Current practice trends for lacrimal gland neurotoxin in the management of epiphora-a BOPSS survey

Ultrasound-Guided Injections for Treatment of Facial Paralysis Sequelae: A Randomized Study on Body Donors

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin injection is the accepted standard treatment for synkinesis and gustatory hyperlacrimation in patients with facial paralysis. However, poor injection accuracy can result in inconsistent treatment outcomes, variable treatment durations, and complications. Ultrasound guidance should increase injection accuracy in the facial region; however, this has not been proven.

METHODS

Twenty-six hemifaces of nonembalmed cadavers were studied in a randomized split-face manner. Ink was injected with ultrasound or landmark guidance into the lacrimal gland and three common synkinetic muscles: the orbicularis oculi, depressor anguli oris, and mentalis. Injection accuracy was evaluated using several measures.

RESULTS

Using ultrasound guidance, most ink (>50%) was found inside the correct target in 88% of cases, compared with 50% using landmark guidance ( P < 0.001). This was most pronounced in the lacrimal gland (62% versus 8%), depressor anguli oris (100% versus 46%), and mentalis (100% versus 54%) ( P < 0.05). All ink was found inside the correct target (no ink outside) in 65% using ultrasound guidance versus 29% without ( P < 0.001). Injection accuracy (any ink in target) was 100% when using ultrasound guidance versus 83% without ( P < 0.01). Twenty-three percent of the landmark-guided depressor anguli oris injections stained the facial artery ( P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound guidance significantly increased injection accuracy and reduced the amount of ink lost in the surrounding tissue compared with landmark guidance. Clinical trials are needed to explore the effects of ultrasound guidance on treatment outcome, duration, and complications in patients with facial paralysis.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Lacrimal Gland Botulinum Toxin Using the TEARS Score

PURPOSE

Botulinum toxin (BoNTA) lacrimal gland injections are one treatment option for managing epiphora. Outcomes for epiphora in existing studies are subjective and lack grading. This study utilized validated grading instruments to evaluate the efficacy of BoNTA lacrimal gland injections.

METHODS

Prospective study evaluating the TEARS score and quality of life in patients receiving incobotulinum toxin (Xeomin) lacrimal gland injections for epiphora. Epiphora was graded using the TEARS score. Quality of life was evaluated using the watery eye quality of life score. Etiology, benefit duration, complications and additional injections were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 28 patients, (median age 67.5 years), 19 (68%) had facial palsy gustatory epiphora (GE). Median effect duration was 13 weeks. Improvements in tearing frequency (T), clinical effects (E), and activity limitation (A) were seen in 57%, 57%, and 71% of patients, respectively. Median watery eye quality of life score improved from 42.4/100 ± 10.1 to 10.6 ± 15.5 (p < 0.001). Alongside crocodile tears, reflex tearing R-scores improved in 68% of patients with GE vs. 11% with non-GE causes (p = 0.004618). In total 89% of patients with GE and 56% with non-GE requested repeat injections. Self-reported percentage improvement ranged from 0% to 100% (median 60%, interquartile range 10%-76.25%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study reporting the outcomes of BoNTA lacrimal gland injections using validated TEARS and watery eye quality of life scores. Clinical and quality of life improvements are seen in most patients. Patients with GE achieve an additional improvement in dry eye-related reflex tearing alongside crocodile tears which both improve with BoNTA. TEARS data supports using BoNTA in these patients and is a useful validated grading instrument for epiphora.