Visual and refractive outcomes of 100 small incision lenticule extractions (SMILE) in moderate and high myopia: a 24-month follow-up study

Posterior corneal stability after small incision lenticule extraction with different optical zones

BACKGROUND

To assess the changes in the posterior corneal surface following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with different optical zones.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 106 eyes of 106 patients who underwent SMILE were recruited 3 years after the procedure. Eyes were divided into two groups according to the size of the surgical optical zone: group A (52 eyes, ≤6.2 mm) and group B (54 eyes, ≥6.5 mm). Posterior central elevation (PCE) and 12 other points at 45°, 135°, 225° and 315° with distances of 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm from the centre were recorded from Pentacam.

RESULTS

No iatrogenic keratectasia was identified, and eyes in the two groups showed comparable visual results. The overall trend in posterior corneal elevation changes was consistent for both groups. PCE decreased significantly from 1.33 ± 2.32 to 0.75 ± 2.41 in group A (P = 0.024) and from 0.87 ± 2.61 to 0.06 ± 2.74 in group B (P = 0.003). All points in the central 2 mm region in both groups were reduced postoperatively. In the 4 mm and 6 mm corneal annulus, almost all points at 225°and 315° showed backward displacement, with the most prominent change occurring at 315° in the 6 mm annulus (P < 0.001), indicating no forward protrusion in the inferior area.

CONCLUSIONS

No forward protrusion in the posterior corneal surface was observed 3 years after SMILE with different optical zones. Comprehensive preoperative measurements are essential for ensuring corneal stability and avoiding iatrogenic keratectasia.

Comparison of visual quality after SMILE correction of low-to-moderate myopia in different optical zones

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of different optical zones for small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on postoperative visual quality in low-to-moderate myopia.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study involved patients who underwent SMILE using two optical-zone diameters: 6.5 mm (50 patients, 100 eyes) and 6.8 mm (50 patients, 100 eyes). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and subjective visual-quality questionnaire scores were assessed.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, UCVA and SE did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma significantly increased at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), while trefoil was unchanged after surgery (P > 0.05). Corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma significantly differed between the groups at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.05), while trefoil did not (P > 0.05). Visual-quality scores were higher in the 6.8 mm group than in the 6.5 mm group at 1 month (P = 0.058), but not at 3 months (P > 0.05). In both groups, subjective scores significantly decreased at 1 month (P < 0.05) and gradually returned to the preoperative level at 3 months (P > 0.05). The subjective visual-quality scores were negatively and positively correlated with pupillary and optical-zone diameter, respectively (P < 0.05 for both). Objective visual-quality indicators (HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma) were negatively correlated with optical-zone diameter (P < 0.05) but not pupillary diameter (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SMILE in different optical zones effectively corrected low-to-moderate myopia. The larger the optical-zone diameter, the better the early postoperative visual quality.

Applying Information Gain to Explore Factors Affecting Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed to identify the key factors influencing postoperative refraction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using information gain.

Methods

This study comprised 2,350 eyes of 1,200 patients who underwent SMILE using a Visumax 500-kHz femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in three ophthalmic centers: Tianjin Eye Hospital (center A), Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital (center B), and Qingdao Eye Hospital (center C). Anterior segment features, including corneal curvature and central corneal thickness (CCT), were obtained from Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Information gain was calculated to analyze the importance of features affecting postoperative refraction.

Results

Preoperative and postoperative mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction were −5.00 (−6.13, −3.88) D and 0.00 (−0.25, 0.13) D, respectively. None of the patients lost more than two lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The safety index was 1.32 ± 0.24, 1.03 ± 0.08, and 1.13 ± 0.16 in centers A, B, and C, respectively. The efficacy index was 1.31 ± 0.25, 1.02 ± 0.08, and 1.13 ± 0.17 in centers A, B, and C, respectively. At least 95% of the eyes were within ±1.00 D of the attempted correction. Postoperative refraction was related to preoperative spherical diopter refraction (r = 0.369, p < 0.001), preoperative SE (r = 0.364, p < 0.001), maximum lenticule thickness (r = −0.311, p < 0.001), preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (r = 0.164, p < 0.001), residual stromal thickness (r = 0.139, p < 0.001), preoperative mean anterior corneal curvature (r = −0.127, p < 0.001), preoperative flattest anterior corneal curvature (r = −0.122, p < 0.001), nomogram (r = −0.100, p < 0.001) and preoperative CCT (r = −0.058, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

SMILE was considered a safe and effective procedure for correcting myopia. Based on information gain, postoperative refraction was influenced by preoperative mean anterior corneal curvature, CCT, refraction, and residual stromal thickness.

Differences of Corneal Biomechanics Among Thin Normal Cornea, Forme-Fruste Keratoconus, and Cornea After SMILE

Background: To compare the corneal biomechanics of thin normal cornea (TNC) with thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) (≤500 µm), forme-fruste keratoconus (FFKC) and cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (Post-SMILE) had their central corneal thickness (CCT) matched by Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST).

Methods: CCT were matched in 23 eyes with FFKC, 23 eyes by SMILE in 3 months post-operatively, and 23 TNC eyes. The differences in corneal biomechanics by Corvis ST among the three groups were compared.

Results: There was no significant difference in CCT among the three groups, and the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) did not differ significantly among the three groups (all p &gt; 0.05). There were significant differences in most DCR parameters between pre- and post-operatively (all p &lt; 0.05). Compared with TNC, the values of corneal deflection amplitude during the first applanation (A1DA), length at the first applanation (A1L), corneal deflection amplitude during the second applanation (A2DA), and maximum deformation amplitude (DA) decreased in 3 months after SMILE (all p &lt; 0.05), these values increased in the FFKC (all p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion: The majority of the DCR parameters were different among the three groups. The parameters A1DA, A1L, A2DA, and DA may be different between TNC and Post-SMILE, TNC and FFKC, and Post-SMILE and FFKC.

Long-term efficacy and safety profiles following small incision lenticule extraction in eyes with ≥ 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, predictability and stability (refractive and keratometric) of myopic and myopic astigmatism correction with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Single center retrospective review of eyes undergoing SMILE from 2012-2015. Forty-two eyes (23 patients) with ≥ 5-year follow-up. Variables analyzed were preoperative, 3-month, 1-year and last follow-up uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, spherical equivalent (SE) and mean keratometry. Descriptive statistics were performed and results reported following the Standard for Reporting Astigmatism Outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up of 5.98 ± 0.90 years. Mean preoperative SE was -5.26 ± 1.22D (range -2.50 to -8.12D). Mean preoperative cylinder was -0.66 ± 0.61D (range 0.00 to -2.25D). Efficacy and safety indices were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. In total, 81% of operated eyes achieved an UDVA of ≥ 0.09 logMar (20/25 Snellen). At the last follow-up, ≥1 line of CDVA was gained in 14% of eyes. Five percent lost 1 line of CDVA, and no eye loss ≥2 lines of CDVA. Sixty-nine percent of eyes were within ± 0.50D and 86% within ± 1.00D of the attempted SE correction. Ninety-one percent of eyes had ≤0.50D of postoperative astigmatism and 71% were within ± 15° from the intended correction axis. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant myopic regression of 0.19 ± 0.50D was observed (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results demonstrate that SMILE is effective, predictable and safe. SMILE has good stability, low regression compared to LASIK, and no signs of corneal ectasia staging within our standard criteria.

Small-incision lenticule extraction in the U.S. military: prospective study of visual and military task performance

PURPOSE

To assess early visual outcomes and military task performance after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) among U.S. military service members.

SETTING

Warfighter Refractive Eye Surgery Program and Research Center and Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, observational study.

METHODS

The study was composed of active duty service members (n = 37) electing to undergo SMILE for myopia or myopic astigmatism. Testing performed preoperatively and at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, wavefront aberrometry, low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), contrast sensitivity, and vision-related questionnaire. 14 participants underwent rifle marksmanship with spectacle correction before and without correction at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 3 months postoperatively, the efficacy index was 0.96 and the safety index was 1.03. UDVA was ≥20/20 in 69 (96%) of eyes. LCVA change from baseline was significant under night vision condition. Eye problems contributed to 10% work and 20% activity impairments, both of which decreased to 0% (P = .001). The overall satisfaction rating for SMILE was high at 90.9 (95% CI, 85.3 to 96.5), and 95% of participants would be willing to undergo the procedure again. The median scores between preoperative and 6 to 8 weeks postoperative firing performance were comparable (34 vs 35, with and without correction, respectively; P = .247).

CONCLUSIONS

After the early recovery period, SMILE seems to preserve quality of vision, which appears to facilitate the accomplishment of tasks related to their work as military service members as well as performing activities outside of work.

Bilateral Lenticule Creation Followed by Bilateral Lenticule Separation Improves Visual Outcomes After SMILE

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of different surgical sequences on the visual and refractive outcomes of bilateral small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

Participants who underwent uneventful SMILE between March 2018 and September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into two groups: Sequence A (laser scanning [LS] of the right eye, manual separation lenticule [MSL] of the right eye, and LS and MSL of the left eye) and Sequence B (LS of the right eye, LS of the left eye, MSL of the left eye, and MSL of the right eye). PSM was conducted to minimize the effect of confounding factors on postoperative visual outcomes at days 1 and 7 and months 1, 3, and 6. Safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,854 eyes of 927 participants were included (Sequence A, n = 280; Sequence B, n = 647). After PSM, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and 534 eyes (267 patients) in the Sequence A group were matched (1:1) to the Sequence B group. The postoperative corrected distance visual acuity significantly differed between groups at 3 months (adjusted P = .007). The uncorrected distance visual acuity significantly differed between groups at all follow-up visits (adjusted P < .01). The safety index (1.341 ± 0.265 and 1.413 ± 0.294) and efficacy index (1.173 ± 0.191 and 1.251 ± 0.269) were different in the Sequence A and Sequence B groups, respectively, at 3 months (adjusted P < .01). No difference in visual outcomes was found between right and left eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had bilateral lenticule creation followed by bilateral lenticule separation had better postoperative visual outcomes than those who underwent complete SMILE surgery in each eye separately. Regardless of the surgical sequence chosen for the SMILE procedure, there was no impact on outcomes between the right and left eyes. Adjusting the sequence of the surgical procedure may be a way to improve the visual results. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):726-733.].

[Regression and ablation profiles in corneal refractive surgery]

Regression after corneal refractive surgery is a complex phenomenon which seems inevitable. The choice of surgical technique has very little influence on regression for low myopia or myopic astigmatism. However, LASIK and SMILE are the two techniques of choice in the correction of high myopia. LASIK is also better for the correction of hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism and mixed astigmatism. Intraoperatively, the choice of a wide optical zone and adherence to a thick residual stromal bed provide stability. Regression may also be reduced by modulating anti-inflammatory therapy, treating dry eye, and using mitomycin C in PKR. In all cases, obtaining keratometry during patient follow-up helps to identify the cause of the regression. The objective of this review is to synthesize recent data from the literature on regression in refractive surgery as a function of the ablation profiles used.

Clinical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Myopia: Study of Vector Parameters and Corneal Aberrations

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) including vector parameters and corneal aberrations in myopic patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational case series included 57 eyes (29 patients) that received treatment for myopia using SMILE. Visual acuity measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and evaluation of corneal wavefront aberration were performed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. We analyzed the safety, efficacy, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations at 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent refraction was -4.94 ± 1.94 D (range, -8.25 to 0 diopters [D]), and the cylinder was -1.14 ± 0.82 D (range, -3 to 0 D). Mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent improved to -0.10 ± 0.23 D at 3 months postoperatively, when uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20 / 20 or better in 55 (96%) eyes. The linear regression model of target induced astigmatism vector versus surgically induced astigmatism vector exhibited slopes and coefficients (R²) of 0.9618 and 0.9748, respectively (y = 0.9618x + 0.0006, R² = 0.9748). While total corneal root mean square higher order aberrations, coma and trefoil showed statistically significant increase, spherical aberration did not show statistically significant change after SMILE.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE has proven to be effective and safe for correcting myopia and astigmatism. We showed that SMILE did not induce spherical aberrations. A small increase in postoperative corneal higher order aberration may be associated with increase in coma and trefoil.

Laser refractive surgery in corneal dystrophies

Twenty-eight case reports and case series published between 2000 and 2019 concerning laser refractive surgery in patients with corneal dystrophies, resulting in 173 eyes from 94 patients, were included in this systematic review. Best results were achieved in posterior corneal polymorphous and Cogan dystrophy. Unfavorable results were found in Avellino dystrophy and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Photorefractive keratectomy was not indicated in Meesmann and Avellino dystrophy. Laser in situ keratomileusis was indicated in posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy but not in FECD, Avellino, or Cogan dystrophy. Small-incision lenticule extraction and other dystrophies such as lattice, fleck, Lisch, or François did not achieve enough scientific evidence to report any recommendation.

Four-Year Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Extreme High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the treatment of high myopia and myopic astigmatism >−10.0 D.

Methods: This was a prospective study that incorporated 35 consecutive patients (35 eyes) undergoing SMILE from September 2015 to March 2016. These patients had a mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of −10.06 ± 0.64 D. Patients were followed over a 4-year period and assessed for outcomes including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, and corneal topography.

Results: At 4 years post-SMILE, respective efficacy and safety indices were 1.01 ± 0.19 and 1.07 ± 0.15. In total, 97% of operated eyes achieved an UDVA of 20/25 or better. ≥1 line was gained for 9 eyes (26%), with 25 eyes (71%) remaining stable. Twenty-four (69%) and 33 (94%) eyes, respectively, were within ±0.50 D and ±1.0 D of target refraction. From 3 months to 4 years postoperatively, a mean refractive regression of −0.22 D (−0.06 D per year) was detected, whereas no significant changes in mean corneal back curvature or posterior central elevation were detected (P = 0.617 and 0.754, respectively). We detected significant increases in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of the anterior and total cornea (all P < 0.001), with spherical aberrations and vertical coma being particularly common, whereas posterior corneal HOA remained fairly stable (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: SMILE is a safe, effective, predictable, and stable means of correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism over a 4-year postoperative period.

Similar Biomechanical Cross-linking Effect After SMILE and PRK in Human Corneas in an Ex Vivo Model for Postoperative Ectasia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in paired human corneas following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in an ex vivo model for postoperative ectasia.

METHODS

Twenty-six paired human corneas preserved in tissue culture medium were equally divided into two groups: right and left corneas were treated with PRK and SMILE, respectively. Corneal thickness was measured in all eyes before surgery. Corneas were stretched using an extensometer with two cycles of up to 9 N (570 kPA stress), followed by accelerated CXL with irradiance of 9 mW/cm² for 10 minutes (fluence 5.4 J/cm²) in both groups. The elastic modulus was evaluated using two-dimensional stress-strain extensometry.

RESULTS

Following accelerated CXL, the ectatic cornea model showed a mean effective elastic modulus of 17.2 ± 5.3 MPa after PRK and 14.1 ± 5.0 MPa after SMILE. Although the elastic modulus in corneas previously subjected to PRK was higher, there was no significant biomechanical difference between the two groups (P = .093).

CONCLUSIONS

Under similar conditions, both experimental groups (PRK followed by CXL and SMILE followed by CXL) were characterized by similar biomechanical stability as measured experimentally on ex vivo human fellow corneas. The data suggest that, in the event of postoperative ectasia, the biomechanical improvement achieved by CXL may be similar after PRK and SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(1):49-54].

Influence of age on small incision lenticule extraction outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of patient's age at the time of surgery on small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, consecutive, comparative study. We compared the refractive outcomes after myopic SMILE from two groups of patients divided by age (patients ≤35 and ≥40 years old). All eyes were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were differences on efficacy, safety, predictability and astigmatic changes by vector analysis with ASSORT software between both study groups.

RESULTS

102 matched eyes of 53 patients were included. Preoperatively, we evidenced no differences in the mean SE or astigmatism between groups. However, 6 months postoperatively we observed a significantly worse mean astigmatism (p=0.019), while not regarding SE, in the older population, with a trend towards undercorrection of the refractive cylinder in the ≥40 group. We also observed a statistically significant difference in the efficacy (0.86-1 month and 0.97-6 months in ≥40group vs 0.97-1 month and 1.07-6 months in the ≤35 group; p=0.003) and safety indexes (0.93-1 month and 1.04-6 months in ≥40 group vs 1.0-1 month and 1.11-6 months in the ≤35 group; p=0.008) at 6 months among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SMILE refractive outcomes in those patients over 40 years of age, although acceptable, are not as good as those obtained in younger patients, showing a significantly lower efficacy and safety indexes, and poorer astigmatic outcomes, with a tendency towards undercorrection. We hypothetise that the increased corneal stroma stiffness in the aged group modifies the post-SMILE corneal stroma remodelling capacity, thus affecting the SMILE refractive and visual response.

Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for high myopia.

METHODS

In this prospective, comparative study, a total of 52 eyes of 34 consecutive highly myopic patients with spherical equivalent within the range of -8.00 to -10.00 diopters were recruited. Twenty-three eyes of 16 patients were in the FS-LASIK group and 29 eyes of 18 patients were in the SMILE group. Visual outcomes and wavefront aberrations were analyzed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At the postoperative 6-month visit, 96.6% in the SMILE group and 91.3% in the FS-LASIK group achieved unchanged or better corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). As for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), 96.6% in the SMILE group and 95.7% in the FS-LASIK group achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better. As for wavefront aberrations, high-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations increased significantly after surgery in both groups relative to corresponding preoperative values (p < 0.001), and vertical coma increased after SMILE (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in changes of HOAs (p =0.90), spherical aberrations (p = 0.07), horizontal coma (p = 0.56), coma (p =0.08), horizontal trefoil (p =0.19), vertical trefoil (p = 0.90), and trefoil (p = 0.45) were detected between the 2 groups, except for vertical coma (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE is as effective as FS-LASIK in correcting high myopia, but attention should be paid to the induction of vertical coma in highly myopic patients following a SMILE procedure.