Refractive errors after sutureless intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens

Application of modified Yamane technique in intrascleral intraocular lens fixation combined with or without iris reconstruction

AIMS

To explore the application and long-term clinical effects of modified Yamane technique in intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation combined with or without iris reconstruction.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

The data of patients receiving IOL fixation with modified Yamane technique in an ophthalmology department between December 2021 and August 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The longest follow-up duration was > 12 months.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

The trailing haptic was fixed with the needle before the leading haptic. The silicone haptic stoppers were used to stabilize the IOL when iris reconstruction was combined. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal endothelial cells (CECs), postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical indications and methods, and postoperative complications were recorded. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to evaluate IOL decentration and tilt. The paired sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare the results of the same index before and after the operation.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (12 eyes) were included in this cohort. There were 1 case of IOL dislocation, eight cases of lens dislocation or subluxation, and three cases of aphakia. Traumatic lens dislocation was the main cause of aphakia. Primary lens extraction was performed in previous surgeries, and all three were combined with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Four of 12 patients underwent IOL fixation and iris reconstruction. The mean age of participants was 63 ± 10.61 years. The mean BCVA increased from 0.89 ± 0.72 logMAR to 0.39 ± 0.56 logMAR at the last visit (p < 0.05). The postoperative relative refractive error was - 0.13 ± 0.42 D (-0.60 D to + 0.57 D). The OCT showed that the IOLs were well centered, with a mean decentration of 0.20 ± 0.13 mm and a mean tilt of 2.31°±0.93°. Ten patients did not experience any complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Yamane technique in IOL fixation surgery, especially combined with iris reconstruction, reduces operation difficulty, increases operational stability and safety, and improves postoperative visual acuity without serious intra- or postoperative complications. The long-term improvement effect was remarkable.

Long-term functional outcome between Yamane technique and retropupillary iris-claw technique in a large study cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate which secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation technique was more successful in achieving the best postoperative results and refractive outcomes between retropupillary iris-claw IOL (ICIOL) and flanged intrascleral IOL (FIIOL) fixation with the Yamane technique.

SETTING

Eye Clinic of the University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

METHODS

116 eyes of 110 patients who underwent ICIOL or FIIOL were analyzed. Patients with follow-up shorter than 6 months or with incomplete clinical data were excluded. Collected data included demographics, ocular comorbidity, indication of surgery, intraocular pressure, early (≤1 month) and late (>1 month) postoperative complications, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

50% (n = 58) of eyes underwent FIIOL and 50% (n = 58) ICIOL implantation for aphakia (n = 44, 38%) and IOL dislocation (n = 72, 62%). No statistically significant differences in demographics, comorbidity, follow-up duration, postoperative complications, and surgical indications were found. The refractive prediction error (RPE) was 0.69 ± 0.94 diopter (D) in the FIIOL group and 0.21 ± 0.75 D in the ICIOL group ( P = .03), indicating residual hyperopia after both techniques. RPE, mean absolute error, and median absolute error were higher in the FIIOL group ( P = .003). ICIOL implantation was more successful in obtaining a RPE between -0.50 D and +0.50 D (52% of ICIOL, n = 30, and 31% of FIIOL, n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques were effective in increasing preoperative CDVA with no statistical difference between them. Although complication rates did not significantly differ, the FIIOL group exhibited less predictable refractive outcomes. Adjusting the dioptric power of the 3-piece IOL, as performed in ciliary sulcus implantation, to prevent myopic shift, is not recommended.

Longer axial length is associated with better prediction for refractive error after sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens

OBJECTIVE

To investigate refractive outcomes and associated factors after sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens (SFIF-IOL).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent SFIF-IOL at a single centre. The prediction error (PE; difference between the achieved and target refractive error) and absolute PE (APE) were analysed. Risk factors associated with refractive surprise, defined as APE > +0.5 D, were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-one eyes were included. At the final follow-up, the mean PE and APE were +0.07 ± 0.88 and +0.68 ± 0.56 D, respectively. Refractive surprise was observed in 44 eyes (54.3%) and was associated with a shorter axial length (AL) [odds ratio, 0.825; 95% confidence interval, 0.688-0.991; P = 0.039]. APE showed a significant correlation with AL at the final visit (⍴ = -0.269, P = 0.010), and eyes with AL ≥ 26 mm had significantly lower APE than did those with AL of 24-26 mm (P = 0.021) and AL < 24 mm (P = 0.0059).

CONCLUSIONS

The refractive outcome after SFIF-IOL using manufacturer's A constant was favourable on average. Eyes with a longer AL were more likely to show a smaller deviation from the target refraction.

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF SUTURELESS INTRASCLERAL INTRAOCULAR LENS FIXATION IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS: Single-Surgeon Case Series With and Without Haptic Flanging With Up to 11 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Report and compare long-term outcomes and complications of sutureless scleral tunnel (SST) and flanged haptic (FH) scleral-fixated intraocular lens, with spontaneous intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation as primary outcome measure.

METHODS

Retrospective single-surgeon case series of 95 SST and 458 FH eyes from 2011 to 2022 (553 total eyes). Demographics, surgical indications, ocular history, visual acuity, and complication rates were collected.

RESULTS

Reoperation-requiring spontaneous IOL dislocation rate was significantly different ( P = 0.0167) between FH (3.7%) and SST (10.5%). Mean follow-up was 3.31 ± 0.30 versus 1.58 ± 0.07 years for SST and FH, respectively. There was no significant difference between preoperative (20/305 vs. 20/300) or final postoperative (20/77 vs. 20/62) visual acuity. Other complications included any cystoid macular edema (20.0% vs. 25.3%), elevated intraocular pressure (16.8% vs. 9.6%), IOL tilt requiring reoperation (5.3 vs. 0%), haptic exposure (2.1% vs. 3.3%), and reverse pupillary block (4.2% vs. 1.1%).

CONCLUSION

Haptic flanging resulted in fewer eyes meeting the primary end point of IOL dislocation. We reported the longest-to-date follow-up of both nonflanged SST IOL fixation and our FH-modified Yamane technique. Our FH-modified Yamane technique represents a safe, durable, and potentially superior option for scleral-fixated intraocular lens.

IMPACT OF GAS/AIR TAMPONADE ON REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER FLANGED INTRASCLERAL INTRAOCULAR LENS FIXATION

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the postoperative refractive outcomes in eyes that underwent the flanged intrascleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation combined with vitrectomy with or without gas/air tamponade.

METHODS

The eyes were divided into two groups (Group A; eyes that underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation with gas/air tamponade, and Group B; eyes that underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation without gas/air tamponade). The predicted spherical equivalent (SE) refraction values were calculated using the Sander-Retzlaff-Kraff Theoretical formula. Then, the prediction error was calculated by subtracting the predicted SE refraction from the postoperative objective SE refraction and the absolute prediction error was calculated as the absolute value of the prediction error for each eye.

RESULTS

A total of 68 eyes were included in the current study. There was a significant correlation between the predicted and postoperative SE refraction in both groups (Group A, r = 0.968, P < 0.0001, Group B, r = 0.943, P < 0.0001, linear regression analysis). The prediction error demonstrated a mild myopic shift after the flanged intrascleral IOL fixation in both groups (Group A, -0.40 ± 0.96 diopter, Group B, -0.59 ± 0.95 diopter). There was no significant difference in prediction error and absolute prediction error between the two groups ( P = 0.44, P = 0.70, Wilcoxon rank sum test).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative SE refraction after flanged intrascleral IOL fixation was not influenced by gas/air tamponade.

Relationship between Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth and Refraction Based on the Haptic Fix Position in Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Fixation

The aim of this study was to analyze the refraction and iris capture tendency regarding the fixation position with respect to the intrascleral fixation (ISF) of intraocular lenses. Consecutive patients who underwent ISF 1.5 mm (ISF 1.5, 45 eyes) and 2.0 mm (ISF 2.0, 55 eyes) from the corneal limbus with NX60, as well as those who underwent normal phacoemulsification with in-the-bag ZCB00V (ZCB, 50 eyes), were enrolled. The anterior chamber depth (post-op ACD), the estimated ACD when using the SRK/T (post-op ACD-predicted ACD), and the refractive error (post-op MRSE, and the predicted MRSE) were all calculated. In addition, the postoperative iris capture was also investigated. The post-op MRSE-predicted MRSE values were: -0.59, 0.02, and 0.00 D (ISF 1.5, ISF 2.0, and ZCB) (p < 0.05, between ISF 1.5 vs. ISF 2.0 and ZCB); the post-op ACD values were: 4.00, 4.17, and 4.29 mm (p < 0.05, ISF 1.5 vs. ZCB); and the post-op ACD-predicted ACD values were: -2.03, -1.98, and -1.60 mm (p < 0.05, between ZCB vs. ISF 1.5 and ISF 2.0). The iris capture occurred in four eyes with regard to ISF 1.5 and three eyes with ISF 2.0 (p = 0.52). Moreover, ISF 2.0 possessed 0.6D hyperopia and 0.17 mm deeper anterior chamber depth. The refractive error of ISF 2.0 was less than that of ISF 1.5. Lastly, no significant iris capture onset was noted between ISF 1.5 mm and 2.0 mm.