Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes

Comparison of Corneal Biomechanics Treated With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction by New Corneal Biomechanical Parameters of Corvis ST II

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare corneal biomechanics treated with femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia and astigmatism using the new corneal biomechanical parameters of Corvis ST II.

METHODS

This was a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Patients treated with FS-LASIK or SMILE between January 2018 and July 2018 were included. Corvis ST II was performed to measure corneal biomechanical parameters, including deformation amplitude ratio 2.0 mm (DA ratio 2.0 mm), integrated inverse radius (Integr Radius), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), and Ambrosio relational thickness through the horizontal meridian (ARTh), preoperatively, 1 month postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. Pentacam pachymetry was used to assess the reduction in pachymetry.

RESULTS

Forty-five eyes underwent FS-LASIK, and 45 eyes underwent SMILE. The new parameters obtained by Corvis ST II between preoperative and postoperative measurements showed significant changes after FS-LASIK or SMILE (all P < 0.001). Postoperative SP-A1 significantly decreased in the 2 groups (108.88 ± 14.47-73.32 ± 13.2 in FS-LASIK and 105.79 ± 17.68-73.91 ± 14.81 in SMILE). Eyes with equal preoperative pachymetry, intraocular pressure, and spherical equivalents showed no significant differences in these new parameters measured using Corvis ST II ( all P > 0.05) between the 2 groups. The prediction of the laser platform overestimated the measured pachymetry reduction in the SMILE group (111.93 ± 15.18 μm vs. 87.16 ± 15.47 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

New corneal biomechanical parameters measured using Corvis ST II showed no significant differences between FS-LASIK and SMILE in eyes with homogeneous preoperative parameters. The laser software platform may have overestimated the actual corneal reduction in the eyes treated with SMILE.

Corneal remodeling after SMILE for moderate and high myopia: short-term assessment of spatial changes in corneal volume and thickness

PURPOSE

To evaluate the early corneal remodeling and its influencing factors after Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate and high myopia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Pre- and post-operative (1 week and 1, 3, 6 months) corneal volume (CV), mean keratometry (Km), and corneal thickness (CT) were measured by Scheimpflug tomography. CT at the central, thinnest point, and on concentric circles of 2, 4, and 6 mm diameter was recorded to assess corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP) and percentage of thickness increase (PTI) in the moderate and high myopia groups, and to explore possible influencing factors.

RESULTS

After SMILE, the peripheral CT decreased in the moderate myopia group and central corneal thickness (CCT) increased in the high myopia group at 1 month compared to 1 week (all P < 0.05). The CV, Km and CT were significantly increased at 3 months compared to 1 month (all P < 0.05), but there was no significant change at 6 months compared to 3 months for both groups (all P > 0.05). Patients with high myopia showed greater corneal thickness changes (△CT) and higher PTI than moderate myopia (all P < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that in addition to refraction, peripheral PTI was negatively correlated with CCT in the moderate myopia group (4 mm: β = -0.023, P = 0.001; 6 mm: β = -0.050, P < 0.001), as well as in the high myopia group (4 mm: β = -0.038, P < 0.001; 6 mm: β = -0.094, P < 0.001). Moreover, peripheral PTI in the moderate myopia group was negatively correlated with age (4 mm: β = -0.071, P = 0.003; 6 mm: β = -0.162, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After SMILE, the CV, Km, and CTSP showed dynamic changes in the early stage, which stabilized after 3 months. Compared to the moderate myopia group, the high myopia group experienced slower corneal stabilization. The change in PTI at 6 months after SMILE may be related to higher preoperative refraction, thinner CCT and younger age.

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia correction. This was a retrospective case series study. Patients who had completed 1-year follow-up after receiving SMILE, FS-LASIK, or LASEK at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021 were included. Pentacam pachymetry was performed to measure the CCT. The predicted CCT reduction was obtained through laser platform. The measured CCT reduction was defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative CCT using Pentacam pachymetry. There were 100 eyes treated by SMILE, 100 eyes by FS-LASIK, and 100 eyes by LASEK. There was a significant difference in predicted CCT reduction among the three surgeries (P < 0.001), but no significant difference in measured CCT reduction postoperatively (PGroup = 0.373). At 1 year postoperatively, the CCT reduction was overestimated by 17.85 ± 5.36 µm in the SMILE group, underestimated by 4.31 ± 7.08 µm in the FS-LASIK group, and underestimated by 7.60 ± 8.28 µm in the LASEK group (PGroup < 0.001, PTime < 0.001). In the FS-LASIK group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction was not related to the predicted CCT reduction (P = 0.095). The laser platform may overestimate the CCT reduction for SMILE and underestimate it for FS-LASIK and LASEK. FS-LASIK has a much higher level of accuracy in CCT reduction, which is not influenced by refractive correction.

Postoperative, but not preoperative, central corneal thickness correlates with the postoperative visual outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) restores visual acuity in patients with progressive corneal endothelial diseases such as Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). However, patients often prefer to delay the surgery as long as possible, even though outcomes are poorer in advanced FECD. A recent study proposed that preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) of ≥625 μm associated with worse best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after DMEK for FECD. Since this threshold could signal to both surgeons and patients when to perform DMEK, we further explored the relationship between CCT and BSCVA with a retrospective cohort study. The cohort consisted of all patients with FECD who underwent DMEK in a tertiary-care hospital in 2015-2020 and were followed for 12 months. Extremely decompensated corneas were not included. Relationships between preoperative CCT and BSCVA on days 8 and 15 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 were examined with Pearson correlation analyses. Eyes with preoperative CCT <625 or ≥625 μm were also compared in terms of postoperative BSCVA. Relationships between postoperative CCT and final BSCVA were also explored. The cohort consisted of 124 first-operated eyes. Preoperative CCT did not correlate with postoperative BSCVA at any timepoint. Eye subgroups did not differ in postoperative BSCVA. However, postoperative CCT at 1-12 months correlated significantly with 12-month BSCVA (r = 0.29-0.49, p = 0.020-0.001). Thus, postoperative, but not preoperative, CCT correlated with postoperative BSCVA. This phenomenon may reflect factors that distort preoperative CCT measurements but disappear after surgery. This observation and our analysis of the literature suggest that while there is a relationship between CCT and post-DMEK visual acuity, preoperative CCT measurements may not always adequately reflect that relationship and may therefore not be a reliable predictor of DMEK visual outcomes.

The short-term effects of wearing swimming goggles on corneal biomechanics

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the impact of wearing swimming goggles (SG) on corneal biomechanics.

METHODS

Corneal deformation response, central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were measured with the Corvis system (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) in thirty-one healthy young adults while wearing a drilled SG. All measurements were obtained before, at 30 s, 2 min, 3.5 min and 5 min of wearing SG, just after SG removal and after 2 min of SG removal.

RESULTS

The corneal biomechanics is sensitive to SG wear, observing lower corneal deformability during SG use. Specifically, wearing SG caused an increase in the time and length of the first applanation and radius curvature at the highest concavity, as well as a decrease and in the velocity of the first applanation and time and deformation amplitude of the second applanation (p < 0.001 in all cases). After SG removal, corneal biomechanical parameters showed a rebound-effect, obtaining a higher corneal deformability in comparison with baseline reading (p-corrected < 0.05 in all cases). Additionally, IOP and bIOP significantly increased while wearing SG (p < 0.001 in both cases), whereas CCT remained stable (p = 0.850).

CONCLUSIONS

Wearing SG modifies the biomechanical properties of the cornea, with reduced corneal deformability during SG wear. The outcomes of this study should be taken into consideration when making clinical decisions in subjects at high risk of developing corneal ectasias or glaucoma, as well as in the post-surgical management of these ocular conditions.

Distribution pattern of total corneal thickness in keratoconus versus normal eyes using an optical coherence tomography

Purpose:

To evaluate the total corneal thickness distribution pattern using a high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (HR SD-OCT) for distinguishing normal eyes from keratoconus (KCN).

Methods:

One hundred and forty-four patients were enrolled in three groups (55 normal, 45 mild KCN, and 44 moderate-to-severe KCN eyes) in this prospective diagnostic test study. Total corneal thickness was measured in 8 semi-meridians using HR SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) in 5 and 7 mm zones. The central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal focal thinning (minimum thickness [Min], min minus median and maximum [Min-Med, Min-Max]), and asymmetry indices (inferior minus superior [I-S] and supranasal minus infratemporal [SN-IT]) were calculated. One-way analysis of variance and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used for the analysis.

Results:

Thinner CCT, lower Min thickness, more negative Min-Max, Min-Med, and greater I-S and SN-IT were found in KCN eyes compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The inferior and IT semi-meridians were the thinnest locations in KCN cases in the 5 mm central zone (P < 0.001). CCT followed by Min-Med had the highest discriminative ability for differentiating mild KCN (AUC, sensitivity and specificity: 0.822, 87.0%, 60.37% and 0.805, 82.93%, 66.0%, respectively) and moderate-to-severe KCN (0.902, 87.82%, 73.08% and 0.892, 85.37%, and 78.85%, respectively) from normal corneas.

Conclusion:

The inferior and IT sectors of the cornea with the largest thickness changes in the 5 mm zone are the most common thinning sites in keratoconic corneas, and CCT and Min-Med are the most sensitive indices for the diagnosis of KCN.

To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained by Pentacam with those obtained by IOLMaster 700, Cirrus anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Tomey specular microscopy in normal healthy eyes

Purpose:

To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained by Pentacam with those obtained by IOL Master 700, Cirrus Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Tomey Specular microscopy in normal healthy eyes.

Methods:

Two hundred and six eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Each subject was assessed by four different methods of measuring central corneal thickness using Pentacam, IOL Master 700, Cirrus AS-OCT and Tomey Specular microscopy by a single examiner.

Results:

The mean CCT [± standard deviation (SD)] for Pentacam, IOL Master 700, Cirrus AS-OCT and Tomey Specular microscopy were Pentacam (Oculus), AS-OCT (Cirrus), IOL Master 700 and Specular microscopy (Tomey) were 523.75 (±27.75), 525.29 (±28.81),517.13 (±28.43) and 512.82 (±27.60) μm, respectively. All the means were significantly different from one another (P < 0.000). The differences between pairs of mean central corneal thickness (CCT) for Pentacam and IOL Master, Pentacam and anterior segment- optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and Pentacam and Specular microscopy are statistically significant. Bland–Altman plots showed that pentacam and IOL Master 700 have the closest agreement, followed by AS-OCT. Specular microscopy was found to have the poorest agreement with Pentacam.

Conclusion:

We found that CCT measurements of Pentacam did not correlate with measurements of IOL Master, or AS-OCT or Specular microscopy. In clinical practice, the devices analyzed should not be used interchangeably due to low agreement regarding CCT values.

Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis

Background

To compare the difference in central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in normal eyes between a rotating Scheimpflug camera combined with a Placido-disk corneal topographer (Sirius, CSO, Italy) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted for relevant studies published on PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to August 1st, 2019. Primary outcome measures were CCT measurements between Sirius and USP. A random effects model was used to pool CCT measurements.

Results

A total of twelve studies involving 862 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found CCT measurements between Sirius and USP to be statistically significantly different (P < 0.0001). The mean difference between Sirius and USP was −11.26 μm with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (−16.92 μm, −5.60 μm). The heterogeneity was I² = 60% (P = 0.004).

Conclusion

CCT measurements with the Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer were statistically significantly lower than USP. However, it may be argued that the mean difference of 11.26 μm is not a clinically significant difference.

Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement between the predicted and measured central corneal thickness (CCT) reduction after the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery.

METHODS

A total 165 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Eighty patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.72 ± 1.80 Diopters (D) were treated with the FS-LASIK procedure and Eighty-five patients with a mean SE of -4.78 ± 1.63 D were treated with SMILE procedure. One eye for each patient was randomly selected and included for statistical analysis. Ultrasound pachymetry measurement and Scheimpflug camera corneal topography were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The measured CCT reduction was calculated by comparing the preoperative examinations with postoperative examinations. Comparative statistics and linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The mean predicted CCT reduction was 95.02 ± 21.39 μm in FS-LASIK group and 103.49 ± 22.87 μm in SMILE group (P = .015). The prediction of laser platform was found to overestimate the measured CCT reduction for both FS-LASIK group (ultrasound 13.20 ± 9.34 μm) and SMILE group (ultrasound 13.12 ± 8.68 μm). The prediction of laser platform was found to systematically overestimate the measured CCT reduction in FS-LASIK group. In SMILE group, the difference between predicted and measured CCT reduction were found significantly related with the predicted CCT reduction (P < .001 for ultrasound; and P = .004 for Pentacam).

CONCLUSION

A systematic overestimation of measured CCT reduction in FS-LASIK group did not influence the refractive precision of FS-LASIK. Due to the different biomechanical distributions in post-SMILE cornea, the measured CCT reduction was influenced as the changes in refractive correction. Nomogram adjustment for high myopic correction needs further research.

Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound (U/S) pachymetry in keratoconic eyes, and investigate factors that affect the agreement.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis within a prospective, observational non-randomised study preformed at the Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, included crosslinking candidates with progressive keratoconus (KC). Main outcome measures were the agreement of CCT measurement between Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) and U/S pachymetry (PachPen 24-5100, Accutome Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA), and factors that affect the agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 794 keratoconic eyes of 456 subjects with a mean age of 27.6±8.0 years (69.7% males and 49.6% right eyes) were included. Agreement between devices was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient: 74.9%, Bland-Altman limits of agreement: -48.5 μm to +62.5 μm). In a multivariable analysis, cone decentration (p<0.001, coefficient +10.13 [+6.73 to +13.53 95% CIs]) and Kmax (p<0.001, coefficient +0.68 [+0.46 to +0.90 95% CIs]) were significantly associated (both clinically and statistically) with the level of agreement between the devices; the discrepancy in CCT between the devices increased on average by 10.13 μm for every mm of cone decentration, and by 6.8 μm for every 10D of Kmax. Age, corneal astigmatism and spherical equivalent were statistically but not clinically significant factors affecting agreement.

CONCLUSION

The agreement of CCT measurement between Scheimpflug imaging and U/S pachymetry in KC was moderate. To ensure the safety of crosslinking in keratoconic corneas, Scheimpflug and U/S CCT measurements should not be used interchangeably, especially in steep corneas and corneas with decentred cones.

Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements between Scheimpflug Photography and Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry in Children

PURPOSE

Central corneal thickness (CCT) is a key indicator of the corneal health status and is therefore of clinical importance. The aim of the present study was to determine the agreement between Scheimpflug photography (SP) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) systems in measuring the CCT in children.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the samples were selected from Shahroud schoolchildren using cluster sampling. The samples then underwent optometric examinations, including the measurement of visual acuity and refraction. CCT measurements were done by the SP and OLCR systems between 8 am and 4 pm. To evaluate the agreement between these devices, 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were reported.

RESULTS

After applying the exclusion criteria, 4890 right eyes (53.2% male) were analyzed. The mean age of the students was 9.22 ± 1.72 years (range: 6-12 years). The mean CCT by the SP and OLCR systems was 555.30 ± 34.15 and 550.23 ± 35.11 µm, respectively. The 95% LoA between the two devices was -19.81 to 9.66 µm, and the ICC was 0.983. The CCT difference between the SP and OLCR systems was 5.61 µm in boys and 3.36 µm in girls. The CCT difference between the two devices was 6.41 µm in 6-year-old and 3.54 µm in 12-year-old children. The 95% LoA was -17.96 to 9.58 µm and -18.89 to 8.47 µm and the ICC was 0.987 and 0.984 in myopic and hyperopic subjects, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed a high agreement between OLCR and SP measurements of CCT in children.

Changes in Corneal Volume at Different Areas and Its Correlation with Corneal Biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK Surgery

Purpose

To investigate the variations of corneal volume (CV) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and analyze the influences of biomechanical properties on the changes of refraction and CV.

Methods

Ninety-seven eyes of 97 patients undergoing SMILE and FS-LASIK were included in this retrospective study. CV was measured with Scheimpflug-based corneal topography at preoperatively and at day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3 postoperatively. CV measured within 5 mm diameter was defined as central region volume (CV5) and between 5 mm and 10 mm diameter was defined as peripheral region volume (CV5-10). An Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) was used to assess corneal biomechanical properties including corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistant factor (CRF). The reduction of study parameters (△) were calculated by subtracting the preoperative value at various time points from the postoperative values.

Results

CV had significant reduction after the SMILE and FS-LASIK procedure (P < 0.05). CV5 increased significantly from postoperative day 1 to month 3 (P < 0.001) in SMILE, while both CV5 and CV5-10 increased significantly in FS-LASIK (P < 0.001). The increase in CV5 after SMILE was 0.11 ± 0.16 mm³，which was significantly different from FS-LASIK (0.20 ± 0.13 mm³, P=0.004). In the SMILE group, △CV5 correlated with △CRF (r = 0.498, P < 0.001) and △CH (r = 0.374, P=0.007). In the FS-LASIK group, △CV5 and △CRF had a significant correlation (r = 0.363, P=0.012), but not with △CH.

Conclusions

Dynamic changes in corneal volume were found after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery. The central region significantly increased after SMILE, while both central and peripheral regions increased following FS-LASIK in the early postoperative period. SMILE was associated with less change in biomechanical properties per unit of reduction in CV compared with FS-LASIK.

Keratometric, Pachymetric, and Surface Elevation Characterization of Corneas With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Treated With DMEK

PURPOSE

To characterize pachymetric, keratometric, and surface elevation parameters in pseudophakic eyes with Fuchs dystrophy that underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to compare these characteristics with those in normal pseudophakic eyes.

METHODS

Postoperative corneal tomography with a median follow-up of 20 months was evaluated using the Pentacam tomographer on 46 DMEK eyes. Results were compared with data from an age-matched cohort of 46 normal eyes. Parameters included curvature analysis, keratometry values, corneal thickness (CT), pachymetric progression index, Ambrósio relational thickness, posterior elevation, and D-index values. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

CT at the apex (mean difference 41 μm; 95% confidence interval 28-54) and CT at the thinnest point (46 μm; 33-60) were statistically significantly lower in the DMEK group (P < 0.001), whereas pachymetric progression index average (0.47; 0.32-0.62), Ambrósio relational thickness maximum (172; 126-228), IHD (0.096; 0.005-0.014), and the global D-index (1.03; 0.51-1.56) were significantly higher in eyes with DMEK (P < 0.001). The mean CT along the vertical and horizontal meridians was significantly lower in the DMEK group within the central 5 mm. A quarter and one half of the DMEK eyes had a CT of less than 500 μm at the apex or at the thinnest point, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Resolution of corneal edema after DMEK was associated with a thinner-than-normal central cornea, steeper pachymetric progression from the thinnest point to the periphery, and some high-end outliers for posterior elevation values. Caution should be exerted in planning corneal refractive surgery for residual refractive errors.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography

Purpose

To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in subjects with corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (OCT), Cirrus OCT, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study included 46 eyes of 33 patients with corneal edema and a CCT exceeding 550 μm evaluated by ultrasound pachymetry, Visante OCT, Cirrus OCT, and Pentacam. Two observers measured each eye twice. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were determined and agreement among the devices calculated.

Results

CCT was measured in 40 eyes of 29 patients. Regardless of the CCT, the measurements obtained using Visante OCT, Cirrus CCT, and ultrasound pachymetry were well correlated. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were high among the three devices. Pentacam overestimated the results compared with the other devices, and ultrasound pachymetry was unmeasurable in six (13%) eyes with very thick and opaque corneas. In eyes with mild corneal edema (CCT 551–650 μm), measurements from the four devices were comparable.

Conclusion

All devices reliably measured the CCT <650 μm. In eyes with edema exceeding 650 μm, CCT measurements from the Visante OCT, Cirrus OCT, and ultrasound pachymetry devices showed good reproducibility and were well correlated, while the Pentacam overestimated the values compared to the other devices. Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry should not be used in eyes with extreme corneal edema and opacity.

Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility of Pentacam Corneal Thickness Maps in Fuchs Dystrophy and Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To assess intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility of Pentacam corneal thickness maps in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) before and after endothelial transplantation.

METHODS

In this observational diagnostic evaluation, 20 healthy subjects along with 81 consecutive patients were examined. Patients were classified into 4 groups: FECD without corneal edema, FECD with corneal edema, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Three consecutive scans of each eye were obtained at 2 different sessions. Raw pachymetry data were used to calculate average values of 4 concentric annular zones, which were also divided into 8 sectors. Repeatability and reproducibility coefficients (CR), coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficient, and 95% limits of agreement were calculated.

RESULTS

The intrasession repeatability CV was ≤1% in the central 6 mm for all groups, with an intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.97. It was better at the central zone than the periphery in all groups. Intersession reproducibility tended to be worse in the central area than the periphery in FECD without edema (CR ≤ 24.37; CV ≤ 1.48) and FECD with edema (CR ≤ 36.74; CV ≤ 2.03), whereas it was better in the central area in healthy eyes (CR ≤ 20.11; CV ≤ 1.32) and improved after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (CR ≤ 21.93; CV ≤ 1.31) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (CR ≤ 30.83; CV ≤ 1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Pentacam corneal thickness maps showed good repeatability and intersession reproducibility in virgin and grafted corneas with FECD, which makes it a valid tool for monitoring these patients. Central areas showed the highest variability between sessions in diseased groups.

Repeatability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement Using Rotating Scheimpflug Camera in Dry and Normal Eyes

PURPOSE

To compare the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement using the Pentacam between dry eyes and healthy eyes, as well as to investigate the effect of artificial tears on CCT measurement.

METHODS

The corneal thicknesses of 34 patients with dry eye and 28 healthy subjects were measured using the Pentacam. One eye from each subject was assigned randomly to a repeatability test, wherein a single operator performed three successive CCT measurements time points-before and 5 min after instillation of one artificial teardrop. The repeatability of measurements was assessed using the coefficient of repeatability and the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The coefficient of repeatability values of the CCT measurements in dry and healthy eyes were 24.36 and 10.69 μm before instillation, and 16.85 and 9.72 μm after instillation, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was higher in healthy eyes than that of in dry eyes (0.987 vs. 0.891), and it had improved significantly in dry eyes (0.948) after instillation of one artificial teardrop. The CCT measurement fluctuated in dry eyes (repeated-measures analysis of variance, P<0.001), whereas no significant changes were detected in healthy eyes, either before or after artificial tear instillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Central corneal thickness measurement is less repeatable in dry eyes than in healthy eyes. Artificial tears improve the repeatability of CCT measurements obtained using the Pentacam in dry eyes.

Use of new imaging in detecting and monitoring ocular manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses

The aim of this review is to summate the eye involvement in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) using current ocular imaging techniques, their advantages and disadvantages and how they may aid diagnosis, management and monitoring. We critically reviewed the current literature surrounding MPS and recent imaging technology as well as histology. Primary searches of PubMed and Web of Science were performed. We reviewed all papers on the topic published and summarized the findings of each medical device as well as the advantages and disadvantages of using these for the MPS patient. We discussed the potential of each of these devices to monitor potential ocular pathology in the MPS cohorts in the order of MPS subtype. We reviewed imaging techniques involving use of the Iris Camera, Pentacam, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) as well as ultrasound and Heidelberg OCT. The need for reliable objective quantification of eye findings in MPS has led to utilization of new imaging technologies described here, and future use will enhance our understanding of the unique eye features in MPS. In particular, we note that the Pentacam and iris camera are able to provide objective measurements of corneal haze and monitor ocular response to treatment.

Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review

We analyze the role of bilateral symmetry in enhancing binocular visual ability in human eyes, and further explore how efficiently bilateral symmetry is preserved in different ocular surgical procedures. The inclusion criterion for this review was strict relevance to the clinical questions under research. Enantiomorphism has been reported in lower order aberrations, higher order aberrations and cone directionality. When contrast differs in the two eyes, binocular acuity is better than monocular acuity of the eye that receives higher contrast. Anisometropia has an uncommon occurrence in large populations. Anisometropia seen in infancy and childhood is transitory and of little consequence for the visual acuity. Binocular summation of contrast signals declines with age, independent of inter-ocular differences. The symmetric associations between the right and left eye could be explained by the symmetry in pupil offset and visual axis which is always nasal in both eyes. Binocular summation mitigates poor visual performance under low luminance conditions and strong inter-ocular disparity detrimentally affects binocular summation. Considerable symmetry of response exists in fellow eyes of patients undergoing myopic PRK and LASIK, however the method to determine whether or not symmetry is maintained consist of comparing individual terms in a variety of ad hoc ways both before and after the refractive surgery, ignoring the fact that retinal image quality for any individual is based on the sum of all terms. The analysis of bilateral symmetry should be related to the patients' binocular vision status. The role of aberrations in monocular and binocular vision needs further investigation.

Reliability of Pentacam HR Thickness Maps of the Entire Cornea in Normal, Post-Laser In Situ Keratomileusis, and Keratoconus Eyes

PURPOSE

To measure the repeatability and reproducibility of Pentacam HR system thickness maps for the entire cornea in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis (post-LASIK), and keratoconus (KC) eyes.

DESIGN

Reliability study.

METHODS

Sixty normal subjects (60 eyes), 30 post-LASIK subjects (60 eyes), and 14 KC patients (27 eyes) were imaged with the Pentacam HR system by 2 well-trained operators. For pachymetry the cornea was divided into 4 zones: a central zone (2-mm diameter) and concentric pericentral zone (2-5 mm), transitional zone (5-7 mm), and peripheral zone (7-10 mm). The 3 concentric zones were subdivided into 8 sectors. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of entire corneal thickness maps were tested by the repeatability and reproducibility coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficient of variation, and 95% limits of agreement.

RESULTS

From central to peripheral zones, the precision of corneal thickness measurements became gradually smaller. Central zone repeatability and reproducibility were the best in the normal, post-LASIK, and KC groups. The peripheral superior sectors showed poorer repeatability and reproducibility for all subjects. The intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility for all zones were ≤19.3 μm, ≤22.1 μm, and ≤20.7 μm, in the normal, post-LASIK, and KC groups, respectively. The intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of variation for all zones were ≤1.3%, ≤1.6%, and ≤1.6% for all 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pentacam HR system pachymetry of the entire cornea provided good precision in normal, post-LASIK, and KC corneas. Thickness measurements in the peripheral cornea should be interpreted with caution in abnormal corneas after surgery or with diseases.

Quantitative assessment of corneal vibrations during intraocular pressure measurement with the air-puff method in patients with keratoconus

BACKGROUND

One of the current methods for measuring intraocular pressure is the air-puff method. A tonometer which uses this method is the Corvis device. With the ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera, it is also possible to observe corneal deformation during measurement. The use of modern image analysis and processing methods allows for analysis of higher harmonics of corneal deflection above 100 Hz.

METHOD

493 eyes of healthy subjects and 279 eyes of patients with keratoconus were used in the measurements. For each eye, 140 corneal deformation images were recorded during intraocular pressure measurement. Each image was recorded every 230 µs and had a resolution of 200 × 576 pixels. A new, original algorithm for image analysis and processing has been proposed. It enables to separate the eyeball reaction as well as low-frequency and high-frequency corneal deformations from the eye response to an air puff. Furthermore, a method for classification of healthy subjects and patients with keratoconus based on decision trees has been proposed.

RESULTS

The obtained results confirm the possibility to distinguish between patients with keratoconus and healthy subjects. The features used in this classification are directly related to corneal vibrations. They are only available in the proposed software and provide specificity of 98%, sensitivity-85%, and accuracy-92%. This confirms the usefulness of the proposed method in this type of classification that uses corneal vibrations during intraocular pressure measurement with the Corvis tonometer.

DISCUSSION

With the new proposed algorithm for image analysis and processing allowing for the separation of individual features from a corneal deformation image, it is possible to: automatically measure corneal vibrations in a few characteristic points of the cornea, obtain fully repeatable measurement of vibrations for the same registered sequence of images and measure vibration parameters for large inter-individual variability in patients.

Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of post-surgical corneal edema on the reliability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior-segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients planned for cataract surgery (n = 16) or vitrectomy (n =  6) were included in a prospective study. The non-surgery eye was used as control. Two investigators acquired two measurements each, with the Pentacam (Oculus, Germany) and the AS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) in a randomized order, followed by USP (Tomey SP-100, Germany). CCT was evaluated using the apex value for Pentacam, the corneal apex cut in AS-OCT and averaging eight single measurements for USP. Coefficients of variation (COV) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined.

RESULTS

Post-surgery corneas showed a thickness of (investigators 1 and 2): Pentacam (615.9 ± 58.02 μm and 615.1 ± 60.17 μm), USP (601.4 ± 63.77 μm and 614.5 ± 70.91 μm), AS-OCT (608.8 ± 65.67 μm and 606.9 ± 64.41 μm) ,with no significant difference (ANOVA p > 0.99). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for control eyes were: Pentacam (0.78 ± 0.52 and 0.70 ± 0.76), USP (0.66 ± 0.29 and 0.98 ± 0.44), AS-OCT (0.59 ± 0.61 and 0.59 ± 0.40). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for post-surgical eyes were: Pentacam (0.98 ± 1.25 and 0.97 ± 0.73), USP (0.73 ± 0.64 and 1.35 ± 0.85), AS-OCT (1.34 ± 1.57 and 1.19 ± 1.18).The ICC was determined in post-surgery corneas (ICC > 0.96) and control corneas (ICC > 0.95).

CONCLUSION

USP measurements have the highest user dependence. Post-surgical corneal edema leads to higher intraobserver variability. All methods reached a high level of agreement in CCT determination in edematous as well as healthy corneas.

Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconic eyes using rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning-slit topography

AIM

To compare the anterior segment measurements obtained by rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam) and Scanning-slit topography (Orbscan IIz) in keratoconic eyes.

METHODS

A total of 121 patients, 71 males (58.7%) and 50 females (41.3%) (214 eyes) with the diagnosis of keratoconus (KC) were enrolled in this study. Following diagnosis of KC by slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination, central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and pupil diameter (PD) were measured by a single examiner using successive instrumentation by Pentacam and Orbscan.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two instruments for the measurement of CCT and TCT. In contrast, scanning-slit topography measured ACD (3.46±0.40 mm vs. 3.38±0.33 mm, P=0.019) and PD (4.97±1.26 mm vs 4.08±1.19 mm, P<0.001) significantly larger than rotating Scheimpflug camera. The two devices made similar measurements for CCT (95% CI: -2.94 to 5.06, P=0.602). However, the mean difference for TCT was -6.28 (95% CI: -10.51 to -2.06, P=0.004) showing a thinner measurement by Orbscan than by Pentacam. In terms of the ACD, the mean difference was 0.08 mm (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.12, P<0.001) with Orbscan giving a slightly larger value than Pentacam. Similarly, Orbscan measurement for PD was longer than Pentacam (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.08, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A good agreement was found between Pentacam and Orbscan concerning CCT measurement while comparing scanning-slit topography and rotating Scheimpflug camera there was an underestimation for TCT and overestimation for ACD and PD.

Comparison of objective and subjective refractive surgery screening parameters between regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices

PURPOSE

To compare objective and subjective metrics from regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug devices (Pentacam) to determine their equivalence and interchangeability for refractive surgery screening.

SETTING

Emory Vision at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative case series.

METHODS

Eyes of consecutive screened refractive surgery patients were evaluated with high-resolution and regular Scheimpflug devices. Objective parameters evaluated included keratometry (K) values, central corneal thickness (CCT), and device-generated keratoconus screening indices. Masked expert reviewers subjectively graded images as normal, suspicious, or abnormal.

RESULTS

One hundred eyes of 50 patients were evaluated. The mean K values were not significantly different (anterior K: high resolution 1.21 diopters [D] ± 1.13 (SD) versus regular 1.15 ± 1.16 D, P = 0.73; posterior K: 0.34 ± 0.23 D versus regular 0.35 ± 0.23 D, P = .67). The mean CCT was significantly thinner in the high-resolution group (514.7 ± 26.6 μm versus 527.6 ± 27.6 μm (P < .0001) with limits of agreement of -12.9 to +17.5 μm. Most keratoconus screening indices were more suspicious with the high-resolution device than with the regular device except the indices of height asymmetry and height deviation. Subjectively, 60% of cases received the same score, high resolution was more suspicious in 28% of cases, and regular was more suspicious in 12% of cases; there was only slight subjective agreement between technologies (κ = 0.26 to 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular and high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging devices generated different objective values and significantly different subjective interpretations with poor inter-reviewer agreement. The high-resolution device provided a more conservative overall output. For refractive surgical screening, the 2 devices are not interchangeable.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references.

Overview of the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the biometry values provided by various ophthalmic devices

PURPOSE

To present an overview of the measurement errors for various biometric devices, as well as a meta-analysis of the agreement between biometric devices using the Pentacam, Orbscan, and IOL Master as a reference.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of the literature.

METHODS

The meta-analysis is based on data from 216 articles that compare a total of 24 different devices with the reference devices for the following 9 parameters: mean, steep and flat curvature of the anterior and posterior cornea; central corneal thickness; anterior chamber depth; and axial length. After the weighted average difference between devices has been determined, the "two one-sided t test" was used to test for equivalence between devices within certain thresholds defined by the measurement errors and the influence of these differences on the calculated refraction.

RESULTS

In only 17 of the 70 comparisons a device was equivalent with the reference device within the thresholds set by the measurement error. More lenient thresholds, based on a change in calculated refraction of ±0.25 diopter, increased this number to a maximum of 25/50 comparisons (excluding pachymetry). High degrees of inconsistency were seen in the reported results, which could partially explain the low agreement between devices.

CONCLUSION

As a rule, biometry measurements taken by different devices should not be considered equivalent, although several exceptions could be identified. We therefore recommend that clinical studies involving multiple device types treat this as a within-subject variable to avoid bias. The follow-up of individual patients using different devices should be avoided at all times.