Intrafamilial heterogeneity of movement disorders: report of three cases in one family

Two cases of autosomal recessive generalized dystonia in childhood: 5 year follow-up and bilateral globus pallidus stimulation results

We report two brothers with an unknown form of early-onset familiar dystonia. Characteristic clinical features are (1) childhood-onset; (2) extrapyramidal motor symptoms; (3) dysarthria; and (4) mental retardation. Additional findings include loss of D(2)-receptors in both basal ganglia and hypoplasia of the cerebellar vermis with dilatation of the fourth ventricle and cisterna magna. There seems to be a progressive and non-progressive form of this clinical entity. Dystonic symptoms of the progressive form that occurred in one of the brothers were alleviated dramatically by bilateral internal globus pallidus (Gpi) stimulation, and the improvement has lasted now for 5 years.

Classification and genetics of dystonia

Dystonia is a syndrome characterised by sustained muscle contractions, producing twisting, repetitive, and patterned movements, or abnormal postures. The dystonic syndromes include a large group of diseases that have been classified into various aetiological categories, such as primary, dystonia-plus, heredodegenerative, and secondary. The diverse clinical features of these disorders are reflected in the traditional clinical classification based on age at onset, distribution of symptoms, and site of onset. However, with an increased awareness of the molecular and environmental causes, the classification schemes have changed to reflect different genetic forms of dystonia. To date, at least 13 dystonic syndromes have been distinguished on a genetic basis and their loci are referred to as DYT1 to DYT13. This review focuses on the molecular and phenotypic features of the hereditary dystonias, with emphasis on recent advances.

Benign hereditary chorea--entity or syndrome?

The existence of "benign hereditary chorea" (BHC), a rare disorder of childhood-onset familial chorea without other neurologic features or progression, has increasingly been questioned, because many patients with this disorder were subsequently diagnosed with different conditions. We therefore analyzed all published reports of families with BHC and contacted their authors to obtain follow-up information. In addition, we reviewed all patients in whom at least one of the authors had at some stage considered a possible diagnosis of BHC. Of 42 families reported to have BHC in the literature, we obtained follow-up information on 11 families, three of which had been seen by us. An additional seven new, unreported families and four sporadic cases, in which this diagnosis was suspected by at least one of us at one point, were reviewed and videotaped. On reviewing the videotapes of the 11 families in the literature, the diagnosis of BHC was changed in nine. In the remaining two families, atypical features suggesting different diagnoses were present in the original reports. In none of our own previously unreported patients (seven familial and four sporadic) was BHC diagnosed unequivocally by all evaluators after review of their video recordings. In three of these families and all four sporadic patients the diagnosis was changed; in one family multifocal myoclonus could not be differentiated from chorea by any author, and in the remaining three families no consensus between the raters was found. Apart from the 11 families in whom we obtained follow-up information, analysis of the remaining 31 reports on families with BHC also revealed atypical features in the majority. We conclude that BHC is not a diagnosis, but a syndrome that requires further investigation. Whether there is a distinct entity "BHC" with a single gene abnormality remains to be proven.