One-year results of intravitreal conbercept in treatment-naïve subjects with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy Regimens for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

There are no guidelines on the optimal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy regimen for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). In this study, we aimed to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF monotherapy for PCV.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to May 2023 for comparative articles reporting on different treatment regimens of anti-VEGF agents in PCV. Our primary outcomes were the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the change in BCVA from baseline. Secondary outcomes were the final retinal thickness (RT), the change in RT from baseline, the rate of polyp closure, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 10,440 studies were screened, and seven studies reporting on 636 eyes with PCV at baseline were included in this systematic review. One RCT of 53 eyes found a similar final BCVA, change in BCVA from baseline, final RT, and complete polyp closure rate between a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen and a bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. This trial also found superiority of T&E for change in RT from baseline. One observational study of 33 eyes found a similar BCVA at last study observation between a pro re nata (PRN) regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One observational study of 42 eyes found a similar change in BCVA from baseline and complete polyp closure rate between a PRN regimen and bimonthly fixed-dosing regimen of aflibercept. One RCT of 249 eyes found a similar change in BCVA and RT from baseline, as well as polyp closure, between a T&E regimen and fixed 12-week dosing regimen of conbercept. One observational study of 30 eyes found a superiority of T&E aflibercept for change in BCVA and risk of polyp recurrence, compared to a PRN regimen.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there is a paucity of evidence comparing various treatment regimens of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with PCV. This limited evidence suggests that current treatment regimens are similarly efficacious, though T&E aflibercept achieved superior outcomes when compared to bimonthly dosing or PRN in some individual studies. Further trials are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

The comparison of two different strategies of intravitreal conbercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Chinese patients results from a 48-week randomized phase 4 study: STAR study

PURPOSE

To compare a treat-and-extend (TAE) strategy with a fixed dosing regimen of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) for the management of treatment-naïve polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) patients.

METHODS

249 patients with treatment-naïve PCV were randomized 1:1 to fixed dosing regimen with injections every 12 weeks (3 + Q12W) group or treat-and-extend regimen(3 + TAE) group. Patients received 3 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg conbercept as loading dose in both groups. The 3 + Q12W patients were monitored monthly and received mandated injections every 12 weeks; the 3 + TAE patients were monitored and treated monthly until the resolution of exudative disease activity; the interval between visits was then individualized according to study protocol. Visual and anatomical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 48 weeks, there was no significant difference between the 3 + Q12W group and 3 + TAE group in mean BCVA improvement (p = 0.421), mean changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) (p = 0.818), maximum retinal thickness (MRT) (p = 0.448), pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height (p = 0.221), PED volume (p = 0.076), branching vascular network (BVN) area (p = 0.615), polypoidal lesion number (p = 0.701), polypoidal lesion area (p = 0.424), rates of patients who avoided vision loss of ≥15 ETDRS letters (p = 0.397) or complete polypoidal lesion regression rate (43.8% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.814). The 3 + Q12W group had more decreased retinal haemorrhage area (p = 0.014) and fewer mean numbers of injections comparing with 3 + TAE group (6.6 vs. 9.4, p < 0.001). Mean maximum extension interval between injections after loading injections was 9.6 ± 2.0 weeks for 3 + TAE group, with 27.8% of patients achieving an extension interval of 12 weeks and 61.1% patients 8 weeks or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 3 + Q12W and 3 + TAE regimens of IVC could result in improvement in visual and anatomical outcomes in PCV patients.

Short-Term Efficacy in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Patients Treated With Intravitreal Aflibercept or Conbercept

Purpose

To compare the short-term efficacy in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) treated using either aflibercept or conbercept.

Methods

This prospective study included 41 patients with treatment-naive PCV (42 eyes). All the patients were treated with either aflibercept or conbercept using an initial series of 3 monthly loading injections. Changes in the best-corrected logMAR visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomic outcomes were evaluated at 3 months.

Results

BCVA was improved with reduction in central choroidal thickness (CCT), central foveal thickness (CFT), and subretinal fluid (SRF) after 3 monthly loading injections in both aflibercept (IVA) and conbercept (IVC) groups. There was no significant difference in either visual or anatomic outcomes between the two groups after 3 months of treatment. However, compared with the IVC group, significantly higher BCVA improvement was observed in the patients in the IVA group with baseline BCVA better than 1. A visual outcome improved ≥3 lines in 13 patients in the IVA group (59%), and 9 patients in the IVC group (45%). A relatively high proportion of polyp regression was observed in the IVA group (63%) compared with the IVC group (55%) via OCTA.

Conclusions

Visual and anatomic outcomes were significantly improved in both IVA and IVC groups, but the results suggest a potentially superior short-term response in the IVA group.

Efficacy of 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis Evaluated as Area Under the Curve

Introduction

This study reports the outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc, Iluvien^®, SIFI, Italy) in patients affected by macular edema secondary to chronic non-infectious uveitis of the posterior segment (NIU-PS).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with NIU-PS and macular thickening undergoing FAc implant at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy). Clinical data, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central macular thickness (CMT), were collected at the time of FAc administration (baseline) and at 1, 6, and 12 months. The area under the curve (AUC) of the BCVA (AUC_BCVA) and CMT (AUC_CMT) was correlated with baseline factors; β estimates and 95% confidence interval (CI) are provided.

Results

Ten eyes of seven patients (60 ± 12 years; 4 male, 57%) were included. The BCVA significantly improved from month 6 (p = 0.03). The CMT improved from month 1 and was persistently lower than baseline until month 12 (p < 0.001). The AUC_BCVA correlated with baseline BCVA (β = 2.5 logMAR; 95% CI 1.59–3.41; p < 0.001), while the mean AUC_CMT positively correlated with the baseline CMT (β = 2.1 μm; 95% CI 0.41–3.80; p = 0.02). No adverse events were recorded over 1 year.

Conclusions

Better visual acuity at the time of FAc administration was associated with better visual function after FAc. Less severe macular edema correlated with better anatomic response. The FAc implant was a safe option for resolving macular edema secondary to NIU-PS.