Comparison of lateral orbital decompression with and without rim repositioning in thyroid eye disease

Orbital Decompression: Conceptual Approach for Orbital Volume Expansion

PURPOSE

To review the advances in the surgical techniques of orbital decompression.

METHODS

A literature review of orbital decompression surgery and experience-based consideration of bony areas for decompression.

RESULTS

In the 100-year-plus span of orbital decompression literature, multiple incisions and multiple bone and fat removal strategies have been described. In general, bone removal has been conceptualized as consisting of 4 walls of the orbit. However, the orbital bony anatomy is more subtle than a simple box, and considering 6 areas of potential bony removal allows a more nuanced paradigm for clinical decision-making and for understanding various technique descriptions. Historical and current techniques, and surgical planning and decision-making, are described from the perspective of a 6 area paradigm. Potential complications are reviewed.

CONCLUSION

A conceptual framework for orbital decompression focusing on 6 potential areas of bone removal provides a nuanced and flexible paradigm for understanding and describing surgical techniques, and for designing individualized surgery. Orbital decompression surgery should be customized to the patient's anatomy and symptoms.

The effect of rim-off deep lateral orbital decompression on the lateral rectus shape and oculomotor balance

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to measure the effect of rim-off deep lateral decompression for Graves orbitopathy on the lateral rectus muscle path and oculomotor balance.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the medical records and pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans of 34 orbits of 23 patients who underwent deep lateral decompression alone. The oculomotor balance of these 23 patients was measured with the alternate cover test and prisms before and after surgery. Bezier functions were used to measure the postoperative path of the lateral rectus in all decompressed orbits.

RESULTS

Deep lateral decompression induced a curvilinear deformation of the lateral rectus. There was no significant correlation between the position of the point of maximum muscle displacement and the size of the residual lateral wall. The changes in the lateral rectus path had no adverse effects on the oculomotor balance of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The location of the curvilinear deformation of the lateral rectus does not depend on the residual segment of the lateral wall. The changes of the lateral rectus path have no deleterious effect on the oculomotor balance.

Effect of Rim-Off Deep Lateral Orbital Decompression on Interpalpebral Fissure Shape

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the palpebral fissure shape after rim-off deep lateral decompression with and without restoration of the lateral orbital rim.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the palpebral fissure images of 17 patients (25 eyes) who underwent rim-off deep lateral orbital decompression without repositioning of the rim (G1) and of 20 patients (34 eyes) operated with rim restoration. Quantification of palpebral fissure images included MRD 1 and MRD 2 , two lateral mid-pupil lid margin (MPD) distances, the width of the palpebral fissure, and the height and shape of the lateral canthus.

RESULTS

Proptosis reduction did not differ significantly between G1 and G2. In both groups, decompression reduced the mean values of the MRD 1 and MRD 2 , the lateral height of the upper eyelid, and the height and angle of the lateral canthus. The palpebral fissure width and lateral height of the lateral lower eyelid were not affected. There was no significant difference between the mean changes of G1 and G2. Multivariate analysis showed that the lateral canthus decrease was correlated with changes in MRD 1 and MRD 2 .

CONCLUSIONS

Small changes in palpebral fissure shape after deep lateral decompression are not dependent on the presence or absence of the lateral rim.

Endoscopic Transconjunctival Deep Lateral Wall Decompression for Thyroid-associated Orbitopathy: A Minimally Invasive Alternative: Transconjunctival Endoscopic with Wall Decompression for TAO

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of endoscopic transconjunctival transorbital deep lateral wall decompression for thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO).

DESIGN

Prospective single-surgeon interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (39 orbits) diagnosed with thyroid-associated orbitopathy without dysthyroid optic neuropathy were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent endoscopic transconjunctival transorbital deep lateral wall decompression for proptosis reduction. The data, including measurement on exophthalmometry, volumetric change on computed tomography, and surgery-related complications, were analyzed.

RESULTS

We observed a proptosis reduction (mean, 3.42 ± 0.87 mm; range, 2.10-5.52 mm) and a corresponding decrease in the bony volume of the greater wing of the sphenoid bone (mean, 1.89 ± 0.81 cm³; range, 0.56-3.79 cm³) postoperatively. Preexisting diplopia improved in 5 patients (22.73%). Transient zygomaticotemporal hypoesthesia developed in all patients, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 1 orbit (2.56%). No patient complained of temporal hollowing, oscillopsia, or new-onset or worsening diplopia during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic transconjunctival transorbital deep lateral wall decompression is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for proptosis reduction in patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy. The surgery-related complications with this technique were fewer compared with traditional approaches.

Efficacy of lateral orbital rim decompression in patients with prior rim-sparing, three-wall orbital decompression

PURPOSE:

The purpose was to study the effects of removal of the lateral orbital rim in patients with prior three-wall decompression for thyroid eye disease (TED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This was a single-institution retrospective case series of patients presenting with symptoms and signs of residual symptomatic proptosis that had previously undergone three-wall decompression for TED. Data collected included patient age, gender, presenting symptoms, ocular history, proptosis reduction, and complications.

RESULTS:

Eleven orbits were identified. The mean preoperative exophthalmometry for the operative eye was 24.0 mm with 2.7 mm of relative proptosis. Removal of the lateral orbital rim resulted in a mean reduction in proptosis of 2.5 mm (range: 0.5–5.0 mm, P < 0.001). There was no significant change in diplopia, lagophthalmos, margin reflex distance (MRD) 1, MRD2, or exposure keratopathy. No canthal deformities were noted. All subjects reported satisfaction with functional and cosmetic outcomes of lateral orbital rim removal, and none reported problems with external contour irregularities of the lateral canthal region.

CONCLUSION:

Removal of the lateral orbital rim as part of a maximal orbital bony decompression adds to the decompressive effect of proptosis reduction with minimal side effects.

Surgical management of the orbit in thyroid eye disease: lateral orbital decompression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lateral orbital wall decompression is one of many well established techniques available to surgeons in management of patients with clinically significant thyroid eye disease (TED). Several different surgical approaches have been described in the literature and are reviewed herein.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lateral orbital wall decompression remains a popular technique for surgical management of TED, with a recent American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery survey showing that 22.6% of respondents preferred a single-wall procedure, with 36.8% of that subset preferring lateral wall decompression alone. Surgical techniques for lateral orbital wall decompression differ based on several steps, such as the incisional approach, whether to take an ab-interno versus ab-externo approach, and whether to remove orbital fat to achieve further decompression. In addition, technological advances have produced an array of tools available to the orbital surgeon to achieve efficient and accurate bone removal.

SUMMARY

Lateral orbital wall decompression for TED, despite being an older technique, remains a popular and well established procedure for orbital decompression. Though no randomized controlled clinical trial supports one decompression technique over another for TED, lateral orbital wall decompression offers many benefits such as its ease of access and visualization of the orbital space.

Oscillopsia After Isolated Lateral Wall Decompression Versus Balanced or 3-Wall Decompression

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of postoperative masticatory oscillopsia after orbital decompression, comparing results between isolated lateral wall and balanced or 3-wall orbital decompression.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study was performed, involving 161 consecutive patients who underwent orbital decompression between 2008 and 2018. Patients' clinical data were registered, and archives were revised for data compilation. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of surgery: "lateral" group included patients who underwent isolated lateral wall decompression and "lateral plus" group involved patients with balanced or 3-wall decompression. Exclusion criteria were secondary decompressions, those not including lateral wall and asymmetrical surgeries, so analysis was performed among 131 remaining patients. Oscillopsia was self-reported and was registered as present or not. Diplopia was evaluated according to Paridaens grading system.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis among the 131 patients with lateral wall decompression (isolated or in combination) was performed. Seven patients referred oscillopsia, 5 among "lateral" group, while 2 reported oscillopsia on "lateral plus" group (p = 0.001). The authors found no differences on new-onset or worsening of diplopia between groups (p = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Oscillopsia was significantly higher after isolated lateral wall decompression than after balanced or 3-wall decompression, while no differences were found between groups according to diplopia status. Transmission of temporal muscle contraction to the orbit seems to be the cause of the oscillopsia. The authors postulate that the absence of orbital floor or medial wall may act as a dampener for the temporalis muscle contractions, allowing the orbital contents to be expanded through them, and avoiding oscillopsia.

Deep lateral orbital decompression for Graves orbitopathy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature on the deep lateral orbital decompression (DLD).

METHODS

The authors searched the MEDLINE, Lilac, Scopus, and EMBASE databases for all articles in English, Spanish, and French that used as keywords the terms orbital decompression and lateral wall. Two articles in German were also included. Data retrieved included the number of patients and orbits operated, types of the approach employed, exophthalmometric and horizontal eye position changes, and complications. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the mean Hertel changes induced by the surgery were calculated from series with 15 or more data.

RESULTS

Of the 204 publications initially retrieved, 131 were included. Detailed surgical techniques were analyzed from 59 articles representing 4559 procedures of 2705 patients. In 45.8% of the reports, the orbits were decompressed ab-interno. Ab-externo and rim-off techniques were used in 25.4% and 28.8% of the orbits, respectively. Mean and 95% CI intervals of Hertel changes, pooled from 15 articles, indicate that the effect of the surgery is not related to the technique and ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 mm. The rate of new onset of diplopia varied from zero to 8.6%. Several complications have been reported including dry eye, oscillopsia, temporal howling, lateral rectus damage, and bleeding. Unilateral amaurosis and subdural hematoma have been described in only one patients each.

CONCLUSIONS

The low rate of new-onset diplopia is the main benefit of DLD. Prospective studies are needed to compare the rate of complications induced by the 3 main surgical techniques used.

Balancing orbital volume reduction and redistribution for a tailored surgical treatment in Graves' ophthalmopathy

Aim

The purpose of this study is to share our experience on the use of different orbital decompression techniques, as well as the principles followed for deciding the most case-appropriate procedure that ensured the most favorable outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed the Graves’ ophthalmopathy cases operated over the course of 14 years, regarding the presenting signs, the imaging evaluation, the degree of exophthalmos, the type of surgical orbital decompression performed, and the postoperative outcomes.

Results

All 42 patients identified presented with proptosis, with 92.8% cases of bilateral proptosis. The main addressing concern was functional in 54.8% cases and aesthetic in 45.2% patients. CT was used for the preoperative evaluation in all cases. In total, 81 orbits were operated. The orbital decompression surgery involved only the orbital fat in 7.4% of orbits and associated fat and bone decompression in the other 92.6% of orbits. The postoperative results were favorable in all cases regarding both appearance and function, with minimal postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The adequate selection of the most suitable procedure based on the characteristics of each case is the prerequisite for a successful surgery. We found that the association of fat and bone decompression of various extents is most permissive in tailoring the degree of decompression to the existing requirements.

Deep Lateral Wall Partial Rim-Sparing Orbital Decompression with Ultrasonic Bone Removal for Treatment of Thyroid-Related Orbitopathy

Purpose

To describe the results of thyroid-related orbitopathy (TRO) treated by ultrasonic deep lateral wall bony decompression with partial rim sparing (DLW-PRS).

Methods

A review was carried out, from January 2015 to September 2017, of all patients treated with ultrasonic DLW-PRS decompression using a SONOPET® (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) ultrasonic aspirator, using a lateral, small triangle flap incision for access. The primary outcome was the change in proptosis (measured by the difference in Hertel exophthalmometry measurements). Other secondary outcomes were changes in visual acuity (VA) (using Snellen scale, decimal fraction), presence of lagophthalmos, eyelid retraction (measured by upper eyelid margin distance to the corneal reflex (MRD₁) and lower eyelid margin distance to the corneal reflex (MRD₂), and presence of exposure keratopathy).

Results

A total of 58 orbital decompressions in 35 patients were reviewed, with 23 patients (65.7%) having bilateral decompressions. There was a female preponderance with 26 patients (74.2%), and the mean age ± standard deviation was 52.6 ± 13.9 years. Mean proptosis was 24.51 ± 1.76 mm preoperatively, reduced to 19.61 ± 1.27 mm in final follow-up. The mean reduction was 4.9 ± 1.54 mm. VA improved from 0.8 ± 0.14 to 0.9 ± 0.12, p=0.039. 5 of 13 patients (38.4%) with preoperative diplopia reported improvement or complete resolution after surgery. MRD₁ was reduced from 5.25 ± 0.88 mm to 4.49 ± 0.7 mm. MRD₂ was also reduced from 6.3 ± 0.88 mm to 5.0 ± 0.17 mm. Presence of lagophthalmos was reduced from 35 eyes (60.3%) to five (8.6%); the presence of epiphora was also reduced from 20 patients (57.1%) to 3 (8.5%) following decompression. Complications of the surgery included zygomatic hypoaesthesia in 14 (40%) patients in the early postoperative period and chewing alterations in 10 (28.5%) of the patients. All of these complications were resolved at the 6-month follow-up visit. We noted no surgical complications such as ocular or soft tissue damage, infection, inflammation, or visual loss.

Conclusions

The SONOPET® ultrasonic bone curette can be used safely and effectively for DLW orbital decompression surgery. The main benefits were good visualization and handling of tissues and speed and ease of use of the equipment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04025034.

A comparative analysis of piezosurgery and oscillating saw for balanced orbital decompression

Introduction: Different minimally invasive surgical approaches to the orbit allow individualized bone resection to reduce proptosis and decompress the optic nerve in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO). This study aims to compare piezosurgery to an oscillating saw used to resect bone from the lateral orbital wall. Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed balanced orbital decompressions performed on 174 patients (318 cases) with GO. An oscillating saw was used in 165 cases (saw group) and piezosurgery in 153 cases (piezo group). Peri- and postoperative complications, reduction of proptosis, new onset of diplopia and improvement of visual acuity in cases of pre-operative optic nerve compression were analyzed. Results: We observed no significant differences in the surgical outcome between the two groups. Proptosis reduction was 4.6 mm in the saw group (p < 0.01) and 5.3 mm in the piezo group (p < 0.01). Intraoperative handling of the piezosurgery device was judged superior to the oscillating saw, due to soft tissue conservation and favourable cutting properties. Duration of the surgery did not differ between the groups. No serious adverse events were recorded in both groups. Conclusion: The application of piezosurgery in orbital decompression is more suitable than an oscillation saw due to superior cutting properties such as less damage to surrounding soft tissue or a thinner cutting grove.

Orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease: methods, outcomes, and complications

PurposeTo determine the safety and effectiveness of orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease (TED) in our unit. To put this in the context of previously published literature.Patients and methodsA retrospective case review of all patients undergoing orbital decompression for TED under the care of one orbital surgeon (SMS) between January 2009 and December 2015. A systematic literature review of orbital decompression for TED.ResultsWithin the reviewed period, 93 orbits of 55 patients underwent decompression surgery for TED. There were 61 lateral (single) wall decompressions, 17 medial one-and-a-half wall, 11 two-and-a-half wall, 2 balanced two wall, and 2 orbital fat only decompressions. For the lateral (single) wall decompressions, mean reduction in exophthalmometry (95% confidence interval (CI) was 4.2 mm (3.7-4.8), for the medial one-and-a-half walls it was 2.9 mm (2.1-3.7), and for the two-and-a-half walls it was 7.6 mm (5.8-9.4). The most common complications were temporary postoperative numbness (29% of lateral decompressions, 17% of other bony decompressions, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.12-2.11) and new postoperative diplopia (9% of lateral decompressions, 39% of other bony decompressions, OR 6.8, 95% CI 1. 5-30.9). Systematic literature searching showed reduction in exophthalmometry for lateral wall surgery of 3.6-4.8 mm, with new diplopia 0-38% and postoperative numbness 12-50%. For other bony decompressions, reduction in exophthalmometry was 2.5-8.0 mm with new diplopia 0-45% and postoperative numbness up to 52%.ConclusionDiffering approaches to orbital decompression exist. If the correct type of surgery is chosen, then safe, adequate surgical outcomes can be achieved.

[Orbital decompression : Indications, technique, results]

Orbital decompression is an effective surgical procedure to reduce intraorbital pressure. Causes may diseases leading to rapid pressure increases, e. g., bleedings, and those causing slower, progressive pressure increases, e. g., tumors or Graves' orbitopathy. During fat tissue decompression, peri- and retrobulbar adipose tissue is removed; in bony decompression, one or more bony orbital walls are removed (one-, two-, or three-wall decompression). In many cases the procedures are combined. Recent developments are the transconjunctival approaches for removing parts of bony orbital walls. Complications include double vision, which occurs in up to 30% of cases depending on the approach, hemorrhage, infections, development of chronic sinusitis, and iatrogenic skull base lesions with consecutive meningitis. In the hands of an experienced rhino- and head and neck surgeon, the intervention has low complication rates.