Direct cost and predictive factors for treatment in patients with ocular hypertension or early, moderate and advanced primary open-angle glaucoma: the CoGIS study in Germany

Immunomodulatory and Antioxidant Drugs in Glaucoma Treatment

Glaucoma, a group of diseases characterized by progressive retinal ganglion cell loss, cupping of the optic disc, and a typical pattern of visual field defects, is a leading cause of severe visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the leading risk factor for glaucoma development. However, glaucoma can also develop at normal pressure levels. An increased susceptibility of retinal ganglion cells to IOP, systemic vascular dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and autoimmune imbalances have been suggested as playing a role in the pathophysiology of normal-tension glaucoma. Since inflammation and oxidative stress play a role in all forms of glaucoma, the goal of this review article is to present an overview of the inflammatory and pro-oxidant mechanisms in the pathophysiology of glaucoma and to discuss immunomodulatory and antioxidant treatment approaches.

Oxidative Stress: A Suitable Therapeutic Target for Optic Nerve Diseases?

Optic nerve disorders encompass a wide spectrum of conditions characterized by the loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and subsequent degeneration of the optic nerve. The etiology of these disorders can vary significantly, but emerging research highlights the crucial role of oxidative stress, an imbalance in the redox status characterized by an excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS), in driving cell death through apoptosis, autophagy, and inflammation. This review provides an overview of ROS-related processes underlying four extensively studied optic nerve diseases: glaucoma, Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION), and optic neuritis (ON). Furthermore, we present preclinical findings on antioxidants, with the objective of evaluating the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting oxidative stress in the treatment of optic neuropathies.

Recent Trends in Treatment and Associated Costs of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To describe recent trends in the treatment for primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and its associated costs in a clinical setting.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

We included patients with PACG from 2011 to 2020 using a large-scale administrative claims database in Japan.

METHODS

We calculated the frequencies and costs of antiglaucoma drugs, ophthalmic examinations, and glaucoma-related surgeries, stratified by fiscal years and age groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequencies and costs of antiglaucoma drugs, ophthalmic examinations, and glaucoma-related surgeries.

RESULTS

We identified 5654 patients with PACG (15 338 patient-years). Prostanoid FP receptor agonist, nonselective β-blocker, and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor use decreased, whereas prostanoid EP2 receptor agonist, α-2 adrenergic agonist, Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor, and fixed-combination eyedrops use increased. The total amount of drug per patient-year significantly decreased. In recent years, the frequency of cataract surgery increased, whereas that of laser peripheral iridotomy decreased. Visual field testing, slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, and funduscopy were performed 0.83, 6.65, 5.15, and 4.61 times/patient-year, respectively. The total cost of drugs, examinations, and surgeries was 60 338 yen per patient-year. Patients with PACG spent more than twice the money on surgeries and examinations than they did on antiglaucoma drugs.

CONCLUSION

The amount of antiglaucoma drugs dispensed decreased, and the proportion of fixed-combination and newly introduced eyedrops increased. Frequency of cataract surgery increased whereas that of laser peripheral iridotomy decreased in recent years. Surgeries and examinations were the major cost drivers for PACG treatment. The current results would be valuable information for future economic analyses and policy making.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Postoperative Pain after Different Transscleral Laser Cyclophotocoagulation Procedures

BACKGROUND

As the number of surgical options in glaucoma treatment is continuously rising, evidence regarding distinctive features of these surgeries is becoming more and more important for clinicians to choose the right surgical treatment for each individual patient.

METHODS

For this retrospective data analysis, we included glaucoma patients treated with either continuous wave (CW-TSCPC) or micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) in an inpatient setting. Pain intensity was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) during hospitalization. CW-TSCPC was performed using OcuLight^® Six (IRIDEX Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA) and MP-TSCPC was performed using the IRIDEX^® Cyclo-G6 System (IRIDEX Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 243 consecutive cases of TSCPC were included. Of these, 144 (59.26%) were treated with CW-TSCPC and 99 (40.74%) with MP-TSCPC. Using the univariable model, the risk for postoperative pain was observed to be lower in MP-TSCPC compared with CW-TSCPC (unadjusted: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.84, p = 0.017), but this did not hold using the multivariable model (adjusted: OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-1.02, p = 0.056). Simultaneously conducted anterior retinal cryotherapy was associated with a higher risk for postoperative pain (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.01-9.69, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the occurrence of postoperative pain was not different in CW-TSCPC compared with MP-TSCPC in a multivariable model. In cases of simultaneous anterior retinal cryotherapy, the risk for postoperative pain was significantly higher.

Systematic Literature Review of Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery or Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma with or Without Cataract Extraction

Introduction

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) are increasingly used options for mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) care. While most MIGS devices are indicated for use in combination with cataract surgery only, with phacoemulsification playing a role in lowering IOP, newer technologies can also be used as standalone glaucoma surgery.

Methods

This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to assess the clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of MIGS and SLT for the treatment of OAG and was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies that assessed MIGS or SLT in at least one treatment arm versus any other glaucoma treatment in adults with mild-to-moderate OAG were included. Clinical, humanistic (health-related quality of life [HRQoL] and patient burden), and economic data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated.

Results

A total of 2720 articles were screened, and 81 publications were included. Fifty-eight reported clinical outcomes. The majority assessed iStent or iStent inject (n=41), followed by OMNI (n=9), gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) (n=7), Hydrus (n=6), SLT (n=5), Xen Gel Stent (n=2), PreserFlo (n=1), and iTrack (n=1). IOP reduction was observed across prospective studies, varying from -31% to -13.7% at month 6 and from -39% to -11.4% at year 1 versus baseline. Most adverse events were transient and non-serious. Limited humanistic and economic data were identified.

Conclusion

Given their established efficacy and safety, there is a rationale for wider use of MIGS in mild-to-moderate OAG. Of the MIGS devices, iStent and OMNI have the largest clinical evidence base supporting their sustained effectiveness.

Budget impact analysis of the XEN®63 for the treatment of primary openangle glaucoma in Spain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the economic impact in Spain derived from the introduction of the XEN®63 implant as a surgical alternative in the management of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) with or without cataract in refractory patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A budget impact analysis was designed to estimate the costs of surgical treatment of POAG from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS), over a time horizon of 1 year. The comparators considered (trabeculectomy, deep non-penetrating sclerectomy, Ahmed valve, iStent inject, Preserflo® microshunt and XEN®45) correspond to those used in Spanish public clinical practice. For the calculation of the target population, market shares and resource use in terms of follow-up visits, additional procedures and post-surgery complications, data from the literature were used and validated with a panel of 4 experts. Unit costs (€ 2021) were obtained from the ESALUD database.

RESULTS

The inclusion of XEN®63 could generate savings of €2,569,737 after one year since its introduction, derived from savings in the cost of the implant and procedure (-€423,120; -0.7%), follow-up visits (-€777,407; -4.5%), additional procedures (-€1,048,145; -20.6%) and post-surgery complications (-€321,065; -14.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of XEN63®in the surgical arsenal for the treatment of refractory POAG with and without cataracts could generate savings for the NHS.

Cost–Utility Analysis of a Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion (STN1013001) versus Other Latanoprost in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension and Concomitant Ocular Surface Disease in Germany

Purpose

This study aimed to estimate the cost–utility and economic value of STN1013001, a latanoprost cationic emulsion vs other latanoprost formulations (henceforth latanoprost) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) and concomitant ocular surface disease (OSD) in Germany.

Methods

An early 5-year Markov model-supported cost–utility analysis was performed to estimate costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years saved (LYS) for STN1013001 vs latanoprost from the German health system perspective. The model included seven mutually exclusive health states and adopted a 1-year cycle length. The model was populated with pooled data derived, by means of a questionnaire, from a convenience sample of five German glaucoma specialists. Remaining data were derived from published sources. Data provided by the ophthalmologists included annual treatment adherence probabilities, utility values and resource utilization. The half-cycle correction as well as a discount rate of 3.0% per year were applied to costs (expressed in €2020), life-year saved (LYS) and QALYs. The incremental cost–utility ratio (ICUR) was contrasted against the informal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for incremental LYS saved or QALY gained (€30,000) proposed for Germany. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (OWSA; PSA) tested the robustness of the base case ICUR.

Results

Over the 5-year time horizon, STN1013001 strongly dominates latanoprost as it is less costly (€1003.65 vs €1145.37; −12.37%) and produces more QALYs (2.612 vs 2.365; +10.44%) per notional patient. Baseline findings were robust against all the variations included in OWSA. PSA shows that STN1013001 has a 100% probability of being cost-effective vs Latanoprost at each WTP threshold for incremental QALY gained.

Conclusion

Once on the market, STN1013001 will provide a cost-effective and possibly strongly dominant therapy vs latanoprost for OAG/OHT+OSD patients from a German health system perspective. Future empirical research should confirm these findings.

Safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous XEN implant surgery: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the bilateral simultaneous XEN (BISIXEN) surgery in open-angle glaucoma patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospective data base conducted on uncontrolled glaucoma patients who underwent BISIXEN surgery. Primary endpoint measure was the incidence of sight-threatening complications. Secondary endpoints included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and in number of required antiglaucoma medications.

RESULTS

Ten patients (20 eyes) were included in the analysis. Median (95% confidence interval) follow-up was 12.0 (7.0-12.0) months, with 14 eyes having a follow-up of 12 months. No sight-threatening complications, such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, corneal decompensation, or intraocular hemorrhages were observed in any eye of study sample. Mean IOP decreased significantly from 25.2 (21.5-28.9) mm Hg at baseline to 15.1 (13.4-16.8) mm Hg at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.0001). Mean number of antiglaucoma medications was significantly reduced from 2.9 (2.5 to 3.3) drugs at baseline to 0.40 (0.00-0.70) at the end of the study (p < 0.0001). At the last study visit, 14 (70.0%) eyes had an IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 18 mm Hg without treatment. Two eyes needed surgical revision and three ones needed a new glaucoma surgery: two underwent Ahmed valves (one eye with aniridia and the other previously operated on) and one underwent non-penetrating deep sclerectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral simultaneous XEN implantation may be a feasible strategy in those patients with high anesthetic risk.

Clinical and Economic Burden of Glaucoma by Disease Severity: A United States Claims-Based Analysis

PURPOSE

To provide updated estimates of the clinical and economic burden in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) or open-angle glaucoma (OAG) by disease severity in the United States and to estimate incremental costs associated with disease progression.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with 1 or more International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnoses for OAG or OHT who are 40 years of age or older.

METHODS

Patients were identified from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus database during the index period (October 1, 2015, to August 31, 2017). Patients had continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months or more before and after the index date (first OAG or OHT diagnosis during index period) and were stratified by baseline disease severity based on diagnosis code. Annual eye-related outpatient healthcare use and costs were estimated on a per-user basis. A generalized linear model was used to estimate adjusted mean costs by severity and to evaluate the impact of observed disease worsening on costs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated the relationship between severity and odds of falls or fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total eye-related outpatient costs and odds of falls or fractures.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven thousand three hundred fifty-two OHT and OAG patients were identified (67.8% with OAG). Open-angle glaucoma patients showed higher eye-related outpatient costs than OHT patients (median, $516 [interquartile range (IQR), $323-$898] vs. $344 [IQR, $197-$617], respectively). Patients with severe OAG showed higher eye-related outpatient costs than moderate and mild OAG patients (median, $639 [IQR, $381-$1264] vs. $546 [IQR, $345-$950] vs. $476 [IQR, $304-$765], respectively; P < 0.0001), as well as higher glaucoma-related pharmacy costs (median, $493 [IQR, $122-$1457] vs. $244 [IQR, $84-$1113] vs. $139 [IQR, $66-$818], respectively; P < 0.0001). In adjusted analyses, disease worsening was associated with at least 2-fold higher annual eye-related outpatient costs (P < 0.0001). Severe OAG patients had significantly higher odds of fall or fracture compared with OHT patients (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Updated estimates showed highest eye-related costs for those with severe disease and disease progression among patients with OAG and OHT. Severe OAG was associated with increased risk of falls or fractures compared with patients with OHT. Therapies that delay disease progression may provide clinical and economic benefits.

Six-Year Incidence and Risk Factors of Primary Glaucoma in the Singapore Indian Eye Study

PURPOSE

To determine the 6-year incidence of primary glaucoma and its risk factors in an Indian population in Singapore.

DESIGN

Cohort population-based study.

PARTICIPANTS

Indian adults between 40 and 80 years of age living in Singapore. A total of 3400 participants underwent the baseline examination between 2007 and 2009. Of them, 2200 (response rate, 75.5% of those eligible) participated in the 6-year follow-up visit between 2013 and 2015.

METHODS

Standardized examination and investigations were performed, including indentation gonioscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, optic disc examination, and static automated perimetry. Glaucoma was defined according to the International Society Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidences of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).

RESULTS

The age-standardized incidences of primary glaucoma, POAG, and PACG were 1.68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21%-2.32%), 1.37% (95% CI, 0.94%-1.96%), and 0.32% (95% CI, 0.15%-0.66%), respectively. For eyes with ocular hypertension (n = 45) at baseline, the incidence of POAG was 4.83% (95% CI, 1.24%-17.21%) and for eyes with primary angle closure (n = 14) or suspected primary angle closure (n = 101), the incidence of PACG developing was 1.82% (95% CI, 0.37%-9.68%). Baseline factors associated significantly with risk of primary glaucoma developing included older age (per decade; odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.44-2.36; P < 0.001), larger vertical cup-to-disc ratio (per 0.1 unit; OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.12-3.64; P < 0.001), and higher IOP (per millimeter of mercury; OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.38; P < 0.001). However, 71 of 85 eyes (84.5%) diagnosed with incident glaucoma had IOP of less than 21 mmHg at the time of examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the overall age-standardized incidence of primary glaucoma was 1.68% in an Indian population in Singapore. In our population, the incidence of POAG was only half and the incidence of PACG was similar to the incidence reported by the Chennai Eye Disease Study.

Comparative efficacy and cost-utility of combined cataract and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma

Purpose

To assess the comparative efficacy and the long-term cost–utility of alternative minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) when combined with cataract surgery in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

Treatment effects, as measured by the 1-year reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP), were estimated with an adjusted indirect treatment comparison. Evidence from randomized clinical trials was identified for four different MIGS methods. A disease-transition model was developed by capturing clinically relevant POAG stages and the expected natural disease evolution. Outcomes of the disease-transition model were the comparative utility [quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)], cost and cost–utility of included strategies in a lifetime horizon.

Results

Estimated 1-year IOP reductions were: cataract surgery − 2.05 mmHg (95% CI − 3.38; − 0.72), one trabecular micro-bypass stent − 3.15 mmHg (95% CI − 5.66; − 0.64), two trabecular micro-bypass stents − 4.85 mmHg (95% CI − 7.71; − 1.99) and intracanalicular scaffold − 2.25 mmHg (95% CI − 4.87; 0.37). Discounted outcomes from the disease-transition model appraised the strategy of two trabecular micro-bypass stents with cataract surgery in the moderate POAG stage as the one providing the greatest added value, with 10,955€ per additional QALY. Improved outcomes were seen when assessing MIGS in the moderate POAG stage.

Conclusions

When indirectly comparing alternative MIGS methods combined with cataract surgery, the option of two trabecular micro-bypass stents showed both a superior efficacy and long-term cost–utility from a German perspective. Moreover, outcomes of the disease-transition model suggest POAG patients to beneficiate the most from an earlier intervention in the moderate stage contrary to waiting until an advanced disease is present.

Current Knowledge and Attitudes Concerning Cost-Effectiveness in Glaucoma Pharmacotherapy: A Glaucoma Specialists Focus Group Study

Background

Rising healthcare costs motivate continued cost-reduction efforts. To help lower costs associated with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), a prevalent, progressive disease with substantial direct and indirect costs, clinicians need to understand the cost-effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering pharmacotherapies. There is little published information on clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes about cost-effectiveness in glaucoma treatment.

Purpose

This pilot focus group study aimed to explore clinician attitudes and perspectives around the costs and cost drivers of glaucoma therapy; the implementation of cost-effectiveness decisions; the clinical utility of cost-effectiveness studies; and the cost-effectiveness of available treatments.

Methods

Six US glaucoma specialists participated in two separate teleconferencing sessions (three participants each), managed by an independent, skilled moderator (also a glaucoma specialist) using a discussion guide. Participants reviewed recent publications (n=25) on health economics outcomes research in glaucoma prior to the sessions.

Results

Participants demonstrated a clear understanding of the economic burden of glaucoma therapy and identified medications, diagnostics, office visits, and treatment changes as key cost drivers. They considered cost-effectiveness an appropriate component of treatment decision-making but identified the need for additional data to inform these decisions. Participants indicated that there were only a few recent studies on health economics outcomes in glaucoma which evaluate parameters important to patient care, such as quality of life and medication adherence, and that longitudinal data were scant. In addition to efficacy, participants felt patient adherence and side-effect profile should be included in economic evaluations of glaucoma pharmacotherapy. Recently approved medications were evaluated in this context.

Conclusion

Clinicians deem treatment decisions based on cost-effectiveness data as clinically appropriate. Newer IOP-lowering therapies with potentially greater efficacy and favorable side-effect and adherence profiles may help optimize cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include: clinicians’ perspectives; lack of commercial bias; analysis of long-term outcomes/costs; more comprehensive parameters; real-world (including quality-of-life) data; and a robust Markov model.

Tolerability and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.01 % in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension evaluated in the Taiwanese clinical setting: the Asia Pacific Patterns from Early Access of Lumigan 0.01 % (APPEAL Taiwan) study

BACKGROUND

In randomized, controlled trials of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), bimatoprost 0.01 % improved tolerability while retaining the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03 %. Given geographic/racial differences in glaucoma presentation, the APPEAL study assessed the occurrence and severity of hyperemia produced by bimatoprost 0.01 %, and its efficacy, in the Taiwanese clinical setting.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, observational study, treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with OHT or OAG received once-daily bimatoprost 0.01 % for 12 weeks. Hyperemia (primary endpoint) was graded at baseline, week 6, and week 12 using a photonumeric scale (0, +0.5, +1, +2, +3), grouped (≤ +1, none to mild; ≥ +2, moderate to severe), and reported as unchanged from baseline, improved, or worsened. IOP assessments followed the same schedule. Supplemental efficacy analyses were conducted based on previous therapies.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population (N = 312) included treatment-naïve (13.5 %) and previously treated (86.5 %) patients; mean age was 53.3 years. At baseline, 46.3 % of previously treated patients were receiving prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy. At week 12, 91.2 %, 5.9 %, and 2.9 % of treatment-naïve patients exhibited unchanged, worsened, and improved hyperemia from baseline, respectively; 77.9 %, 12.9 %, and 9.2 % of previously treated patients showed no change, worsening, and improvement, respectively. There were no statistically significant shifts in hyperemia severity in either group, or in subgroups based on previous use of any PGA, any non-PGA, latanoprost, or travoprost monotherapies. In treatment-naïve patients, mean IOP reduction from baseline (18.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg) was 3.6 mm Hg at week 12 (P < 0.0001); 83.3 % had baseline IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg. In previously treated patients, mean additional IOP reduction from baseline (17.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg) was 2.6 mm Hg (P < 0.0001); similar results were observed in patient subgroups based on previous therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Taiwanese clinical setting, bimatoprost 0.01 % provided significant IOP lowering in treatment-naïve patients (regardless of baseline IOP) and previously treated patients (even those with relatively low IOP on other therapies), while causing no significant changes in hyperemia from baseline.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01814761 . Registered 18 March 2013.

Comparison of Two Different OCT Systems: Retina Layer Segmentation and Impact on Structure-Function Analysis in Glaucoma

Purpose. To compare two different spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems in regard to full macular thickness (MT) and ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) measures and in regard to structure-function correlation when compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP). Methods. Seventeen primary open angle glaucoma patients and 16 controls (one eye per subject) were enrolled. MT and GCIPL thicknesses were measured by Cirrus and Spectralis OCTs. Octopus Perimeter 101 (G2 protocol) reports sensitivity in mean defect (dB). Differences between measurements were assessed with Student's t-test and Bland Altman. Diagnostic performance was also compared between each parameter calculating the areas under the operator receiver (ROC). Linear models were used to investigate structure-function association between OCT and SAP. Results. Disagreement between OCTs in both MT and GCIPL values was significant. Spectralis values were thicker than Cirrus. Average difference between OCTs was 21.64 μm (SD 4.5) for MT and 9.8 μm (SD 5.4) for GCIPL (p < 0.001). Patients differed significantly from controls in both OCTs, in both measurements. MT and GCIPL were negatively associated with MD (p < 0.001). Conclusions. Although OCT values were not interchangeable, both machines differentiated patients from controls with statistical significance. Structure-function analysis results were comparable, when either OCT was compared to SAP.

Treatment of ocular hypertension: is it cost effective?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review evaluates the past 18-month literature related to cost-effectiveness of treating ocular hypertension (OHT) and give an opinion of the state of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three studies question the value of intensive monitoring in OHT and glaucoma. One study suggests that implementing Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study - European Glaucoma Prevention Study (OHTS-EGPS) risk prediction in every day practice overestimates the risk of open-angle glaucoma. While two models suggest that treating all intraocular pressures above 21 mmHg would be cost-saving (but disagree on the impact of this strategy on conversion to glaucoma), another study in turn suggests than we could safely reduce medications in almost half of the patients. Two studies suggest that effective early treatment could decrease follow-up costs in OHT and one modeling study suggests that using laser in preference to medication would be cost effective in glaucoma.

SUMMARY

The results of this time-limited review are confusing as they challenge many current beliefs to continue to do more than what we are currently doing. We have a huge gap in understating whether we are currently doing the 'right' things in our every day practices.