Cyclic summation versus m-sequence technique in the multifocal ERG

Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials Elicited by Multifrequency Pattern-Reversal Stimulation

Purpose

It has been shown that multifrequency stimulation with multifocal electroretinography can reduce recording time without a loss in signal-to-noise ratio. Here, we studied the applicability of multifrequency stimulations for steady-state visually evoked potential (VEP) recordings.

Methods

Multifrequency VEPs were recorded monocularly from 10 healthy subjects using pattern-reversal stimuli. The reversal frequency varied between 5 and 30 Hz. Pattern-reversal checkerboard stimuli were generated using four square arrays, each containing 100 light-emitting diodes (LEDs), positioned in four quadrants. Each array had a temporal frequency that differed slightly from the nominal frequency. The long duration of the data acquisition ensured that the slightly different stimulus frequencies in the four LED arrays can be resolved and that the responses to the stimulus in each array can be distinguished (e.g., with a frequency resolution: 0.011 Hz at 12 Hz). The best response from the four recording electrode configuration, defined as the recording with the maximal signal-to-noise ratio, was used for further analysis. Algorithmic latencies were calculated from the ratio of phase data and frequencies in a range of 4 and 20 Hz.

Results

Quadrant-VEPs with simultaneous pattern-reversal stimulation yielded a significant dependency on temporal frequency and stimulus location. The frequency range leading to the maximal response amplitude was between 10 and 12 Hz. Response phases decreased approximately linearly, with increasing temporal frequency suggesting a mean algorithmic latency between 112 and 126 ms.

Conclusions

Multifrequency stimulation using LED arrays is an efficient method for recording pattern-reversal VEPs while all stimuli are presented at the same time.

Translational Relevance

Simultaneously recorded VEPs as performed by the multi-frequency method can be used for objective measurements of visual field defects.

Topography of the long- to middle-wavelength sensitive cone ratio in the human retina assessed with a wide-field color multifocal electroretinogram

The topographical distribution of relative sensitivity to red and green lights across the retina was assayed using a custom-made wide-field color multifocal electroretinogram apparatus. There were increases in the relative sensitivity to red compared to green light in the periphery that correlate with observed increases in the relative amount of long (L) compared to middle (M) wavelength sensitive opsin mRNA. These results provide electrophysiological evidence that there is a dramatic increase in the ratio of L to M cones in the far periphery of the human retina. The central to far peripheral homogeneity in cone proportions has implications for understanding the developmental mechanisms that determine the identity of a cone as L or M and for understanding the circuitry for color vision in the peripheral retina.

The clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography: a systematic review

Multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) is an investigation that can simultaneously measure multiple electroretinographic responses at different retinal locations by cross-correlation techniques. mfERG therefore allows topographic mapping of retinal function in the central 40-50 degrees of the retina. The strength of mfERG lies in its ability to provide objective assessment of the central retinal function at different retinal areas within a short duration of time. Since the introduction of mfERG in 1992, mfERG has been applied in a large variety of clinical settings. This article reviews the clinical applications of mfERG based on the currently available evidence. mfERG has been found to be useful in the assessment of localized retinal dysfunction caused by various acquired or hereditary retinal disorders. The use of mfERG also enabled clinicians to objectively monitor the treatment outcomes as the changes in visual functions might not be reflected by subjective methods of assessment. By changing the stimulus, recording, and analysis parameters, investigation of specific retinal electrophysiological components can be performed topographically. Further developments and consolidations of these parameters will likely broaden the use of mfERG in the clinical setting.

Pattern reversal ERG and VEP--comparison of stimulation by LED, monitor and a Maxwellian-view system

PURPOSE

Pattern stimulation is widely used to detect inner retinal dysfunction. In this work we describe a pattern stimulation technique with LEDs and compare the results with conventional methods.

METHODS

PERG and VEP were derived from three normal subjects. Three different techniques were used to generate a checkerboard pattern reversal stimulus: a 70 Hz monitor, a Maxwellian-view system equipped with a Xenon-arc lamp and a mechanical mirror system, and a LED array (Roland Consult) consisting of 100 white LEDs. Two kinds of luminance (125 and 340 cd/m2) and four temporal frequencies (4, 8, 12 and 24 reversals per second) were studied on three healthy subjects. Additionally, a luminance tuning experiment (30, 60, 90, 125 and 340 cd/m2) was performed on one subject.

RESULTS

Comparison of different stimulation techniques shows reproducible responses of PERG and VEP with all three methods. The LED array leads to slightly smaller amplitudes than both other techniques, which we ascribe to the design of the LED field. No difference of peak times or phases was noticed between different stimulation techniques. A luminance dependency of PERG and VEP is noticeable using stimulation with LED: with decreasing luminance we measured increasing peak times of PERG and VEP and decreasing amplitude of PERG.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that central retinal stimulation with checkerboard pattern reversal is possible with LED. It gives comparable results to monitor and Maxwellian-view system.

30 Hz-flicker mfERG in primary open-angle glaucoma patients : 30 Hz-flicker-mfERG in POAG

PURPOSE

This study was performed in an attempt to gain more information on whether the 30 Hz-flicker mfERG indeed provides a sensitive measure of dysfunction in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) as has been suggested previously.

METHODS

Eighteen POAG patients with visual field defects (MD > 2.2 dB) and glaucomatous optic neuropathies as well as 10 control subjects underwent mfERG recording as follows: 30 Hz-flicker mfERG, LED stimulus screen, 61 hexagons, Lmax: 180 cd/m2, Lmin: 0 cd/m2, recording time: approximately 5 min, filter setting: 10-200 Hz. The 30 Hz response (also called the fundamental or the first harmonic response (1HW) and the second harmonic wave at 60 Hz (2HW) were analysed as an overall response and in quadrants, as well as in 4 small neighbouring areas per quadrant. The patients' mfERGs were compared to those of the control group and to the mean defect values (MD) of the corresponding quadrants of the Octopus perimetry.

RESULTS

Neither in the overall response, nor in the quadrants, nor in the smaller areas examined did amplitudes and phases of the 1HW and the 2HW or the amplitude ratio of the 2HW to the 1HW (DFT-ratio) differ from the controls (P > 0.05-ANOVA). There was no significant correlation between mfERG values and the MD (Spearman-test, Bonferroni).

CONCLUSION

Thus, the 30 Hz-flicker mfERG does not seem to be sensitive enough to separate glaucoma patients from normal.

Pattern reversal ERG with LED-stimulation using cyclic summation technique

PURPOSE

Multifocal pattern reversal stimulation can be used to detect inner retinal dysfunction. Commonly, the stimulus is generated on a monitor using m-sequence technique. We describe a pattern reversal ERG evoked by LED arrays using cyclic summation (CS).

METHODS

One eye of eight healthy subjects was examined with an arrangement of 13 LED arrays. Each array consisted of 100 LEDs separated by thin walls. One of the fields was placed centrally, three fields each were placed above, below, left and right of the central field. CS technique at a temporal frequency of 16 reversals per second (RPS) was used for stimulation. Viewing distance was 30 cm, check size was 0.58 cyc/deg. Luminance of the bright fields was 340 cd/m2.

RESULTS

Fourier analysis was performed. Centrally, the amplitude of the 2nd harmonic wave was highest (0.87 microV). In the first paracentral fields, amplitudes were 0.28 microV (nasally), 0.21 microV (superior, inferior and temporally). In the second paracentral fields, amplitudes were 0.11 microV (nasally), 0.09 microV (superior), 0.13 microV (inferior) and 0.15 microV (temporally). With exception of the temporal field (0.1 microV), in the outermost fields no reproducible ERG response could be recorded.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral ERG responses to a pattern reversal stimulus can be recorded with LED stimulation using CS technique up to an eccentricity of 30 degrees. Responses are highest centrally and decrease with increasing distance to the centre.