Neurofilament light chain levels indicate acute axonal damage under bortezomib treatment

Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of chemotherapy. The frequency of CIPN ranges from one in three to almost all patients depending on type of chemotherapy and dose. It causes symptoms that can range from sensitivity to touch and numbness to neuropathic pain in hands and feet. CIPN is notoriously difficult to grade objectively and has mostly relied on a clinician- or patient-based rating that is subjective and poorly reproducible. Thus, considerable effort has been aimed at identifying objective biomarkers of CIPN. Recent in vitro, animal, and clinical studies suggest that neurofilament light chain (NFL), a structural neuronal protein, may be an objective biomarker of CIPN. NFL released from cells to cell culture media reflects in vitro neurotoxicity, while NFL in serum reflects neuronal damage caused by chemotherapy in rodent models. Finally, NFL in serum may be a diagnostic biomarker of CIPN, but its prognostic ability to predict CIPN requires prospective evaluation. We discuss current limitations and future perspectives on the use of NFL as a preclinical and clinical biomarker of CIPN.

Plasma neurofilament light chain levels in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity according to type of anticancer drug

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A real-time biomarker in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) would be useful for clinical decision-making during treatment. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) can be detected in blood in the case of neuroaxonal damage. The aim of the study was to compare the levels of plasma NfL (pNfL) according to the type of chemotherapeutic agent and the severity of CIPN.

METHODS

This single-center prospective observational longitudinal study included patients treated with paclitaxel (TX; n = 34), brentuximab vedotin (BV; n = 29), or oxaliplatin (PT; n = 19). All patients were assessed using the Total Neuropathy Score-clinical version and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events before, during, and up to 6-12 months after the end of treatment. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed before and after chemotherapy discontinuation. Consecutive plasma samples were analyzed for NfL levels using a Simoa® analyzer. Changes in pNfL were compared between groups and were eventually correlated with clinical and NCS data. Clinically relevant (CR) CIPN was considered to be grade ≥ 2.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients, mostly women (59.8%), were included. One third of the patients who received TX (29.4%), BV (31%), or PT (36.8%) developed CR-CIPN, respectively, without differences among them (p = 0.854). Although pNfL significantly increased during treatment and decreased throughout the recovery period in all three groups, patients receiving TX showed significantly greater and earlier changes in pNfL levels compared to the other agents (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A variable change in pNfL is observed depending on the type of agent and mechanism of neurotoxicity with comparable CIPN severity, strongly implying the need to identify different cutoff values for each agent.

Targeting the PAC1 receptor mitigates degradation of myelin and synaptic markers and diminishes locomotor deficits in the cuprizone demyelination model

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with a strong neuroinflammatory component. Current treatments principally target the immune system but fail to preserve long-term myelin health and do not prevent neurological decline. Studies over the past two decades have shown that the structurally related neuropeptides VIP and PACAP (vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, respectively) exhibit pronounced anti-inflammatory activities and reduce clinical symptoms in MS disease models, largely via actions on their bivalent VIP receptor type 1 and 2. Here, using the cuprizone demyelination model, we demonstrate that PACAP and VIP, and strikingly the PACAP-selective receptor PAC1 agonist maxadilan, prevented locomotor deficits in the horizontal ladder and open field tests. Moreover, only PACAP and maxadilan were able to prevent myelin deterioration, as assessed by a reduction in the expression of the myelin markers proteolipid protein 1, oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2, quaking-7 (APC) and Luxol Fast Blue staining. Furthermore, PACAP and maxadilan (but not VIP), prevented striatal synaptic loss and diminished astrocyte and microglial activation in the corpus callosum of cuprizone-fed mice. In vitro, PACAP or maxadilan prevented lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced polarisation of primary astrocytes at 12-24 h, an effect that was not seen with maxadilan in LPS-stimulated microglia. Taken together, our data demonstrates for the first time that PAC1 agonists provide distinctive protective effects against white matter deterioration, neuroinflammation and consequent locomotor dysfunctions in the cuprizone model. The results indicate that targeting the PAC1 receptor may provide a path to treat myelin-related diseases in humans.

Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy: Clinical features, molecular basis, and therapeutic approach

Bortezomib is the first-line standard and most effective chemotherapeutic for multiple myeloma; however, bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) severely affects the chemotherapy regimen and has long-term impact on patients under maintenance therapy. The pathogenesis of BIPN is poorly understood, and basic research and development of BIPN management drugs are in early stages. Besides chemotherapy dose reduction and regimen modification, no recommended prevention and treatment approaches are available for BIPN apart from the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for peripheral neuropathy in myeloma. An in-depth exploration of the pathogenesis of BIPN, development of additional therapeutic approaches, and identification of risk factors are needed. Optimizing effective and standardized BIPN treatment plans and providing more decision-making evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment of BIPN are necessary. This article reviews the recent advances in BIPN research; provides an overview of clinical features, underlying molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic approaches; and highlights areas for future studies.

Studying serum neurofilament light chain levels as a potential new biomarker for small fiber neuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diagnosing small fiber neuropathies can be challenging. To address this issue, whether serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) could serve as a potential biomarker of damage to epidermal Aδ- and C-fibers was tested.

METHODS

Serum NfL levels were assessed in 30 patients diagnosed with small fiber neuropathy and were compared to a control group of 19 healthy individuals. Electrophysiological studies, quantitative sensory testing and quantification of intraepidermal nerve fiber density after skin biopsy were performed in both the proximal and distal leg.

RESULTS

Serum NfL levels were not increased in patients with small fiber neuropathy compared to healthy controls (9.1 ± 3.9 and 9.4 ± 3.8, p = 0.83) and did not correlate with intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the lateral calf or lateral thigh or with other parameters of small fiber impairment.

CONCLUSION

Serum NfL levels cannot serve as a biomarker for small fiber damage.

Ultrasensitive assay technology and fluid biomarkers for the evaluation of peripheral nerve disease

The field of biomarker discovery is rapidly expanding. The introduction of ultrasensitive immunoassays and the growing precision of genetic technologies are poised to revolutionise the assessment and monitoring of many diseases. Given the difficulties in imaging and tissue diagnosis, there is mounting interest in serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of peripheral neuropathy. Realised and potential fluid biomarkers of peripheral nerve disease include neuronal biomarkers of axonal degeneration, glial biomarkers for peripheral demyelinating disorders, immunopathogenic biomarkers (such as the presence and titre of antibodies or the levels of cytokines) and genetic biomarkers. Several are already starting to inform clinical practice, whereas others remain under evaluation as potential indicators of disease activity and treatment response. As more biomarkers become available for clinical use, it has become increasingly difficult for clinicians and researchers to keep up-to-date with the most recent discovery and interpretation. In this review, we aim to inform practising neurologists, neuroscientists and other clinicians about recent advances in fluid biomarker technology, with a focus on single molecule arrays (Simoa), chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays (CLEIA), electrochemiluminescence (ECL), proximity extension assays (PEA), and microfluidic technology. We discuss established and emerging fluid biomarkers of peripheral neuropathy, their clinical applications, limitations and potential future developments.

Exploring Serum Biomarkers for Neuropathic Pain in Rat Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Comparative Pilot Study with Oxaliplatin, Paclitaxel, Bortezomib, and Vincristine

Blood biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain (NfL), have garnered attention as potential indicators for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a dose-limiting adverse effect of neurotoxic anticancer drugs. However, no blood biomarker has been established for routine application or translational research. This pilot study aimed to evaluate a limited panel of blood biomarkers in rat models of CIPN and their correlations with neuropathic pain. CIPN models were induced through repeated injections of oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, bortezomib, and vincristine. Electronic von Frey testing was used to assess tactile allodynia. Post anticancer injections, serum concentrations of 31 proteins were measured. Allodynia thresholds decreased in anticancer-treated animals compared to controls. No consistent modifications were observed in the biomarkers across CIPN models. The most noteworthy biomarkers with increased concentrations in at least two CIPN models were NfL (paclitaxel, vincristine), MCP-1, and RANTES (oxaliplatin, vincristine). Vincristine-treated animals exhibited strong correlations between LIX, MCP-1, NfL, and VEGF concentrations and tactile allodynia thresholds. No single biomarker can be recommended as a unique indicator of CIPN-related pain. Because of the study limitations (single dose of each anticancer drug, young animals, and single time measurement of biomarkers), further investigations are necessary to define the kinetics, specificities, and sensitivities of MCP-1, RANTES, and NfL.