Estimation of visual outcome without treatment in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia

The efficacy of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and prognostic biomarkers in monitoring of the treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To evaluate anatomical and visual results of eyes with naive myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in patients treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, non-randomized, comperative, intervetional study. One hundred fourteen eyes of 114 patients with mCNV who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) monotherapy injections were enrolled into the study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were compared among the groups during the follow-up periods at the beginning, months 1, 3, 6, 12, and the final visit.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 47.76 ± 10.57 years (range, 33-72 years) and the mean follow-up period was 23.34 ± 6.81 months (range, 13-38 months). The mean BCVA denoted a significantly improve at each group (p < 0.05). In terms of an inter-group analysis of all 3 groups, at months 1, 6, and 12 and final visit, the BCVA were statistically significantly better in the IVA group when compared to both IVB and IVR groups (p = 0.021, p = 0.032, p = 0.024, p = 0.012). There was a significant decrease in CMT following IVB (236.49 ± 40.91 μm-190.74 ± 50.12 μm), IVA (232.91 ± 46.29 μm-193.73 ± 46.81 μm) and IVR (234.78 ± 45.37 μm-192.21 ± 37.27 μm) between baseline and final visit (p = 0.018, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant decrease in SFCT values between baseline and final examination only in the IVA group (p < 0.001). The mean number of injections were 9.18 ± 3.18 (range; 3 to 13) in IVB, 6.46 ± 2.93 (range; 3-11) in IVR and 4.45 ± 1.42 (range; 2-7) in IVA (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

All three anti-VEGFs were found to be effective in terms of visual results in patients with mCNV. However, we demonstrated that IVA reduces the need for anti-VEGF when compared to patients who received both IVB and IVR. Furthermore, IVA induced a prominent reduction in SFCT, whereas IVR and IVB did not have a significant action on SFCT.

Genetic Polymorphisms Affecting Ranibizumab Response in High Myopia Patients

High myopia is an ophthalmic pathology that affects half of the young adults in the United States and Europe and it is predicted that a third of the world’s population could be nearsighted at the end of this decade. It is characterized by at least 6 diopters or axial length > 26 mm and, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in 5 to 11% of cases. Ranibizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody fragment. It is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drug used in the treatment of CNV. Many genetic polymorphisms have been associated with interindividual differences in the response to ranibizumab, but these associations were not yet assessed among patients with high myopia and CNV. We performed a retrospective study assessing the association of genetic polymorphisms with response to ranibizumab in patients with CNV secondary to high myopia (mCNV). We included genetic polymorphisms previously associated with the response to drugs used in CNV patients (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and photodynamic therapy (PDT)). We also included genetic variants in the VEGFA gene. Based on our results, ARMS2 (rs10490924) and CFH (rs1061170) are associated with response to ranibizumab in high myopia patients; and, included VEGFA genetic polymorphisms are not associated with ranibizumab response in our population but might be related to a higher risk of CNV.

IMI Pathologic Myopia

Pathologic myopia is a major cause of visual impairment worldwide. Pathologic myopia is distinctly different from high myopia. High myopia is a high degree of myopic refractive error, whereas pathologic myopia is defined by a presence of typical complications in the fundus (posterior staphyloma or myopic maculopathy equal to or more serious than diffuse choroidal atrophy). Pathologic myopia often occurs in eyes with high myopia, however its complications especially posterior staphyloma can also occur in eyes without high myopia.

Owing to a recent advance in ocular imaging, an objective and accurate diagnosis of pathologic myopia has become possible. Especially, optical coherence tomography has revealed novel lesions like dome-shaped macula and myopic traction maculopathy. Wide-field optical coherence tomography has succeeded in visualizing the entire extent of large staphylomas. The effectiveness of new therapies for complications have been shown, such as anti-VEGF therapies for myopic macular neovascularization and vitreoretinal surgery for myopic traction maculopathy.

Myopia, especially childhood myopia, has been increasing rapidly in the world. In parallel with an increase in myopia, the prevalence of high myopia has also been increasing. However, it remains unclear whether or not pathologic myopia will increase in parallel with an increase of myopia itself. In addition, it has remained unclear whether genes responsible for pathologic myopia are the same as those for myopia in general, or whether pathologic myopia is genetically different from other myopia.

Machine learning prediction of pathologic myopia using tomographic elevation of the posterior sclera

Qualitative analysis of fundus photographs enables straightforward pattern recognition of advanced pathologic myopia. However, it has limitations in defining the classification of the degree or extent of early disease, such that it may be biased by subjective interpretation. In this study, we used the fovea, optic disc, and deepest point of the eye (DPE) as the three major markers (i.e., key indicators) of the posterior globe to quantify the relative tomographic elevation of the posterior sclera (TEPS). Using this quantitative index from eyes of 860 myopic patients, support vector machine based machine learning classifier predicted pathologic myopia an AUROC of 0.828, with 77.5% sensitivity and 88.07% specificity. Axial length and choroidal thickness, the existing quantitative indicator of pathologic myopia only reached an AUROC of 0.758, with 75.0% sensitivity and 76.61% specificity. When all six indices were applied (four TEPS, AxL, and SCT), the discriminative ability of the SVM model was excellent, demonstrating an AUROC of 0.868, with 80.0% sensitivity and 93.58% specificity. Our model provides an accurate modality for identification of patients with pathologic myopia and may help prioritize these patients for further treatment.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is one of the most vision-impairing complications in patients with pathologic myopia. It is also one of the most frequently encountered non.age-related macular degeneration causes of CNV and affects young patients in the working age group. Fluorescein angiography (FA) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) are generally indicated to confirm the diagnosis of active myopic CNV before initiation of treatment. Without treatment, natural history studies have shown that the vision outcome can be very poor. More recently, a number of retrospective, prospective and phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trials have established the safety and efficacy of intravitreal anti.vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for the treatment of myopic CNV. Long-term follow-up studies have found that some of the initial vision gained after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy may not be maintained, owing to the presence and progression of chorioretinal atrophy (CRA) adjacent to the CNV. Further research on clinical and imaging characteristics may elucidate the prognostic factors that are crucial to optimizing the treatment and prevention of visual impairment associated with myopic CNV.

Epidemiology, treatment pattern and health care utilization of myopic choroidal neovascularization: a population based study

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence and incidence of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in Taiwan, including the health care utilization and treatment-associated costs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using existing data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance claims database to identify patients who had a diagnosis of myopic CNV recorded from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011. The prevalence of myopic CNV was monitored during this period, and the frequency and cost of both treatment visits and monitoring visits were analyzed for 2 years following diagnosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of myopic CNV was 0.017%. In total, 9068 patients with myopic CNV were identified, 12.3% (n = 1111) of whom were treated. Of those treated, 72.0% (n = 800) received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (IVI); the remainder received either photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (vPDT), laser photocoagulation, or a combination of therapies. IVI was associated with the largest number of treatment visits as well as a higher administrative (non-drug) cost per treatment visit (a mean of USD 57.18). vPDT alone was associated with a higher overall cost per treatment visit and more monitoring visits than IVI or laser photocoagulation. Costs for monitoring visits were highest for IVI.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of myopic CNV was lower than that reported in previous studies, possibly because of differences in age distribution in the populations studied. The frequencies of treatment administered were similar to those reported in previous studies; however, a cost-effectiveness comparison could not be made owing to lack of data in previous studies.

Management of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Focus on Anti-VEGF Therapy

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) is the second most common form of CNV after age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is a sight-threatening complication of pathologic myopia (PM) and often affects patients in their working years causing significant impact on quality of life. Previous therapies such as photodynamic therapy with verteporfin have shown limited success. Due to the similarities in pathogenesis of mCNV and AMD CNV, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF), which has so far been the mainstay of treatment for AMD CNV, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of mCNV and has become the first-line treatment of choice. This article aims to examine briefly the epidemiology and pathophysiology of mCNV, as well as review the evidence for efficacy, safety, and clinical use of anti-VEGF treatment for mCNV.

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor use and treatment approach for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia

INTRODUCTION

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is the most common cause of CNV in those under 50 years of age. It is a significant cause of visual loss in those with pathologic myopia. The current standard of care involves therapy with intravitreal inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

AREAS COVERED

The epidemiology of myopia, high myopia, pathologic myopia, and myopic CNV is reviewed, along with a brief discussion of historical treatments. The pharmacology of the three most commonly used anti-VEGF agents is discussed, with an emphasis on the licensed drugs, ranibizumab and aflibercept. A comprehensive clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment of myopic CNV is presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The current standard of care for myopic CNV is intravitreal inhibition of VEGF, with ranibizumab and aflibercept licensed for intraocular use. The diagnosis, OCT features of disease activity and retreatment algorithm for myopic CNV is different from wet age-related macular degeneration. In the long-term, myopic CNV may be associated with gradual, irreversible visual loss due to progressive chorioretinal atrophy, for which there is currently no treatment.

Understanding the Determinants of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization and Response to Treatment

Purpose

The pathophysiologic pathways that govern the development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are complex. Patchy atrophy and lacquer cracks are known to be major anatomic risk factors for the development of myopic CNV, but they are not alone and much remains to be understood about other factors that influence development. In addition, a greater understanding of the modifiable and nonmodifiable factors that influence outcome, resolution, and recurrence after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could lead to more personalized treatment algorithms that integrate parameters other than the presence of CNV itself and could help improve clinical outcomes and reduce recurrence.

Methods

We reviewed recently published data on risk factors for CNV and predictors of response to anti-VEGF treatments. In particular, data pertaining to age, sex, genetic predisposition, baseline visual acuity, axial length, staphyloma, lacquer cracks, atrophic lesions, choroidal thickness or choroidal thinning, characteristics of CNV such as duration, localization, and size of CNV, and treatment considerations such as choice of treatment, loading doses, and combination treatments were reviewed.

Results

Our analysis showed that the body of evidence is incomplete.

Conclusions

Additional studies are required to identify high-risk patients and to develop personalized therapeutic approaches.

Myopic choroidal neovascularisation: current concepts and update on clinical management

Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) is a common vision-threatening complication of myopia and pathological myopia. Despite significant advances in understanding the epidemiology, pathogenesis and natural history of myopic CNV, there is no standard definition of myopic CNV and its relationship to axial length and other myopic degenerative changes. Several treatments are available to ophthalmologists, but with the advent of new therapies there is a need for further consensus and clinical management recommendations. Verteporfin photodynamic therapy has been an established treatment for subfoveal myopic CNV for many years, but this treatment does not restore visual acuity and is associated with long-term chorioretinal atrophy. More recently, clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in patients with myopic CNV have demonstrated substantial visual acuity gains and quality of life increases compared with photodynamic therapy. These enhanced outcomes provide updated evidence-based clinical management guidelines of myopic CNV, and increase the need for a generally accepted definition for myopic CNV. This review critically summarises the latest myopic CNV literature in the context of clinical experience and recommends a myopic CNV treatment algorithm.

Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarize the epidemiology of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and their impact on vision.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review of all English-language studies evaluating the epidemiology and visual burden of pathologic myopia or myopic CNV.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched with no time limits using predefined search strings for English-language studies evaluating the epidemiology and visual burden of pathologic myopia and myopic CNV.

RESULTS

In total, 39 relevant publications were identified. Population-based studies reported pathologic myopia to be the first to third most frequent cause of blindness. The prevalence of pathologic myopia was reported to be 0.9%-3.1%, and the prevalence of visual impairment attributable to pathologic myopia ranged from 0.1%-0.5% (European studies) and from 0.2%-1.4% (Asian studies). The prevalence of CNV in individuals with pathologic myopia was reported to be 5.2%-11.3%, and was bilateral in approximately 15% of patients. All studies of visual outcome in patients with myopic CNV (duration ranging from less than 3 months to 21.5 years) reported deterioration in best-corrected visual acuity over time. Older age, subfoveal CNV location, and larger baseline lesion size were predictors of worse visual outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic myopia is an important cause of vision loss worldwide, affecting up to 3% of the population. Of these, a substantial proportion of patients develop myopic CNV, which mostly causes a significant progressive decrease in visual acuity. This condition should therefore be a target for new treatment strategies.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for myopic choroidal neovascularization

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a vision-threatening complication in the eyes with pathological myopia, which is particularly prevalent among young and middle-aged Asians globally. To date, the verteporfin in photodynamic therapy study is the only randomized-controlled study in treatment of subfoveal myopic CNV. However, its long-term benefit is controversial. Recently, intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors have shown promising results. In the absence of randomized-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors with photodynamic therapy and placebo, the purpose of this article is to review the current studies on functional and anatomical outcomes in both subfoveal and juxtafoveal myopic CNV. Furthermore, the influences of various doses and frequencies, as well as age and previous photodynamic therapy treatment on its effect are described.

Predictive factors for visual outcome to intravitreal bevacizumab in young Chinese patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To report the anatomical and functional outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab in both young and old Chinese patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization.

METHODS

Consecutive series of 56 eyes (52 patients) with myopic choroidal neovascularization treated exclusively with intravitreal bevacizumab were reviewed retrospectively. Data from clinical examination, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography were collected.

RESULTS

Vision significantly improved after intravitreal bevacizumab in this patient series (P < 0.0001), with an average of 2.2 injections. Higher myopia was positively correlated to a worse outcome (r = -0.3, P = 0.036). Stratifying by age, the correlation between spherical equivalent and final outcome showed statistical significance (r = -0.44, P = 0.027) only in younger patients. In younger patients, both spherical equivalent (P = 0.036) and initial visual acuity (P = 0.004) were predictive factors for visual outcome after adjusting for age, spherical equivalent, and number of injections, whereas in older patients, only initial visual acuity (P < 0.0001) was predictive of visual outcome after similar adjustments.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients do not have a better outcome when compared with older patients. Initial visual acuity, regardless of age, plays a more significant role. Both initial visual acuity and spherical equivalent are predictive factors for final visual acuity in young Chinese patients.

Outcome of photodynamic therapy in choroidal neovascularization due to pathologic myopia and related factors

To evaluate the outcome of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and the factors influencing its outcome in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to pathologic myopia. Twenty-three eyes of 21 consecutive patients who received PDT for subfoveal CNV due to pathologic myopia and who were followed for >12 months were included in the study. The relationship between the factors that might affect the treatment outcome were evaluated. Mean age was 48.7 ± 16.0 years (23-74 years). Mean follow-up was 23.2 ± 7.7 months (15-41 months). Mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.85 ± 0.24 before treatment, 0.89 ± 0.37 at 12 months, and 0.92 ± 0.46 at the final visit. Mean logMAR visual acuity did not change significantly at 12 months or at the final visit (P = 0.47 and 0.36, respectively). The baseline visual acuity strongly correlated with the final visual acuity (P = 0.001). Age showed an inverse correlation with change in logMAR visual acuity at 12 months (P = 0.01). PDT prevented significant visual loss in eyes with subfoveal CNV due to pathologic myopia. Better initial visual acuity resulted in better final visual acuity. Younger age was correlated with better treatment outcome at 12 months.

Characteristics of periconus choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia

PURPOSE

To examine the clinical characteristics of periconus choroidal neovascularizations (CNVs) in eyes with pathologic myopia.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 260 eyes of 254 patients with a myopic CNV and selected those with a periconus CNV. A periconus CNV was defined as a CNV that is located next to a myopic conus. To differentiate a periconus CNV from a subfoveal CNV that has expanded to the edge of the disc, eyes whose CNV involved the fovea were excluded. The data of the eyes with a subfoveal CNV were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Eleven eyes (4.2%) of 11 patients had a periconus CNV. These CNVs had a triangular or oval shape whose base was directed toward the myopic conus. The eyes with a periconus CNV had a significantly larger myopic conus than eyes with a subfoveal myopic CNV. The degree of myopia and axial length were not significantly associated with the incidence of periconus CNV. In 5 of the 11patients, the periconus CNV had a spontaneous regression without treatment, and none had a recurrence. The other 6 patients received treatment and obtained an angiographic closure after a single treatment. A chorioretinal atrophy (ChRA) developed in 3 eyes, and the ChRA enlarged over the fovea in 2 of these eyes, which led to a significant decrease of vision.

CONCLUSION

A periconus CNV is rare (4.2%) among the eyes with a myopic CNV and is more likely to develop in eyes with a large myopic conus. The absence of a significant association between the degree of myopia and incidence of periconus CNV suggests that the morphologic characteristics of the eye are not the causes of the periconus CNV. Although an angiographic closure can be easily attained with or without the treatment, the later development and progression of ChRA can impair vision.

Intravitreal injection of 2.5 mg bevacizumab for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization in treatment-naive cases: a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab in treatment-naive patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia over a 2-year interval.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with myopic CNV who had not received previous treatment were given intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 mL). All patients were retrospectively evaluated using best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) measured with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients aged 15-81 years (mean, 42.6 years) were enrolled. OCT images demonstrated that the mean CMT±standard deviation (SD) significantly changed from 270±47 μm at baseline to 228±35, 218±35, 212±25, 210±29, and 209±30 μm in the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th post-treatment months, respectively (P<0.001 for all). The BCVA in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution±SD significantly changed from 0.75±0.43 at baseline to 0.57±0.44, 0.42±0.44, 0.39±0.47, 0.41±0.44, and 0.42±0.41 in the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th post-treatment months, respectively (P<0.001 for all). The mean number of injections was 1.69 (range, 1-4) within the 24-month period. The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 35 months (mean, 28 months). No other ocular or systemic adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present study lacked a control group, the results in this small series of patients over the 2-year follow-up period indicate that intravitreal injection of 2.5 mg bevacizumab is effective and safe in patients with myopic CNV.

Prognostic factors for visual outcomes 2-years after intravitreal bevacizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To determine the pre-treatment ocular factors significantly associated with the visual outcome 24 months after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV).

METHODS

A total of 23 eyes of 23 patients with mCNV were treated with IVB followed by as needed therapy. The efficacy of IVB was evaluated by the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months after the initial treatment. Forward stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of pre-treatment factors on the BCVA and the improvement of the BCVA at 24 months.

RESULTS

The mean pre-IVB BCVA was 0.74 ± 0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units, and it improved to 0.43 ± 0.31 logMAR units after 1 month (P < 0.001, paired t-test). The improvement was maintained at 24 months (0.46 ± 0.40, P < 0.005). The mean number of IVB performed during the 24 months was 1.35 ± 0.71. Forward stepwise regression analysis showed that the pre-IVB CNV size (standardized β = 0.52, P < 0.01) and BCVA (standardized β = -0.44, P < 0.05) significantly affected the visual acuity change after 24 months. The CNV size was the only factor that significantly affected the BCVA after 24 months (standardized β=0.56, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

IVB with as needed therapy for mCNV led to a rapid and sustained visual improvement. Smaller CNV size was a significant prognostic factor that predicts better visual acuity. Patients with lower pre-treatment BCVA had better visual recovery than those with better pre-treatment BCVA, however, this may be due to a ceiling/floor effect.

Bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia: Is there a decline of the treatment efficacy after 2 years?

BACKGROUND

The Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Study failed to prove a statistically significant benefit for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) at the end of the second year. Therefore, we wanted to evaluate whether the early effects seen under anti-VEGF treatment can be maintained over longer follow-up intervals.

METHODS

This consecutive case series included all patients at the Centre for Ophthalmology, Tuebingen, with a 2-year follow-up after treatment with 1.25 mg of bevacizumab alone or in combination with photodynamic therapy. Twenty-one eyes from 19 patients were analyzed in the retrospective evaluation of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT).

RESULTS

Mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.64 at baseline to 0.55 after 1 year (p = 0.32) and remained 0.55 at 2 years (p = 0.23). A subgroup analysis showed that mean logMAR BCVA in the monotherapy group improved from 0.7 to 0.5 at 2 years (n = 11, p = 0.06). In the combined therapy group, mean logMAR BCVA changed from 0.55 to 0.59 at 2 years (n = 10, p = 0.69). Mean CFT decreased significantly in both groups by 168 microm (p < 0.001) and 76 microm (p < 0.05) in the monotherapy and in the combined groups, respectively. No complications or adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Although the limitations of the study design have to be acknowledged and carefully discussed, we found no obvious superiority of a combined treatment for myopic CNV, at least in terms of the functional outcome and the injection frequency. The results indicate that bevacizumab might be beneficial in the treatment of patients with CNV secondary to pathologic myopia.

Two-year visual results for older Asian women treated with photodynamic therapy or bevacizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term visual and anatomic outcome of treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT) or intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB; Avastin; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA) for choroidal neovascularization attributable to pathologic myopia (mCNV).

DESIGN

An open-label, interventional case series.

METHODS

SETTING

Multi-institutional.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one eyes of Japanese women who received either PDT or IVB for mCNV. Inclusion criteria were age 50 years or older, greatest linear dimension (GLD) 1200 to 3000 microm, and baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/200 to 20/40. INTERVENTION PROCEDURES: Patients received either PDT or IVB (1 mg/40 microL) throughout the study, with re-treatment when necessary.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BCVA and visual gain/loss at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the initial treatment.

RESULTS

Age, BCVA, location of CNV, refractive error, and symptom duration at baseline did not differ significantly between groups. BCVA was significantly improved at 3 to 12 months (P < .05); however, the significance was lost at 18 and 24 months in the IVB group. The PDT group showed no significant improvement within the first year, and vision slowly worsened after 12 months, becoming significantly worse at 18 and 24 months compared to baseline (P< .01). BCVA was significantly higher in the IVB group at 6 months (P< .05), and 12 months or further (P < .01). Visual gain was significantly greater in the IVB group at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (P < .05 for 6, 18, and 24 months and P < .01 for 12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the effects of PDT and IVB have a different time course, and that IVB provides a significantly better BCVA than PDT for mCNV over the long-term.

Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia: 12-month results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty eyes from 20 patients with CNV secondary to pathologic myopia participated in this prospective nonrandomized interventional case series. All patients were scheduled for three monthly intravitreal bevacizumab 1.25 mg injections. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal center thickness (FCT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiographic findings were examined before and after treatment. Patients were followed up for 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean BCVA (+/- standard deviation [SD]) at baseline was 24.8 (+/- 11.86) letters (Snellen equivalent: 20/80). At 12 months after treatment, the mean BCVA (+/- SD) improved significantly (P = .000001) to 43 (+/- 12.38) letters (Snellen equivalent: 20/35). At 12 month follow-up, BCVA improved 10 letters or more in 18 (90%) out of 20 treated eyes and improved 15 letters or more in 14 (70%) out of 20 treated eyes. No treated eyes experienced a worsening of BCVA from baseline. The mean FCT (+/- SD) at baseline was 223 (+/- 47.43) microns. At 12 months after treatment, the mean FCT (+/- SD) reduced to 206 (+/- 50.87) microns. This reduction in FCT after treatment was not statistically significant (P = .11). At 12 months follow-up, absence of fluorescein leakage from the CNV was demonstrated in 19 (95%) out of 20 treated eyes and persistent leakage in one eye (5%). None of the 19 eyes that had CNV closure experienced recurrence at 12-month follow-up. No ocular or systemic adverse effects from treatment were encountered.

CONCLUSION

These results of intravitreal bevacizumab in myopic CNV are very promising with no apparent short-term safety concerns. At 12 months, treated eyes had a significant improvement in visual acuity (VA). OCT findings, as well, showed a trend consistent with the beneficial changes observed for VA. Treatment resulted in complete absence of angiographic leakage in 95% of eyes. Further studies will be needed to better determine long-term efficacy and safety.

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization of pathologic myopia in Japanese patients: comparison with nontreated controls

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin on subfoveal or juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia in Japanese patients and to compare the visual outcomes of PDT-treated patients with that of age-matched and visual acuity-matched untreated controls.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, consecutive, interventional case series.

METHODS

We prospectively followed up 43 eyes of 42 consecutive patients with pathologic myopia (>6 diopters or axial length>26.5 mm) who received PDT for myopic CNV. In addition, the visual outcomes of these patients who were followed up for more than one year were compared with those of age- and initial visual acuity-matched untreated controls.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 15.0+/-7.0 months. Patients received an average of 1.40+/-0.73 treatments during follow-up, and 30 eyes (69.8%) required only one treatment. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by more than two Snellen lines in seven eyes (16.3%), decreased in six eyes (14.0%), and remained stable in 30 eyes (69.7%). In three eyes with a juxtafoveal CNV, CNV could not be detected ophthalmoscopically or angiographically after PDT. Statistical analysis showed that the PDT-treated patients had significantly better visual acuity at one year after PDT than the age- and initial BCVA-matched untreated controls.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that PDT was beneficial for maintaining vision in Japanese patients with myopic CNV. The visual outcome after PDT was better than the natural course of the disease as determined from untreated controls. The effect on chorioretinal atrophy around CNV should be investigated with a long-term study.

Intravitreal Avastin for choroidal neovascularisation in pathological myopia: the controversy continues

Intravitreal Avastin provides an opportunity to prevent visual acuity loss particularly in non‐Western countries