Effect of corneal curvature on optical zone decentration and its impact on astigmatism and higher-order aberrations in SMILE and LASIK

Comparison of early visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 for myopia: a retrospective matched case-control study

VISUMAX 800 was introduced to improve the patient experience and clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This was a retrospective, matched, and case-control study (1:2) controlled for preoperative central corneal thickness and refractive error that compared early refractive and visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 to treat myopia. We included 50 eyes that underwent the VISUMAX 800 SMILE and 100 eyes that underwent the VISUMAX 500 SMILE. SMILE using VISUMAX 800 was performed using the CentraLign aid for vertex centration. Cyclotorsion was controlled by an OcuLign assistant in the VISUMAX 800 group after corneal marking. Corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated using a Pentacam 1 month after surgery. No differences were observed in the pre- and post-operative refractive and visual outcomes at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. VISUMAX 800 induced less total HOAs than VISUMAX 500 (P = 0.036). No statistically significant differences were observed in the amounts of induced spherical aberrations or vertical and horizontal comas. No differences were observed in the 1 month and 6 months refractive and visual outcomes between two SMILE procedures, except for VISUMAX 800, which resulted in lower postoperative total HOAs than VISUMAX 500.

Association of myopia and astigmatism with postoperative ocular high order aberration after small incision lenticule extraction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between higher-order aberrations (HOA) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the severity of myopia and astigmatism, along with the relevant factors. These findings will provide valuable insights for decreasing the occurrence of HOA after SMILE and enhancing visual quality.

METHODS

A total of 75 patients (150 eyes) with myopia and astigmatism who underwent SMILE were categorized into four groups based on the severity of myopia and astigmatism: Myopia Group 1 (Group M1, spherical diopter ranged from -1.00 D to -4.00 D), Myopia Group 2 (Group M2, spherical diopter ranged from -4.10 D to -10.00 D), Astigmatism Group 1 (Group A1, cylindrical diopter ranged from 0 D to -1.00 D), and Astigmatism Group 2 (Group A2, cylindrical diopter ranged from -1.10 D to -3.00 D). A comprehensive assessment was performed to examine the association between HOA and various relevant factors, including a detailed analysis of the subgroups.

RESULTS

Group M1 had significantly lower levels of total eye coma aberration (CA), corneal total HOA (tHOA), internal tHOA, and vertical CA ( Z 3 - 1 ) after SMILE than Group M2 (P < 0.05). Similarly, Group A1 had significantly lower levels of total eye tHOA, CA, trefoil aberration (TA), corneal tHOA, TA, and vertical TA ( Z 3 - 3 ) after SMILE than Group A2 (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between the severity of myopia/astigmatism and most HOA (P < 0.05). Subgroup evaluations demonstrated a notable increase in postoperative HOA associated with myopia and astigmatism in Groups M2 and A2 compared with the control group. Lenticule thickness, postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and postoperative corneal Km and Cyl were strongly correlated with most HOA. Age, eyes, and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) were only associated with specific HOA.

CONCLUSION

HOA positively correlated with the severity of myopia and astigmatism after SMILE. However, this relationship was not linear. HOA after SMILE was influenced by various factors, and additional specialized investigations are required to establish its clinical importance.

Topographic and surgical risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction in patients with different degrees of myopia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the possible topographic and surgical risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism in patients who undergo small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and have different myopia degrees.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and patients who underwent SMILE surgery were enrolled. A total of 80 and 150 eyes from 40 to 75 individuals, respectively, were selected as the low myopia and high myopia groups. The demographic data, visual acuity, refraction, topographic parameters and surgical settings were recorded. Multiple linear regression with interaction tests were performed to survey the risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism in each group.

RESULTS

Five (6.25%) and 9 (6.00%) eyes presented with high postoperative residual astigmatism in the low myopia and high myopia groups, respectively, but these differences were not significant (P = 0.569). A steep corneal curvature was correlated with a greater risk of high postoperative residual astigmatism in the low myopia group (P = 0.015), while a higher degree of cycloplegic cylinder power, steeper corneal curvature, greater topographic cylinder power, smaller optic zone and longer incision length were associated with a high rate of postoperative residual astigmatism in the high myopia group (all P < 0.05). In addition, the interaction effects of cycloplegic and topographic cylinder power and longer incision length on the incidence of high postoperative residual astigmatism development were more evident in the high myopia group than in the low myopia group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A steep corneal curvature correlates with a high risk of high postoperative residual astigmatism after SMILE surgery, and a higher degree of cycloplegic and topographic cylinder and longer incision are associated with high postoperative residual astigmatism in individuals with high myopia.

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Higher-order Aberrations Between FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE for Moderate to High Hyperopia: A 2-Year Result

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the long-term visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (SMI-LIKE) in the correction of moderate to high hyperopia.

METHODS

In this study, 16 subjects (20 eyes) underwent FS-LASIK and 7 subjects (10 eyes) underwent SMI-LIKE. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, mean keratometry (Km), anterior asphericity (Q), and HOAs preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively were obtained in both procedures.

RESULTS

The efficacy indices of the FS-LASIK group and the SMI-LIKE group were 0.85 ± 0.14 and 0.87 ± 0.17, respectively. The safety indices of the FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE groups were 0.99 ± 0.15 and 1.08 ± 0.24, respectively. No significant difference in safety index or efficacy index was found between the FS-LASIK and SMI-LIKE groups (all P > 0.05). The correlation coefficient of the attempted versus achieved spherical equivalent postoperatively was 0.69 ( P < 0.01) and 0.89 ( P < 0.01) in the FS-LASIK group and SMI-LIKE groups, respectively. The front Km, negative Q value, negative spherical aberrations (SAs), coma, and total HOAs significantly increased postoperatively in the 2 groups ( P < 0.05). The FS-LASIK group had greater changes in Q value and SA postoperatively than the SMI-LIKE group ( P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SMI-LIKE had similar safety and efficacy to FS-LASIK in the correction of moderate to high hyperopia. However, SMI-LIKE may equip better visual quality postoperatively for its lower Q value and SA changes than FS-LASIK.

Methods of Corneal Vertex Centration and Evaluation of Effective Optical Zone in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Inappropriate small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) centration methods can affect the decentration of the effective optical zone (EOZ) after operation, which can subsequently lead to the decline of postoperative visual quality. We aimed to provide an overview of corneal vertex (CV) centration methods and an evaluation of the size and decentration of the EOZ in SMILE. We described the CV centration methods for patients with myopia, myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle. The measurement methods of the EOZ were evaluated from the aspects of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power. Additionally, we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of measuring decentration based on topographic mapping and intraoperative video-captured images. Finally, we discussed the relationship between the EOZ and visual quality. Based on our review, clinicians should consider the following when choosing CV centration methods and evaluating EOZ postoperatively. First, the tear film mark center or topographic map comparison method is preferred for the correction of myopia, low myopic astigmatism, hyperopia, and large kappa angle (>0.2 mm). Triple marking centration is recommended for high myopic astigmatism (-3.5 diopters). Second, the total corneal power better reflects the change in refractive power than the topographic method. The measurement of the area rather than the diameter of the total corneal refractive power is more suitable for the evaluation of noncircular EOZs after high myopia astigmatism (<-2.0 diopters). Third, for the evaluation of decentration, the tangential curvature difference map method is preferred as it is not influenced by offset pupils. Finally, a large EOZ after SMILE may improve patient tolerance to decentration.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Versus Laser Assisted Stromal In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Astigmatism Corrections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted stromal in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for astigmatism correction.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis METHODS: We reviewed published studies comparing outcomes after LASIK and SMILE for astigmatism correction by querying PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science, with a cut-off date of September 3, 2022. We also compared the changes in visual acuity, refraction, and high-order aberrations between the surgeries. Astigmatism correction outcomes in the low-to-moderate group (less than or equal to -2.00 D) and high group (greater than -2.00 D) were evaluated using vector analysis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool in RevMan software was used for randomized studies (RCT), and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used for the nonrandomized studies (NRSs).

RESULTS

There were 17 studies (5 randomized studies and 12 cohort studies), including 1,985 eyes. A statistically significant difference was found in the correction index (mean difference [MD] = -0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.04 to -0.01, P =0.01), although there was no significant difference in the index of success (MD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.05, P =0.51), different vector (MD = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.13, P =0.04), and angle of error (MD = 0.56, 95% CI = -0.34 to 1.45, P =0.22) between SMILE and LASIK. However, for low-to-moderate astigmatism correction, SMILE exhibited a smaller correction index (MD = -0.08, 95% CI= -0.13 to -0.02, P =0.008) and a larger difference vector (MD = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.27, P <0.0001) than LASIK. There was no significant difference between the different procedures in visual acuity and refraction (spherical equivalent: MD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.08 to 0.01, P =0.15) or high-order aberration (MD = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.07 to 0.04, P =0.67), except spherical aberration (MD = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.23 to -0.01, P =0.04). The risk of bias was moderate in most studies because of poor reporting of several bias domains for RCTs, and because of confounding and selective outcome reporting for NRSs.

CONCLUSIONS

When used to treat severe astigmatism, both SMILE and LASIK provide effective and predictable results and generally have equivalent outcomes. However, evidence reveals a tendency toward undercorrection in the SMILE groups for astigmatism correction. In addition, LASIK has a greater probability of causing postoperative spherical aberration.

Evaluation of the Effects of Myopic Astigmatism Correction and Anterior Corneal Curvature on Functional Optical Zone After SMILE

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of different degrees of myopic astigmatism correction and preoperative anterior corneal curvature on the functional optical zone (FOZ) following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 68 patients (106 eyes) treated with SMILE were grouped according to myopic astigmatism correction: control (0.00 diopters [D]), moderate astigmatism (-0.50 to -2.00 D), and high astigmatism (> -2.00 D). The FOZ was measured and compared between the three groups for 3 months. Correlations between attempted correction, anterior corneal curvature, corneal aberrations, and the FOZ were analyzed.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean treatment spherical equivalent was comparable among the three groups. The average FOZ was 5.06 ± 0.24 mm in the control group, 5.19 ± 0.25 mm in the moderate astigmatism group, and 5.35 ± 0.20 mm in the high astigmatism group The FOZ showed statistically significant differences among the three groups (P < .001), particularly between the high astigmatism group and the other two groups (P < .001 and .018). Correlation analysis showed that the total higher order aberrations, coma, and spherical aberration change were correlated with the FOZ (P < .001). Preoperative steep keratometry, average keratometry, and corneal astigmatism were significantly correlated with the FOZ (P < .05). The correlation remained after excluding the influence of attempted correction on the FOZ (P < .05). After adjusting for other risk factors using multiple linear regression analysis, there was still a significant positive association between preoperative steep keratometry and the FOZ (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher myopic astigmatism achieved a larger FOZ and less induced horizontal coma than the control and moderate astigmatism groups. A larger FOZ after SMILE can be achieved in eyes with steeper keratometry. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(2):135-141.].

Evaluating early-stage disk halo changes after small incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To investigate early changes in the disk halo under different light conditions after myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

This prospective study included 70 eyes of 70 myopic patients aged 18-33 years, with a spherical equivalent (SE) of -5.87 ± 1.86 D, who underwent SMILE. The subjective refraction, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), pupillometry, and halo were measured preoperatively and postoperatively to analyse disk halo variations and correlated factors.

RESULTS

At 5 cd/m2 and 1 cd/m2 luminance, the halo radius in the high myopia (HM) group reached a postoperative peak after 1 week (p = 0.000 and 0.019, respectively), and recovered to baseline after 3 months. In the low-to-moderate (LM) myopia group, the halo radius did not differ 1 week postoperatively compared to the preoperative level (p = 0.015), but significantly improved after 3 months (p = 0.000). The halo radius correlated with SE, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), ocular HOAs, coma, and the pupillary light reflex in the LM group at all time points, but there were no correlations in the HM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Halo symptoms occurred early after SMILE, but recovered within 3 months. The recovery process was slower in the HM group than in the LM group, and the halo radius correlated with SE, UDVA, ocular HOAs, coma, and the pupillary light reflex.

Effect of keratometric astigmatism on visual outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction

Purpose

To investigate the influence of keratometric astigmatism on visual outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Eighty eyes undergoing SMILE for myopia correction were classified into two groups based on preoperative keratometric astigmatism: low keratometric astigmatism (LA) and high keratometric astigmatism (HA) groups. Refractive outcomes, vector components, and changes in higher order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

At the postoperative 6-month visit, no significant difference was observed in the decentered distance between the HA and LA groups (HA: 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, LA: 0.16 ± 0.08 mm, P = 0.189). No significant differences in the correction index (P = 0.481), absolute angle of error (P = 0.104), or index of success (P = 0.147) were observed between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the induction of corneal aberrations between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no significant associations between the decentered distance and the vector components of astigmatic correction or induction of higher-order aberration in the HA group (P ≥ 0.294, P ≥ 0.112) or the LA group (P ≥ 0.323, P ≥ 0.080).

Conclusions

SMILE for high keratometric astigmatism could achieve comparable treatment centration and visual quality to that of low keratometric astigmatism

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Myopic Eyes With Corectopia After Intraocular Lens Implantation

ABSTRACT

We present a case of ametropia corrected by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in a corectopia eye after cataract surgery. The patient's optical zone, nomogram, and centration were carefully considered. The intended corrections were -6.60 - 1.25 × 175 OD and -6.85 - 0.50 × 10 OS. M-sized and S-sized cones were recorded in the right and left eye, respectively. The diameter of the right eye optical zone was 7.00 mm, whereas that of the left eye was 6.50 mm. The corneal vertex was determined using the film mark method as the scanning center. Three months after surgery, the uncorrected distance visual acuities were 20/20 OD and 20/13 OS. The effective optical zone was 6.5 and 5.5 mm in the right and left eyes, respectively. It is feasible to correct ametropia with SMILE in patients with corectopia after intraocular lens implantation. The large optical zone will compensate for the visual disturbance.

Achieved and Functional Optical Zone in Myopic Eyes With High Astigmatism After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

PURPOSE

To investigate the achieved optical zone and functional optical zone in myopic eyes with high astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Seventy-five eyes of 75 consecutive patients with myopia before SMILE were included and divided into two groups (no astigmatism group: without astigmatism vs high astigmatism group: with astigmatism > 2.00 diopters). The achieved optical zone, functional optical zone, and corneal aberrations were compared using Scheimpflug imaging at 6 months postoperatively. Correlations between corneal aberrations and functional optical zone were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean achieved optical zone diameter was smaller in the no astigmatism group than in the high astigmatism group. There were no significant differences in achieved optical zone among the different meridians in each group. The mean functional optical zone diameter was significantly smaller in the no astigmatism group than in the high astigmatism group. Compared with the programmed optical zone, significant reduction of the functional optical zone was found in the two groups. The reduction of the functional optical zone was significantly smaller in the high astigmatism group than in the no astigmatism group, except for the 60°, 90°, and 120° meridians. There were significant correlations between the functional optical zone area and the induced corneal aberrations in the high astigmatism group, except for horizontal coma, whereas significant correlations of functional optical zone with total higher order aberrations and spherical aberration were detected in the no astigmatism group.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopic eyes with high astigmatism following SMILE had a circular achieved optical zone, but the functional optical zone was oval and larger than in eyes without astigmatism. Moreover, a lower spherical aberration was observed in the patients with high astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(4):243-249.].

Relationship of Location Between Tear Film Center and Corneal Vertex Following Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction

Introduction

We aimed to measure the relationship of location between the tear film center (TFC) and corneal vertex (CV) following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

A total of 100 consecutive patients (100 eyes) who underwent the SMILE procedure were included. Screen captures of intraoperative videos and pupillary offset were analyzed. Location was compared using a vector plot for the two reference points.

Results

The arithmetic values for the distance from the pupil center (PC) were almost identical between the TFC and CV (P = 0.118). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the measures of distance from the CV and TFC to the PC was 0.659. The mean vector and standard deviation ellipse showed similar directional tendencies for both reference points. No significant difference was observed in the arithmetic values of decentration from the TFC and from the CV (P = 0.056). The ICC for the measures of decentration from the TFC and from the CV was 0.768. The difference in the distance from the PC was significant for the tear film mark (TFM) decentration group (P = 0.002, ICC = .480), while the difference in decentration was significant for the TFM centration group (P = 0 .000, ICC = 0.230).

Conclusions

The location of the CV in each eye could be simulated by the TFC. Furthermore, TFM decentered displacement could indicate optical zone decentered displacement.

Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Functional Optical Zone, and Visual Quality After SMILE and FS-LASIK for High Myopia

Purpose

To compare the functional optical zone (FOZ) and visual quality after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) in correcting high myopia.

Methods

Ninety-two eyes of 46 high myopic patients with the same programmed optical zone (POZ) received SMILE in one eye and FS-LASIK in the contralateral eye. FOZ was calculated using a refractive power method. The decentration, visual outcomes, wavefront aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire were analyzed at 6 months postoperatively.

Results

The postoperative visual and refractive outcomes were comparable between SMILE and FS-LASIK. The FOZ for SMILE (5.62 ± 0.31 mm) was larger than for FS-LASIK (5.35 ± 0.28 mm; P < 0.001). Moreover, the total decentration for SMILE (0.29 ± 0.14 mm) was greater than in FS-LASIK (0.22 ± 0.11 mm; P < 0.001). The induced change in spherical aberration was less for SMILE than for FS-LASIK (P < 0.001). There was better contrast sensitivity under the mesopic condition with glare for SMILE than for FS-LASIK (P = 0.024). However, no significant difference was found in QoV scores between the two groups.

Conclusions

SMILE created a larger FOZ and greater decentration than FS-LASIK when the same POZ was designed in high myopia. Objective and subjective visual symptoms were comparable between SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Translational Relevance

The differences in FOZ and decentration between SMILE and FS-LASIK have little effect on vision outcomes. Surgeons should consider the FOZ and decentration in surgical options in high myopia.

Options and results in managing suction loss during small-incision lenticule extraction

Suction loss is an intraoperative complication in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) that presents a management challenge for the refractive surgeon. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the visual, refractive, and wavefront outcomes after suction loss across the different stages of SMILE with various respective surgical treatments. Surgical management options include immediate re-SMILE by redocking or delayed re-SMILE, with or without adjustment of the laser parameters, conversion to femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis, transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, refractive lenticule extraction, or pseudo-SMILE. The restart treatment module on VisuMax provides appropriate retreatment recommendation. Most retreatment options for suction loss, immediate or delayed, resulted in effective, safe, and predictable outcomes, and patients were satisfied with their outcomes. Based on available level II evidence, immediate re-SMILE with or without adjustment to the laser settings achieve favorable visual and refractive outcomes in handling this intraoperative complication across all stages of SMILE.

Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

Background

To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism.

Methods

This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method.

Results

Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from − 6.56 ± 2.38 D to − 0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to − 0.02 ± 0.09 and from − 0.03 ± 0.07 D to − 0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was − 5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to − 2.27 ± 0.97 D and − 0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p < 0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

Complications of small incision lenticule extraction

The procedure of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was introduced in 2011, and since then there has been an increase in the number of cases undergoing this procedure worldwide. The surgery has a learning curve and may be associated with problems in the intraoperative and postoperative periods. The intraoperative problems during SMILE surgery include the loss of suction, the occurrence of altered or irregular opaque bubble layer and black spots, difficulty in lenticular dissection and extraction, cap perforation, incision-related problems, and decentered ablation. Most of the postoperative problems are similar as in other laser refractive procedures, but with decreased incidence. The identification of risk factors, clinical features, and management of complications of SMILE help to obtain optimum refractive outcomes.

Initial Single-Site Experience Using SMILE for the Treatment of Astigmatism in Myopic Eyes and Comparison of Astigmatic Outcomes with Existing Literature

Purpose

To assess a single site’s initial experience with SMILE for the treatment of myopic astigmatism and compare outcomes and vector analysis results with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) results and published literature.

Patients and Methods

Forty-eight eyes (29 patients) with mean preoperative sphere of −5.11 ± 1.31 diopters (D) and cylinder of −1.12 ± 0.60 D underwent SMILE. Visual acuity, refractive, and vector analysis outcomes as well as subjective measures were reported at three and twelve months postoperatively and compared with FDA results and the published literature between 2014 and 2020 involving treatment of patients with mean cylinders of >−0.50 to ≤−3.00 D.

Results

At three and twelve months, 43 and 32 eyes were evaluated, respectively. At twelve months, mean cylinder power was reduced to −0.38 ± 0.38 D with 78.1% achieving ≤±0.50 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 was achieved in 77.4% of eyes by twelve months with 100% achieving ≥20/30 UDVA. No loss of corrected distance visual acuity was observed in eyes seen at twelve months. Correction index (CI) at twelve months was 0.90 indicating overall undercorrection of 10%. Twelve-month CI was 0.96, 0.90, and 0.83 in eyes with preoperative cylinders of <−1.00 D, ≥−1.00 to <−2.00 D, and ≥−2.00 D, respectively. Mean angle of error was −1.58 ± 11.61° ranging from −24.22° to 37.75°.

Conclusion

We found SMILE to be an effective and safe means of achieving spectacle independence and improving visual acuity in patients with myopic astigmatism. SMILE has the potential for improved clinical outcomes with better nomogram guidance and advancements in technique. However, surgeons must be aware of the potential for undercorrection in with-the-rule astigmatism and at higher preoperative cylinders and as well as the potential for overcorrection in against-the-rule and lower preoperative cylinder astigmatism.

Effect of flap homogeneity on higher-order aberrations induction after femtosecond LASIK for myopia

PURPOSE

To assess the relevance of the homogeneity of femtosecond laser flap thickness regarding induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

SETTING

Clínica Rementería & Clínica Novovisión, Madrid, Spain.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-one patients underwent in situ keratomileusis using 5 different femtosecond lasers. The flap thicknesses were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography 3 months postoperatively. The same masked observer measured 6 symmetrical points nasally and temporally 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, and 3.0 mm from the center of the flap in each case. HOAs induced in the cornea were measured using tomography.

RESULTS

Positive and significant correlations were found between HOA induction and the flap thickness heterogeneity 3.0 mm from the center of the flap. Pearson correlation coefficients for the induction of HOAs were third-order 0.17112 (P = .0224), fourth-order 0.22474 (P = .0026), fifth-order 0.16449 (P = .0282), coma-like 0.17370 (P = .0204), and total HOAs 0.18182 (P = .0151).

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of flap-thickness heterogeneity at 3.0 mm from the center of the flap created using femtosecond lasers was correlated with the magnitude of the HOAs induced.

Four-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) to correct high myopic astigmatism

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in subjects with myopic astigmatism of ≥2.00 dioptres (D).

METHODS

Patients who underwent SMILE 4 years prior with astigmatism ≥2.00 D and ≤1.00 D were assigned to the high astigmatic group (HA group) or the low astigmatic group (LA group), respectively. The visual and refractive results as well as corneal wavefront aberrations were measured.

RESULTS

The preoperative cylinder was -2.47±0.54 D in 43 eyes in the HA group and -0.55±0.28 D in 31 eyes in the LA group. At 4 years, the residual cylinder was -0.31±0.29 D in the HA group and -0.20±0.28 D in the LA group (p=0.088). An uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 was achieved in 88.4% of eyes in the HA group and 93.5% of eyes in the LA group. The efficacy index was 0.99±0.14 and 1.10±0.21 (p=0.025), and the safety index was 1.11±0.20 and 1.22±0.21 in the HA and LA groups, respectively (p=0.012). Eighty-six per cent and 90.3% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of the attempted cylindrical correction in the HA and LA groups, respectively. Vector analysis showed that the magnitude of error was -0.14±0.28 D and -0.05±0.16 D (p=0.085), the angle of error was -0.13±4.48 degrees and -2.57±29.42 degrees (p=0.592), the correction index was 0.94±0.13 and 0.94±0.35 (p=0.959), the index of success was 0.15±0.14 and 0.46±0.62 (p=0.517), and the flattening index was 0.93±0.13 and 0.71±0.59 (p=0.450) in the HA and LA groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SMILE is effective and safe for correcting high astigmatism. Vector analysis shows a tendency for the undercorrection of astigmatism in subjects with high astigmatism.

Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for the Correction of Myopia with Astigmatism: Outcomes of the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To present outcomes of the United States Food and Drug Administration premarket approval clinical trial of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 357 eyes of 357 patients treated with SMILE (50 for myopia and 307 for myopia with astigmatism). Preoperative sphere ranged between -1.00 and -10.00 diopters (D), with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) of up to -11.50 D and refractive cylinder of up to -3.00 D.

METHODS

-Participants were followed up for 12 months. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), stability of the manifest refraction, and vector analysis of refractive cylinder are presented for the 307 eyes treated for myopia with astigmatism. Adverse events (AEs) are presented for all 357 eyes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, astigmatic outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 307 astigmatic eyes enrolled in the study, 304 were treated successfully. In 3 eyes, the procedure was aborted because of intraoperative suction loss. The mean MSE reduced from -5.39±2.30 D at baseline to -0.01±0.24 D at 12 months. Of all eyes, 95.3% were within 0.50 D of emmetropia at 12 months. The percentage of eyes with UDVA of 20/20 or better was 89.0%. No loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA was observed at the 12-month visit. The refractive cylinder reduced from -1.53±0.70 D at baseline to -0.18±0.31 D at 12 months. The mean correction ratio of refractive cylinder was 0.96±0.16 and a slight undercorrection was apparent for higher attempted corrections of astigmatism. Three intraoperative AEs associated with difficult lenticule removal and resultant cap tear occurred, and all resolved without sequelae at postoperative day 1. During the postoperative period, 8 AEs were recorded, but none of them had significant consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Small-incision lenticule extraction for the treatment of myopia and astigmatism was safe and effective, and the reported AEs had no significant impact on visual acuity. Slight undercorrection of refractive cylinder requires further attention.

Astigmatism Correction Using SMILE

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) was introduced in the recent decade for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. This flap-free technique has a high efficacy and safety profile and also carries potential advantages over laser in situ keratomileusis such as a better corneal biomechanical stability, reduction in dry eyes rate, and the avoidance of flap complications. However, there have been concerns regarding the precision of astigmatism correction that undercorrection has been reported to be apparent. Various factors that affect astigmatism correction have been identified in the literature. The purpose of this review is to discuss the factors that affect astigmatism correction in SMILE and several techniques to improve the refractive outcomes.

Decentration following femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism and its impact on visual quality

Background

To measure the decentration following SMILE in eyes with high myopic astigmatism and investigate its impact on visual quality.

Methods

The prospective study was conducted to analyze patients who underwent SMILE for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism ≥2.5D (high astigmatism group, HA) at the ophthalmology department, Eye and ENT hospital, Shanghai, China.. Patients with myopic astigmatism < 1.5D served as controls (low astigmatism group, LA). Decentration was measured using a Scheimpflug camera with a difference map of the tangential curvature at 12 months postoperatively. Also the associations between decentration from the coaxial sighted corneal light reflex (CSCLR) and the visual outcomes, correction efficacy of astigmatism, wavefront aberrations and objective scatter index (OSI) were analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were observed in the decentered distance between HA and LA in either eyes (OD: HA: 0.18 ± 0.10 mm, LA: 0.20 ± 0.14 mm, P = 0.659; OS: HA: 0.22 ± 0.11 mm, LA: 0.20 ± 0.11 mm, P = 0.637). The analysis across the three levels of decentration (< 0.1 mm, 0.1–0.2 mm, and > 0.2 mm) showed no significant association between decentration and visual outcomes of predictability, efficiency, safety, MTF cutoff, OSI, SR and OVs in both groups. Also no significant association was observed between decentration and postoperative astigmatism in either group. A significant relationship between the magnitude of decentration and induced coma and spherical aberration was observed in HA.

Conclusions

The amount of decentration between HA and LA groups showed no differences. Decentration > 0.20 mm from CSCLR resulted in greater induction of coma and SA after SMILE in eyes with HA.