1
|
Niazi S, Doroodgar F, Nazari SH, Rahimi Y, Del Barrio JLA, Gatzioufas Z, Findl O, Vinciguerra P, Vinciguerra R, Moshirfar M, Ambrósio R, Alio JL. Refractive surgical approaches to keratoconus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol 2024:S0039-6257(24)00045-6. [PMID: 38710236 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Advancements in diagnostic methods and surgical techniques for keratoconus (KC) have increased non-invasive treatment options. Successful surgical planning for KC involves a combination of clinical science, empirical evidence, and surgical expertise. Assessment of disease progression is crucial, and halting the progression should be the focus if it is progressive. While surgeons used to rely on experience alone to decide the surgical method, comparing the network of primary factors, such as visual acuity, across studies can help them choose the most appropriate treatments for each patient and achieve optimal outcomes. Meticulous tabulation methods facilitate interpretation, highlighting the importance of selecting the correct surgical and rehabilitation approach based on each patient's condition and stage of the disease. We detail the outcomes of a comprehensive network meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of various combined therapeutic refractive treatments for KC at identical stages of the disease, spanning four distinct follow-up intervals. Additionally, the comprehensive analysis suggests that for corneas with optimal best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) preoperatively (classified as regular), combining phakic intraocular lenses with intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) could offer the best therapeutic approach provided the disease stage does not exceed stage 3. For irregular corneas, although initial follow-ups show a significant difference in BCVA with surface ablation, longer-term follow-ups recommend combining surface ablation with ICRS and CXL, especially at higher stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Niazi
- Negah Aref Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farideh Doroodgar
- Negah Aref Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Saeed Hashemi Nazari
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Yekta Rahimi
- Student Research Committee, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jorge L Alió Del Barrio
- Vissum Miranza, Alicante, Spain; Division of Ophthalmology, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Oliver Findl
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, 1140, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paolo Vinciguerra
- Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Majid Moshirfar
- John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Renato Ambrósio
- Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; BrAIN: Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Networking in Medicine, Rio de Janeiro & Maceió, Brazil; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University the state of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Ophthalmology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jorge L Alio
- Vissum Miranza, Alicante, Spain; Division of Ophthalmology, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cohen E, Ong Tone S, Mimouni M, Stein R, Chan CC, Chew HF, Rabinovitch T, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR, Hatch WV, Singal N. Comparison of long-term outcomes of simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking combined with intracorneal ring segment or topography-guided PRK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2024; 50:378-384. [PMID: 38015419 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare long-term outcomes of simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking (CXL) with intrastromal corneal ring segments (CXL-ICRS) with simultaneous accelerated CXL with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (CXL-TG-PRK) in progressive keratoconus (KC). SETTING Kensington Eye Institute and Bochner Eye Institute, Toronto, Canada. DESIGN Prospective nonrandomized interventional study. METHODS The change in visual and topographical outcomes of CXL-ICRS and CXL-TG-PRK 4 to 5 years postoperatively were compared using linear regression models adjusted for preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax). RESULTS 57 eyes of 43 patients with progressive KC who underwent simultaneous accelerated (9 mW/cm 2 , 10 minutes) CXL-ICRS (n = 32) and CXL-TG-PRK (n = 25) were included. Mean follow-up duration was 51.28 (9.58) and 54.57 (5.81) months for the CXL-ICRS and CXL-TG-PRK groups, respectively. Initial mean Kmax was higher in the CXL-ICRS group compared with the CXL-TG-PRK group (60.68 ± 6.81 diopters [D] vs 57.15 ± 4.19 D, P = .02). At the last follow-up, change (improvement) in logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared with that preoperatively was significant with CXL-ICRS (-0.31 ± 0.27, P < .001, which is equivalent to approximately 3 lines) and not significant with CXL-TG-PRK (-0.06 ± 0.42, P = .43). The logMAR CDVA improved significantly with CXL-ICRS (-0.22 ± 0.20, P < .001), but not with CXL-TG-PRK (-0.05 ± 0.22, P = .25). Adjusting for baseline Kmax and CDVA, the improvement in UDVA was significantly greater with CXL-ICRS than with CXL-TG-PRK (-0.27, 95% CI, 0.06-0.47, P = .01). Improvement in CDVA was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of progressive KC with long-term follow-up, UDVA showed more improvement with accelerated CXL-ICRS than with CXL-TG-PRK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal Cohen
- From the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Cohen, Tone, Mimouni, Stein, Chan, Chew, Rabinovitch, Rootman, Slomovic, Hatch, Singal); Division of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Cohen); Department of Ophthalmology, Rambam Health Care Campus affiliated with the Bruce and Ruth Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (Mimouni)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ponces Ramalhão J, Mesquita Neves M, Gomes M, Oliveira L. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in a Patient with the Bowman Layer Inlay Transplantation for Keratoconus. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2023; 2023:9967223. [PMID: 37261071 PMCID: PMC10228214 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9967223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Keratoconus (KC) is a bilateral ectatic corneal disease which results in changes in the corneal architecture and can lead to severe visual impairment. Treatment options depend on the stage of the disease, and they aim either at improving vision or arrest progression. The Bowman layer transplantation (BLT) is a recent surgical option in patients with KC and may postpone corneal transplantation in some patients. We present a case of a 22-year-old patient with a 10-year follow-up history of progressing KC. A first attempt for an intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation when he was 13 years old was unsuccessful due to a superficially implanted segment. At that time, collagen cross-linking was unavailable, and his young age raised concerns about performing a penetrating keratoplasty/lamellar keratoplasty. A BLT was performed with further ICRS implantation with relative disease stability and visual improvement. ICRS implantation in KC patients with BLT has not previously been described in literature and can be an option in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Ponces Ramalhão
- Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - Miguel Mesquita Neves
- Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - Miguel Gomes
- Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Oliveira
- Ophthalmology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto Largo Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cataract surgery considerations in patients with prior history of keratoconus and ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2023; 34:41-47. [PMID: 36165405 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Preoperative workup for cataract surgery in patients with keratoconus poses certain challenges, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. This review aims to outline the appropriate preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations and provides an algorithm to help guide the workup prior to surgery. RECENT FINDINGS A new system for keratoconus progression and staging has been proposed and additional studies comparing intraocular lens (IOL) formulas calculations and biometry devices have been conducted. SUMMARY Patients with severe keratoconus have unpredictable results and have an increased risk of a hyperopic refraction postoperatively. Although studies have compared IOL calculation formulas, there is no consensus on management. Clinical considerations and an approach to the workup are presented; however, additional studies are required to determine the most appropriate management of cataracts in severe keratoconus.
Collapse
|