generalised myasthenia gravis in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by muscle weakness, and progression from ocular (oMG) to generalised (gMG) symptoms results in a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the patient burden experienced by people living with gMG.

METHODS

Electronic database searches (conducted March 2022), supplemented by interrogation of grey literature, were conducted to identify studies reporting patient burden outcomes in patients with gMG in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Results were synthesised narratively due to the heterogeneity across trials.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patient burden publications (representing 38 unique studies) were identified as relevant for inclusion in the systematic review, consisting of 37 publications reporting formal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and two publications describing alternative qualitative assessments of patient experience. The studies included a variety of measures including generic and disease-specific PROMs, as well as symptom-specific PROMs focusing on key comorbidities including depression, anxiety, fatigue and sleep disturbance. The findings showed some variation across studies and PROMs; however, in general there was evidence for worse QoL in patients with gMG than in healthy controls or in patients with oMG, and a trend for worsening QoL with increasing MG severity.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the importance of considering patient QoL when developing and assessing treatment and management plans for patients with gMG. However, the heterogeneity identified across studies illustrates the need for further representative and well-powered studies in large cohorts administering consistent, validated questionnaires.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42022328444.

The Burden Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Experience in Terms of Breathing, Fatigue, Sleep, Mental Health, Discomfort and Usual Activities in Comparison to the General Population

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disorder marked by a variable combination of weakness of eye, bulbar, respiratory, axial, and limb muscles. This study compared the experience of people with MG regarding breathing, fatigue, sleep, pain/discomfort, mental health, and usual activities with the general population.

METHODS

The MyRealWorld-MG digital, multinational study enrolled patients with MG and collected demographics, PROMIS-Dyspnea, PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance, FACIT-Fatigue, EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and MG-Quality-of-Life (MG-QoL-15r). Comparisons with the general population were based on PROMIS population norms, published literature, or on data from a digital, multinational, observational study which enrolled a representative sample of the general population (POPUP).

RESULTS

In MyRealWorld-MG (N = 2074), patients experienced higher intensity, frequency, and duration of PROMIS shortness of breath than a US population (p < 0.0001). Patients with MG had higher PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance scores than POPUP (53.7 vs 50.0, p < 0.0001), and 54.9% of patients had clinically severe FACIT-Fatigue scores vs 6.8% in POPUP (p < 0.0001). Among patients with MG, 69.6% and 18.5% had moderate-to-severe HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression compared to 20.3% and 6.9% in POPUP (p < 0.001). Statistically significant and strong associations were found between fatigue, sleep, dyspnea, usual activities, and emotions. All outcomes worsened with more severe disease.

CONCLUSION

A considerable burden was observed in this comparison of breathing, sleep, fatigue, mental health, and usual activities between patients with MG and the general population, using data from two international studies and published population norms. Even mildly affected patients had significantly worse outcomes than the general population.

Symptom and Treatment Satisfaction in Members of the US and Canadian GBS/CIDP Foundations with a Diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines for defining good outcomes in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are predominately defined by experts. At present, we do not have a patient-anchored definition of what constitutes a "good" outcome. Our study aimed to assess the symptom burden of people living with CIDP, as well as satisfaction with treatments and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted an online-survey in CIDP patients registered with the US and Canadian GBS/CIDP foundations. Respondents answered general demographic and clinical questions, as well as satisfaction with current symptom burden and treatments, plus validated outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 318 individuals with self-reported CIDP completed the online survey, of whom 128 (40%) considered their current disease burden as satisfactory while 190 (60%) did not. Of 305 patients who answered the treatment satisfaction question, 222(74%) were satisfied with their treatments. Patients who were satisfied with their current symptoms had, on average, better scores in quality of life and disease severity scales, although regression modeling showed that only ability to walk, stable symptoms, and health utility scores were associated with symptom satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction was associated with stable symptoms, use of IVIG, and use of one versus no medication.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of members of the US and Canadian GBS/CIDP Foundations reporting a diagnosis of CIDP were unsatisfied with current symptoms, despite a high level of overall satisfaction with treatments. There is an unmet need for improving long-term outcomes in people with a diagnosis of CIDP, and for studying patient-centered long-term treatment goals.

Understanding the Symptom Burden and Impact of Myasthenia Gravis from the Patient's Perspective: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) experience functional impairment due to MG symptoms. This study aimed to assess, from the patient perspective, the symptoms, impacts, and treatment goals of individuals diagnosed with gMG.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth concept-elicitation interviews were conducted with 28 individuals diagnosed with gMG in the United States.

RESULTS

Participants reported gMG symptoms that affected many body regions and functions, with an average of 16 symptoms per participant. The most frequently reported symptoms were eyelid drooping (93%), physical fatigue (89%), symptoms affecting the legs (82%), difficulty breathing (82%), and difficulty holding head up (82%). Nearly all participants (96%) reported fluctuations in symptoms and severity. Participants' most bothersome symptoms were blurry/double vision (43%), breathing difficulties (36%), all-over fatigue (36%), and swallowing problems (29%). Impacts on physical functioning included an inability to participate in hobbies/sports, need for increased planning, and difficulties performing activities of daily living. All participants reported emotional impacts and impacts on their work and finances. Their treatment goals included reduced fatigue and weakness, improved symptom stability, and minimization of the impact of symptoms, in particular the emotional impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluctuating and unpredictable nature of gMG symptoms was found to have a substantial impact on patients' emotional, social, and economic well-being. Participants' goals for symptom management suggest that greater focus is needed to help them quickly resume a normal lifestyle by achieving symptom stability. Impacts of fluctuating and unpredictable symptoms are difficult to measure, but it is important to consider symptom fluctuation as well as ongoing symptomatology when making treatment decisions, and to recognize the impact of uncontrolled symptoms on patients, their partners/caregivers, and family/friends. These factors are often not reflected in burden/cost-of-illness studies.